Re: George Groves vs Andrea di Luisa and undercard.
Posted: 30 Jan 2016, 18:15
that count was a fornicate up imo
He missed the count.
Its 8, 9 and out.
The boxer is considered down if he is in the act of rising.
BoxRec
George Groves vs Andrea di Luisa and undercard.
Page 5 of 8
Re: George Groves vs Andrea di Luisa and undercard.
Posted: 30 Jan 2016, 18:17
Re: George Groves vs Andrea di Luisa and undercard.
Posted: 30 Jan 2016, 18:17
Count looked a bit off.
Re: George Groves vs Andrea di Luisa and undercard.
Posted: 30 Jan 2016, 18:17
Refs don't seem to like counting past 8.LancashireLoyal wrote:that count was a eff up imo
It's not a count of 9, it's a count of 10.
Re: George Groves vs Andrea di Luisa and undercard.
Posted: 30 Jan 2016, 18:18
Shame didn't get to end, I had Hibbert up by 2 in a close fight. Great fight. Tommy Martin and JWH both seem real gentleman and sportsmen. That's great value for an undercard match, flew by, really entertaining.
Re: George Groves vs Andrea di Luisa and undercard.
Posted: 30 Jan 2016, 18:18
Tommy looks one for the future, he's game enough and fit enough, he needs more experience and a few tricks.
Hibbert is a very decent and classy fellow and looked very strong and composed though Dave Ryan casts a long shadow over him.
Hibbert is a very decent and classy fellow and looked very strong and composed though Dave Ryan casts a long shadow over him.
Re: George Groves vs Andrea di Luisa and undercard.
Posted: 30 Jan 2016, 18:20
Yeah it was a smashing fight they are both gentleman just shows you dont need trash talking for a good fight mr fury take note!cmdenny wrote:Shame didn't get to end, I had Hibbert up by 2 in a close fight. Great fight. Tommy Martin and JWH both seem real gentleman and sportsmen. That's great value for an undercard match, flew by, really entertaining.
Re: George Groves vs Andrea di Luisa and undercard.
Posted: 30 Jan 2016, 18:20
Horse wrote:Refs don't seem to like counting past 8.LancashireLoyal wrote:that count was a eff up imo
It's not a count of 9, it's a count of 10.
No. Its 8, 9 and out.
Thats the rule.
Re: George Groves vs Andrea di Luisa and undercard.
Posted: 30 Jan 2016, 18:21
Carl Frampton looks like a child stood inbetween Johnny Nelson & Glenn McCrory. I still pick him to beat Quigg tho
Re: George Groves vs Andrea di Luisa and undercard.
Posted: 30 Jan 2016, 18:22
That's what I said.CharlesListon wrote:No. Its 8, 9 and out.
Thats the rule.
It's not 7, 8 and out.
Re: George Groves vs Andrea di Luisa and undercard.
Posted: 30 Jan 2016, 18:23
He was up exactly when the ref counted 9.
Re: George Groves vs Andrea di Luisa and undercard.
Posted: 30 Jan 2016, 18:24
Another trainer another new groves. You cant teach an old dog new tricks he wins this I wouldn't be surprised if its groves degale pay per view in the summer
Re: George Groves vs Andrea di Luisa and undercard.
Posted: 30 Jan 2016, 18:24
No, its 7,8, 9, out.
He was in the act of rising on out.
Thats down.
He failed to beat the count.
He admitted so himself.
Next
He was in the act of rising on out.
Thats down.
He failed to beat the count.
He admitted so himself.
Next
Re: George Groves vs Andrea di Luisa and undercard.
Posted: 30 Jan 2016, 18:25
He popped up as the ref said "9".CharlesListon wrote:No, its 7,8, 9, out.
He was in the act of rising on out.
Thats down.
He failed to beat the count.
He admitted so himself.
Next
Re: George Groves vs Andrea di Luisa and undercard.
Posted: 30 Jan 2016, 18:25
George Groves, the second comeback, and he's only 27.
Re: George Groves vs Andrea di Luisa and undercard.
Posted: 30 Jan 2016, 18:28
Hes full of shite agreed!Neil Gee wrote:George Groves, the second comeback, and he's only 27.
Re: George Groves vs Andrea di Luisa and undercard.
Posted: 30 Jan 2016, 18:31
Super-bantamweights do have this strange habit of being very short compared to Cruiserweights.Neil Gee wrote:Carl Frampton looks like a child stood inbetween Johnny Nelson & Glenn McCrory. I still pick him to beat Quigg tho
Re: George Groves vs Andrea di Luisa and undercard.
Posted: 30 Jan 2016, 18:35
jameswilson wrote:Super-bantamweights do have this strange habit of being very short compared to Cruiserweights.Neil Gee wrote:Carl Frampton looks like a child stood inbetween Johnny Nelson & Glenn McCrory. I still pick him to beat Quigg tho
Re: George Groves vs Andrea di Luisa and undercard.
Posted: 30 Jan 2016, 18:36
FFS
Re: George Groves vs Andrea di Luisa and undercard.
Posted: 30 Jan 2016, 18:37
To be fair Badou Jack is probably still the most under-rated champion in this division.
Re: George Groves vs Andrea di Luisa and undercard.
Posted: 30 Jan 2016, 18:40
There's a very good article on Quigg and Frampton in this months Boxing Monthly - well written and interesting.Neil Gee wrote:Carl Frampton looks like a child stood inbetween Johnny Nelson & Glenn McCrory. I still pick him to beat Quigg tho
Re: George Groves vs Andrea di Luisa and undercard.
Posted: 30 Jan 2016, 18:43
who invited the fornicating brass band,they do my tits in at the football and now they've pitched up at the boxing.. 
Re: George Groves vs Andrea di Luisa and undercard.
Posted: 30 Jan 2016, 18:43
Oh no not the band!
Re: George Groves vs Andrea di Luisa and undercard.
Posted: 30 Jan 2016, 18:43
LancashireLoyal wrote:who invited the effing brass band,they do my tits in at the football and now they've pitched up at the boxing..
Thought they went away with Hatton!
Re: George Groves vs Andrea di Luisa and undercard.
Posted: 30 Jan 2016, 18:45
First round to Groves. Doesn't look like Di Luisa has bought much to the table, but it's only round one...