BoxRec

http://www.skysports.com/boxing/news/12 ... peter-fury

Peter Fury seems pretty confident about this accusation- lot of people with egg on their face if that's the case

Terminator666 wrote:http://www.skysports.com/boxing/news/12 ... peter-fury

Peter Fury seems pretty confident about this accusation- lot of people with egg on their face if that's the case

Real people know its bollocks mate ,you only got to look at the dates and timeframe with half a brain is all you need to workout its just another smear campaign .
Best think to do with the mirror is wipe your arse with it

CiganoBoxer wrote:

Terminator666 wrote:http://www.skysports.com/boxing/news/12 ... peter-fury

Peter Fury seems pretty confident about this accusation- lot of people with egg on their face if that's the case

Real people know its bollocks mate ,you only got to look at the dates and timeframe with half a brain is all you need to workout its just another smear campaign .
Best think to do with the mirror is wipe your arse with it

Why is it you believe that the Mirror has a witch-hunt against Fury precisely?

Terminator666 wrote:http://www.skysports.com/boxing/news/12 ... peter-fury

Peter Fury seems pretty confident about this accusation- lot of people with egg on their face if that's the case

What else is he going to say?

I'll wait until the story breaks fully before rushing to any judgements - as I said however, the idea that a mainstream publication is going to print such an overtly potentially libellous story, without any sources to back it up, is pretty fanciful. The press have never been under as much scrutiny as they are currently.

Of course, we could all buy into the fact that the Mirror has a personal vendetta against Fury, that would embolden it to leave itself open to a multi-million pound lawsuit.

Wiping your arse with a mirror sounds truly messy.

I'm very surprised he didn't try and super-injunction it. That's the first thing id have advised him to do.

jamesmcdonnell wrote:

Terminator666 wrote:http://www.skysports.com/boxing/news/12 ... peter-fury

Peter Fury seems pretty confident about this accusation- lot of people with egg on their face if that's the case

What else is he going to say?

I'll wait until the story breaks fully before rushing to any judgements - as I said however, the idea that a mainstream publication is going to print such an overtly potentially libellous story, without any sources to back it up, is pretty fanciful. The press have never been under as much scrutiny as they are currently.

Of course, we could all buy into the fact that the Mirror has a personal vendetta against Fury, that would embolden it to leave itself open to a multi-million pound lawsuit.

It is still worth noting there have been a ton of controversies purely from people in the media misrepresenting things. I'm not saying that's the case here but I wouldn't discount it either.

Loynesy wrote:Wiping your arse with a mirror sounds truly messy.

Ask Ironside, he'd know.

BitPlayer wrote:

jamesmcdonnell wrote:

Terminator666 wrote:http://www.skysports.com/boxing/news/12 ... peter-fury

Peter Fury seems pretty confident about this accusation- lot of people with egg on their face if that's the case

What else is he going to say?

I'll wait until the story breaks fully before rushing to any judgements - as I said however, the idea that a mainstream publication is going to print such an overtly potentially libellous story, without any sources to back it up, is pretty fanciful. The press have never been under as much scrutiny as they are currently.

Of course, we could all buy into the fact that the Mirror has a personal vendetta against Fury, that would embolden it to leave itself open to a multi-million pound lawsuit.

It is still worth noting there have been a ton of controversies purely from people in the media misrepresenting things. I'm not saying that's the case here but I wouldn't discount it either.

I'd say that is definitely possible, however, the idea they've plucked this entirely from thin air, is pretty fanciful.

What would concern me is the reaction of the UK anti doping, if there was no truth in it whatsoever, they would surely just say "We have no knowledge of any irregularities in any of Mr Fury's samples."

jamesmcdonnell wrote:

BitPlayer wrote:

jamesmcdonnell wrote:
What else is he going to say?

I'll wait until the story breaks fully before rushing to any judgements - as I said however, the idea that a mainstream publication is going to print such an overtly potentially libellous story, without any sources to back it up, is pretty fanciful. The press have never been under as much scrutiny as they are currently.

Of course, we could all buy into the fact that the Mirror has a personal vendetta against Fury, that would embolden it to leave itself open to a multi-million pound lawsuit.

It is still worth noting there have been a ton of controversies purely from people in the media misrepresenting things. I'm not saying that's the case here but I wouldn't discount it either.

I'd say that is definitely possible, however, the idea they've plucked this entirely from thin air, is pretty fanciful.

What would concern me is the reaction of the UK anti doping, if there was no truth in it whatsoever, they would surely just say "We have no knowledge of any irregularities in any of Mr Fury's samples."

