David Haye vs. ??? - December 10th 2016

[Killer Blow]

Haye won't be fighting for the interim title. No chance. If he does, he drops out of all the other ratings. No WBO title fight. He won't take a third rate WBA title. No way in the world.

He won't fight Parker either.

Go on then, why won't he fight Parker?

Because Parker's dangerous, low reward and Haye hasn't fought a decent opponent in four and a half years?

[keithmoonhangover]

He won't fight Parker either.

Go on then, why won't he fight Parker?

Because Parker's dangerous, low reward and Haye hasn't fought a decent opponent in four and a half years?

Yes, but unless Hearn offers him a Joshua fight, it's his best option. If he gets that, then it'll be more like 50/50 for a Joshua unification fight.

[Killer Blow]

Go on then, why won't he fight Parker?

Because Parker's dangerous, low reward and Haye hasn't fought a decent opponent in four and a half years?

Yes, but unless Hearn offers him a Joshua fight, it's his best option. If he gets that, then it'll be more like 50/50 for a Joshua unification fight.

He's lined up to fight Bellew in February, where he will earn millions. If that isn't enough for him, he'll wait around for Joshua.

Skip to 2:47 where he talks about Haye and the WBO:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3QoGqQPqRU4

[Rob3_142]

He won't fight Parker either.

Go on then, why won't he fight Parker?

Because Parker's dangerous, low reward and Haye hasn't fought a decent opponent in four and a half years?

I personally think Haye beats Parker, thus winning the WBO. With a world belt, he has more leverage for a unification fight, and can pretty much demand 50% of a Wembley fight end of the summer. That's the fight he wants, probably the most lucrative fight in the UK, and probably top 5 in the world.