BoxRec

crow wrote:For Tanzidiot and his alts:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jiJaRqMF4CY

Still waiting on those "alts" to be identified by you croward.

I am a Lomachenko, 3G, Krusher, and Usyk fan, croward. You are the one with wordtracks, blackturd.

Tanzio wrote:

crow wrote:For Tanzidiot and his alts:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jiJaRqMF4CY

Still waiting on those "alts" to be identified by you croward.

I am a Lomachenko, 3G, Krusher, and Usyk fan, croward. You are the one with wordtracks, blackturd.

You are a f*cking liar. You are clearly not a Kovalev fan if you give a fight he clearly won to a spoiler.

boxing_rocks wrote:

Tanzio wrote:

crow wrote:For Tanzidiot and his alts:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jiJaRqMF4CY

Still waiting on those "alts" to be identified by you croward.

I am a Lomachenko, 3G, Krusher, and Usyk fan, croward. You are the one with wordtracks, blackturd.

You are a f*cking liar. You are clearly not a Kovalev fan if you give a fight he clearly won to a spoiler.

No, I am not a liar. I have been a fan of Lomachenko, 3G and Krusher for years. That doesn't mean I am too biased not to acknowledge that Salido defeated Loma in his first pro fight and that Ward defeated Krusher in a very close decision that could have gone either way.

Tanzio wrote:

boxing_rocks wrote:

Tanzio wrote: Still waiting on those "alts" to be identified by you croward.

I am a Lomachenko, 3G, Krusher, and Usyk fan, croward. You are the one with wordtracks, blackturd.

You are a f*cking liar. You are clearly not a Kovalev fan if you give a fight he clearly won to a spoiler.

No, I am not a liar. I have been a fan of Lomachenko, 3G and Krusher for years. That doesn't mean I am too biased not to acknowledge that Salido defeated Loma in his first pro fight and that Ward defeated Krusher in a very close decision that could have gone either way.

Salido only defeated Loma, because he was allowed to come way overweight and foul non-stop.

3/4 of experts and fans think that Kovalev defeated Ward, and that includes ALL his fans.

boxing_rocks wrote:

Tanzio wrote:

boxing_rocks wrote:
You are a f*cking liar. You are clearly not a Kovalev fan if you give a fight he clearly won to a spoiler.

No, I am not a liar. I have been a fan of Lomachenko, 3G and Krusher for years. That doesn't mean I am too biased not to acknowledge that Salido defeated Loma in his first pro fight and that Ward defeated Krusher in a very close decision that could have gone either way.

Salido only defeated Loma, because he was allowed to come way overweight and foul non-stop.

3/4 of experts and fans think that Kovalev defeated Ward, and that includes ALL his fans.

No it doesn't.

Tanzio wrote:

Caractacus wrote:because Kovalev was a Russian and Vladimir Putin is a Russian too
and in their nutty liberal minds ,
Putin equals Trump and are best buds
so they couldnt possibly give the fight to Kovalev if it meant a Russian champion if they could help it
(and they did)
particularly when the 10th round started and knew Kovalev was winning on points going in to it.
Its all about Politics as usual.
What you think ?

and I'm the one with the agenda

You got that right... Your every post proves it.

Tanzio wrote:

crow wrote:For Tanzidiot and his alts:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jiJaRqMF4CY

Still waiting on those "alts" to be identified by you croward.

I am a Lomachenko, 3G, Krusher, and Usyk fan, croward. You are the one with wordtracks, blackturd.

You're an idiot and Montero is a pathetic idiot... Lomachenko is easily the best fighter in the sport.. He beat the stellar 24-0 Gary Russell in his 3rd pro fight.. He dominated and stopped 27-0 Nicholas Walters in his 8th pro fight.. He's never been hurt, knocked down, or stunned in a fight.. Ward has an anemic KO record.. He a dirty, head-butting grappler who's been hurt and knocked down twice by Darnell Boone and Sergei Kovalev.. Ward gets decisions he doesn't deserve and the deck stacked in his favor by a bunch of cheating bastards... and he says "Kovalev has no inside game" after fouling him all night.

Floyd hasn't knocked anyone out in several years.. Floyd is anemic.. He ducked all the top top Welterweights and cherry-picked Andre Berto... If you think Floyd was the greatest defensive boxer in Fistic History look at the exposé below -- and see Floyd getting hurt and stunned numerous times by 2nd raters.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ofeqQ_ljCk

Tanzio wrote:
I am a boring troll spamming boxing forums whenever a corrupt boxing decision needs to be covered up, croward.
I've done it 4 years ago with the obvious Pac vs Bradley fiasco witnessed in disbelief by the whole world, and i'm attempting to do it again now.
But you guys have grown weary of the rubbish i keep posting. Please stop laughing at me.

