BoxRec

evrenb wrote:I never said I didn't like you...I find it Hipocritical that you would call a decent, erudite fellah a 'dick' yet you
Like to lick Douche's crack dry...

evrenb wrote:Yeah whatever...doing my best on train home on the smart phone...i know all about it...definition in dictionary ; Saadoffthecock...
Let me guess I'm gonna get the zzzz treatment...

klompton wrote:maybe, but el douche's crack is dry and your tongue is looking awfully suspicious right now...

evrenb wrote:I post when I can...what has that got to do with it...I look forward to your book....101 witty retorts by Saad...

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:

evrenb wrote:Yeah whatever...doing my best on train home on the smart phone...i know all about it...definition in dictionary ; Saadoffthecock...
Let me guess I'm gonna get the zzzz treatment...

Awww, now you're really upset. No need to besmirch the great Saad Muhammad. Do you know him? Are you sure he gets on cock?

evrenb wrote:

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:

evrenb wrote:Yeah whatever...doing my best on train home on the smart phone...i know all about it...definition in dictionary ; Saadoffthecock...
Let me guess I'm gonna get the zzzz treatment...

Awww, now you're really upset. No need to besmirch the great Saad Muhammad. Do you know him? Are you sure he gets on cock?

Not besmirching MSM at all...you do that by donning his moniker..

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:

klompton wrote:maybe, but el douche's crack is dry and your tongue is looking awfully suspicious right now...

Nobody could get near his crack with your head so deep in his ass.

evrenb wrote:As well as you do Klompton...?

klompton wrote:

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:

klompton wrote:maybe, but el douche's crack is dry and your tongue is looking awfully suspicious right now...

Nobody could get near his crack with your head so deep in his ass.

i knew there was a reason you follow me everywhere... but thats not my head up his ass, its my foot.

evrenb wrote:I'm using your judgement skills as a character assasination barometer...you are a joke pal...

BoxBuzz wrote:Well lying is one thing.....believe it or not...you can lie all you want. Fictionalizing is not an offense.

However....what I am sensing is a "lie with a planned intent" designed to wonk up one or a number of people.

For me, when you make a statement, followed by a hyperlink which is there to support a statement....I look for relevance/context. When it's not there, I just laugh and say...."boy that Il Duce almost had me there"....and I suffer no more pain. In fact I find it entertaining. Like a game of "fact or crap".

With that said, other "types" can be more reactive, and set off. And thus "trolling" occurs. Trolling can only occur when a recipient is ramped up by an ill intended contributor. And trolling is not allowed. So once someone is ramped up....I need to be available to "moderate".

So once again. Il Duce......please explain why you are "playing" in this manner. Is it that you just don't understand linear logic processing? And thus are innocent on the "intent" to troll? In other words you do not recognize that there is no relative info in the hyperlink which backs up your statement?

OR are you fully aware and know that someone (not myself or Saad) will be unhappy with your "bate and switch" antics? (They are ramped up because they seek truth, or some sort of explanation which contributes to some sort or credibility in your claims.)

Now as for libel (written word version of slander) you can not libel a deceased person. Only those who are living....and in the U.S. typically only those who are not celebrity class. English law is more narrow and protects celebrity status folks as well.

Il Duce....Please respond.

raylawpc wrote:

BoxBuzz wrote:Well lying is one thing.....believe it or not...you can lie all you want. Fictionalizing is not an offense.

However....what I am sensing is a "lie with a planned intent" designed to wonk up one or a number of people.

For me, when you make a statement, followed by a hyperlink which is there to support a statement....I look for relevance/context. When it's not there, I just laugh and say...."boy that Il Duce almost had me there"....and I suffer no more pain. In fact I find it entertaining. Like a game of "fact or crap".

With that said, other "types" can be more reactive, and set off. And thus "trolling" occurs. Trolling can only occur when a recipient is ramped up by an ill intended contributor. And trolling is not allowed. So once someone is ramped up....I need to be available to "moderate".

So once again. Il Duce......please explain why you are "playing" in this manner. Is it that you just don't understand linear logic processing? And thus are innocent on the "intent" to troll? In other words you do not recognize that there is no relative info in the hyperlink which backs up your statement?

