Page 5 of 6

Posted: 19 Jan 2007, 08:19
by Max Molyneux
Terence wrote:
achybreaky wrote:
Terence wrote: Since when do I make spelling mistakes you, you, peruser (I did that one on purpose) of trash-TV :TU:

Burn the pig! :lol:
Since when do i care enough to check your spelling you eogomaniac :TU:
You got me there, it's a fare kop guv :TU:

Max, you're just hurt because this Scouse Schlepper is caught up in it all! Beat Chelski tomorrow and you will be redeemed :box:
Chelsea will probably win, I don't follow football much anyway.

I bet fake Vcash on Eastsides forums On Liverpool though.

Posted: 19 Jan 2007, 08:19
by Achybreaky
Chesney_Chambers wrote:
achybreaky wrote: Then why give out the abuse if its not needed, also what was it to do with you anyway you complete bag of shite.
I was looking for a 'as plain as' analogy and that was the first one that sprung to mind after reading your post that said Terence was slating Shilpa
i will back off if im upsetting you.

You leave my Terence alone!

Posted: 19 Jan 2007, 08:19
by Max Molyneux
Hatton Vs Ali anyone? :D :wink:


Image

Posted: 19 Jan 2007, 08:33
by Max Molyneux
How big is the Hall Hatton and Urango fighting In at the Paris?

I hear It's only 4,500 seats.

Posted: 19 Jan 2007, 08:33
by Chesney_Chambers
achybreaky wrote:
Chesney_Chambers wrote:
achybreaky wrote: Then why give out the abuse if its not needed, also what was it to do with you anyway you complete bag of shite.
I was looking for a 'as plain as' analogy and that was the first one that sprung to mind after reading your post that said Terence was slating Shilpa
i will back off if im upsetting you.

You leave my Terence alone!
????????

I don't understand.....are you posting in code?

1) You can't upset me
2) I haven't criticised Terence, I criticised you for not getting his sarcastic\ironic post

Posted: 19 Jan 2007, 08:34
by Chesney_Chambers
Max Molyneux wrote:How big is the Hall Hatton and Urango fighting In at the Paris?

I hear It's only 4,500 seats.
I though I read that it was 7,000 with the possibility of adding another 3,000 depending on ticket sales

Posted: 19 Jan 2007, 09:06
by Achybreaky
Chesney_Chambers wrote:
achybreaky wrote:
Chesney_Chambers wrote: I was looking for a 'as plain as' analogy and that was the first one that sprung to mind after reading your post that said Terence was slating Shilpa
i will back off if im upsetting you.

You leave my Terence alone!
????????

I don't understand.....are you posting in code?

1) You can't upset me
2) I haven't criticised Terence, I criticised you for not getting his sarcastic\ironic post
I wouldnt want to upset you if you get this wound up over somebody elses posts.

The 'you leave my terence alone' is a jibe at you and im suggesting that your defence of his posts and the need to point out his meaning and the needless attack on me even though you had nothing to do with the conversation suggests that you in fact are in love with terence and cant handle anybody having a go at 'Your' terence.

Take that up to your pseudo intellectual pedestal and swivel.

Posted: 19 Jan 2007, 09:12
by Achybreaky
Terence wrote:Keep me out of this chaps. Chesney just appreciates a fellow Big Aud' fan :TU:
I was under the impression we were sound by the banter after the initial posts but then chessers had to throw his oar in for some reason. I got nothing against you.

Posted: 19 Jan 2007, 10:25
by Chesney_Chambers
achybreaky wrote:
Chesney_Chambers wrote:
achybreaky wrote: i will back off if im upsetting you.

You leave my Terence alone!
????????

I don't understand.....are you posting in code?

1) You can't upset me
2) I haven't criticised Terence, I criticised you for not getting his sarcastic\ironic post
I wouldnt want to upset you if you get this wound up over somebody elses posts.

The 'you leave my terence alone' is a jibe at you and im suggesting that your defence of his posts and the need to point out his meaning and the needless attack on me even though you had nothing to do with the conversation suggests that you in fact are in love with terence and cant handle anybody having a go at 'Your' terence.

