Page 5 of 6

Re: Frampton v Galahad

Posted: 13 Nov 2013, 15:10
by lefty
It get's annoying seeing people who have agenda's ie linked with a certain gym spouting the same kind of propaganda over and over again. There's no objectivity.

Re: Frampton v Galahad

Posted: 13 Nov 2013, 15:19
by palooka
columbo wrote:It get's annoying seeing people who have agenda's ie linked with a certain gym spouting the same kind of propaganda over and over again. There's no objectivity.
Though to be fair they know the people that we criticise, they see them train and struggle and wait and then we stick the boot in without a seconds thought, If I knew any good boxers and someone laid into them then I'd spout off as well; there is a lack of objectivity though sometimes; I can't read Billy Nelsons stuff sometimes about Ricky Burns etc, he'd purjure himself for the cause.

Re: Frampton v Galahad

Posted: 13 Nov 2013, 15:22
by expe
Parson Cross wrote:Am I missing something here ?
Barry is an easy fight allegedly so would be the perfect tune up for a World title tilt.
Instead Frampton vacates and will probably fight some unknown Eastern European in a 10 rounder.
That says to me that Barry is a significant risk to team Frampton.
As Horse says - lets see who he fights next - then we can decide whether duck is on the menu.
Can you imagine the debate on here if it was someone from Sheffield that vacated in similar circumstances ?
Frampton hasn't started training yet and Martinez-Mathebula is next month, there's no need or opportunity for a fight in the interim because it's likely that he will be fighting for a world title, so he can have a rest now and return in March for a world title. Galabad doesn't feature in any of those plans, it's a pointless fight, he struggled with Dickens who's far below Frampton's level. I don't even know how he ended up mandatory when he's only just won the British title, there must be someone more deserving.

Re: Frampton v Galahad

Posted: 13 Nov 2013, 15:26
by lefty
palooka wrote:
columbo wrote:It get's annoying seeing people who have agenda's ie linked with a certain gym spouting the same kind of propaganda over and over again. There's no objectivity.
Though to be fair they know the people that we criticise, they see them train and struggle and wait and then we stick the boot in without a seconds thought, If I knew any good boxers and someone laid into them then I'd spout off as well; there is a lack of objectivity though sometimes; I can't read Billy Nelsons stuff sometimes about Ricky Burns etc, he'd purjure himself for the cause.
That's a valid point admittedly. It's just that because of their closeness to these gyms/fighters they see things through rose tinted glasses though and cant admit the faults or where they're going wrong, etc. The whole objectivity thing again.

Re: Frampton v Galahad

Posted: 13 Nov 2013, 15:33
by palooka
There were a couple of Brian Rose' fans on here after his bout the other week' one was really confrontational and argumentative and the other was sound; though both stood their ground and were plainly in Brians' corner one at least interacted for quite some time. Lots of those close to the boxers and gyms keep on posting and it must get tiresome for them sometimes and some of them maybe feel things personally when their mates are being knocked.

Re: Frampton v Galahad

Posted: 13 Nov 2013, 15:57
by Parson Cross
Expe,
So if Frampton does take a warm up and it's a shit opponent will you be prepared to edit your post ?

Re: Frampton v Galahad

Posted: 13 Nov 2013, 16:06
by Horse
expe wrote:I don't even know how he ended up mandatory when he's only just won the British title, there must be someone more deserving.
Like who?

On paper Galahad would be Frampton's third best opponent behind Molitor and Martinez.

Re: Frampton v Galahad

Posted: 13 Nov 2013, 16:10
by expe
Parson Cross wrote:Expe,
So if Frampton does take a warm up and it's a poo opponent will you be prepared to edit your post ?
Yep, I just don't see a need for one when a world title fight could be sorted for March, if it isn't, he should be in with Galahad.

Re: Frampton v Galahad

Posted: 13 Nov 2013, 17:06
by Pugilist-specialist
youngrell wrote:I have to admire the Sheffield boxing fans' support of their local fighters, but sometimes the blind faith shown is just crazy.
Sheffield boxing fans deserve your admiration, but blind faith?

Billy Nelson is a reputable trainer that has guided his man to 2 world titles. He's had Frampton and Galahad in his gym and on this thread states that Galahad would beat him. Nelson has no connection to Sheffield.

(Incidentally Billy, who did you have Frampton up to spar?)

:TU:

Re: Frampton v Galahad

Posted: 13 Nov 2013, 17:09
by Pugilist-specialist
Horse wrote:
expe wrote:I don't even know how he ended up mandatory when he's only just won the British title, there must be someone more deserving.
Like who?

On paper Galahad would be Frampton's third best opponent behind Molitor and Martinez.
Boxrec only have Frampton, Martinez and Quigg above Galahad in their European ratings.

Molitor was due to box Galahad when Eddie nipped in to get him for Frampton (Parson Cross could confirm this).

:TU:

Re: Frampton v Galahad

Posted: 13 Nov 2013, 17:19
by lefty
Pugilist-specialist wrote:
youngrell wrote:I have to admire the Sheffield boxing fans' support of their local fighters, but sometimes the blind faith shown is just crazy.
Sheffield boxing fans deserve your admiration, but blind faith?

