BoxRec

oogiebe wrote: ↑13 Nov 2023, 17:11

Redback Rasta wrote: ↑13 Nov 2023, 15:34

SendoTakeshi97 wrote: ↑13 Nov 2023, 06:46 Little wonder this forum is on its last legs. It is inhabited by a small group of lunatics nobody would bother wasting their time with.

Never a truer word spoken. 6-8 years ago this place was not only busy, the conversation was actually adult level. I hadn't posted for some time and came back recently to find a little nuthouse in its place. Sad, but it is amazing how much a small minority of nutters can do.

The conversations here haven't been adult in a decade or more.

Oh, is that right, Mr Poopypants??

Redback Rasta wrote: ↑13 Nov 2023, 15:34

SendoTakeshi97 wrote: ↑13 Nov 2023, 06:46 Little wonder this forum is on its last legs. It is inhabited by a small group of lunatics nobody would bother wasting their time with.

Never a truer word spoken. 6-8 years ago this place was not only busy, the conversation was actually adult level. I hadn't posted for some time and came back recently to find a little nuthouse in its place. Sad, but it is amazing how much a small minority of nutters can do.

Likewise, took a similar hiatus and OMFG, now there are some childish, sick, dumb MF's on these boards.

It really depends on the subject matter and the reasons behind threads.
Create a boxing thread in the boxing part of the forum in all good faith to chat about boxing and it'll get the respect it's due.
Create a thread about mistakes a boxer has made in the past just in an attempt to undermine and be snidey about it and it'll be given the respect it's due.

This thread was given the right amount of respect.

oogiebe wrote: ↑13 Nov 2023, 17:11

Redback Rasta wrote: ↑13 Nov 2023, 15:34

SendoTakeshi97 wrote: ↑13 Nov 2023, 06:46 Little wonder this forum is on its last legs. It is inhabited by a small group of lunatics nobody would bother wasting their time with.

Never a truer word spoken. 6-8 years ago this place was not only busy, the conversation was actually adult level. I hadn't posted for some time and came back recently to find a little nuthouse in its place. Sad, but it is amazing how much a small minority of nutters can do.

The conversations here haven't been adult in a decade or more.

It has never been as tragic as it is right now. Some of these absolute twats who have only been here 2 or 3 years have f....ed the place beyond repair.

NazNaci1 wrote: ↑13 Nov 2023, 17:19

Redback Rasta wrote: ↑13 Nov 2023, 15:34

SendoTakeshi97 wrote: ↑13 Nov 2023, 06:46 Little wonder this forum is on its last legs. It is inhabited by a small group of lunatics nobody would bother wasting their time with.

Never a truer word spoken. 6-8 years ago this place was not only busy, the conversation was actually adult level. I hadn't posted for some time and came back recently to find a little nuthouse in its place. Sad, but it is amazing how much a small minority of nutters can do.

Likewise, took a similar hiatus and OMFG, now there are some childish, sick, dumb MF's on these boards.

It would be funny if it wasn't so sad. This forum will never recover while this small band of mental midgets drag it down to sheltered workshop level.

says the guy who started this thread

margaret thatcher wrote: ↑13 Nov 2023, 19:16 says the guy who started this thread :lol:

Says one of mental midgets doing their utmost to derail the thread. Little wonder this forum is on the bones of its butt with the dribble you and your equally socially retarded mate post.

Redback Rasta wrote: ↑13 Nov 2023, 19:34

margaret thatcher wrote: ↑13 Nov 2023, 19:16 says the guy who started this thread

Says one of mental midgets doing their utmost to derail the thread. Little wonder this forum is on the bones of its butt with the dribble you and your equally socially retarded mate post.

threads about boxers smoking some weed 15 years ago add no quality to the forum anyway

Rasta, a bit of truth from yourself here. You didn't start this thread for an adult discussion, you started it for a reaction.
It's been clear with your posts that you're extremely anti-Joshua, and that goes hand in hand with your even extremer anti-Hearn views; every few days there's something from you bitching about Hearn. Granted you're not the only one whom Hearn winds up, but you're certainly the most triggered and react the most.

Recent examples of your bias:

You pick Wilder to easily KO Joshua.
Washington gets mentioned as a possible opponent for Wilder, and you find that acceptable.
Washington gets mentioned as a possible opponent for Joshua, and it's a shit choice and unacceptable.
- That doesn't make sense, just pure bias and hating on Joshua

You put up a post criticising Joshua because he'd been bitching about his training camp with Robert Garcia. Only, if you'd bothered to read the article properly, you'd have realised that it was actually Robert Garcia who was doing the bitching.