Take that up to your pseudo intellectual pedestal and swivel.
You can pretend I'm wound up if you makes you happy :lol: (personally I fail to see how anybody can get wound up on a boxing forum)

This is a public forum and I've been heavily involved in this thread, so I am involved in the conversation. It doesn't matter if it was Terence or Penelope Pitstop who posted

She came over here from her shack in Indian and humiliated herself with her ability to speak six languages fluently and she cannot speak the gud English like wot we cahn.

Its just that I found it hilarious when you thought he was slagging off Shilpa, how did you manage to miss the irony/sarcasm in the post?

Peace

Love you Terence :wink:

Posted: 19 Jan 2007, 12:19
by Achybreaky
Chesney_Chambers wrote:
achybreaky wrote:
Chesney_Chambers wrote: ????????

I don't understand.....are you posting in code?

1) You can't upset me
2) I haven't criticised Terence, I criticised you for not getting his sarcastic\ironic post
I wouldnt want to upset you if you get this wound up over somebody elses posts.

The 'you leave my terence alone' is a jibe at you and im suggesting that your defence of his posts and the need to point out his meaning and the needless attack on me even though you had nothing to do with the conversation suggests that you in fact are in love with terence and cant handle anybody having a go at 'Your' terence.

Take that up to your pseudo intellectual pedestal and swivel.
You can pretend I'm wound up if you makes you happy :lol: (personally I fail to see how anybody can get wound up on a boxing forum)

This is a public forum and I've been heavily involved in this thread, so I am involved in the conversation. It doesn't matter if it was Terence or Penelope Pitstop who posted

She came over here from her shack in Indian and humiliated herself with her ability to speak six languages fluently and she cannot speak the gud English like wot we cahn.

Its just that I found it hilarious when you thought he was slagging off Shilpa, how did you manage to miss the irony/sarcasm in the post?

Peace

Love you Terence :wink:
Yawn

Posted: 19 Jan 2007, 12:29
by J
I have to say form a completely impartial point of view anyone who cant see that.................................

She came over here from her shack in Indian and humiliated herself with her ability to speak six languages fluently and she cannot speak the gud English like wot we cahn.


was ironic / satirical is rivalling Jade goody in the "who has the least brain cells 2007" competition.

Posted: 19 Jan 2007, 13:26
by E
achybreaky wrote:
White trash is not a racially motivated slur. The orgins of the term may come from a racially segregated past, but modern usage of the term places emphasis on the word "trash" or the labeling of someone as socially worthless. It is often used by lower class white people to stigmatize others within their class who are perceived to be more backward than the norm for their class. "White trash" are perceived as having crude manners, abnormally low moral standards, and lack of cultured behavior and/or education. Swearing, smoking, promiscuity, drunkenness, overly loud and animated behavior in public, and gambling (especially the copious purchase of scratch-style lottery tickets), and owning expensive cable television packages are examples of "white trash" vices. The label might be applied to a household that, for example, lives in a decrepit apartment or trailer, has a large family, lacks indoor plumbing, and has a yard strewn with debris or perhaps a non-functioning vehicle.


Not racism in my book by germain just absolutely spot on in his description of the situation at the time.
I really am not going to mince my words here - either you yourself are 'attempting' to be ironic or you are an imbecile, a total moron......

So to keep it simple:

White trash by definition is a racial insult as it: a) relates to a specific colour/race only and b) is a derogatory term.

I can't think of any more racially abusive term that can be applied to a white. Can you?

If, according to you, 'white trash' is not a racist term, then please enlighten me and provide to the forum the equivalent term which might be applied to black people....

Black Trash? GHetto trash?

Using your logic these are not racist....hmmmmm can't imagine the furore if these expressions were uttered.

Posted: 19 Jan 2007, 13:47
by jamesmcdonnell
Actually, White Trash is a comment about class not a racist jibe. For instance, if you are white and work on the New York Stock Exchange, the comment would be very unlikely to rankle.

