Page 5 of 11

Re: Mundine v Green result

Posted: 07 Feb 2017, 09:40
by Sweet P
bogan whisperer wrote:
coneye wrote:
lazboy wrote:
!00% agree with you. One thing though, obviously you don't have to agree. Yea Green was more active but I thought that was "survival active" to try keep Mundine off him rather than effective active if you know what I mean
150% AGREE Green was holding , committed the biggest mistake of all and took his eyes of his opponent , choc hit him with a LEGAL punch ref had not said break so Choc was entitled to punch ,, Green should of had a count put on him and then a ko victory to Mundine ,
You need to take a listen to the video above too. You can clearly hear the referee well before Mundine strikes Green and the referee is almost in touching distance of them when he says it. That he didn't hear the call is all too convenient. He heard it alright :OhYes:
Ref never said STOP or BREAK. So choc was within his rights to punch.
The only 3 commands a ref should give are Stop Box and break. Both boxers would have been told that before the fight in the dressing room.

Re: Mundine v Green result

Posted: 07 Feb 2017, 19:01
by Lairdy
buster007 wrote:I noticed that the mundine huggers are especially quiet on how do they explain mundines corner acknowledging that he was losing.

or are they a bunch of dummies are they?
I want the drugs you're on...

I've never seen a fighter "win" a fight, than him and his fans relentlessly defend his "win".

Yes, he got backed up all fight by a much smaller opponent. Yes, he got busted up. Yes, he could barely through 3 punches without holding. Yes, he looked flat footed and very slow. But the most important thing, is that 2 of the 6 people in Australia that think he "won" were moralless (Minn was almost certainly paid off) individuals.

Do i find it suspicious that a fighter with a 6kg weight advantage and more power spends almost the entire fight being backed up, seemingly doing all he can not to be ko'd... Absolutely.

#heknew

Re: Mundine v Green result

Posted: 07 Feb 2017, 19:19
by buster007
that has to be the biggest biased dribble ever written on here, lol.

and yet you have completely ignored the comment that you quoted.

how do you mundine huggers explain his corner being aware that mundine was LOSING the fight?

are they pathetic dogs who know nothing about boxing?

not one of you have the balls to answer this question and it shows you are all as weak as mundine himself imo, pmsl.

Re: Mundine v Green result

Posted: 07 Feb 2017, 22:10
by fox
buster007 wrote:that has to be the biggest biased dribble ever written on here, lol.

and yet you have completely ignored the comment that you quoted.

how do you mundine huggers explain his corner being aware that mundine was LOSING the fight?

are they pathetic dogs who know nothing about boxing?

not one of you have the balls to answer this question and it shows you are all as weak as mundine himself imo, pmsl.
For a start I'm no Mundine hugger. I couldn't give a shit who won the fight. But in my opinion Mundine won the fight. I wasn't listening to his corner, so I didn't know they thought he was losing. It was close but I thought it went the wrong way.

Re: Mundine v Green result

Posted: 07 Feb 2017, 22:19
by fox
Sweet P wrote:
bogan whisperer wrote:
coneye wrote:
150% AGREE Green was holding , committed the biggest mistake of all and took his eyes of his opponent , choc hit him with a LEGAL punch ref had not said break so Choc was entitled to punch ,, Green should of had a count put on him and then a ko victory to Mundine ,
You need to take a listen to the video above too. You can clearly hear the referee well before Mundine strikes Green and the referee is almost in touching distance of them when he says it. That he didn't hear the call is all too convenient. He heard it alright :OhYes:
Ref never said STOP or BREAK. So choc was within his rights to punch.
The only 3 commands a ref should give are Stop Box and break. Both boxers would have been told that before the fight in the dressing room.
Exactly what I thought Ben. Did you think it went the right way or are you not allowed to answer that?

Re: Mundine v Green result

Posted: 07 Feb 2017, 22:36
by DA GOOSE
ClivePatrickLyons wrote:
Like a Boss wrote:
fox wrote: The fight is in the books now and we see a points win to Green.
:OhYes:

That's was a sad day for Aussie boxing when we can do that sort of rubbish to some one I always believed boxing was out of reach from of some one not liking another persons political view's and you know ''leave your race religion at the door'' if those judge's did that to Green or anyother Aussie fighter I would say the same thing its terrible for boxing period.
Lets not exaggerate there have been much worse decisions.

Re: Mundine v Green result

Posted: 08 Feb 2017, 00:36
by Beltane
The tedious thing about the main event was why all the hangers-on that followed Mundine in his walk to the ringside.

Then at the end of the bout they massed again, climbing into the ring and making it difficult for the announcer and officials with their crowding around. With the ring packed out, the bouncers/security couldn't clear the interlopers resulting in a shambles.

But the best thing happened straight after the announcement of Mundine's defeat, he quickly exited the ring, taking away with him this raggedy mob, to let Green get in his two-bobs worth.

