Page 5 of 5
Re: Pulev vs. Joshua Oct. 28th
Posted: 22 Oct 2017, 18:14
by Ilya Muromets
candyslim wrote:The way the division is losing its top stars: Klitschko, Fury, probably Ortiz, effectively Haye, and Povetkin showing signs of decline (that might have been a bad day but at 38 his days are surely numbered) it looks like Pulev might be up for another shot soon if he wants it.
There are plenty of candidates for the vacancies but first the buggers need to show some ambition and start fighting each other.
I've always loved the heavyweight division but I can certainly understand why some boxing fans have lost patience and lost interest.
ps x2x thank you for fixing my typo

Ha! See I'm not entirely bad!
The western boxing mafia has blackballed Povetkin who is the real #1 contender. There are good up and coming heavies, mostly from Russia and eastern Europe I think, and maybe even from China, i hope, because that would be great for boxing. I like to see the worldwide proliferation of heavyweights because through the 1990's the world heavyweight championship was really just a US and UK championship.
Re: Pulev vs. Joshua Oct. 28th
Posted: 23 Oct 2017, 02:57
by candyslim
The more the merrier, bring them on !

Re: Pulev vs. Joshua Oct. 28th
Posted: 23 Oct 2017, 03:06
by candyslim
KiwiRider wrote:How do we, as boxing fans, get across that we don't care about unbeaten records?
I'm sick of soft matchups.
If your unbeaten, then your either the baddest in your weight class, or you have not challenged yourself. There is only one baddest, the rest fall into the latter category
Can we truthfully say that though? Look at Izu Ugonoh. Adrian Granat, John Wesley Nofire, Nick Asberry, Ed Latimore. Once regarded as decent prospects and now largely forgotten. I guess you could say some need to get back in the saddle, but I think we as fans do have a tendency to write people off after a loss or two. It's unhelpful.
Re: Pulev vs. Joshua Oct. 28th
Posted: 23 Oct 2017, 05:04
by KiwiRider
candyslim wrote:KiwiRider wrote:How do we, as boxing fans, get across that we don't care about unbeaten records?
I'm sick of soft matchups.
If your unbeaten, then your either the baddest in your weight class, or you have not challenged yourself. There is only one baddest, the rest fall into the latter category
Can we truthfully say that though? Look at Izu Ugonoh. Adrian Granat, John Wesley Nofire, Nick Asberry, Ed Latimore. Once regarded as decent prospects and now largely forgotten. I guess you could say some need to get back in the saddle, but I think we as fans do have a tendency to write people off after a loss or two. It's unhelpful.
I can. Some guys redeem themselves if they get a chance. Pac is no less because of his losses, well, maybe his last one.George Groves got more popular after losing. But it's rare today.
Re: Pulev vs. Joshua Oct. 28th
Posted: 23 Oct 2017, 15:15
by candyslim
I'm with you Kiwi. Some of the greatest fighters in history have suffered losses, sometimes multiple losses, because they fought other fighters at the highest level. There are still many around of a similar mind-set, sadly not too many appear to be heavyweights. I think fans can play their part by getting behind those fighters who have come up short on occasion.
It's gratifying to note that Dillian Whyte's popularity hasn't been affected by his knockout loss at least, not in a bad way, there again maybe we are understandably more forgiving of Joshua victims. Curiously Whyte doesn't even recognize that deteat. The daft bugger reports his record as being however many wins it is, and '0'

Re: Pulev vs. Joshua Oct. 28th
Posted: 23 Oct 2017, 15:32
by KiwiRider
candyslim wrote:I'm with you Kiwi. Some of the greatest fighters in history have suffered losses, sometimes multiple losses, because they fought other fighters at the highest level. There are still many around of a similar mind-set, sadly not too many appear to be heavyweights. I think fans can play their part by getting behind those fighters who have come up short on occasion.
It's gratifying to note that Dillian Whyte's popularity hasn't been affected by his knockout loss at least, not in a bad way, there again maybe we are understandably more forgiving of Joshua victims. Curiously Whyte doesn't even recognize that deteat. The daft bugger reports his record as being however many wins it is, and '0'


