It was bleeding when he was getting punched in the face.expe wrote:It's not even bleeding, McDonnell didn't even call the doctor in to look at it before stopping it, Hall carried on with his eye shut against Malinga and we've all seen other fighters go on with blood streaming down their faces.jameswilson wrote:![]()
Commentators are calling for the rematch and saying he needs plastic surgery. Is the cut bad enough to need more than stitches?
Hall v Ward bill RBR
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 17154
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: Hall v Ward bill RBR
Re: Hall v Ward bill RBR
Indeed. A farcical ending to a farcical matchup.crusader wrote:Fitting ending for such a poor title match.
Absolute joke.
-
jameswilson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13502
- Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01
Re: Hall v Ward bill RBR
Hall - 'I thought it was a punch........'
Good to see his honesty has continued since his post fight interview after Peralles got jobbed.
Good to see his honesty has continued since his post fight interview after Peralles got jobbed.
-
Boxing Prospect
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 6592
- Joined: 25 Jun 2012, 14:35
Re: Hall v Ward bill RBR
Not think it'll be the Oba/Caballero winner as a mandatory?expe wrote:At least Bunce has some sense admitting they won't meet again, the man who will fight Hall next is stood right next to him.jameswilson wrote:![]()
Commentators are calling for the rematch and saying he needs plastic surgery. Is the cut bad enough to need more than stitches?
Re: Hall v Ward bill RBR
Might do a topic next week where a fighter got a cut early and kept going. hatton against thaxton, Denis Lebedev - Guillermo Jones
Re: Hall v Ward bill RBR
The plan all along has been for Butler to fight the winner, the mandatory will likely come after that, it's definitely not going to happen by the 21st June, he could fight Butler before that date.Boxing Prospect wrote:Not think it'll be the Oba/Caballero winner as a mandatory?expe wrote:At least Bunce has some sense admitting they won't meet again, the man who will fight Hall next is stood right next to him.jameswilson wrote:![]()
Commentators are calling for the rematch and saying he needs plastic surgery. Is the cut bad enough to need more than stitches?
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 17154
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: Hall v Ward bill RBR
It depends where the cut is. A big gash like that ABOVE the eye is the worst possible cut.Glass Joe wrote:Might do a topic next week where a fighter got a cut early and kept going. hatton against thaxton, Denis Lebedev - Guillermo Jones
Re: Hall v Ward bill RBR
Hatton's face was covered in blood against Thaxton after 10 seconds and he went the full 12 rounds and he wasn't exactly a defensive master.keithmoonhangover wrote:It depends where the cut is. A big gash like that ABOVE the eye is the worst possible cut.Glass Joe wrote:Might do a topic next week where a fighter got a cut early and kept going. hatton against thaxton, Denis Lebedev - Guillermo Jones

-
jameswilson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13502
- Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01
Re: Hall v Ward bill RBR
Admittedly Bellew's cut against that Argentine was not bleeding like mad but by Christ was it a bad one. You wouldn't moan at all if that one got stopped.
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 17154
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: Hall v Ward bill RBR
What's your point? Just let them go on if they can't see anything?expe wrote:Hatton's face was covered in blood against Thaxton after 10 seconds and he went the full 12 rounds and he wasn't exactly a defensive master.keithmoonhangover wrote:It depends where the cut is. A big gash like that ABOVE the eye is the worst possible cut.Glass Joe wrote:Might do a topic next week where a fighter got a cut early and kept going. hatton against thaxton, Denis Lebedev - Guillermo Jones
Re: Hall v Ward bill RBR
It was a world title fight, of course the fight should have gone on.keithmoonhangover wrote:What's your point? Just let them go on if they can't see anything?
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 17154
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: Hall v Ward bill RBR
So the safety of a fighter is less important if it's a world title?Horse wrote:It was a world title fight, of course the fight should have gone on.keithmoonhangover wrote:What's your point? Just let them go on if they can't see anything?
Re: Hall v Ward bill RBR
Yes.keithmoonhangover wrote:So the safety of a fighter is less important if it's a world title?
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 17154
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: Hall v Ward bill RBR
Single stupidest thing that's ever been posted in the entire history of boxing forums. You are a complete idiot Horse.Horse wrote:Yes.keithmoonhangover wrote:So the safety of a fighter is less important if it's a world title?
Re: Hall v Ward bill RBR
keithmoonhangover wrote:Single stupidest thing that's ever been posted in the entire history of boxing forums. You are a complete idiot Horse.
Re: Hall v Ward bill RBR
If that same cut happened in Froch- Groves they would of kept going. Ward corner reckon he was heading for a beating so pulled him out without having the doctor looking at it.
-
jameswilson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13502
- Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01
Re: Hall v Ward bill RBR
To be fair I think expe is more making the point of how there is a double standard with this. If the home fighter has a bad cut or a closed eye it goes on. If not it is waved off. It should be even. If that means that a lot of fights are stopped then so be it but lets have it that way every time.keithmoonhangover wrote:
What's your point? Just let them go on if they can't see anything?
Re: Hall v Ward bill RBR
And Horse is right that it was a world title fight, you have to let it go on for a bit longer than normal because of what's on the line. At least give Ward the chance to show he can still see the punches coming and box without the cut causing major problems, or try and get through the round without taking too many to give the corner an extra minute to work on it, whatever happened the doctor should have been allowed to take a look at it.jameswilson wrote:To be fair I think expe is more making the point of how there is a double standard with this. If the home fighter has a bad cut or a closed eye it goes on. If not it is waved off. It should be even. If that means that a lot of fights are stopped then so be it but lets have it that way every time.keithmoonhangover wrote:
What's your point? Just let them go on if they can't see anything?
-
curtis wood
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 935
- Joined: 23 May 2010, 03:23
Re: Hall v Ward bill RBR
I agree 100% with horse, if it's a world title fight, if you can see then you can fight, ward won't ever get another chance like that, let the man fight
-
ttornado
- Heavyweight

Re: Hall v Ward bill RBR
Nothing wrong with the match-up just not world level.Horse wrote: A farcical ending to a farcical matchup.
Absolute joke.
Re: Hall v Ward bill RBR
expe wrote:And Horse is right that it was a world title fight, you have to let it go on for a bit longer than normal because of what's on the line. At least give Ward the chance to show he can still see the punches coming and box without the cut causing major problems, or try and get through the round without taking too many to give the corner an extra minute to work on it, whatever happened the doctor should have been allowed to take a look at it.
curtis wood wrote:I agree 100% with horse, if it's a world title fight, if you can see then you can fight, ward won't ever get another chance like that, let the man fight
Re: Hall v Ward bill RBR
I agree with Horse too, even if it is a British title fight.
Re: Hall v Ward bill RBR
So it was a farcical matchup. The context of a world title makes it so.ttornado wrote:Nothing wrong with the match-up just not world level.Horse wrote: A farcical ending to a farcical matchup.
Absolute joke.
Re: Hall v Ward bill RBR
It was a good match up, not really befitting of a world title, but had the fight gone longer, it could have been good to watch. Hall took a lot of punishment against Malinga and will realistically lose the belt next time out, so it's hard to blame him for taking an easier fight in a local derby, for a good payday.DMA1987 wrote:So it was a farcical matchup. The context of a world title makes it so.ttornado wrote:Nothing wrong with the match-up just not world level.Horse wrote: A farcical ending to a farcical matchup.
Absolute joke.
Re: Hall v Ward bill RBR
Ricky Burns v Nicky Cook was a World Title fightShadrachSimmo wrote:Worst world title fight I have ever seen.