BoxRec

As long as Mahmoud Charr holds the WBA heavyweight “World Champion” belt, no one should recognize the existence of the WBA or anything related with them.
I’m supporting boxrec in this regard, even if they do it for the wrong reasons.

Who gets to decide what is or what isn’t a real world title organisation? Very tough question to answer. Is the IBO significantly less real than the WBA? Yea it probably is, but does it have to be forever??? What about WBF, GBO,…. Blah blah (I dunno if they exist l, but what makes a belt real? I guess it’s the recognition from the other belt, but still. I

JonnyKupfer wrote: ↑25 Sep 2024, 17:42 As long as Mahmoud Charr holds the WBA heavyweight “World Champion” belt, no one should recognize the existence of the WBA or anything related with them.
I’m supporting boxrec in this regard, even if they do it for the wrong reasons.

Dude….whatever you think of Charr…..it’s ridiculous for a database to act like Roberto Duran wasn’t a lightweight world champion in the 70s.

Childish and unprofessional decision by Boxrec. I do not like WBA, but come on now. At least include the Super Title..

And why is boxing scene censored to BS?

It was a bad idea for boxrec.com to eliminate all wba content ,i have to go over to fight fax now ,

We record all the titles and if you subscribe you can see them.