besides Rocky, I can't name a boxing HW great who retired undefeated. I'm sure some of you lot can, but the greatest fighters in The HW division of the last 40 years all lost. Floyd sold everyone on the being undefeated thing, as a product,, and they bought it.
So now you get a whole cavalcade of fighters hanging onto their "0" for dear life. Never fighting the big fights in their prime. Dissapoining fans. Wilder is a prime example, he is less popular than he was 2 years ago. If he fought Wlad after Stiverne and lost, then came back from it he would have a huge following. And our respect
Re: Pulev vs. Joshua Oct. 28th
Posted: 23 Oct 2017, 15:42
by Ilya Muromets
I think the promoters like the zero, particularly on little known fighters. Good for business. Sells tickets. Puts asses in seats.
Re: Pulev vs. Joshua Oct. 28th
Posted: 23 Oct 2017, 18:06
by Kalan
Believe me the "0" does not help put asses in the seats...
Dempsey and Louis took early losses... They were much better draws than Marciano who went undefeated for his entire career but had no charisma.. He was a guy you'd expect to find behind the counter at the local pizzeria...or the mechanic you'd expect to talk to about your car -- no glamour, no glitz... Arnold Gjergjaj was 29-0 for Haye and everybody was critical of him.. Nobody had ever heard of him.. It was Haye who put the asses in those seats, not Gjergjaj.. Wilder is 38-0, with 37 KO wins.. Extremely impressive, but who is real excited about him??? Nobody.
Ali had losses for his biggest money making fights.. Holmes was undefeated for his first 48 and set no records for money or crowds, other than the Ali fight -- which was one of the worst mismatches imaginable, but people were fooled and many thought Ali had a chance... What was the richest Heavyweight fight of all time??? Lewis-Tyson and they had 5 losses between them.. Dempsey-Tunney I and II were the biggest drawing fights in the first 70 years of the 20th Century and neither was undefeated.. Mayweather might have been more of a draw because he went unbeaten.. We don't know that for sure.
So what puts asses in seats??? ... Fame and charisma.. Some guys know how to get ink and be well liked.. or hated.. Fans can't be ambivalent about you.
Re: Pulev vs. Joshua Oct. 28th
Posted: 24 Oct 2017, 05:28
by Ilya Muromets
Kalan wrote:Believe me the "0" does not help put asses in the seats...
Dempsey and Louis took early losses... They were much better draws than Marciano who went undefeated for his entire career but had no charisma.. He was a guy you'd expect to find behind the counter at the local pizzeria...or the mechanic you'd expect to talk to about your car -- no glamour, no glitz... Arnold Gjergjaj was 29-0 for Haye and everybody was critical of him.. Nobody had ever heard of him.. It was Haye who put the asses in those seats, not Gjergjaj.. Wilder is 38-0, with 37 KO wins.. Extremely impressive, but who is real excited about him??? Nobody.
Ali had losses for his biggest money making fights.. Holmes was undefeated for his first 48 and set no records for money or crowds, other than the Ali fight -- which was one of the worst mismatches imaginable, but people were fooled and many thought Ali had a chance... What was the richest Heavyweight fight of all time??? Lewis-Tyson and they had 5 losses between them.. Dempsey-Tunney I and II were the biggest drawing fights in the first 70 years of the 20th Century and neither was undefeated.. Mayweather might have been more of a draw because he went unbeaten.. We don't know that for sure.
So what puts asses in seats??? ... Fame and charisma.. Some guys know how to get ink and be well liked.. or hated.. Fans can't be ambivalent about you.
Well u r talking about fighters that are already big names. They comprise only a very small percentage of boxers in the world. If a local venue puts on a boxing show they’d rather headline Joe Schmo 10-0 all ko’s than Joe Schmo 1-9. Gjergjag would never had the opportunity to take his dive on tv againt Haye if he didn’t have that unbeaten record because that "sports entertainment’ thing was billed as a real fight and ridiculous as it was it would have been quite difficult to fabricate some interest in another “comeback’ fight vs. Joe Schmo 1-9. Two more fake wins for Haye there, di Mori and Gjerg. I wonder how much he paid them
Also your baloney about Marciano having ‘no glamor no glitz", what does that mean, he didn’t trash talk like what you see now? For a guy with no glamor, glitz, or charisma he did pretty well in show biz. He even had his own tv show. This very interesting episode is on Youtube, Rocky interviews Jackie Gleason...
https://youtu.be/Kq9MNX0nZQw
Re: Pulev vs. Joshua Oct. 28th
Posted: 24 Oct 2017, 07:02
by SteveO
Kalan wrote:Believe me the "0" does not help put asses in the seats...
Dempsey and Louis took early losses... They were much better draws than Marciano who went undefeated for his entire career but had no charisma.. He was a guy you'd expect to find behind the counter at the local pizzeria...or the mechanic you'd expect to talk to about your car -- no glamour, no glitz... Arnold Gjergjaj was 29-0 for Haye and everybody was critical of him.. Nobody had ever heard of him.. It was Haye who put the asses in those seats, not Gjergjaj.. Wilder is 38-0, with 37 KO wins.. Extremely impressive, but who is real excited about him??? Nobody.
Ali had losses for his biggest money making fights.. Holmes was undefeated for his first 48 and set no records for money or crowds, other than the Ali fight -- which was one of the worst mismatches imaginable, but people were fooled and many thought Ali had a chance... What was the richest Heavyweight fight of all time??? Lewis-Tyson and they had 5 losses between them.. Dempsey-Tunney I and II were the biggest drawing fights in the first 70 years of the 20th Century and neither was undefeated.. Mayweather might have been more of a draw because he went unbeaten.. We don't know that for sure.
So what puts asses in seats??? ... Fame and charisma.. Some guys know how to get ink and be well liked.. or hated.. Fans can't be ambivalent about you.
All so true
