Tiger Flowers 'Claws and Dismantles' Harry Greb

[evrenb]

I never said I didn't like you...I find it Hipocritical that you would call a decent, erudite fellah a 'dick' yet you
Like to lick Douche's crack dry...

[SaadOffTheDeck]

I never said I didn't like you...I find it Hipocritical that you would call a decent, erudite fellah a 'dick' yet you
Like to lick Douche's crack dry...

You obviously know even less about what hypocritical means than you know of how to spell it.

[evrenb]

Yeah whatever...doing my best on train home on the smart phone...i know all about it...definition in dictionary ; Saadoffthecock...
Let me guess I'm gonna get the zzzz treatment...

[SaadOffTheDeck]

I had enough arguments with Il Duce that I was ignoring him by the time ya'll came charging in as the cavalry to save a forum you barely post in.

[SaadOffTheDeck]

Yeah whatever...doing my best on train home on the smart phone...i know all about it...definition in dictionary ; Saadoffthecock...
Let me guess I'm gonna get the zzzz treatment...

Awww, now you're really upset. No need to besmirch the great Saad Muhammad. Do you know him? Are you sure he gets on cock?

[klompton]

maybe, but el douche's crack is dry and your tongue is looking awfully suspicious right now...

[evrenb]

I post when I can...what has that got to do with it...I look forward to your book....101 witty retorts by Saad...

[SaadOffTheDeck]

maybe, but el douche's crack is dry and your tongue is looking awfully suspicious right now...

Nobody could get near his crack with your head so deep in his ass.

[SaadOffTheDeck]

I post when I can...what has that got to do with it...I look forward to your book....101 witty retorts by Saad...

I'm not talented enough as a writer to pen a book. I can certainly clown you all night. Though to be fair, you're clowning yourself enough.

[evrenb]

Yeah whatever...doing my best on train home on the smart phone...i know all about it...definition in dictionary ; Saadoffthecock...
Let me guess I'm gonna get the zzzz treatment...

Awww, now you're really upset. No need to besmirch the great Saad Muhammad. Do you know him? Are you sure he gets on cock?

Not besmirching MSM at all...you do that by donning his moniker..

[SaadOffTheDeck]

Yeah whatever...doing my best on train home on the smart phone...i know all about it...definition in dictionary ; Saadoffthecock...
Let me guess I'm gonna get the zzzz treatment...

Awww, now you're really upset. No need to besmirch the great Saad Muhammad. Do you know him? Are you sure he gets on cock?

Not besmirching MSM at all...you do that by donning his moniker..

How do you know that? Do you know me?

[evrenb]

As well as you do Klompton...?

[klompton]

maybe, but el douche's crack is dry and your tongue is looking awfully suspicious right now...

Nobody could get near his crack with your head so deep in his ass.

i knew there was a reason you follow me everywhere... but thats not my head up his ass, its my foot.

[SaadOffTheDeck]

As well as you do Klompton...?

Exactly, hypocrite.

[SaadOffTheDeck]

maybe, but el douche's crack is dry and your tongue is looking awfully suspicious right now...

Nobody could get near his crack with your head so deep in his ass.

i knew there was a reason you follow me everywhere... but thats not my head up his ass, its my foot.

Oh my bad, I didn't realize you were an internet warlord. Not surprising, you're very tough.

[evrenb]

I'm using your judgement skills as a character assasination barometer...you are a joke pal...

[SaadOffTheDeck]

I'm using your judgement skills as a character assasination barometer...you are a joke pal...

You're making an ass out of yourself.

[raylawpc]

Well lying is one thing.....believe it or not...you can lie all you want. Fictionalizing is not an offense.

However....what I am sensing is a "lie with a planned intent" designed to wonk up one or a number of people.

For me, when you make a statement, followed by a hyperlink which is there to support a statement....I look for relevance/context. When it's not there, I just laugh and say...."boy that Il Duce almost had me there"....and I suffer no more pain. In fact I find it entertaining. Like a game of "fact or crap".

With that said, other "types" can be more reactive, and set off. And thus "trolling" occurs. Trolling can only occur when a recipient is ramped up by an ill intended contributor. And trolling is not allowed. So once someone is ramped up....I need to be available to "moderate".

So once again. Il Duce......please explain why you are "playing" in this manner. Is it that you just don't understand linear logic processing? And thus are innocent on the "intent" to troll? In other words you do not recognize that there is no relative info in the hyperlink which backs up your statement?

OR are you fully aware and know that someone (not myself or Saad) will be unhappy with your "bate and switch" antics? (They are ramped up because they seek truth, or some sort of explanation which contributes to some sort or credibility in your claims.)

Now as for libel (written word version of slander) you can not libel a deceased person. Only those who are living....and in the U.S. typically only those who are not celebrity class. English law is more narrow and protects celebrity status folks as well.

Il Duce....Please respond.

Okay . . . let me understand. This isn't to be tolerated . . . but it is okay to describe somebody as posting while holding a certain part of his anatomy in one hand? Or somebody talking about tongues and other parts of the anatomy? Maybe you can clarify these rules for me . . . Thanks.

[SaadOffTheDeck]

Well lying is one thing.....believe it or not...you can lie all you want. Fictionalizing is not an offense.

However....what I am sensing is a "lie with a planned intent" designed to wonk up one or a number of people.

For me, when you make a statement, followed by a hyperlink which is there to support a statement....I look for relevance/context. When it's not there, I just laugh and say...."boy that Il Duce almost had me there"....and I suffer no more pain. In fact I find it entertaining. Like a game of "fact or crap".

