Re: Sugar Ray Leonard's Most Extraordinary Performance at Welterweight
Posted: 17 Apr 2019, 10:43
Agreed. He fought and in a great era and was the best of that era. That says a lot.
A fighter can be the 2nd, third, fourth best fighter in one era and be better than a guy that is first in another era. Happens all the time.
When rating fighters, you have to take the good with the bad. Bad losses should be held up against a fighter. Great wins should count for a lot. You weigh them against each other when rating a fighter. In this case it clearly shows that Leonard was better than Griffith at both welter and when rating in totality without regard to a specific weight class. The film of the two confirms this. Leonard deserves to be rated as the #2 welter of all time and in the top 10 overall. Griffith was a great fighter but clearly not at that level.
A fighter can be the 2nd, third, fourth best fighter in one era and be better than a guy that is first in another era. Happens all the time.
When rating fighters, you have to take the good with the bad. Bad losses should be held up against a fighter. Great wins should count for a lot. You weigh them against each other when rating a fighter. In this case it clearly shows that Leonard was better than Griffith at both welter and when rating in totality without regard to a specific weight class. The film of the two confirms this. Leonard deserves to be rated as the #2 welter of all time and in the top 10 overall. Griffith was a great fighter but clearly not at that level.