BoxRec

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Yes, every more accomplished fighter always wins.

Horse wrote:

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Yes, every more accomplished fighter always wins.

Mason didn't really do anything with his career.

He is unworthy of being compared to Tyson Fury.

Horse wrote:

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Yes, every more accomplished fighter always wins.

Mason didn't really do anything with his career.

He is unworthy of being compared to Tyson Fury.

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:You're wrong.

Horse wrote:

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:You're wrong.

Not really.

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Definitely

Horse wrote:

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Definitely

Credit should be given to those who have achieved something, rather than those that people think looked pretty good.

Fury is leagues above Mason.

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:No, he isn't.

Horse wrote:

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:No, he isn't.

He is.

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:

Horse wrote:

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Watch Mason fight, you should try that more often when discussing boxers.

I am against the "eye test", it is vastly overrated.

Fury has achieved far more than Mason ever did.

Mason does not deserve to be compared favourably to Fury.

Yes, every more accomplished fighter always wins.

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:They don't get much better with horse. He's not very bright and all around unpleasant.

Horse wrote:

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:They don't get much better with horse. He's not very bright and all around unpleasant.

And you are so sophisticated and lovely.

BitPlayer wrote:It would be different if Fury only did a little more, but you're comparing someone a lineal and unified champion to someone who won a vacant British title and defended once against someone with 3 losses including someone called Tony Tricker. Forget Fury, Chisora has achieved levels above Mason.

BitPlayer wrote:

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:

Horse wrote:I am against the "eye test", it is vastly overrated.

Fury has achieved far more than Mason ever did.

Mason does not deserve to be compared favourably to Fury.

Yes, every more accomplished fighter always wins.

It would be different if Fury only did a little more, but you're comparing a lineal and unified champion to someone who won a vacant British title and defended once against someone with 3 losses including one to someone called Tony Tricker. Forget Fury, Chisora has achieved levels above Mason.

crusader wrote:Does Mason beat Wlad too?

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:

BitPlayer wrote:

SaadOffTheDeck wrote: Yes, every more accomplished fighter always wins.

It would be different if Fury only did a little more, but you're comparing a lineal and unified champion to someone who won a vacant British title and defended once against someone with 3 losses including one to someone called Tony Tricker. Forget Fury, Chisora has achieved levels above Mason.

None of that matters if they shared a ring. Biggs was as good a win as chisora. Obviously wlad is a much bigger win but it certainly wasn't a fight that screamed elite level. Quite the opposite. I don't think either wlad or fury sees 7 rounds with Lewis that night.

BitPlayer wrote:

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:

BitPlayer wrote: It would be different if Fury only did a little more, but you're comparing a lineal and unified champion to someone who won a vacant British title and defended once against someone with 3 losses including one to someone called Tony Tricker. Forget Fury, Chisora has achieved levels above Mason.

None of that matters if they shared a ring. Biggs was as good a win as chisora. Obviously wlad is a much bigger win but it certainly wasn't a fight that screamed elite level. Quite the opposite. I don't think either wlad or fury sees 7 rounds with Lewis that night.

Maybe the first time he beat Chisora.

mimmy123 wrote:

Horse wrote:

mimmy123 wrote:So we gonna start the name calling again.

This time I wont be sending you any private messages offering olive branches. Im not stupid fella I save lives.

That's why I think that you are trolling.

So you misfit you have only just established that after over 6000 posts ive made. And many decent posts. While you, you are the biggest vile troll I know on here. Do not ever reply to me again, If you do its clear that you want me to then reply as you are the troll, you say vile nasty things to people so you get a reaction. Look up the definition of trolling. Then look at your filthy stained Y fronts.

mickey1975 wrote:

thechump wrote:

mickey1975 wrote: No he wouldn't. You're all going to have to live with the fact you can't change the result. As you're a scouser, I expect you'll find that virtually impossible.

If geography is too big a word for you it means do you know areas? Cause im not a scouser im from the wirral which is not liverpool,i have the accent but not from there sorry pal and lets not turn this into manchester vs liverpool cause i have supported john and joe murray ricky hatton jamie moore michael gomez michael brodie anthony crolla etc etc so kets not say uts cause of were i am from and were fury is from cause thats not true,i also support all the liverpool boxers,i dislike tony bellew sometimes with some of the things he says but still im absolutley chuffed he has done what he set out to do in this sport and thats secure him and his families future. I also cant stand paul smith but i used to support till i seen some of the sh1te he used to put on facebook and twitter as if he is the encyclopedia of boxing.

So you're a plastic scouser? I'm surprised with your PHD in geography that you think Lancaster is in Manchester.... The people from there are about as Mancunian as you are Scouse.

Boxerbeetle wrote:

thechump wrote:

mimmy123 wrote:
Fury isnt in the league of the Greatest. I would put Fury around the British decent fighters such as Gary Mason and thats being kind in my opinion as Fury never reached his peak or full potential.

Fury vs lewis = lewis by k.o
Fury vs bruno = bruno by k.o
Fury vs mason = mason by k.o
Fury vs herbie hide = hide points
Fury vs cooper= fury by k.o
Fury vs Henry akinwande = points win fury
Fury vs joe bugner= bugner points
Fury vs julius francis= fury k.o
Fury vs prime danny williams = williams by k.o
Fury vs joshua =joshua devastating k.o

So 2 of the hardest punching heavyweights ever, Lewis & Bruno, beat Fury by ko, but Joshua beats Fury by devastating ko? Why the difference?

Horse wrote:

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Definitely

Credit should be given to those who have achieved something, rather than those that people think looked pretty good.

Fury is leagues above Mason.