Re: Did you pay £17 for that
Posted: 13 Dec 2016, 05:30
At the end of the day ppv is here to stay no matter how loud we shout in protest
EddieHearnsUncle wrote:Oooo, you're hardboxingknockout wrote:I watched all those fights as well. But I'd don't pay 16.95 + a 12 month Sky contract for it.davie wrote:
The words of a mug
And I won't be paying £24.95 for Klit either
It didn't need to.Khaosai-Galaxy wrote:That card would never have happened without PPV
i bought frampton v quigg (and it was shite, but that couldnt have been foreseen) and i didnt bother with brook v ggg because it was a fairground fight. no problem overall with that, i watched smith v canelo, just not going to pay above and beyond for it.dirk2686 wrote:To be fair he's putting Joshua Wlad on next and the non-Joshua ppv's this year have been Frampton Quigg and Brook Golovkin which are hardly shite.veriton wrote:i love boxing, but paying 17 quid for that just gives hearn the excuse to keep putting on poo fights in main events.
Yeah bruv I mess you up Innit famEddieHearnsUncle wrote:Oooo, you're hardboxingknockout wrote:I watched all those fights as well. But I'd don't pay 16.95 + a 12 month Sky contract for it.davie wrote:
The words of a mug
And I won't be paying £24.95 for Klit either