BoxRec

jamamb wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 14:53

ironbeard wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 10:14 I had it 115-111 real time. There were a minimum of 8 rounds that could have gone either way. A draw was entirely appropriate.

116-110

"Rd 12 = good night irene. Another Kd. Sick the eff down. No the fvck way Fury won this.

10-8 Wilder

116-110 Wilder"

did he scored it 116-110 Wilder? i didn't know that Adelaide Byrd is posting on here

jamamb wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 14:53

ironbeard wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 10:14 I had it 115-111 real time. There were a minimum of 8 rounds that could have gone either way. A draw was entirely appropriate.

116-110

"Rd 12 = good night irene. Another Kd. Sick the eff down. No the fvck way Fury won this.

10-8 Wilder

116-110 Wilder"

Thanks for the reminder. That’s the way I saw it at the time. I gave Wilder 6 of the close rounds.

Difference is I never whined about the result, beyond defending myself and the draw.

jamesmcdonnell wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 14:34 I think Fury's got the right skillset to dominate ruiz in a fairly boring comfortable win.

i share that view. since tyson doesn't feel obliged
to easily beat ruiz, the whole game changes in his
favour.

tobyh5 wrote: ↑11 Jul 2019, 16:46

SportsRatings wrote: ↑08 Jul 2019, 13:12


If Fury had stayed down one second longer, there would be no arguing Wilder is #1. So he has to be considered a candidate for #1 in a logical sense.

If my mum had bollocks, she'd be my dad.

Stupid fcking comment

Not a stupid comment. It shows how close the fight was. When the "winner" was 1/2 second from clearly being a knockout loser, then the fight was close, very close. So Wilder was very, very close to being considered #1.

I assume your Mom isn't close, at all, to having bollocks, so that's a stupid fcking comparison.

Though maybe your Mom has one ball like Hitler, I don't know