Similarly, calling a black woman MP a 'ghetto hoochie' probably wouldn't cause too much offence.

Posted: 19 Jan 2007, 14:03
by Autobarn
I thought white trash were all sweaty uneducated people from rural Texas?

Posted: 19 Jan 2007, 14:07
by nickd
And there I was complaining I was bored with the Hatton v Witter talk, BACK TO THE FIGHT PLEASE FOR FUCKS SAKE.

Posted: 19 Jan 2007, 14:26
by jamesmcdonnell
Max Molyneux wrote:
jamesmcdonnell wrote:
Max Molyneux wrote:Hatton can backtrack all he likes.

Leagues above him In what? In Skill Witter's the better fighter.

Hatton said he wanted all the belts too and you won't see him touch even the winner of the Interim between Mosley and Callazo.

Hatton doesn't realise how easy he got to the top.

What are you basing this on. Witter struggled with Colin Lynes, almost lost to Kotelnik, and almost lost to N'dou despite knocking him down three times.

Just because Witter is flashy, doesn't make him more skilfull.

At the end of the day, Hatton was able to impose his style on Kostya Tszyu, who is head and shoulders better than anyone witter has fought by some considerable margin. End of.
Almost lost to Kotelnik? Kotelnik only came on late so no wonder he lost the fight.

If your going to say end of don't bother posting towards me.

Kessler Isn't a big name but you Joe has to fight him but because Witter Isn't a big name, Hatton doesn't need him!

Witter Is clearly more skillful than Hatton, Hatton Is no counter puncher, he roughs fighters up being big for the weight and wears them down with body shots.

Witter beats his opponents with counter punching and switch hitting.

Screw your Hatton double standard bias.
Someone has got sand in their vagina.

Posted: 19 Jan 2007, 17:13
by Floyd
viciousmaussa wrote:I thought white trash were all sweaty uneducated people from rural Texas?

Actually anywhere from the American south.

Posted: 19 Jan 2007, 17:49
by E
jamesmcdonnell wrote:Actually, White Trash is a comment about class not a racist jibe. For instance, if you are white and work on the New York Stock Exchange, the comment would be very unlikely to rankle.

Similarly, calling a black woman MP a 'ghetto hoochie' probably wouldn't cause too much offence.

Christ, you're not the sharpest tool in the box are you?

Maybe it is a classist remark as well, but as previously explained it is a derogatory term, and directed at someone purely of a specific race. Hence a racist remark...

Or does logical thought desert you because of your bizarre white self-loathing?

I'm sure if someone on the board called a black person 'black ghetto trash' you wouldn't be able to type quickly enough to castigate them....or will you be OK if this expression is used in future next time Floyd Mayweather or Zab Judah comes up?

You have, yet again, shown yourself to be a hypocrite as well lacking logic and to the ability to understand words and simple concepts.

Posted: 19 Jan 2007, 19:01
by Autobarn
Floyd wrote:
viciousmaussa wrote:I thought white trash were all sweaty uneducated people from rural Texas?

Actually anywhere from the American south.
yeah that's it, Southern Trash

Posted: 19 Jan 2007, 21:29
by Chesney_Chambers
Terence wrote:You crack a crap joke and this place becomes a US self-help group :roll:
Troublemaker

Posted: 20 Jan 2007, 02:49
by kevo
Terence wrote:You crack a crap joke and this place becomes a US self-help group :roll:
It made me laugh.

Posted: 20 Jan 2007, 06:14
by G-man
Max Molyneux wrote:How big is the Hall Hatton and Urango fighting In at the Paris?

I hear It's only 4,500 seats.
7,000 i think.

It's just shown a pic on SS News and the roof looks really low which should make for a cracking atmosphere - it looks like some sort of ballroom.

Posted: 20 Jan 2007, 07:01
by Achybreaky
E wrote:
achybreaky wrote:
White trash is not a racially motivated slur. The orgins of the term may come from a racially segregated past, but modern usage of the term places emphasis on the word "trash" or the labeling of someone as socially worthless. It is often used by lower class white people to stigmatize others within their class who are perceived to be more backward than the norm for their class. "White trash" are perceived as having crude manners, abnormally low moral standards, and lack of cultured behavior and/or education. Swearing, smoking, promiscuity, drunkenness, overly loud and animated behavior in public, and gambling (especially the copious purchase of scratch-style lottery tickets), and owning expensive cable television packages are examples of "white trash" vices. The label might be applied to a household that, for example, lives in a decrepit apartment or trailer, has a large family, lacks indoor plumbing, and has a yard strewn with debris or perhaps a non-functioning vehicle.


Not racism in my book by germain just absolutely spot on in his description of the situation at the time.
I really am not going to mince my words here - either you yourself are 'attempting' to be ironic or you are an imbecile, a total moron......

So to keep it simple:

White trash by definition is a racial insult as it: a) relates to a specific colour/race only and b) is a derogatory term.

I can't think of any more racially abusive term that can be applied to a white. Can you?

If, according to you, 'white trash' is not a racist term, then please enlighten me and provide to the forum the equivalent term which might be applied to black people....

Black Trash? GHetto trash?

Using your logic these are not racist....hmmmmm can't imagine the furore if these expressions were uttered.
Are you serious? you want to get out more mate.

Posted: 20 Jan 2007, 07:23
by Phenomenal-Nutrition
Well the term 'white trash' is American but we of course adopt everything American. In America both white and black people user the term 'whitetrash' or 'redneck' as pretty much their equivilent to 'chav scum'. The term 'ghetto trash' is also used more by black people and sometimes by white people, but not as often as they don't want to appear racist.

I don't think its racist perse because a black person couldn't call for example Tony Blair can't be referenced to all white people like the N word can be referenced to all black people. I've known educated African American people who I wouldn't consider racist in the slightest use the term in conversation to describe someones class not their race

Posted: 20 Jan 2007, 07:33
by E
achybreaky wrote:
E wrote:
achybreaky wrote:
White trash is not a racially motivated slur. The orgins of the term may come from a racially segregated past, but modern usage of the term places emphasis on the word "trash" or the labeling of someone as socially worthless. It is often used by lower class white people to stigmatize others within their class who are perceived to be more backward than the norm for their class. "White trash" are perceived as having crude manners, abnormally low moral standards, and lack of cultured behavior and/or education. Swearing, smoking, promiscuity, drunkenness, overly loud and animated behavior in public, and gambling (especially the copious purchase of scratch-style lottery tickets), and owning expensive cable television packages are examples of "white trash" vices. The label might be applied to a household that, for example, lives in a decrepit apartment or trailer, has a large family, lacks indoor plumbing, and has a yard strewn with debris or perhaps a non-functioning vehicle.


Not racism in my book by germain just absolutely spot on in his description of the situation at the time.
I really am not going to mince my words here - either you yourself are 'attempting' to be ironic or you are an imbecile, a total moron......

So to keep it simple:

White trash by definition is a racial insult as it: a) relates to a specific colour/race only and b) is a derogatory term.

I can't think of any more racially abusive term that can be applied to a white. Can you?

If, according to you, 'white trash' is not a racist term, then please enlighten me and provide to the forum the equivalent term which might be applied to black people....

Black Trash? GHetto trash?

Using your logic these are not racist....hmmmmm can't imagine the furore if these expressions were uttered.
Are you serious? you want to get out more mate.
You are a moron - you can't even pick up OBVIOUS irony in an earlier post claiming that one 'cannot detect irony in text'...

Funny, you should write a thesis on this - it would turn the world of literature on its head. Irony has been a literary mechanism recognised as early as PLato's Republic I believe.

If you want to ahem, attempt to question my logic above then do so, but glib remarks like 'you want to get out more mate' are unhelpful.

Or with your and your lover James's permission, I assume I have carte blanche to use the term 'black trash', 'ghetto trash' etc without reproach?

( Please Note: this last phrase is a subtle use of irony to prove my point, though you can take it literally if you want and confirm. (You can deny me allowance to use these terms, but this will essentially destroy your own position.)[/i]