Page 5 of 5
Posted: 08 Dec 2006, 07:56
by Autobarn
Should've stuck with Enzo's first WBO title defence.
Posted: 08 Dec 2006, 08:07
by Max Molyneux
nickd wrote:
Hurrah about fuccking time, they've known all week according to Harrison's old man.
RIP OFF MERCHANTS
If they did know about this all week then howcome Hughes was quoted on BBC as only speaking Harrison and his dad?
Posted: 08 Dec 2006, 08:31
by jamesmcdonnell
I think we have to take anything the Harrison camp says with a ladle full of salt, Hughes seems to be little more than a cheerleader, saying whatever suits Harrison best at the time.
Warren must have known there was a chance this would fall through, but as he had a contractual obligation to fulfill, and the BBBofC and the WBO agreed to the fight, what more could he do.
Sounds like Harrison was offered a non title affair for a payday, but either couldn't make 9 6, or wasn't interested, or maybe he was offered a reduced payday for the non title bout.
Either way, everyone has lost out here.
Posted: 08 Dec 2006, 08:37
by Max Molyneux
Oh dear Harrison has tax problems too and mix that with if Warren does take legal action!
http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/news/ ... _page.html
Harrison's messed up bad!
Posted: 08 Dec 2006, 08:38
by MTG
viciousmaussa wrote:KOJOE90 wrote:liamlion wrote:
Why's that?
Didn't F.Warren help the BBBofC out with a few ££££'s when Michael Watson sued them?
not exactly, he convinced them to sell off one of their buildings so they could pay Watson
THEY WERE TOLD TO SELL FROM THE ADMINISTRATORS,NOT WARREN