With that said, other "types" can be more reactive, and set off. And thus "trolling" occurs. Trolling can only occur when a recipient is ramped up by an ill intended contributor. And trolling is not allowed. So once someone is ramped up....I need to be available to "moderate".

So once again. Il Duce......please explain why you are "playing" in this manner. Is it that you just don't understand linear logic processing? And thus are innocent on the "intent" to troll? In other words you do not recognize that there is no relative info in the hyperlink which backs up your statement?

OR are you fully aware and know that someone (not myself or Saad) will be unhappy with your "bate and switch" antics? (They are ramped up because they seek truth, or some sort of explanation which contributes to some sort or credibility in your claims.)

Now as for libel (written word version of slander) you can not libel a deceased person. Only those who are living....and in the U.S. typically only those who are not celebrity class. English law is more narrow and protects celebrity status folks as well.

Il Duce....Please respond.

Okay . . . let me understand. This isn't to be tolerated . . . but it is okay to describe somebody as posting while holding a certain part of his anatomy in one hand? Or somebody talking about tongues and other parts of the anatomy? Maybe you can clarify these rules for me . . . Thanks.

Hey, Hey, Klompton and Evrenb are here to clean up the forum of 'trolling' & 'lying'.

[evrenb]

I'm using your judgement skills as a character assasination barometer...you are a joke pal...

You're making an ass out of yourself.

Maybe....i just think you are out of order calling Steve a dick...and then get away with it...

[evrenb]

Well lying is one thing.....believe it or not...you can lie all you want. Fictionalizing is not an offense.

However....what I am sensing is a "lie with a planned intent" designed to wonk up one or a number of people.

For me, when you make a statement, followed by a hyperlink which is there to support a statement....I look for relevance/context. When it's not there, I just laugh and say...."boy that Il Duce almost had me there"....and I suffer no more pain. In fact I find it entertaining. Like a game of "fact or crap".

With that said, other "types" can be more reactive, and set off. And thus "trolling" occurs. Trolling can only occur when a recipient is ramped up by an ill intended contributor. And trolling is not allowed. So once someone is ramped up....I need to be available to "moderate".

So once again. Il Duce......please explain why you are "playing" in this manner. Is it that you just don't understand linear logic processing? And thus are innocent on the "intent" to troll? In other words you do not recognize that there is no relative info in the hyperlink which backs up your statement?

OR are you fully aware and know that someone (not myself or Saad) will be unhappy with your "bate and switch" antics? (They are ramped up because they seek truth, or some sort of explanation which contributes to some sort or credibility in your claims.)

Now as for libel (written word version of slander) you can not libel a deceased person. Only those who are living....and in the U.S. typically only those who are not celebrity class. English law is more narrow and protects celebrity status folks as well.

Il Duce....Please respond.

Okay . . . let me understand. This isn't to be tolerated . . . but it is okay to describe somebody as posting while holding a certain part of his anatomy in one hand? Or somebody talking about tongues and other parts of the anatomy? Maybe you can clarify these rules for me . . . Thanks.

Are you a cop?

[SaadOffTheDeck]

I'm using your judgement skills as a character assasination barometer...you are a joke pal...

You're making an ass out of yourself.

Maybe....i just think you are out of order calling Steve a dick...and then get away with it...

I'm sure Steve can take up for himself just fine. By all means, continue, I've gotten a great laugh about you calling me a hypocrite with zero basis and then proceeding to make a complete hypocrite out of yourself.

[raylawpc]

Well lying is one thing.....believe it or not...you can lie all you want. Fictionalizing is not an offense.

However....what I am sensing is a "lie with a planned intent" designed to wonk up one or a number of people.

For me, when you make a statement, followed by a hyperlink which is there to support a statement....I look for relevance/context. When it's not there, I just laugh and say...."boy that Il Duce almost had me there"....and I suffer no more pain. In fact I find it entertaining. Like a game of "fact or crap".

With that said, other "types" can be more reactive, and set off. And thus "trolling" occurs. Trolling can only occur when a recipient is ramped up by an ill intended contributor. And trolling is not allowed. So once someone is ramped up....I need to be available to "moderate".

So once again. Il Duce......please explain why you are "playing" in this manner. Is it that you just don't understand linear logic processing? And thus are innocent on the "intent" to troll? In other words you do not recognize that there is no relative info in the hyperlink which backs up your statement?

OR are you fully aware and know that someone (not myself or Saad) will be unhappy with your "bate and switch" antics? (They are ramped up because they seek truth, or some sort of explanation which contributes to some sort or credibility in your claims.)

Now as for libel (written word version of slander) you can not libel a deceased person. Only those who are living....and in the U.S. typically only those who are not celebrity class. English law is more narrow and protects celebrity status folks as well.

Il Duce....Please respond.

Okay . . . let me understand. This isn't to be tolerated . . . but it is okay to describe somebody as posting while holding a certain part of his anatomy in one hand? Or somebody talking about tongues and other parts of the anatomy? Maybe you can clarify these rules for me . . . Thanks.

Are you a cop?

No.

[BoxBuzz]

Though I am not just a dick, I do have a dick. But I sense I am more than that. In fact I believe we are all more than the sum of our parts.

As for the "clock in mind" phrase......well I just don't understand it.

I wished I had an answer for everything......perhaps a genie heard me.

[evrenb]

Boring response wasn't it??? Home to bed now...will sleep like a baby as always....sorry to others I have offended...regardless of whether people can take care of themselves or not I will defend what I feel is out of order...nite..