Maskeev for Haye
Re: Maskeev for Haye
Line 10 top heavyweights up, have Haye and Klitschko each fight them, and I would be confident that the Ukrainian would beat more. However, I think the Hayemaker would have Vlad.
Haye struggles against shorter fighters who can put the pressure on, but excels against taller men, especially those with European tutelage. Klitschko’s is stamina is suspect enough to render the Haye stamina issue mute, and both seem to be vulnerable in the chin department.
Of course, one never knows how Haye will react when hit by a full blown heavyweight wearing 10 oz gloves, but I would actually argue that Haye has fought a higher caliber of opponent. Relevant to his weight division, he clearly hasn’t; but the paucity of heavyweight talent combined with the prestige of the heavyweight division means that simply awful fighters are hyped, gain exposure and settle into top ten positions. For years the cruiserweight division has been better quality, and has certainly had the better fights.
If Vlad can establish his jab or fight at his pace, Haye would be in an uphill battle, but in recent fights, the muscled Ukrainian has simply pawed with the jab, and fought in a painfully conservative manner in order to play the percentages, conserve his tiny stamina reserves, and protect his china chapes. I think Haye has enough to trouble Vlad, and take him out of his comfort zone, where, I suspect, the one-dimensional Klitschko will be pretty clueless. I think Haye will find Klitchko’s chin easily and early, and I believe he’d win.
An outrageous prediction, but it’s just a gut feeling. Haye is super confident, and rather, as he claims, than going after the best of the best, I suspect he’s cannily going against the champion he’s most likely to beat and framing it as chasing the king pin. Sometimes fighters ‘just know’ they’ll beat a certain other boxer. And I think David would, indeed, beat Klitschko.
Haye struggles against shorter fighters who can put the pressure on, but excels against taller men, especially those with European tutelage. Klitschko’s is stamina is suspect enough to render the Haye stamina issue mute, and both seem to be vulnerable in the chin department.
Of course, one never knows how Haye will react when hit by a full blown heavyweight wearing 10 oz gloves, but I would actually argue that Haye has fought a higher caliber of opponent. Relevant to his weight division, he clearly hasn’t; but the paucity of heavyweight talent combined with the prestige of the heavyweight division means that simply awful fighters are hyped, gain exposure and settle into top ten positions. For years the cruiserweight division has been better quality, and has certainly had the better fights.
If Vlad can establish his jab or fight at his pace, Haye would be in an uphill battle, but in recent fights, the muscled Ukrainian has simply pawed with the jab, and fought in a painfully conservative manner in order to play the percentages, conserve his tiny stamina reserves, and protect his china chapes. I think Haye has enough to trouble Vlad, and take him out of his comfort zone, where, I suspect, the one-dimensional Klitschko will be pretty clueless. I think Haye will find Klitchko’s chin easily and early, and I believe he’d win.
An outrageous prediction, but it’s just a gut feeling. Haye is super confident, and rather, as he claims, than going after the best of the best, I suspect he’s cannily going against the champion he’s most likely to beat and framing it as chasing the king pin. Sometimes fighters ‘just know’ they’ll beat a certain other boxer. And I think David would, indeed, beat Klitschko.
Re: Maskeev for Haye
Why do you make ridiculous comments like that? I can assure you I am one of the least uptight people in existence! Why would you make such an assumption just because someone doesn't agree with you? That smells of extreme arrogance.Max Molyneux wrote:http://www.BS.com/?m=show&id=14901
I'm not wether most you are uptight and need drugs for your high blood pressure when reading my post.
You can;t talk shit after being so duped about things like Hatton's stuff like the rest of them.
You act like you're the leading authority on everything, I think you'll find pretty much every poster here thinks you don't really have a clue.
Quite honestly I can't be bothered with you and your blinkered opinions and pisspoor posts anymore and will avoid them accordingly.
Have fun though.
-
Max Molyneux
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 7084
- Joined: 16 Aug 2004, 16:53
Re: Maskeev for Haye
nickd wrote:Why do you make ridiculous comments like that? I can assure you I am one of the least uptight people in existence! Why would you make such an assumption just because someone doesn't agree with you? That smells of extreme arrogance.Max Molyneux wrote:http://www.BS.com/?m=show&id=14901
I'm not wether most you are uptight and need drugs for your high blood pressure when reading my post.
You can;t talk shit after being so duped about things like Hatton's stuff like the rest of them.
You act like you're the leading authority on everything, I think you'll find pretty much every poster here thinks you don't really have a clue.
Quite honestly I can't be bothered with you and your blinkered opinions and pisspoor posts anymore and will avoid them accordingly.
Have fun though.
Because I get Insults on my opinions and lack of posters being civil, so It seems like their Insecure. None of you who have replied to me with a lack of civil posting can say It reeks of arrogance. Most of you guys reek of double standards.
I don't act or Intend like I'm the leading authority I keep discussing with you and eventually most of you get too fustrated and wrongly assume shit like that.
See, your being hypocritical and contradicting, you were blinkered for Hatton like the rest of them till Floyd beat him and you've said you can't be bothered with my posts before.
Re: Maskeev for Haye
This time it's for real, your iliteracy hurts my mind.Max Molyneux wrote:nickd wrote:Why do you make ridiculous comments like that? I can assure you I am one of the least uptight people in existence! Why would you make such an assumption just because someone doesn't agree with you? That smells of extreme arrogance.Max Molyneux wrote:http://www.BS.com/?m=show&id=14901
I'm not wether most you are uptight and need drugs for your high blood pressure when reading my post.
