Peter McGrail versus Dennis McCann

Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32849
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: Peter McGrail versus Dennis McCann

Post by Boxerbeetle »

Ruthless-RKO wrote: 14 Jan 2025, 08:13
TheLeprechaun wrote: 13 Jan 2025, 18:55 Everyone is on these things
Some just haven’t been caught yet.

Or mask them?
The testing regime in boxing is a joke.
THEBUTCH
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6637
Joined: 27 Jan 2004, 08:51

Re: Peter McGrail versus Dennis McCann

Post by THEBUTCH »

As things currently stand it's a real shame. McCann is clearly a talent and it seemed well worth following his career.

The only saving grace at the moment is McGrail didn't take part in contest against someone who (at the moment) tested positive for a cocktail of banned substances !
SeanBrennan
Bantamweight
Posts: 9855
Joined: 12 Feb 2022, 12:45

Re: Peter McGrail versus Dennis McCann

Post by SeanBrennan »

Tren and Mast are heavy compounds, tren particularly - amazing he is on it and not in a good way. Tren I never found good for CV either, epic for strength and leanness but he will be sweating loads on that and if he is in any way inherently volatile will suffer if he runs anything over 200mg a week.

Mast I found to be good as a hardening agent for the physique although it caused my hair to fall out a lot.
Post Reply