Probably not, it's probably a bad leak or something if untrue. However UKAD my not want to say that to stop people trying to get leaks by randomly asking about athletes and seeing if anything is happening, it's just a vague reply that they'll never respond to that sort of thing, and they've used the exact wording before.

BitPlayer wrote:

jamesmcdonnell wrote:

BitPlayer wrote: It is still worth noting there have been a ton of controversies purely from people in the media misrepresenting things. I'm not saying that's the case here but I wouldn't discount it either.

I'd say that is definitely possible, however, the idea they've plucked this entirely from thin air, is pretty fanciful.

What would concern me is the reaction of the UK anti doping, if there was no truth in it whatsoever, they would surely just say "We have no knowledge of any irregularities in any of Mr Fury's samples."

Probably not, it's probably a bad leak or something if untrue. However UKAD my not want to say that to stop people trying to get leaks by randomly asking about athletes and seeing if anything is happening, it's just a vague reply that they'll never respond to that sort of thing, and they've used the exact wording before.

Yes, you could be right there, never considered that.

jamesmcdonnell wrote: Why is it you believe that the Mirror has a witch-hunt against Fury precisely?

Lets me an you end this titter tatter and talk some sense ay ?

Since Fury won the titles i don't think i have read one positive story from such a paper .
The mirror was very vague on facts ,it named no source which lets be fair is what they do usually when they want to spread chit when they don't have anything factual to back up what their alleging ,the only thing they was sure about was the date the sample was taken .

Are the paper trying to tell us that this sample was taken in feb 2015, he tested positive and they let him still fight for 5 world titles at the end of that year?, and moreover are still allowing him to defend them 19 months after a positive test ?
I personally can't see it,the dots just don't line up for me ,we all know he's not liked by the media for how he carries on, fair enough but lets not take a mans life with mere speculation backed up by nothing more than a fairy story not worth the paper its written in.

Yes i am a gypsy and proud , also pleased that we are doing well in boxing ,nothing wrong with that ,if Fury had a positive test i would be disappointed for us but be the first to say what he is,but until then it might not be a bad idea to base our opinion on what is known rather than whats being said.

CiganoBoxer wrote:

jamesmcdonnell wrote: Why is it you believe that the Mirror has a witch-hunt against Fury precisely?

Lets me an you end this titter tatter and talk some sense ay ?

Since Fury won the titles i don't think i have read one positive story from such a paper .
The mirror was very vague on facts ,it named no source which lets be fair is what they do usually when they want to spread chit when they don't have anything factual to back up what their alleging ,the only thing they was sure about was the date the sample was taken .

Are the paper trying to tell us that this sample was taken in feb 2015, he tested positive and they let him still fight for 5 world titles at the end of that year?, and moreover are still allowing him to defend them 19 months after a positive test ?
I personally can't see it,the dots just don't line up for me ,we all know he's not liked by the media for how he carries on, fair enough but lets not take a mans life with mere speculation backed up by nothing more than a fairy story not worth the paper its written in.

Yes i am a gypsy and proud , also pleased that we are doing well in boxing ,nothing wrong with that ,if Fury had a positive test i would be disappointed for us but be the first to say what he is,but until then it might not be a bad idea to base our opinion on what is known rather than whats being said.

Have you ever made a post that doesn't sound as though you are raging?

I agree with some bits of what you say and not others, but for me your style of posting actually detracts from what you are saying.

To be fair Cigano looks not like the kind of guy to tangle with! In modern parlance he's a unit!

https://mobile.twitter.com/ciganoboxer

reggaereggae wrote:To be fair Cigano looks not like the kind of guy to tangle with! In modern parlance he's a unit!

https://mobile.twitter.com/ciganoboxer

i never knew the 11 o'clock show's Bulla was based on a real person

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Li26wilL4Cs

CiganoBoxer wrote:

jamesmcdonnell wrote: Why is it you believe that the Mirror has a witch-hunt against Fury precisely?

Lets me an you end this titter tatter and talk some sense ay ?

Since Fury won the titles i don't think i have read one positive story from such a paper .
The mirror was very vague on facts ,it named no source which lets be fair is what they do usually when they want to spread chit when they don't have anything factual to back up what their alleging ,the only thing they was sure about was the date the sample was taken .