Billy Nelson is a reputable trainer that has guided his man to 2 world titles. He's had Frampton and Galahad in his gym and on this thread states that Galahad would beat him. Nelson has no connection to Sheffield.

(Incidentally Billy, who did you have Frampton up to spar?)

:TU:
Just because Billy say's Galahad would beat Frampton, that doesnt mean it's the case though. For all we know, Galahad might of been in the groove and Frampton might of not been on form, etc.

Re: Frampton v Galahad

Posted: 13 Nov 2013, 17:30
by whiteboy
Parson Cross wrote: Can you imagine the debate on here if it was someone from Sheffield that vacated in similar circumstances ?
Yes I remember your defense of Ryan when he swerved the Small fight :OhYes:

Re: Frampton v Galahad

Posted: 14 Nov 2013, 07:17
by youngrell
Pugilist-specialist wrote:
youngrell wrote:I have to admire the Sheffield boxing fans' support of their local fighters, but sometimes the blind faith shown is just crazy.
Sheffield boxing fans deserve your admiration, but blind faith?
Yes. I think the support you (the Sheff fans) give your guys is excellent. But, you seem to judge more on geography and potential ability shown in the local gym, whereas most outsiders judge on ability actually shown on fight nights.

Re: Frampton v Galahad

Posted: 14 Nov 2013, 08:00
by Pugilist-specialist
Parson Cross wrote: Can you imagine the debate on here if it was someone from Sheffield that vacated in similar circumstances ?
Tyson Fury got dogs abuse when he vacated the British title.

Re: Frampton v Galahad

Posted: 14 Nov 2013, 08:03
by Pugilist-specialist
youngrell wrote:
Pugilist-specialist wrote:
youngrell wrote:I have to admire the Sheffield boxing fans' support of their local fighters, but sometimes the blind faith shown is just crazy.
Sheffield boxing fans deserve your admiration, but blind faith?
Yes. I think the support you (the Sheff fans) give your guys is excellent. But, you seem to judge more on geography and potential ability shown in the local gym, whereas most outsiders judge on ability actually shown on fight nights.
Not just the local gym, Glasgow, Manchester etc. Barry was a late starter to boxing and is still improving rapidly. People who have seen him in the gym know that there is plenty more to come.

:TU:

Re: Frampton v Galahad

Posted: 14 Nov 2013, 08:47
by youngrell
Pugilist-specialist wrote: Not just the local gym, Glasgow, Manchester etc. Barry was a late starter to boxing and is still improving rapidly. People who have seen him in the gym know that there is plenty more to come.

:TU:
I hope so. Be great to have 3 world class fighters in the same division from the UK :TU:

Re: Frampton v Galahad

Posted: 14 Nov 2013, 09:02
by Parson Cross
Whiteboy
:zzz: :zzz:
Only Morons would mention that wanker and Rhodes in the same breath. I know exactly how that panned out so believe what you will.

If Frampton takes a warm up and the opponent is shit please all come back on and review your comments.
Pugilist has called this bang on.

Re: Frampton v Galahad

Posted: 14 Nov 2013, 11:54
by palooka
Parson Cross wrote:Whiteboy
:zzz: :zzz:
Only Morons would mention that wanker and Rhodes in the same breath. I know exactly how that panned out so believe what you will.

If Frampton takes a warm up and the opponent is poo please all come back on and review your comments.
Pugilist has called this bang on.
It's the Shefffield Mafia

Re: Frampton v Galahad

Posted: 14 Nov 2013, 18:15
by Parson Cross
Nah mate no mafia - just brains and knowledge.

Re: Frampton v Galahad

Posted: 14 Nov 2013, 18:17
by palooka
Parson Cross wrote:Nah mate no mafia - just brains and knowledge.
about where the guns and bodies are

Re: Frampton v Galahad

Posted: 14 Nov 2013, 18:20
by Black Sam Bellamy
Fair play to the Sheffield contingent trying to talk up a decent pay day for Galahad, but realistically Frampton's far too strong for him.

Re: Frampton v Galahad

Posted: 15 Nov 2013, 03:55
by Pugilist-specialist
Don't think that anyone has mentioned the purse - it's been about the European champion facing his mandatory but he has since decided to give his belt up.

:TU:

Re: Frampton v Galahad

Posted: 18 Nov 2013, 11:08
by Fergz16COTJ
:lol: - Frampton has bigger fish to fry than Young Barry...maybe he should fight someone the level that Carl has 1st[/quote]
galahad is his mandatory.... :shame: :shame:[/quote]

:roll: And Carl stopped for the 1st time in his career the current IBF WORLD champion, Galahad was down on all judges scorecards where Dickens who didnt do the weight right and Carl himself voiced this concern, ran out of steam for the BRITISH title...Levels :shame:

Re: Frampton v Galahad

Posted: 18 Nov 2013, 11:14
by Fergz16COTJ
Horse wrote:
Fergz16COTJ wrote:Well hopefully its the winner of Martinez and Mathebula
He should fight someone else before then.
Why should he, and he had defended those belts

Re: Frampton v Galahad

Posted: 18 Nov 2013, 11:21
by Horse
Fergz16COTJ wrote:Why should he,
So he isn't inactive for over 6 months.
Fergz16COTJ wrote:and he had defended those belts
What's your point?