Fixed for ya.

lazboy wrote:

jamesmcdonnell wrote:

lazboy wrote:
No wonder you scored it for Ward. The amateurs is point based. Pros is the pain game. Get it right.

Here is the comment I was referencing, which is clearly nonsense.

Both versions of the sport, amateur and professional are points based. The pain game - is meaningless. So I stick by my words, you were talking shite.

Back a few years, amateur boxing, where i'm from was purely point based. If all three judges saw a punch landed, whether it was hard or soft, you got a point and those accumulated. So some amateur fighters didnt put any pop on their punches and just tried to outland. Pro's is a different system, unless they've changed amautuers now, I didnt watch this years Olympics but i know theres been some changes. Pros the harder punches mean MORE than the tap tap of the amateurs. Thats what I mean when referring to the pain game. Thats the comparison. Not visible damage. I never said that. Either you misunderstood me or you don't see pro boxing like that. Thats your right.

Or perhaps you don't write clearly enough to explain your point - ?

If you don't give enough detail in what you write - then you can't blame the reader for not knowing what the intention was behind it.

"The amateurs is point based. Pros is the pain game. Get it right"

That's not a very clear statement is it? certainly it doesn't contain the detail of the comment you typed above.

You are somewhat behind the curve.. Amateur boxing in any case is no longer scored like that, I believe from memory, that it hasn't been since the 2008 olympics, as it produced inconsistent results, and also led to contests that were too dissimilar from the professional game, and amateurs who weren't well prepared for professional contests. In fact the amateur code is moving further and further toward the professional game, with removal of headguards in senior competition, and a scoring model based around a very similar model to the professional code - in fact I think it may be identical aside from how knockdowns are scored.

jamesmcdonnell wrote:

lazboy wrote:

jamesmcdonnell wrote:
Here is the comment I was referencing, which is clearly nonsense.

Both versions of the sport, amateur and professional are points based. The pain game - is meaningless. So I stick by my words, you were talking shite.

Back a few years, amateur boxing, where i'm from was purely point based. If all three judges saw a punch landed, whether it was hard or soft, you got a point and those accumulated. So some amateur fighters didnt put any pop on their punches and just tried to outland. Pro's is a different system, unless they've changed amautuers now, I didnt watch this years Olympics but i know theres been some changes. Pros the harder punches mean MORE than the tap tap of the amateurs. Thats what I mean when referring to the pain game. Thats the comparison. Not visible damage. I never said that. Either you misunderstood me or you don't see pro boxing like that. Thats your right.

Or perhaps you don't write clearly enough to explain your point - ?

If you don't give enough detail in what you write - then you can't blame the reader for not knowing what the intention was behind it.

"The amateurs is point based. Pros is the pain game. Get it right"

That's not a very clear statement is it? certainly it doesn't contain the detail of the comment you typed above.

You are somewhat behind the curve.. Amateur boxing in any case is no longer scored like that, I believe from memory, that it hasn't been since the 2008 olympics, as it produced inconsistent results, and also led to contests that were too dissimilar from the professional game, and amateurs who weren't well prepared for professional contests. In fact the amateur code is moving further and further toward the professional game, with removal of headguards in senior competition, and a scoring model based around a very similar model to the professional code - in fact I think it may be identical aside from how knockdowns are scored.

Perhaps you shouldn't assume things and jump downs people's throats. Remember assuming makes an ass of u and me ass-u-me. Thanks for ur education lesson although back in 2011 it was still the points system I discussed. Learn to ask question. Learn not to assume. Learn definitions of words like pain vs facial damage.

lazboy wrote:

jamesmcdonnell wrote:

lazboy wrote:
Back a few years, amateur boxing, where i'm from was purely point based. If all three judges saw a punch landed, whether it was hard or soft, you got a point and those accumulated. So some amateur fighters didnt put any pop on their punches and just tried to outland. Pro's is a different system, unless they've changed amautuers now, I didnt watch this years Olympics but i know theres been some changes. Pros the harder punches mean MORE than the tap tap of the amateurs. Thats what I mean when referring to the pain game. Thats the comparison. Not visible damage. I never said that. Either you misunderstood me or you don't see pro boxing like that. Thats your right.

Or perhaps you don't write clearly enough to explain your point - ?

If you don't give enough detail in what you write - then you can't blame the reader for not knowing what the intention was behind it.

"The amateurs is point based. Pros is the pain game. Get it right"

That's not a very clear statement is it? certainly it doesn't contain the detail of the comment you typed above.

You are somewhat behind the curve.. Amateur boxing in any case is no longer scored like that, I believe from memory, that it hasn't been since the 2008 olympics, as it produced inconsistent results, and also led to contests that were too dissimilar from the professional game, and amateurs who weren't well prepared for professional contests. In fact the amateur code is moving further and further toward the professional game, with removal of headguards in senior competition, and a scoring model based around a very similar model to the professional code - in fact I think it may be identical aside from how knockdowns are scored.

Perhaps you shouldn't assume things and jump downs people's throats. Remember assuming makes an ass of u and me ass-u-me. Thanks for ur education lesson although back in 2011 it was still the points system I discussed. Learn to ask question. Learn not to assume. Learn definitions of words like pain vs facial damage.

Learn to write concisely and clearly about what your intentions are, instead of repeating phrases to make yourself appear smart, that ass-u-me saying is old and lame. Whether it is 2011 or 2008, it's still 5 years ago since that form of scoring was used.

Fights aren't scored on 'pain' they are scored on 'points' stop if you make trite statements like that, then don't be surprised when you get pulled up on it.

It's a forum, if you make statements people find irritating, they will act in an irritable manner.

jamesmcdonnell wrote:

lazboy wrote:

jamesmcdonnell wrote:

Or perhaps you don't write clearly enough to explain your point - ?

If you don't give enough detail in what you write - then you can't blame the reader for not knowing what the intention was behind it.

"The amateurs is point based. Pros is the pain game. Get it right"

That's not a very clear statement is it? certainly it doesn't contain the detail of the comment you typed above.

You are somewhat behind the curve.. Amateur boxing in any case is no longer scored like that, I believe from memory, that it hasn't been since the 2008 olympics, as it produced inconsistent results, and also led to contests that were too dissimilar from the professional game, and amateurs who weren't well prepared for professional contests. In fact the amateur code is moving further and further toward the professional game, with removal of headguards in senior competition, and a scoring model based around a very similar model to the professional code - in fact I think it may be identical aside from how knockdowns are scored.

Perhaps you shouldn't assume things and jump downs people's throats. Remember assuming makes an ass of u and me ass-u-me. Thanks for ur education lesson although back in 2011 it was still the points system I discussed. Learn to ask question. Learn not to assume. Learn definitions of words like pain vs facial damage.

Learn to write concisely and clearly about what your intentions are, instead of repeating phrases to make yourself appear smart, that ass-u-me saying is old and lame. Whether it is 2011 or 2008, it's still 5 years ago since that form of scoring was used.

Fights aren't scored on 'pain' they are scored on 'points' stop if you make trite statements like that, then don't be surprised when you get pulled up on it.

It's a forum, if you make statements people find irritating, they will act in an irritable manner.

I'll write how I write and u can twist it anyway u want. Pros is the pain game. It's boxing, a combat sport.

lazboy wrote:

jamesmcdonnell wrote:

lazboy wrote:
Perhaps you shouldn't assume things and jump downs people's throats. Remember assuming makes an ass of u and me ass-u-me. Thanks for ur education lesson although back in 2011 it was still the points system I discussed. Learn to ask question. Learn not to assume. Learn definitions of words like pain vs facial damage.

Learn to write concisely and clearly about what your intentions are, instead of repeating phrases to make yourself appear smart, that ass-u-me saying is old and lame. Whether it is 2011 or 2008, it's still 5 years ago since that form of scoring was used.

Fights aren't scored on 'pain' they are scored on 'points' stop if you make trite statements like that, then don't be surprised when you get pulled up on it.

It's a forum, if you make statements people find irritating, they will act in an irritable manner.

I'll write how I write and u can twist it anyway u want. Pros is the pain game. It's boxing, a combat sport.

I'm well aware what boxing is, I've been watching it almost 40 years, I'm also aware of how to write clearly, so that people can understand what my opinions are, something you obviously aren't capable of. Now run along, you're boring me with your endless repetition and 9 year old's vocabulary.

jamesmcdonnell wrote:

lazboy wrote:

jamesmcdonnell wrote:
Learn to write concisely and clearly about what your intentions are, instead of repeating phrases to make yourself appear smart, that ass-u-me saying is old and lame. Whether it is 2011 or 2008, it's still 5 years ago since that form of scoring was used.

Fights aren't scored on 'pain' they are scored on 'points' stop if you make trite statements like that, then don't be surprised when you get pulled up on it.

It's a forum, if you make statements people find irritating, they will act in an irritable manner.

I'll write how I write and u can twist it anyway u want. Pros is the pain game. It's boxing, a combat sport.

I'm well aware what boxing is, I've been watching it almost 40 years, I'm also aware of how to write clearly, so that people can understand what my opinions are, something you obviously aren't capable of. Now run along, you're boring me with your endless repetition and 9 year old's vocabulary.

No.