Re: Calzaghe-certain-he-would-have-demolished froch-in-his-prime
Posted: 15 Jun 2015, 11:52
Those 90s albums (OG pressings anyway) are worth big dollar these days.
They were catchy tunes I'll give Oasis that, but then so was 'I should be so lucky' by Kylie - doesn't stop it being shite.SNG wrote:Oasis were the first band I ever got into. I was ten when Morning Glory came out and rented the cassette from the library and I loved them then. Don't really listen to them anymore, but they got me into all the music I'm into these days in a way, or at least they were the start.
I bought Be Here Now on vinyl recently, a really nice copy on Creation and it sounds so big on the stereo, I was quite shocked at how good it sounded, the songs were still a bit poo though.
Well it's his own fault that that fight didn't get made. Whilst I have a lot of admiration for Calzaghe has a boxer, he was the one who choose to leave the weight division and not take the Froch fight.pimp wrote:Calzaghe thinks he will smash froch
class has a lot to do with it these days. There's no anger or rebellion in music as it's drilled out of them while they're studying music in order to not offend their sponsors when they get a break. A group of lads from a council estate are going to struggle when up against that lot as they are seen as a commercial risk rather than a safe bet on sterile mediocrity.jamesmcdonnell wrote:Each to their own - don't see what class has to do with it - the guy writes very beautiful lyrics - for me Oasis were the most overrated band of all time - football chant lyrics and mock beatles horseshite, few good tunes, but really pretty simple stuff.freddydoesdallas wrote:Ed Sheeran is a wet lettuce. Pretty much sums up the current awful state of music for me. Bland, inoffensive stuff that appeals to parents and kids. Middle class england personifiedjamesmcdonnell wrote: There's always good music, and there's some brilliant songwriting going on right now - Ed Sheeran, even if you don't like his music is an incredible lyricist, - considering he's a mainstream artist, I'd say it's pretty healthy, though I do find a lot of the current vocoder dominated overproduced pop music pretty anodyne these days.
Have you actually sat and listened to the first Ed Sheeran album?
The Internet nipped that in the bud, it stole their hunger. They don't get bored enough to write songs. Nothing's leftfield anymore. Everything's packaged. I wouldn't wana be young now.SNG wrote:One thing I have noticed, and it may be making it up in my head, but there doesn't seem to be a counter culture amongst the young today.
fornicating fox!Boxerbeetle wrote: (nowhere near as much as Saffron from Republica though, obviously).
The Internet was a great thing when I was young, music got passed around for free about smaller bands, The Arctic Monkeys for instance, their demos were all on the net and that's how they got so big before they even had a release. I remember going to see them in Wigan and you could tell something was happening, a few weeks later I saw them on the new bands tent at Leeds in 2005 and you couldn't move there were that many people there which is unusual for that tent, that was due to the internet. I was also at the gig at the Ritz the night the first single went to number one, that was a great night. All the interest with Libertines was the same.stevieb_8006 wrote:The Internet nipped that in the bud, it stole their hunger. They don't get bored enough to write songs. Nothing's leftfield anymore. Everything's packaged. I wouldn't wana be young now.SNG wrote:One thing I have noticed, and it may be making it up in my head, but there doesn't seem to be a counter culture amongst the young today.
Did you see his turn as Walter White the other night on that TFI reunion?stevieb_8006 wrote:Two years ago I did a mental health workshop and it ended in me and my mate doing a gig with bonehead. He was a total gent and gave everyone loads of time. I didn't discuss oasis with him cos I got them impression he was sick to death of talking about it.
Anyway, he's a right shy fella, almost camp. It made me think what a crock of shite it was that this band were a bunch of leery hard nuts from the streets. All that nonsense is just as fake as X factor. Cracks me up when transpotters go on about how "authentic" their fav bands are. It's all entertainment.
Yep, thought Liam sounded alright. It was telling that the old guard blew the younguns out of the water. Years and years......just awful. Blur were better WITHOUT their singer ffsSNG wrote:Did you see his turn as Walter White the other night on that TFI reunion?stevieb_8006 wrote:Two years ago I did a mental health workshop and it ended in me and my mate doing a gig with bonehead. He was a total gent and gave everyone loads of time. I didn't discuss oasis with him cos I got them impression he was sick to death of talking about it.
