Page 5 of 5

Re: Did you pay £17 for that

Posted: 13 Dec 2016, 05:30
by TheGman
At the end of the day ppv is here to stay no matter how loud we shout in protest

Re: Did you pay £17 for that

Posted: 13 Dec 2016, 06:14
by Boxerbeetle
EddieHearnsUncle wrote:
boxingknockout wrote:
davie wrote:
The words of a mug
I watched all those fights as well. But I'd don't pay 16.95 + a 12 month Sky contract for it.
:lol: And I won't be paying £24.95 for Klit either :lol:
Oooo, you're hard
:lol:

Re: Did you pay £17 for that

Posted: 13 Dec 2016, 07:26
by PredatorHayds
I didn't pay £17. I paid £22. My skybox was new and wouldn't let me order via remote.
Good card. I watched 15 hours straight boxing Saturday so no complaints from me as the two best fights were on the SKY PPV.

Re: Did you pay £17 for that

Posted: 13 Dec 2016, 15:10
by Khaosai-Galaxy
That card would never have happened without PPV

Re: Did you pay £17 for that

Posted: 13 Dec 2016, 16:51
by Boxerbeetle
Khaosai-Galaxy wrote:That card would never have happened without PPV
It didn't need to.

Re: Did you pay £17 for that

Posted: 13 Dec 2016, 18:23
by veriton
dirk2686 wrote:
veriton wrote:i love boxing, but paying 17 quid for that just gives hearn the excuse to keep putting on poo fights in main events.
To be fair he's putting Joshua Wlad on next and the non-Joshua ppv's this year have been Frampton Quigg and Brook Golovkin which are hardly shite.
i bought frampton v quigg (and it was shite, but that couldnt have been foreseen) and i didnt bother with brook v ggg because it was a fairground fight. no problem overall with that, i watched smith v canelo, just not going to pay above and beyond for it.

Re: Did you pay £17 for that

Posted: 13 Dec 2016, 18:59
by boxingknockout
EddieHearnsUncle wrote:
boxingknockout wrote:
davie wrote:
The words of a mug
I watched all those fights as well. But I'd don't pay 16.95 + a 12 month Sky contract for it.
:lol: And I won't be paying £24.95 for Klit either :lol:
Oooo, you're hard
Yeah bruv I mess you up Innit fam