OR are you fully aware and know that someone (not myself or Saad) will be unhappy with your "bate and switch" antics? (They are ramped up because they seek truth, or some sort of explanation which contributes to some sort or credibility in your claims.)

Now as for libel (written word version of slander) you can not libel a deceased person. Only those who are living....and in the U.S. typically only those who are not celebrity class. English law is more narrow and protects celebrity status folks as well.

Il Duce....Please respond.

Okay . . . let me understand. This isn't to be tolerated . . . but it is okay to describe somebody as posting while holding a certain part of his anatomy in one hand? Or somebody talking about tongues and other parts of the anatomy? Maybe you can clarify these rules for me . . . Thanks.

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:

evrenb wrote:I'm using your judgement skills as a character assasination barometer...you are a joke pal...

You're making an ass out of yourself.

raylawpc wrote:

BoxBuzz wrote:Well lying is one thing.....believe it or not...you can lie all you want. Fictionalizing is not an offense.

However....what I am sensing is a "lie with a planned intent" designed to wonk up one or a number of people.

For me, when you make a statement, followed by a hyperlink which is there to support a statement....I look for relevance/context. When it's not there, I just laugh and say...."boy that Il Duce almost had me there"....and I suffer no more pain. In fact I find it entertaining. Like a game of "fact or crap".

With that said, other "types" can be more reactive, and set off. And thus "trolling" occurs. Trolling can only occur when a recipient is ramped up by an ill intended contributor. And trolling is not allowed. So once someone is ramped up....I need to be available to "moderate".

So once again. Il Duce......please explain why you are "playing" in this manner. Is it that you just don't understand linear logic processing? And thus are innocent on the "intent" to troll? In other words you do not recognize that there is no relative info in the hyperlink which backs up your statement?

OR are you fully aware and know that someone (not myself or Saad) will be unhappy with your "bate and switch" antics? (They are ramped up because they seek truth, or some sort of explanation which contributes to some sort or credibility in your claims.)

Now as for libel (written word version of slander) you can not libel a deceased person. Only those who are living....and in the U.S. typically only those who are not celebrity class. English law is more narrow and protects celebrity status folks as well.

Il Duce....Please respond.

Okay . . . let me understand. This isn't to be tolerated . . . but it is okay to describe somebody as posting while holding a certain part of his anatomy in one hand? Or somebody talking about tongues and other parts of the anatomy? Maybe you can clarify these rules for me . . . Thanks.

evrenb wrote:

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:

evrenb wrote:I'm using your judgement skills as a character assasination barometer...you are a joke pal...

You're making an ass out of yourself.

Maybe....i just think you are out of order calling Steve a dick...and then get away with it...

evrenb wrote:

raylawpc wrote:

BoxBuzz wrote:Well lying is one thing.....believe it or not...you can lie all you want. Fictionalizing is not an offense.

However....what I am sensing is a "lie with a planned intent" designed to wonk up one or a number of people.

For me, when you make a statement, followed by a hyperlink which is there to support a statement....I look for relevance/context. When it's not there, I just laugh and say...."boy that Il Duce almost had me there"....and I suffer no more pain. In fact I find it entertaining. Like a game of "fact or crap".

With that said, other "types" can be more reactive, and set off. And thus "trolling" occurs. Trolling can only occur when a recipient is ramped up by an ill intended contributor. And trolling is not allowed. So once someone is ramped up....I need to be available to "moderate".

So once again. Il Duce......please explain why you are "playing" in this manner. Is it that you just don't understand linear logic processing? And thus are innocent on the "intent" to troll? In other words you do not recognize that there is no relative info in the hyperlink which backs up your statement?

OR are you fully aware and know that someone (not myself or Saad) will be unhappy with your "bate and switch" antics? (They are ramped up because they seek truth, or some sort of explanation which contributes to some sort or credibility in your claims.)

Now as for libel (written word version of slander) you can not libel a deceased person. Only those who are living....and in the U.S. typically only those who are not celebrity class. English law is more narrow and protects celebrity status folks as well.

Il Duce....Please respond.

Okay . . . let me understand. This isn't to be tolerated . . . but it is okay to describe somebody as posting while holding a certain part of his anatomy in one hand? Or somebody talking about tongues and other parts of the anatomy? Maybe you can clarify these rules for me . . . Thanks.

Are you a cop?