Anyway, he's a right shy fella, almost camp. It made me think what a crock of shite it was that this band were a bunch of leery hard nuts from the streets. All that nonsense is just as fake as X factor. Cracks me up when transpotters go on about how "authentic" their fav bands are. It's all entertainment.
The whole Arctic monkeys internet rise to fame was all record label managed. Got a grip of a new thing, let everyone 'discover' the next big thing and you've got a goldmine. Worked a treat. Nothing against the band, it was a genius marketing campaignSNG wrote:The Internet was a great thing when I was young, music got passed around for free about smaller bands, The Arctic Monkeys for instance, their demos were all on the net and that's how they got so big before they even had a release. I remember going to see them in Wigan and you could tell something was happening, a few weeks later I saw them on the new bands tent at Leeds in 2005 and you couldn't move there were that many people there which is unusual for that tent, that was due to the internet. I was also at the gig at the Ritz the night the first single went to number one, that was a great night. All the interest with Libertines was the same.stevieb_8006 wrote:The Internet nipped that in the bud, it stole their hunger. They don't get bored enough to write songs. Nothing's leftfield anymore. Everything's packaged. I wouldn't wana be young now.SNG wrote:One thing I have noticed, and it may be making it up in my head, but there doesn't seem to be a counter culture amongst the young today.
I always find it funny how bands that were great at a particular time get really big subsequently on much poorer material. Like Arcade Fire, released an amazing album in '04 and win Grammy Awards for the shite they release now.
It all happened well before they got signed.freddydoesdallas wrote: The whole Arctic monkeys internet rise to fame was all record label managed. Got a grip of a new thing, let everyone 'discover' the next big thing and you've got a goldmine. Worked a treat. Nothing against the band, it was a genius marketing campaign
It didn't. They may have had a song or 2 on their like most bands but the big surge they had that grabbed the spotlight was label ledSNG wrote:It all happened well before they got signed.freddydoesdallas wrote: The whole Arctic monkeys internet rise to fame was all record label managed. Got a grip of a new thing, let everyone 'discover' the next big thing and you've got a goldmine. Worked a treat. Nothing against the band, it was a genius marketing campaign
I've still got the cd of demos I had a year before they signed to Domino, before they re-recorded everything and ruined the sound.freddydoesdallas wrote:It didn't. They may have had a song or 2 on their like most bands but the big surge they had that grabbed the spotlight was label ledSNG wrote:It all happened well before they got signed.freddydoesdallas wrote: The whole Arctic monkeys internet rise to fame was all record label managed. Got a grip of a new thing, let everyone 'discover' the next big thing and you've got a goldmine. Worked a treat. Nothing against the band, it was a genius marketing campaign
If we're talking cynical marketing campaigns, the 90s wasn't exactly free of that. Anyone care to remember Gay Dad, a ridiculously overhyped British band who got crazy amounts of attention from the music press simply because the lead singer used to be a music journalist? The worst thing was, they were absolute shite & only released 1 single I can actually remember.SNG wrote:It all happened well before they got signed.freddydoesdallas wrote: The whole Arctic monkeys internet rise to fame was all record label managed. Got a grip of a new thing, let everyone 'discover' the next big thing and you've got a goldmine. Worked a treat. Nothing against the band, it was a genius marketing campaign
Oh my god, Hamilton was painful wasn't he? You wouldn't wanna get stuck in the kitchen with him at a party would you.SNG wrote:I thought Liam was good too, his voice is usually shite too. I was surprised that was the young band they chose, did nothing for, and there are bands making great music now. I felt a bit sorry for Lewis Hamilton, he seems like a nice guy and he genuinely seems like he tried but eff me he has zero personality.
Two actually. To earth with love and a little joy. Not that I'm obsessed or owtBoxerbeetle wrote:If we're talking cynical marketing campaigns, the 90s wasn't exactly free of that. Anyone care to remember Gay Dad, a ridiculously overhyped British band who got crazy amounts of attention from the music press simply because the lead singer used to be a music journalist? The worst thing was, they were absolute shite & only released 1 single I can actually remember.SNG wrote:It all happened well before they got signed.freddydoesdallas wrote: The whole Arctic monkeys internet rise to fame was all record label managed. Got a grip of a new thing, let everyone 'discover' the next big thing and you've got a goldmine. Worked a treat. Nothing against the band, it was a genius marketing campaign