Re: AJ vs Wladimir...
Posted: 27 Sep 2016, 18:11
Like he would most people's.DannyMCR wrote:But Khan made your September top ten British P4P
Like he would most people's.DannyMCR wrote:But Khan made your September top ten British P4P
Pulev is upright, has no head movement, leaves his chin out to dry. He would be stopped very quickly. Look at how the styles match up instead of fixating on records and meaningless alphabet rankings. Assess fighters on an absolute scale rather than a relative one. Use eyes.BitPlayer wrote:Considering his best opponents have been Whyte and Breazeale, it likely would.Riddick Blowe wrote:because a Kubrat Pulev bout is going to teach Joshua Soooooo much about what it means to be a top fighterBitPlayer wrote: It means not having a win over a top ten fighter.
And here something weird, if the competition is poor, that means you need to fight higher ranked opponents to be credible, not lower.
I will ask you again, based on what?Horse wrote:Like he would most people's.DannyMCR wrote:But Khan made your September top ten British P4P
X2Riddick Blowe wrote:Pulev is upright, has no head movement, leaves his chin out to dry. He would be stopped very quickly. Look at how the styles match up instead of fixating on records and meaningless alphabet rankings. Assess fighters on an absolute scale rather than a relative one. Use eyes.BitPlayer wrote:Considering his best opponents have been Whyte and Breazeale, it likely would.Riddick Blowe wrote:
because a Kubrat Pulev bout is going to teach Joshua Soooooo much about what it means to be a top fighter
And whats ur logic u donkey?Horse wrote:Your logic is wasted on him.BitPlayer wrote:Considering his best opponents have been Whyte and Breazeale, it likely would.
Horse? More like a fvckin assHorse wrote:Like he would most people's.DannyMCR wrote:But Khan made your September top ten British P4P
There's no need for name callingthechump wrote:Horse? More like a fvckin assHorse wrote:Like he would most people's.DannyMCR wrote:But Khan made your September top ten British P4P
There's no need for him to post anything at all, he's rubbish.kevo wrote:There's no need for name calling
He also said, in an interview I watched the other day, that Wlad was looking done and that Joshua wasn't ready for him yet.Naandrew wrote:Hearn was saying he doesn't want this fight unless Fury gets stripped and the other belts are on the lines.
THIS FIGHT DOESNT NEED F**KING BELTS !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Right now this fight would be huge and if AJ destroyed Wlad then he becomes the man because it looks like Fury is never fighting again.
Hearn just making excuses this fight isn't happening.
Anyone with one if these belts and proclaiming to be word champion should be ready for ANYONE.davie wrote:He also said, in an interview I watched the other day, that Wlad was looking done and that Joshua wasn't ready for him yet.Naandrew wrote:Hearn was saying he doesn't want this fight unless Fury gets stripped and the other belts are on the lines.
THIS FIGHT DOESNT NEED F**KING BELTS !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Right now this fight would be huge and if AJ destroyed Wlad then he becomes the man because it looks like Fury is never fighting again.
Hearn just making excuses this fight isn't happening.
Basically all in one breath.![]()
So his world champion heavy weight, who he maintains is the best in the world, isn't quite ready to face a done, 40 year old ex-champion who lost his last fight, with a really poor performance, to a guy that Hearn maintains his man would also whup.
Things change over time you know. AJ didn't expect Fury to win either, while he also thinks Fury is probably quite an easy opponend.davie wrote:He also said, in an interview I watched the other day, that Wlad was looking done and that Joshua wasn't ready for him yet.Naandrew wrote:Hearn was saying he doesn't want this fight unless Fury gets stripped and the other belts are on the lines.
THIS FIGHT DOESNT NEED F**KING BELTS !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Right now this fight would be huge and if AJ destroyed Wlad then he becomes the man because it looks like Fury is never fighting again.
Hearn just making excuses this fight isn't happening.
Basically all in one breath.![]()
So his world champion heavy weight, who he maintains is the best in the world, isn't quite ready to face a done, 40 year old ex-champion who lost his last fight, with a really poor performance, to a guy that Hearn maintains his man would also whup.
Because Whyte and Brezeale are defensive masters.Riddick Blowe wrote:Pulev is upright, has no head movement, leaves his chin out to dry. He would be stopped very quickly. Look at how the styles match up instead of fixating on records and meaningless alphabet rankings. Assess fighters on an absolute scale rather than a relative one. Use eyes.BitPlayer wrote:Considering his best opponents have been Whyte and Breazeale, it likely would.Riddick Blowe wrote:
because a Kubrat Pulev bout is going to teach Joshua Soooooo much about what it means to be a top fighter
Just because Pulev is 'ranked', doesn't mean he'll do any better than those guys.BitPlayer wrote:Because Whyte and Brezeale are defensive masters.Riddick Blowe wrote:Pulev is upright, has no head movement, leaves his chin out to dry. He would be stopped very quickly. Look at how the styles match up instead of fixating on records and meaningless alphabet rankings. Assess fighters on an absolute scale rather than a relative one. Use eyes.BitPlayer wrote: Considering his best opponents have been Whyte and Breazeale, it likely would.
No, because he's better he will.Riddick Blowe wrote:Just because Pulev is 'ranked', doesn't mean he'll do any better than those guys.BitPlayer wrote:Because Whyte and Brezeale are defensive masters.Riddick Blowe wrote:
Pulev is upright, has no head movement, leaves his chin out to dry. He would be stopped very quickly. Look at how the styles match up instead of fixating on records and meaningless alphabet rankings. Assess fighters on an absolute scale rather than a relative one. Use eyes.
Well I cant see Parker being readyBoxing Writer wrote:https://twitter.com/TOPCLASSBOXING/stat ... 1940689921
chrisnew86 wrote:" charismatic personality "
That's how that article describes AJ