Re: Mundine v Green result

Posted: 08 Feb 2017, 00:54
by AntonS
I fail to understand why Dr John O'Neil was elected to officiate the fight. According to our (Boxrec) record, he hasn't been ringside doctor since 2013? Maybe local doctor with same name??

Re: Mundine v Green result

Posted: 08 Feb 2017, 01:04
by bogan whisperer
Sweet P wrote:
bogan whisperer wrote:
coneye wrote:
150% AGREE Green was holding , committed the biggest mistake of all and took his eyes of his opponent , choc hit him with a LEGAL punch ref had not said break so Choc was entitled to punch ,, Green should of had a count put on him and then a ko victory to Mundine ,
You need to take a listen to the video above too. You can clearly hear the referee well before Mundine strikes Green and the referee is almost in touching distance of them when he says it. That he didn't hear the call is all too convenient. He heard it alright :OhYes:
Ref never said STOP or BREAK. So choc was within his rights to punch.
The only 3 commands a ref should give are Stop Box and break. Both boxers would have been told that before the fight in the dressing room.
They are the commands a ref should use but we all know many vary to that.

Re: Mundine v Green result

Posted: 08 Feb 2017, 01:34
by AntonS
fox wrote:
Sweet P wrote:
bogan whisperer wrote:
You need to take a listen to the video above too. You can clearly hear the referee well before Mundine strikes Green and the referee is almost in touching distance of them when he says it. That he didn't hear the call is all too convenient. He heard it alright :OhYes:
Ref never said STOP or BREAK. So choc was within his rights to punch.
The only 3 commands a ref should give are Stop Box and break. Both boxers would have been told that before the fight in the dressing room.
Exactly what I thought Ben. Did you think it went the right way or are you not allowed to answer that?
He's allowed, but unwise to do so. Down the track, it might bite his backside, as superman ring official Vocale found out :lol: :lol:

Re: Mundine v Green result

Posted: 08 Feb 2017, 02:33
by toppity
Sweet P wrote:
bogan whisperer wrote:
coneye wrote:
150% AGREE Green was holding , committed the biggest mistake of all and took his eyes of his opponent , choc hit him with a LEGAL punch ref had not said break so Choc was entitled to punch ,, Green should of had a count put on him and then a ko victory to Mundine ,
You need to take a listen to the video above too. You can clearly hear the referee well before Mundine strikes Green and the referee is almost in touching distance of them when he says it. That he didn't hear the call is all too convenient. He heard it alright :OhYes:
Ref never said STOP or BREAK. So choc was within his rights to punch.
The only 3 commands a ref should give are Stop Box and break. Both boxers would have been told that before the fight in the dressing room.
G'day Ben, been awhile. Just remember the other instruction they would have received. "Protect yourself at all times". Danny failed there.

Re: Mundine v Green result

Posted: 08 Feb 2017, 03:21
by convict
Needs a rematch.

Re: Mundine v Green result

Posted: 08 Feb 2017, 04:21
by coneye
convict wrote:Needs a rematch.
Don't worry it will be on the cards ,, Green likes the money too much to say no , and Choc will really look back and think , shit if i had only gone for him , the judges would'nt of mattered

Re: Mundine v Green result

Posted: 08 Feb 2017, 04:46
by Lairdy
buster007 wrote:that has to be the biggest biased dribble ever written on here, lol.

and yet you have completely ignored the comment that you quoted.

how do you mundine huggers explain his corner being aware that mundine was LOSING the fight?

are they pathetic dogs who know nothing about boxing?

not one of you have the balls to answer this question and it shows you are all as weak as mundine himself imo, pmsl.
By all means, please show where this "apparently" happened? So i can go there and see the straws you are clutching at! :TU:

By the way, it's very common for trainers to say things like that in fights they believe are close. It's an attempt to get them to take the fight out of judges hands.

You probably wouldn't know this but...

Re: Mundine v Green result

Posted: 08 Feb 2017, 16:40
by buster007
show you?

you are not a complete idiot are you? watch the damn fight and see for yourself bud. its not hidden, its obvious and there to see to anyone who is willing to get off mundines knob just for a minute, lol

but you wouldn't know this cause maybe u don't want to believe its possible.

Re: Mundine v Green result

Posted: 08 Feb 2017, 17:22
by Lairdy
buster007 wrote:show you?

you are not a complete idiot are you? watch the damn fight and see for yourself bud. its not hidden, its obvious and there to see to anyone who is willing to get off mundines knob just for a minute, lol

but you wouldn't know this cause maybe u don't want to believe its possible.
So, you can't even give me a moment. I watched the fight and didn't notice an worrying from Mundine's corner. No need to start the name calling champ. I know it's hard being a Fanny Green fan, but made easier because you're sitting behind a keyboard, but no one is perfect.