You can;t talk shit after being so duped about things like Hatton's stuff like the rest of them.
You act like you're the leading authority on everything, I think you'll find pretty much every poster here thinks you don't really have a clue.
Quite honestly I can't be bothered with you and your blinkered opinions and pisspoor posts anymore and will avoid them accordingly.
Have fun though.
Because I get Insults on my opinions and lack of posters being civil, so It seems like their Insecure. None of you who have replied to me with a lack of civil posting can say It reeks of arrogance. Most of you guys reek of double standards.
I don't act or Intend like I'm the leading authority I keep discussing with you and eventually most of you get too fustrated and wrongly assume shit like that.
See, your being hypocritical and contradicting, you were blinkered for Hatton like the rest of them till Floyd beat him and you've said you can't be bothered with my posts before.
-
Max Molyneux
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 7084
- Joined: 16 Aug 2004, 16:53
Re: Maskeev for Haye
Stylewise though Oleg Is made for Haye, Sam Peter Is a limted over bulky fighter so no wonder Oleg was competitive. Peter has a heavily padded record.Terry D wrote:Haye could fight King Kong on crack and people would complain. Maskaeev is a decent opponent. Especially if he can do for him better than Sam did.
I personally hope, and pray, that Toney beats Peter and comes over here to fight Haye. I would kill someone else's dog in order to see Toney fight live.
-
Max Molyneux
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 7084
- Joined: 16 Aug 2004, 16:53
Re: Maskeev for Haye
Terry D wrote:Max, not being funny mate but you seem to have difficulties with metaphors and irony, plus take a literalist approach, perhaps that is why you take things the wrong way. You may not be able to help that, for reasons given by you a few times, but try to count to 10 before you call people retards, all joking aside it does not sound like banter.
Sorry to come across all Ghandi. I've just got the new Nas album.
He put up a good fight though. It will be a decent win for Haye on paper and as a point of comparison.Max Molyneux wrote:StylewiseTerry D wrote:Haye could fight King Kong on crack and people would
complain. Maskaeev is a decent opponent. Especially if he can do for
him better than Sam did.
I personally hope, and pray, that Toney
beats Peter and comes over here to fight Haye. I would kill someone
else's dog in order to see Toney fight live.
though Oleg Is made for Haye, Sam Peter Is a limted over bulky fighter
so no wonder Oleg was competitive. Peter has a heavily padded record.
Don't feel like I take things the wrong way, feels the other way around since the replies I get seem to have anger In them or over sensitivity. I never used to call people retards until It seemed that they refused to give a civil disagreement to my posts.
Rap music eh, I'm more of a heavy metal man. Rap music doesn't get me pumped, especially when exercising 8)
Re: Maskeev for Haye
Peter is the number two fighter in the division and has fought Klitschko and beaten: Toney x2, McCline and Maskaev, so his record is not padded it is actually a good solid record with good names on it.Max Molyneux wrote:Stylewise though Oleg Is made for Haye, Sam Peter Is a limted over bulky fighter so no wonder Oleg was competitive. Peter has a heavily padded record.
Every fighter is limited, Max, but it has not stopped Peter beating a lot of good fighters. Oleg was a World champion only a few months ago, so for Haye to fight him (if he does) in his next fight would be very impressive (whether Makaev's style is "made" for Haye or not).
-
Max Molyneux
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 7084
- Joined: 16 Aug 2004, 16:53
Re: Maskeev for Haye
It will be an easy fight for Haye though and will hardly test him, thats my problem, Oleg's lost any reflexes he once had and has a bad chin as well. His right hand won't be dangerous without decent reflexes.
Yeah before those names, he had a padded record and shouldn't of been ranked so high. He lost the 1st Toney fight, lost the Klitschko once and 3 of those names aren't what they once were.
Yeah before those names, he had a padded record and shouldn't of been ranked so high. He lost the 1st Toney fight, lost the Klitschko once and 3 of those names aren't what they once were.
Re: Maskeev for Haye
Is there any pleasing you? Who are the good fighters at heavyweight? Oleg can still punch and is ranked in the top 10 of the independent rankings, he is not a bad opponent for a heavyweight novice.Max Molyneux wrote:It will be an easy fight for Haye though and will hardly test him, thats my problem, Oleg's lost any reflexes he once had and has a bad chin as well. His right hand won't be dangerous without decent reflexes.
Yeah before those names, he had a padded record and shouldn't of been ranked so high. He lost the 1st Toney fight, lost the Klitschko once and 3 of those names aren't what they once were.
Re: Maskeev for Haye
I'm a Rock fan. For my jog last night I was listening to "Punk Goes Crunk". That is some weird stuff (Crunk converted to Pop-Punk)! My favourite cover is the Big Tymers song, "Still Fly".Terry D wrote:Well, sounds reasonable enough.Max Molyneux wrote:Don't feel like I take things the wrong way, feels the other way around since the replies I get seem to have anger In them or over sensitivity. I never used to call people retards until It seemed that they refused to give a civil disagreement to my posts.
Rap music eh, I'm more of a heavy metal man. Rap music doesn't get me pumped, especially when exercising 8)
Rap in general. Rock for specifics. I am a big prog-rock fan myself. Gets me pumped up to f*ck all on a Sunday afternoon.
-
Khaosai-Galaxy
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 2739
- Joined: 29 Apr 2007, 12:15
Re: Maskeev for Haye
I once fucked the bass player from Elastica
She was a bit rough, frankly
She was a bit rough, frankly