Re: Jarrell Miller vs. Bogdan Dinu - November 17, 2018
Posted: 20 Nov 2018, 05:49
Makes it even sadder for Whyte who has won and defended that stupid silver belt a few times, and then they bump him out from a shot at Wilder, and put Brazeale ( who has had one decent fight since his loss to AJ) in the #1 spot.jamamb wrote: ↑20 Nov 2018, 04:40spot onLackeos wrote: ↑20 Nov 2018, 00:04Yep, accurate. The most fair way to judge if a fighter has earned a shot to a great degree, an average amount, or a below average amount, is to just compare what he's done to everyone else in the division. There are some people in boxing forums who have this unrealistic standard for what it takes to earn a title shot, but the most objective standard is to just look at what everyone else did to earn it.jamamb wrote: ↑19 Nov 2018, 09:26 hes done more then wilder and aj had done, and done more then several of there title opponents had done. i mean for example he easily beat johann duhaupas and gerald washington, and both of those guys had already had title shots but he hasnt. other less proven guys who fought for titles recently : andy ruiz, hughie fury, raz cojanu, charles martin, artur szpilka.tyson fury really wasnt much more proven if at all either. and joe parker had only really beaten takam before getting his wbo shot, and stiverne only really beaten 40 year old ray austin and arreola before his.
most champs actually hadnt done all that much before getting shots. these days its pretty rare to have someone super proven before getting a title shot.
miller is probably the 2nd most proven out of hws who havent got a title shot yet (behind whyte, who at least already got a fight vs one of the big names)
Probably about one-third of recent heavyweight title challengers didn't even have a single scalp as good as Washington when they got the call to fight for a title. At least half of recent HW title challengers don't have a scalp as good as Duhaupas, and among those that do, some didn't have a second decent win.![]()