Re: Does David Price stand a chance against Tyson Fury?
Posted: 01 Jul 2014, 15:38
We are going round in circles, Keith, like I said, Wlad-Briggs, I could probably go on all day if I wanted.
If Wlad has to fight Briggs or vacate the titles and chooses to vacate, then he's ducking him. Anyone could call Wlad out, it doesn't mean he's ducking them if he doesn't fight them.mickey1975 wrote:We are going round in circles, Keith, like I said, Wlad-Briggs, I could probably go on all day if I wanted.
No.keithmoonhangover wrote:If Wlad has to fight Briggs or vacate the titles and chooses to vacate, then he's ducking him. Anyone could call Wlad out, it doesn't mean he's ducking them if he doesn't fight them.mickey1975 wrote:We are going round in circles, Keith, like I said, Wlad-Briggs, I could probably go on all day if I wanted.
Price ducked Chisora? Do you agree?
Bowe ducked Lewis? Do you agree?
Fury ducked Price? Do you not agree?
it's nice that we can have an intelligent and well thought out debate.mickey1975 wrote:No.keithmoonhangover wrote:If Wlad has to fight Briggs or vacate the titles and chooses to vacate, then he's ducking him. Anyone could call Wlad out, it doesn't mean he's ducking them if he doesn't fight them.mickey1975 wrote:We are going round in circles, Keith, like I said, Wlad-Briggs, I could probably go on all day if I wanted.
Price ducked Chisora? Do you agree?
Bowe ducked Lewis? Do you agree?
Fury ducked Price? Do you not agree?
Though I never agreed that Fury ducked Price.Your argument is valid.keithmoonhangover wrote:If Wlad has to fight Briggs or vacate the titles and chooses to vacate, then he's ducking him. Anyone could call Wlad out, it doesn't mean he's ducking them if he doesn't fight them.mickey1975 wrote:We are going round in circles, Keith, like I said, Wlad-Briggs, I could probably go on all day if I wanted.
Price ducked Chisora? Do you agree?
Bowe ducked Lewis? Do you agree?
Fury ducked Price? Do you not agree?
Price and Fury couldn't be made in the past because of TV and promoterstiny_acres wrote:Though I never agreed that Fury ducked Price.Your argument is valid.keithmoonhangover wrote:If Wlad has to fight Briggs or vacate the titles and chooses to vacate, then he's ducking him. Anyone could call Wlad out, it doesn't mean he's ducking them if he doesn't fight them.mickey1975 wrote:We are going round in circles, Keith, like I said, Wlad-Briggs, I could probably go on all day if I wanted.
Price ducked Chisora? Do you agree?
Bowe ducked Lewis? Do you agree?
Fury ducked Price? Do you not agree?
It would be hard to argue basic logic as you stated.
But this is a boxing site and logic usually goes out the window.
Price and Fury couldn't be made in the past because of TV and promoters[/quote]GilFilmore wrote:But this is a boxing site and logic usually goes out the window.
It could have been made. It just wasn't.[/quote]keithmoonhangover wrote:Price and Fury couldn't be made in the past because of TV and promotersGilFilmore wrote:But this is a boxing site and logic usually goes out the window.
You're right, either Mick or little Frank should have pissed off their broadcaster and taken their prize asset to fight on a rivals channel.[/quote]mickey1975 wrote:It could have been made. It just wasn't.keithmoonhangover wrote:Price and Fury couldn't be made in the past because of TV and promotersGilFilmore wrote:But this is a boxing site and logic usually goes out the window.
You're right, either Mick or little Frank should have pissed off their broadcaster and taken their prize asset to fight on a rivals channel.[/quote]mickey1975 wrote:It could have been made. It just wasn't.keithmoonhangover wrote:Price and Fury couldn't be made in the past because of TV and promotersGilFilmore wrote:But this is a boxing site and logic usually goes out the window.
Oh Keith. You never stop with your narrow-minded, short-sighted and simple interpretation of situations. You honestly think something as complex and shifting as champions vacating titles when sanctioning bodies, managers, promoters, mountains of money and more lucrative markets are involved can be, in all cases, always summed up with your one sweeping statement: Fighter A ducked Fighter B . . . ? Is the bigger picture really that hard for you to comprehend?keithmoonhangover wrote: If Wlad has to fight Briggs or vacate the titles and chooses to vacate, then he's ducking him. Anyone could call Wlad out, it doesn't mean he's ducking them if he doesn't fight them.
Price ducked Chisora? Do you agree?
Bowe ducked Lewis? Do you agree?
Fury ducked Price? Do you not agree?