BoxRec

gilgamesh wrote: ↑22 Jun 2019, 22:25 No. Hence the joke. It's kinda a 5 year old thing to do. Similar to his arguments.

Susej_SOG wrote: ↑22 Jun 2019, 22:27 Your arguments were "Huck was too good because he had like 50 title defenses", yeah, Narváez did the same and he is not on a top-20 of the 112, and never was near of a top-30.

But well, im talking about boxing with a guy that thinks Pacquiao (40 years old version) hits harder than Thurman that probably will be fighting in 154 next year

jamamb wrote: ↑22 Jun 2019, 22:29 the ketchup hate is real

gilgamesh wrote: ↑22 Jun 2019, 22:29 When did I say Pac hits harder than Thurman?

Huck would have to rank as one of the Top 10 all time Cruiserweights. Whereas Narvaez does not rank in the upper echelon of his weight class, so once again your argument and logic is deeply flawed.

gilgamesh wrote: ↑22 Jun 2019, 20:16 I'm not sure he would stop Lopez, but I'm with you on your overall point that Thurman is no bigger a puncher at the weight than Pac is.

It really says a lot about Thurman, and the kind of Champion he's seen as that he's still seen as either 50/50 or a slight underdog against a 40 year old Pacquiao. I guess it also speaks to Pac's greatness, and how revered he is, but when a guy is 40, and fighting in his like 10 or 12th weight class, if you call yourself a Champion of any description you should be able to beat that guy.

oogiebe wrote: ↑22 Jun 2019, 22:31 More importantly guys, putting ketchup on your steak is blasphemous. If the steak is as bad as Susie-Q's post, no amount of ketchup could make it ingestible.

jamamb wrote: ↑22 Jun 2019, 22:33 how do you guys rate cheese on steak then

jamamb wrote: ↑22 Jun 2019, 22:33 how do you guys rate cheese on steak then

gilgamesh wrote: ↑22 Jun 2019, 22:35 I put nothing on a steak personally. Any kinda sauce or whatever f*cks up the flavor.

Susej_SOG wrote: ↑22 Jun 2019, 22:34 Here, and it's equally stup.id Say that Pacquiao has the same power than a guy that is 10 pounds or more heavier than him





Well, if Huck is a top 10, that say all about the weakest division in boxing history

jamamb wrote: ↑22 Jun 2019, 22:41 hmm, this thread has left me with some things to think about regarding steak and ketchup and cheese

boxing? well, best we all forget about that stuff posted on this thread

jamamb wrote: ↑22 Jun 2019, 22:41 hmm, this thread has left me with some things to think about regarding steak and ketchup and cheese

boxing? well, best we all forget about that stuff posted on this thread

jamamb wrote: ↑22 Jun 2019, 22:51 true, maybe just amputate the last 3 pages or so

gilgamesh wrote: ↑22 Jun 2019, 22:39 I haven't seen Thurman knock out anybody that Pac couldn't so I stand by that statement. He SHOULD have more power than Pac being the bigger man, but he's never shown it in his biggest fights.

And Huck is definitely a Top 10 all time Cruiserweight. And the fact that you don't know this says it all about you, and your supposed knowledge of Boxing.

oogiebe wrote: ↑22 Jun 2019, 22:53 Someone's very hyper focused on you Gil.

gilgamesh wrote: ↑22 Jun 2019, 22:56 And I got f*ck all going on tonight so I'm kinda enjoying being in wise-ass comedian mode

oogiebe wrote: ↑22 Jun 2019, 22:58 I'll stay tuned in then and enjoy the show.

gilgamesh wrote: ↑22 Jun 2019, 22:56 Once again putting words into my mouth. Garbled, unintelligible words in a broken language.

I certainly didn't say Canelo and Jacobs hit as hard as Golovkin that's for goddamn sure.

As for whether or not Thurman hits harder than Pacquiao or not. It honestly doesn't matter. He's not a big puncher at Welterweight. Neither of them are.

oogiebe wrote: ↑22 Jun 2019, 22:53 Someone's very hyper focused on you Gil.