Are the paper trying to tell us that this sample was taken in feb 2015, he tested positive and they let him still fight for 5 world titles at the end of that year?, and moreover are still allowing him to defend them 19 months after a positive test ?
I personally can't see it,the dots just don't line up for me ,we all know he's not liked by the media for how he carries on, fair enough but lets not take a mans life with mere speculation backed up by nothing more than a fairy story not worth the paper its written in.

Yes i am a gypsy and proud , also pleased that we are doing well in boxing ,nothing wrong with that ,if Fury had a positive test i would be disappointed for us but be the first to say what he is,but until then it might not be a bad idea to base our opinion on what is known rather than whats being said.

Nobody is condemning him though, as the facts are as yet unknown. The trouble is that many gypsies seem to think everyone's got it in for Tyson because he's from traveller folk, and that everything written about him is because of this, and that isn't true.

jamesmcdonnell wrote:

CiganoBoxer wrote:

jamesmcdonnell wrote: Why is it you believe that the Mirror has a witch-hunt against Fury precisely?

Lets me an you end this titter tatter and talk some sense ay ?

Since Fury won the titles i don't think i have read one positive story from such a paper .
The mirror was very vague on facts ,it named no source which lets be fair is what they do usually when they want to spread chit when they don't have anything factual to back up what their alleging ,the only thing they was sure about was the date the sample was taken .

Are the paper trying to tell us that this sample was taken in feb 2015, he tested positive and they let him still fight for 5 world titles at the end of that year?, and moreover are still allowing him to defend them 19 months after a positive test ?
I personally can't see it,the dots just don't line up for me ,we all know he's not liked by the media for how he carries on, fair enough but lets not take a mans life with mere speculation backed up by nothing more than a fairy story not worth the paper its written in.

Yes i am a gypsy and proud , also pleased that we are doing well in boxing ,nothing wrong with that ,if Fury had a positive test i would be disappointed for us but be the first to say what he is,but until then it might not be a bad idea to base our opinion on what is known rather than whats being said.

Nobody is condemning him though, as the facts are as yet unknown. The trouble is that many gypsies seem to think everyone's got it in for Tyson because he's from traveller folk, and that everything written about him is because of this, and that isn't true.

The reason Tyson has attracted so much negative press, is that his views are repellent to the majority of people, it's as simple as that.

Before started spouting off about gays, women and jews, the press was pretty ambivalent, even disinterested in him.

I don't know the facts of this story from the Mirror, nobody does yet, time will tell, and if the Mirror have been foolish enough to print outright rubbish, then Tyson's family will have a field day, as they would get annihilated in court and lose millions most likely, for defamation and libel.

What on earth is that??!?!

reggaereggae wrote:What on earth is that??!?!

A bloody awful film with Ricky Grover in it.

reggaereggae wrote:To be fair Cigano looks not like the kind of guy to tangle with! In modern parlance he's a unit!

https://mobile.twitter.com/ciganoboxer

You should be a P.I mate you found me
Just a big friendly giant pal

CiganoBoxer wrote:

reggaereggae wrote:To be fair Cigano looks not like the kind of guy to tangle with! In modern parlance he's a unit!

https://mobile.twitter.com/ciganoboxer

You should be a P.I mate you found me
Just a big friendly giant pal

Hahahah thanks bro.... But I definitely wouldn't want a physical disagreement with you!

reggaereggae wrote:

CiganoBoxer wrote:

reggaereggae wrote:To be fair Cigano looks not like the kind of guy to tangle with! In modern parlance he's a unit!

https://mobile.twitter.com/ciganoboxer

You should be a P.I mate you found me
Just a big friendly giant pal

Hahahah thanks bro.... But I definitely wouldn't want a physical disagreement with you!

I would. Me Mrs fights my battles, it would be nice to see her get chinned

CiganoBoxer wrote:

reggaereggae wrote:To be fair Cigano looks not like the kind of guy to tangle with! In modern parlance he's a unit!

https://mobile.twitter.com/ciganoboxer

You should be a P.I mate you found me
Just a big friendly giant pal

But are you gay?
You look quare.......post quare.....suck cocks
Just how many people do you get *friendly * with ?
Hadaka jime

tedley wrote:

CiganoBoxer wrote:

reggaereggae wrote:To be fair Cigano looks not like the kind of guy to tangle with! In modern parlance he's a unit!

https://mobile.twitter.com/ciganoboxer

You should be a P.I mate you found me
Just a big friendly giant pal

But are you gay?
You look quare.......post quare.....suck cocks
Just how many people do you get *friendly * with ?
Hadaka jime

oh your such a comedian ,the world has never seen such bravery .
That sperm covered keyboard gives you powers