Hall v Ward bill RBR

keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17154
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Hall v Ward bill RBR

Post by keithmoonhangover »

expe wrote:
jameswilson wrote::lol:

Commentators are calling for the rematch and saying he needs plastic surgery. Is the cut bad enough to need more than stitches?
It's not even bleeding, McDonnell didn't even call the doctor in to look at it before stopping it, Hall carried on with his eye shut against Malinga and we've all seen other fighters go on with blood streaming down their faces.
It was bleeding when he was getting punched in the face.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Hall v Ward bill RBR

Post by Horse »

crusader wrote:Fitting ending for such a poor title match.
Indeed. A farcical ending to a farcical matchup.

Absolute joke.
jameswilson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13502
Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01

Re: Hall v Ward bill RBR

Post by jameswilson »

Hall - 'I thought it was a punch........'


Good to see his honesty has continued since his post fight interview after Peralles got jobbed.
Boxing Prospect
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 6592
Joined: 25 Jun 2012, 14:35

Re: Hall v Ward bill RBR

Post by Boxing Prospect »

expe wrote:
jameswilson wrote::lol:

Commentators are calling for the rematch and saying he needs plastic surgery. Is the cut bad enough to need more than stitches?
At least Bunce has some sense admitting they won't meet again, the man who will fight Hall next is stood right next to him.
Not think it'll be the Oba/Caballero winner as a mandatory?
Glass Joe
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 5029
Joined: 08 Feb 2012, 10:29

Re: Hall v Ward bill RBR

Post by Glass Joe »

Might do a topic next week where a fighter got a cut early and kept going. hatton against thaxton, Denis Lebedev - Guillermo Jones
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: Hall v Ward bill RBR

Post by expe »

Boxing Prospect wrote:
expe wrote:
jameswilson wrote::lol:

Commentators are calling for the rematch and saying he needs plastic surgery. Is the cut bad enough to need more than stitches?
At least Bunce has some sense admitting they won't meet again, the man who will fight Hall next is stood right next to him.
Not think it'll be the Oba/Caballero winner as a mandatory?
The plan all along has been for Butler to fight the winner, the mandatory will likely come after that, it's definitely not going to happen by the 21st June, he could fight Butler before that date.
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17154
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Hall v Ward bill RBR

Post by keithmoonhangover »

Glass Joe wrote:Might do a topic next week where a fighter got a cut early and kept going. hatton against thaxton, Denis Lebedev - Guillermo Jones
It depends where the cut is. A big gash like that ABOVE the eye is the worst possible cut.
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: Hall v Ward bill RBR

Post by expe »

keithmoonhangover wrote:
Glass Joe wrote:Might do a topic next week where a fighter got a cut early and kept going. hatton against thaxton, Denis Lebedev - Guillermo Jones
It depends where the cut is. A big gash like that ABOVE the eye is the worst possible cut.
Hatton's face was covered in blood against Thaxton after 10 seconds and he went the full 12 rounds and he wasn't exactly a defensive master.
Image
jameswilson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13502
Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01

Re: Hall v Ward bill RBR

Post by jameswilson »

Admittedly Bellew's cut against that Argentine was not bleeding like mad but by Christ was it a bad one. You wouldn't moan at all if that one got stopped.
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17154
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Hall v Ward bill RBR

Post by keithmoonhangover »

expe wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:
Glass Joe wrote:Might do a topic next week where a fighter got a cut early and kept going. hatton against thaxton, Denis Lebedev - Guillermo Jones
It depends where the cut is. A big gash like that ABOVE the eye is the worst possible cut.
Hatton's face was covered in blood against Thaxton after 10 seconds and he went the full 12 rounds and he wasn't exactly a defensive master.
Image
What's your point? Just let them go on if they can't see anything?
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Hall v Ward bill RBR

Post by Horse »

keithmoonhangover wrote:What's your point? Just let them go on if they can't see anything?
It was a world title fight, of course the fight should have gone on.
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17154
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Hall v Ward bill RBR

Post by keithmoonhangover »

Horse wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:What's your point? Just let them go on if they can't see anything?
It was a world title fight, of course the fight should have gone on.
So the safety of a fighter is less important if it's a world title?
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Hall v Ward bill RBR