Re: Mundine v Green result

Posted: 08 Feb 2017, 19:26
by buster007
I can't give you a moment?

oh u r a funny dude.

i'll just teach u something ok kid. in between rounds they have a 1 minute break. that's when the trainer talks to the fighter ok. have a listen and watch for yourself, lol.

Re: Mundine v Green result

Posted: 08 Feb 2017, 19:33
by DA GOOSE
Lairdy wrote:
buster007 wrote:show you?

you are not a complete idiot are you? watch the damn fight and see for yourself bud. its not hidden, its obvious and there to see to anyone who is willing to get off mundines knob just for a minute, lol

but you wouldn't know this cause maybe u don't want to believe its possible.
So, you can't even give me a moment. I watched the fight and didn't notice an worrying from Mundine's corner. No need to start the name calling champ. I know it's hard being a Fanny Green fan, but made easier because you're sitting behind a keyboard, but no one is perfect.
Lairdy this guy thought Green threw the Tarver fight. Like all Green fans they were certain he would knock Mundine out with everything in his favour. He doesn't understand many corners say that to their fighters to motivate them.

Re: Mundine v Green result

Posted: 08 Feb 2017, 19:37
by crusader
It's an elementary motivation tactic; it doesn't at all mean that's what the corner truly believes. And if they did, it could've just been a case of thinking that he was outboxing Green, but feeling that the judges would be generous to Danny (and IMO they were).

Another possibility is, of course, that they actually thought Green was getting the better of it, but that's not necessarily true.

Re: Mundine v Green result

Posted: 08 Feb 2017, 20:34
by ClivePatrickLyons
DA GOOSE wrote:
ClivePatrickLyons wrote:
Like a Boss wrote:
:OhYes:

That's was a sad day for Aussie boxing when we can do that sort of rubbish to some one I always believed boxing was out of reach from of some one not liking another persons political view's and you know ''leave your race religion at the door'' if those judge's did that to Green or anyother Aussie fighter I would say the same thing its terrible for boxing period.
Lets not exaggerate there have been much worse decisions.

When and was the money involved anywhere near what this fight generated because if it wasn't you should just keep your stupit comment to ya self because its silly when it was worth thousand's not million's of dollar's and you try to talk crap and say it wasn't worst robbery's now now what did I say that got up your nose was it the political view that I mentioned or was it religion/race word I'LL SAY IT AGAIN BIGGEST ROBBERY IN A MILLION DOLLAR FIGHT IN AUSSIE BOXING HISTORY.................NOW DA GOOSE WHO'S RIGHT SHOW ME THE FIGHT THAT BACKS UP YOUR CLAIM THAT I EXAGGERATING
AND PLEASE IF YOU CAN JUST LET ME KNOW WHAT UPSET YOU WITH MY POST WAS THE BIT ABOUT RACE/RELIGION OR WAS IT THE POLITICAL VIEW..............PS I DON'T REALLY GIVE A F.CK ANYMORE

Re: Mundine v Green result

Posted: 08 Feb 2017, 20:37
by buster007
you know what, how about all you people actually have a look and see for yourself before automatically dissing it.

then u can maybe make an INFORMED opinion instead of just plucking it out of your rear, lol.

up to u of course.

Re: Mundine v Green result

Posted: 08 Feb 2017, 20:40
by buster007
oh boy, now the mundine huggers r turning on each other, pmsl.

shows how hurt that they r of seeing their hero get smashed by a guy who was severely concussed for the whole fight, lol.

I can see why they r embarrassed alright.

Re: Mundine v Green result

Posted: 08 Feb 2017, 21:05
by fox
buster007 wrote:oh boy, now the mundine huggers r turning on each other, pmsl.

shows how hurt that they r of seeing their hero get smashed by a guy who was severely concussed for the whole fight, lol.

I can see why they r embarrassed alright.
As I said I couldn't give a rats who won the fight but in my opinion it went the wrong way and the judges got it wrong. Not a lot in it but I couldn't see Green getting there. Obviously the concussion affected him. I thought Green would be too big and catch him at some stage. But the only one who got hurt was Green.

Re: Mundine v Green result

Posted: 08 Feb 2017, 21:13
by bogan whisperer
Mundine now complaining to the Australian National Boxing Federation about the size of the ring used, inquiring as to whether all officials were financial with the ANBF, and protesting that the referee didn't have an ANBF emblem on his shirt.

I kid you not :lol:

Re: Mundine v Green result

Posted: 08 Feb 2017, 23:05
by Lairdy
buster007 wrote:I can't give you a moment?

oh u r a funny dude.

i'll just teach u something ok kid. in between rounds they have a 1 minute break. that's when the trainer talks to the fighter ok. have a listen and watch for yourself, lol.
Been there champ. I know all to well. I've had trainers tell me I'm "losing" a fight, yet I've won UD.

I don't think someone that makes 20 grammatical errors every comment should be "teaching anyone"... ANYTHING! :TU: :stop: