Page 5 of 5
Re: MCCLOSKEY V LYNES BRIT TITLE
Posted: 07 Dec 2008, 10:46
by Dioufy
How can I give you a few examples of when you never acknowledge you're wrong?
Think about it, plausible deniability is a bitch.
Now, let's not ruin this thread anymore. The "Spitter" wants to talk boxing, not this crap.
..................

Re: MCCLOSKEY V LYNES BRIT TITLE
Posted: 07 Dec 2008, 10:52
by slapbangwhallop
Dioufy wrote:How can I give you a few examples of when you never acknowledge you're wrong?
Think about it, plausible deniability is a bitch.
Now, let's not ruin this thread anymore. The "Spitter" wants to talk boxing, not this crap.
..................

Logic isnt your strong point is it! Well what you could do is give me an example when I was wrong and then when I the fact that i wrong has been highlight and I didnt acknowledge it - I would say that that is an "example of when I never acknowledge I am wrong"
as I thought, if you are faced with your bullshit statements you would run and hide. tosspot!
Re: MCCLOSKEY V LYNES BRIT TITLE
Posted: 07 Dec 2008, 14:38
by harrygreb
i was ringside supporting lynes and i thought he looked very relaxed coming in to the ring. too relaxed! no edge to his boxing at all which is understandable as we all have off nights. but tacticly way off the game which is not understandable and not acceptable. wait for the guy to come in and catch him with the jab. dont try to find him with leads - the fella is too elusive. fair play to paul he fought the right fight and never looked flustered. a cool head and good movement and a great attitude. good luck for the future.
i'll allow a good fighter only one occasion of quitting on your stool in a career. this is twice. i think colin has lost the heart for the fight game and should retire now.
Re: MCCLOSKEY V LYNES BRIT TITLE
Posted: 07 Dec 2008, 16:07
by stujones
harrygreb wrote:
i'll allow a good fighter only one occasion of quitting on your stool in a career. this is twice. i think colin has lost the heart for the fight game and should retire now.
Is something that is a concern, but they were not in consequitive fights. Lynes did go on after Daws to have his best spell in his career.
Re: MCCLOSKEY V LYNES BRIT TITLE
Posted: 07 Dec 2008, 16:34
by harrygreb
true stu, but i think it may be something less in his head and more in his general health - i know i said his heart may not be in it but i now think its a combination of all these factors. i hope colin comes back and wins back at least a british title, i really do.
Re: MCCLOSKEY V LYNES BRIT TITLE
Posted: 07 Dec 2008, 16:50
by fatton
sligobhoy67 wrote:Dioufy wrote:How can I give you a few examples of when you never acknowledge you're wrong?
Think about it, plausible deniability is a bitch.
Now, let's not ruin this thread anymore. The "Spitter" wants to talk boxing, not this crap.
..................

Logic isnt your strong point is it! Well what you could do is give me an example when I was wrong and then when I the fact that i wrong has been highlight and I didnt acknowledge it - I would say that that is an "example of when I never acknowledge I am wrong"
as I thought, if you are faced with your bullshit statements you would run and hide. tosspot!
Take it outside girls.
Re: MCCLOSKEY V LYNES BRIT TITLE
Posted: 07 Dec 2008, 21:52
by SticknMove
stujones wrote:harrygreb wrote:
i'll allow a good fighter only one occasion of quitting on your stool in a career. this is twice. i think colin has lost the heart for the fight game and should retire now.
Is something that is a concern, but they were not in consequitive fights. Lynes did go on after Daws to have his best spell in his career.
It's a question of motivation Stu.
You have a fully fledged guy that has boxed from a kid winning titles along the way - turning over, doing very well at domestic level and improving to Euro level with a prospective of reaching the fringes of a world title. The guy falls short regathers himself and has a new resurgence showing some class at a level but falls short again againsta big and strong Branco.
There are matchups out there for him but from a motivational point of view what's the point of reference? Why tread water and go through the motions? I dont know him personally but have spoken to a few that do. He is a honest fella and stand up family man, by all accounts, and I think that will shape his decision.