Post by Horse »

keithmoonhangover wrote:So the safety of a fighter is less important if it's a world title?
Yes.
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17154
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Hall v Ward bill RBR

Post by keithmoonhangover »

Horse wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:So the safety of a fighter is less important if it's a world title?
Yes.
Single stupidest thing that's ever been posted in the entire history of boxing forums. You are a complete idiot Horse.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Hall v Ward bill RBR

Post by Horse »

keithmoonhangover wrote:Single stupidest thing that's ever been posted in the entire history of boxing forums. You are a complete idiot Horse.
:zzz:
Glass Joe
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 5029
Joined: 08 Feb 2012, 10:29

Re: Hall v Ward bill RBR

Post by Glass Joe »

If that same cut happened in Froch- Groves they would of kept going. Ward corner reckon he was heading for a beating so pulled him out without having the doctor looking at it.
jameswilson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13502
Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01

Re: Hall v Ward bill RBR

Post by jameswilson »

keithmoonhangover wrote:
What's your point? Just let them go on if they can't see anything?
To be fair I think expe is more making the point of how there is a double standard with this. If the home fighter has a bad cut or a closed eye it goes on. If not it is waved off. It should be even. If that means that a lot of fights are stopped then so be it but lets have it that way every time.
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: Hall v Ward bill RBR

Post by expe »

jameswilson wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:
What's your point? Just let them go on if they can't see anything?
To be fair I think expe is more making the point of how there is a double standard with this. If the home fighter has a bad cut or a closed eye it goes on. If not it is waved off. It should be even. If that means that a lot of fights are stopped then so be it but lets have it that way every time.
And Horse is right that it was a world title fight, you have to let it go on for a bit longer than normal because of what's on the line. At least give Ward the chance to show he can still see the punches coming and box without the cut causing major problems, or try and get through the round without taking too many to give the corner an extra minute to work on it, whatever happened the doctor should have been allowed to take a look at it.
curtis wood
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 935
Joined: 23 May 2010, 03:23

Re: Hall v Ward bill RBR

Post by curtis wood »

I agree 100% with horse, if it's a world title fight, if you can see then you can fight, ward won't ever get another chance like that, let the man fight
ttornado
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Hall v Ward bill RBR

Post by ttornado »

Horse wrote: A farcical ending to a farcical matchup.

Absolute joke.
Nothing wrong with the match-up just not world level.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Hall v Ward bill RBR

Post by Horse »

expe wrote:And Horse is right that it was a world title fight, you have to let it go on for a bit longer than normal because of what's on the line. At least give Ward the chance to show he can still see the punches coming and box without the cut causing major problems, or try and get through the round without taking too many to give the corner an extra minute to work on it, whatever happened the doctor should have been allowed to take a look at it.
curtis wood wrote:I agree 100% with horse, if it's a world title fight, if you can see then you can fight, ward won't ever get another chance like that, let the man fight
:TU:
Coco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 28545
Joined: 08 May 2007, 05:42

Re: Hall v Ward bill RBR

Post by Coco »

I agree with Horse too, even if it is a British title fight.
DMA1987
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2927
Joined: 04 Jun 2011, 17:05

Re: Hall v Ward bill RBR

Post by DMA1987 »

ttornado wrote:
Horse wrote: A farcical ending to a farcical matchup.

Absolute joke.
Nothing wrong with the match-up just not world level.
So it was a farcical matchup. The context of a world title makes it so.
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: Hall v Ward bill RBR

Post by expe »

DMA1987 wrote:
ttornado wrote:
Horse wrote: A farcical ending to a farcical matchup.

Absolute joke.
Nothing wrong with the match-up just not world level.
So it was a farcical matchup. The context of a world title makes it so.
It was a good match up, not really befitting of a world title, but had the fight gone longer, it could have been good to watch. Hall took a lot of punishment against Malinga and will realistically lose the belt next time out, so it's hard to blame him for taking an easier fight in a local derby, for a good payday.
earsjohn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1691
Joined: 02 Sep 2006, 14:34

Re: Hall v Ward bill RBR

Post by earsjohn »

ShadrachSimmo wrote:Worst world title fight I have ever seen.
Ricky Burns v Nicky Cook was a World Title fight
Post Reply