Page 5 of 5
Re: Peter McGrail versus Dennis McCann
Posted: 14 Jan 2025, 08:34
by Boxerbeetle
Ruthless-RKO wrote: ↑14 Jan 2025, 08:13
Some just haven’t been caught yet.
Or mask them?
The testing regime in boxing is a joke.
Re: Peter McGrail versus Dennis McCann
Posted: 14 Jan 2025, 10:45
by THEBUTCH
As things currently stand it's a real shame. McCann is clearly a talent and it seemed well worth following his career.
The only saving grace at the moment is McGrail didn't take part in contest against someone who (at the moment) tested positive for a cocktail of banned substances !
Re: Peter McGrail versus Dennis McCann
Posted: 15 Jan 2025, 20:01
by SeanBrennan
Tren and Mast are heavy compounds, tren particularly - amazing he is on it and not in a good way. Tren I never found good for CV either, epic for strength and leanness but he will be sweating loads on that and if he is in any way inherently volatile will suffer if he runs anything over 200mg a week.
Mast I found to be good as a hardening agent for the physique although it caused my hair to fall out a lot.