BoxRec

He's Lee's trainer and manager isn't he?

palooka wrote:Yusi Malinga was the mandatory for Jamie's title

Cheers palooka!

It's a run out for the Matchroom boxers so there'll be no surprises; it doesn't have to be a slaughter though.

squared circle wrote:

jameswilson wrote:

squared circle wrote:14.99 and they show adverts. Pretty outrageous. We should be getting analysis etc in between every round for money we have paid.

You act like they haven't shown adverts on PPV before......

I was live at froch Kessler so no idea what they did. Almost certain wlad v haye didn't have adverts?

I'm more pissed off with quality of fights at minute tbh!!

The fights at this stage of any card are gonna be shite. And I do mean any card. It's only the top 3 or so fights on any bill that are gonna be worth a damn. Obviously that isn't the case with tonights bill but moaning about the fights that are going on right now is pretty daft.

And there were ads in the Haye v Wladimir PPV bill.[/quote]

Cmon James. You know this is grim viewing. Jamie McDonnell is a former world champion *by default* so should of been in a far better fight than that and this guy Smith is in with which is an eliminator is terrible aswell.

Neil Gee wrote:

palooka wrote:Yusi Malinga was the mandatory for Jamie's title

Cheers palooka!

No worries Neil; I've not seen Malinga box and think he's to box Hall now.

Vusi

The guy Smith is in with was knocked out by a 13-7 guy in an argentinian super bantamweight title fight last year.

columbo wrote:
Cmon James. You know this is grim viewing. Jamie McDonnell is a former world champion *by default* so should of been in a far better fight than that and this guy Smith is in with which is an eliminator is terrible aswell.

I appreciate that at late notice they aren't gonna get him in an amazing fight. For some reason whenever there are injuries pullouts or fights made at really late notice tho you just seem to ignore it and condemn it as a load of shite as if the matchmakers had months to make a big fight. You can slag the Quigg fight off and I'd agree. But I think the fights right down the bill here have a few reasons for being the way they are. If it's a choice between McDonnell not fighting on the bill or having a runout against a journeyman then I'd take the latter.

jameswilson wrote:

columbo wrote:
Cmon James. You know this is grim viewing. Jamie McDonnell is a former world champion *by default* so should of been in a far better fight than that and this guy Smith is in with which is an eliminator is terrible aswell.

I appreciate that at late notice they aren't gonna get him in an amazing fight. For some reason whenever there are injuries pullouts or fights made at really late notice tho you just seem to ignore it and condemn it as a load of shite as if the matchmakers had months to make a big fight. You can slag the Quigg fight off and I'd agree. But I think the fights right down the bill here have a few reasons for being the way they are. If it's a choice between McDonnell not fighting on the bill or having a runout against a journeyman then I'd take the latter.

I'm pretty sure they could of gotten better opponents than this. Im not talking world title fights or even the best guys in the division but this truely crap.

jameswilson wrote:

columbo wrote:
Cmon James. You know this is grim viewing. Jamie McDonnell is a former world champion *by default* so should of been in a far better fight than that and this guy Smith is in with which is an eliminator is terrible aswell.

I appreciate that at late notice they aren't gonna get him in an amazing fight. For some reason whenever there are injuries pullouts or fights made at really late notice tho you just seem to ignore it and condemn it as a load of shite as if the matchmakers had months to make a big fight. You can slag the Quigg fight off and I'd agree. But I think the fights right down the bill here have a few reasons for being the way they are. If it's a choice between McDonnell not fighting on the bill or having a runout against a journeyman then I'd take the latter.

I'd rather have less rubbish and not have to pay for it

rossij8 wrote:

jameswilson wrote:

columbo wrote:
Cmon James. You know this is grim viewing. Jamie McDonnell is a former world champion *by default* so should of been in a far better fight than that and this guy Smith is in with which is an eliminator is terrible aswell.

I appreciate that at late notice they aren't gonna get him in an amazing fight. For some reason whenever there are injuries pullouts or fights made at really late notice tho you just seem to ignore it and condemn it as a load of shite as if the matchmakers had months to make a big fight. You can slag the Quigg fight off and I'd agree. But I think the fights right down the bill here have a few reasons for being the way they are. If it's a choice between McDonnell not fighting on the bill or having a runout against a journeyman then I'd take the latter.

I'd rather have less rubbish and not have to pay for it

Same.

jameswilson wrote:

columbo wrote:
Cmon James. You know this is grim viewing. Jamie McDonnell is a former world champion *by default* so should of been in a far better fight than that and this guy Smith is in with which is an eliminator is terrible aswell.

I appreciate that at late notice they aren't gonna get him in an amazing fight. For some reason whenever there are injuries pullouts or fights made at really late notice tho you just seem to ignore it and condemn it as a load of shite as if the matchmakers had months to make a big fight. You can slag the Quigg fight off and I'd agree. But I think the fights right down the bill here have a few reasons for being the way they are. If it's a choice between McDonnell not fighting on the bill or having a runout against a journeyman then I'd take the latter.

Hearn did say though that the undercard had to be outrageous for this to be PPV, I think it is but for the opposite reason..

Juanma Lopez wiped this guy out in when he was at superbantam

The scheduled undercard was never good.

Hearn didn't even try.

rossij8 wrote:

jameswilson wrote:

columbo wrote:
Cmon James. You know this is grim viewing. Jamie McDonnell is a former world champion *by default* so should of been in a far better fight than that and this guy Smith is in with which is an eliminator is terrible aswell.

I appreciate that at late notice they aren't gonna get him in an amazing fight. For some reason whenever there are injuries pullouts or fights made at really late notice tho you just seem to ignore it and condemn it as a load of shite as if the matchmakers had months to make a big fight. You can slag the Quigg fight off and I'd agree. But I think the fights right down the bill here have a few reasons for being the way they are. If it's a choice between McDonnell not fighting on the bill or having a runout against a journeyman then I'd take the latter.

I'd rather have less rubbish and not have to pay for it

Have you paid for this?

Naandrew wrote:Juanma Lopez wiped this guy out in when he was at superbantam

Yeah, Smith is showing what an elite operator he is tonight.

I'd rather have less rubbish and not have to pay for it[/quote]

Have you paid for this?[/quote]


I have but I daren't even turn it on yet; if it's shit it'll be world war 3 in ours - '£15 for this' etc etc etc for ever.

STEPHEN SMAAAAAAAAAAA!!

I can hear Groves' arse going from here. Night night Georgie boy.

That belt looks like something I made at primary school.

Who wants a game?

Remember this fella that Smith has just done in 8 rounds was knocked out in 7 by a guy with a 13-7 record in an argentinian super bantamweight title fight last year.

palooka wrote:

Neil Gee wrote:

palooka wrote:Yusi Malinga was the mandatory for Jamie's title

I've not seen Malinga box and think he's to box Hall now.

I looked at both Hall & Malinga's boxrec and neither of them have a record as good as J's.

You missed "teak tough"

expe wrote:Who wants a game?

Hahahaha that is class

Printing it off