You then did one of your usual anti-Eddie posts, criticising him for making 'an announcement about an announcement' for December 23rd in Saudi. You claimed it was a lot of empty words. Yet, once again, if you'd actually bothered to read the article properly instead of diving right in, you'd have realised that half those words were actually said by Fwank W.

Now, when someone makes mistakes like that, the 'adult' thing to do is to admit it and then move on. Instead, your ego came into play and you decided to double down on it, the hurt child option. Yet here you now are, complaining about how others aren't being adults. You could, of course, now take the adult route and admit your mistakes if you wanted?

It's because of your blatant bias and such examples that makes it clear that this thread was just you sounding off with your standard anti-AJ rhetoric. Look at the first page itself; you're clearly desperate to bring up his drug dealing past. You repeat mention it in your first 3 posts, just another clear indication that you're looking for a reaction. Well, your shit stirring attempt got a reaction, the thread turned into a shitshow, and now you're bitching about it. What really did you expect?

As for your faux indignation about AJ dealing weed (honestly, why on earth choose a username with Rasta in it if you're so against weed? You know Rastas believe it has healing properties and it has been proven to be correct), if you are so up in arms about that sort of thing then i'm looking forward to your next thread on why people with mental health problems shouldn't be housed with young children whilst high on a mix of cocaine and alcohol. I somehow doubt you'll do it though as the perpetrator in this instance doesn't fit your agenda.

As I previously said, stick to boxing talk without the obvious shit stirring and you'll end up with a good thread. Start one just looking for a reaction and this is what you'll get; weirdos like me and mags (OK, maybe just me) taking the piss out of your obvious bias and the resultant shitshow.

Time to draw a line under it.

The Gratest wrote: ↑13 Nov 2023, 17:18

oogiebe wrote: ↑13 Nov 2023, 17:11

Redback Rasta wrote: ↑13 Nov 2023, 15:34

Never a truer word spoken. 6-8 years ago this place was not only busy, the conversation was actually adult level. I hadn't posted for some time and came back recently to find a little nuthouse in its place. Sad, but it is amazing how much a small minority of nutters can do.

The conversations here haven't been adult in a decade or more.

Oh, is that right, Mr Poopypants??

Accused of exhibiting bias by someone who exhibits bias :lol:

ah yes, the type of grown up discussion you were talking about rasta

NAH AH YOURE BIASED!

very well thought out, mature response to the grate's post

Hard to believe some of you people have attained puberty.

i blame aj's spliffs for that

SendoTakeshi97 wrote: ↑14 Nov 2023, 00:13 Hard to believe some of you people have attained puberty.

I bet I'll be banned one day because of posts which I never wrote.
I didn't post anything in this thread before now

another sendo imposter

alright, who was it this time

margaret thatcher wrote: ↑13 Nov 2023, 22:02 ah yes, the type of grown up discussion you were talking about rasta

NAH AH YOURE BIASED!

very well thought out, mature response to the grate's post

I kind of expected that type of response.

I guess that's it until the next time AJ rides his e-scooter on the pavement or Eddie wears cargo trousers without socks

Deny, deflect and deflect some more.

Joshua apologists being Joshua apologists :OhYes:

Just out of interest, genuine question, why did you choose a username with 'Rasta' in it?

:doh:

and the deflection continues :lol:

Well there's that adult response again.
It was a genuine question, not sure why you can't answer rather than try to deflect?

The question has nothing to do with the topic of the thread. Zero :roll:

Deny, deflect and deflect again :lol: :lol:

Superior Black Race

But the question actually does have everything to do with the topic of the thread.

You, a person with a username of 'Rasta' who started the thread, have so far displayed the complete opposite of what true Rastas are.
The perception of Rastas are laid back cool kinda guys. They believe that weed contains healing properties, the use of marijuana is directed in biblical passages and that the “holy herb” induces a meditative state and brings them closer to the divine.
From this thread (and others) you have been extremely uptight, full of hate towards Eddie and Anthony, and informed us all about the evils of marijuana.

It just seems like such an extreme contrast that I just simply wondered why you would choose such a username when you feel so strongly against what a true Rasta is?

The thread has already turned into a shitshow and died from the main subject. I don't see why you couldn't just answer that simple question? Indeed, it appears that you are actually the one doing the deflecting as you now realise how inappropriate and somewhat embarrassing your username now is given your outspoken stance against something Anthony Joshua did 15 years ago.

So many words. So little substance and absolutely no relevance.

Deflect, deflect and deflect again :lol: :lol: