Re: Post Your Scorecards
Posted: 13 Aug 2017, 09:57
Yeah , he beat Castillo largely on the basis of being bigger and stronger and gradually wearing him down and imposing himself on him 
I had it 58-56 Hearns. From round 2 on, Harold made it extremely competitive, and definitely won the last 2, but Tommy had the first 4. Could Harold have scored the upset? Doubt it, figure Tommy would have came on possibly by the eighth round, but there was a good possibility for it. Sad Harold's career went out like that, surprised he never fought Ray Leonard.Seamus wrote:Tommy Hearns vs Harold Weston
R1.10-9 TH
R2.10-10
R3.10-9 HW
R4.10-9 TH
R5.10-9 HW
R6.10-9 HW
Tommy Hearns TK0 6 after Weston is unable to continue due to an eye injury. I had it 58-57 for Harold Weston. All 3 judges had it 58-56 for Hearns, but they had given Weston the last 2 rds.
Really an unfortunate result for Harold Weston, who after getting hammered in the 1st round had done a good job of blocking alot of Hearns punches while countering to the body. Weston was getting inside, dictating the pace and Hearns' punches looked to be losing there steam. A really shame it ended like this because Weston looked like he had a decent shot at the upset.
Just saw it on YouTube, and felt it was a clear Boza win. Roberto won the initial 2 rounds, but Boza took it from there. He got into his rhythm, and though Roberto made several rounds close, he didn't do enough to win. 8-2 Boza.scartissue wrote:Guys, here's a real Christmas treat for you if you've never seen it. The Boza-Edwards-Roberto Elizondo 10 rounder. Saw it back in the day, but remembered it again recently. All I can say is Wow!. It didn't lose its luster over the years. Here we go, 10 point must system.
Round 1: 10-9 Elizondo
Round 2: 10-9 Elizondo - I saw the first portion of the round and the last portion. A power failure took out the action in between. I felt Elizondo controlled what I did see and the announcer stated that Elizondo really 'sparkled' that round. So I had to take a leap of faith.
Round 3: 10-9 Boza
Round 4: 10-9 Boza
Round 5: 10-10 Even
Round 6: 10-10 Even
Round 7: 10-9 Boza
Round 8: 10-9 Elizondo
Round 9: 10-9 Boza
Round 10: 10-9 Boza
Total: 97-95 Boza Edwards
This fight was amazing. Fought at break neck speed and phonebooth warfare. Rounds 8, 9 & 10 were incredible, but actually, every round was. I must tackle the Nelson-Martinez fight next. It sounds great.
Nile, thanks for your input. I just felt Elizondo's body-punching wasn't taken heed of at times. Incidentally, official scores were 97-93, 96-94 and 96-94 again. It was an excellent fight though, wasn't it?Nile4000 wrote:Just saw it on YouTube, and felt it was a clear Boza win. Roberto won the initial 2 rounds, but Boza took it from there. He got into his rhythm, and though Roberto made several rounds close, he didn't do enough to win. 8-2 Boza.scartissue wrote:Guys, here's a real Christmas treat for you if you've never seen it. The Boza-Edwards-Roberto Elizondo 10 rounder. Saw it back in the day, but remembered it again recently. All I can say is Wow!. It didn't lose its luster over the years. Here we go, 10 point must system.
Round 1: 10-9 Elizondo
Round 2: 10-9 Elizondo - I saw the first portion of the round and the last portion. A power failure took out the action in between. I felt Elizondo controlled what I did see and the announcer stated that Elizondo really 'sparkled' that round. So I had to take a leap of faith.
Round 3: 10-9 Boza
Round 4: 10-9 Boza
Round 5: 10-10 Even
Round 6: 10-10 Even
Round 7: 10-9 Boza
Round 8: 10-9 Elizondo
Round 9: 10-9 Boza
Round 10: 10-9 Boza
Total: 97-95 Boza Edwards
This fight was amazing. Fought at break neck speed and phonebooth warfare. Rounds 8, 9 & 10 were incredible, but actually, every round was. I must tackle the Nelson-Martinez fight next. It sounds great.
It was Scar, definitely was. And you right, people didn't take heed of Roberto's body punching. I bet if Elizondo fought any of the WBA champs, he would've been champion.scartissue wrote:Nile, thanks for your input. I just felt Elizondo's body-punching wasn't taken heed of at times. Incidentally, official scores were 97-93, 96-94 and 96-94 again. It was an excellent fight though, wasn't it?Nile4000 wrote:Just saw it on YouTube, and felt it was a clear Boza win. Roberto won the initial 2 rounds, but Boza took it from there. He got into his rhythm, and though Roberto made several rounds close, he didn't do enough to win. 8-2 Boza.scartissue wrote:Guys, here's a real Christmas treat for you if you've never seen it. The Boza-Edwards-Roberto Elizondo 10 rounder. Saw it back in the day, but remembered it again recently. All I can say is Wow!. It didn't lose its luster over the years. Here we go, 10 point must system.
Round 1: 10-9 Elizondo
Round 2: 10-9 Elizondo - I saw the first portion of the round and the last portion. A power failure took out the action in between. I felt Elizondo controlled what I did see and the announcer stated that Elizondo really 'sparkled' that round. So I had to take a leap of faith.
Round 3: 10-9 Boza
Round 4: 10-9 Boza
Round 5: 10-10 Even
Round 6: 10-10 Even
Round 7: 10-9 Boza
Round 8: 10-9 Elizondo
Round 9: 10-9 Boza
Round 10: 10-9 Boza
Total: 97-95 Boza Edwards
This fight was amazing. Fought at break neck speed and phonebooth warfare. Rounds 8, 9 & 10 were incredible, but actually, every round was. I must tackle the Nelson-Martinez fight next. It sounds great.
Liston is easily one of the most overrated fighters in this section. There's been way too much 'I just cant see how ATG X could beat him'....Seamus wrote:After seeing the thread on this fight I decided to score it.
Sonny Liston vs Eddie Machen
R1.10-9 SL
R2.10-9 SL
R3.10-9 SL
R4.10-9 SL
R5.10-9 SL
R6.9-9 (1 pt from Liston for a low blow)
R7.10-10
R8.10-9 SL
R9.10-9 SL
R10.10-9 SL
R11.9-8 EM (2 pts from Liston for low blows)
R12.10-10
Sonny Liston 117-110
Eddie Machen did a good job of punch blocking and even jabbed well at times, but he just wasn't countering enough or getting off first to have a chance of winning. Liston never had Machen in trouble, but he always looked to be pressing the attack, dictating the pace, and keeping the punches coming, It should be pointed out though, that this was prime Liston in his 32nd bout, a guy some posters here think would stop Lewis, Tyson, Holyfield, Frazier, Bowe, etc
Wanted to give this one a go. never saw it before, so here we go.Seamus wrote:Pinklon Thomas vs Tim Witherspoon
1.10-9 TW
2.10-9 TW
3.10-9 PT
4.10-9 TW
5.10-8 PT (pt taken from Witherspoon for repeated backhands)
6.10-9 PT
7.10-9 PT
8.10-9 PT
9.10-9 TW
10.10-10
11.10-10
12.10-9 PT
Pinklon Thomas 116-113
Very good fight, and if you love to see jabbing, this is a bout worth watching. Pinklon Thomas showed excellent composure in winning the title from Witherspoon, because he was hit with some good shots, but just soaked it up and stayed within his fight plan and scored heavily with his jab and quick combinations.
This is the second time I watched this fight in my life and this is how I had it with pen to paper. Seamus, this was scored on NY's rounds basis, which is only 1 point a round. A very flawed system because it prevents you from giving Joe extra points for the 11th and 15th rounds. Unless the fight is scored even, in which then it allows supplemental points, but only if it is even. It's like a tie-breaker, but employed with major flaws.Seamus wrote:Joe Frazier vs Muhammad Ali I
R1.JF 1pt
R2.MA 1pt
R3.Even
R4.MA 1pt
R5.JF 1pt
R6.JF 1pt
R7.JF 1pt
R8.JF 1pt
R9.MA 1pt
R10.JF 1pt
R11.JF 2pts
R12.JF 1pt
R13.MA 1pt
R14.MA 1pt
R15.JF 2pts
Under scoring system used. 1pt for winning a round, 2 pts typically for a knockdown or winning round decisively, 0 pts for an even round. I scored it Joe Frazier 11-5. Had the 10 pt must been in use that would have been 145-139 for Joe Frazier.
If there a 10-point must system, I would have scored the 11th round 10-8 as well. The problem is that the judges probably would not have. Most of the time, the judges only score a round 10-8 if there is a knockdown. Have always thought that it's too bad that the judges score fights the way that they do.scartissue wrote:This is the second time I watched this fight in my life and this is how I had it with pen to paper. Seamus, this was scored on NY's rounds basis, which is only 1 point a round. A very flawed system because it prevents you from giving Joe extra points for the 11th and 15th rounds. Unless the fight is scored even, in which then it allows supplemental points, but only if it is even. It's like a tie-breaker, but employed with major flaws.Seamus wrote:Joe Frazier vs Muhammad Ali I
R1.JF 1pt
R2.MA 1pt
R3.Even
R4.MA 1pt
R5.JF 1pt
R6.JF 1pt
R7.JF 1pt
R8.JF 1pt
R9.MA 1pt
R10.JF 1pt
R11.JF 2pts
R12.JF 1pt
R13.MA 1pt
R14.MA 1pt
R15.JF 2pts
Under scoring system used. 1pt for winning a round, 2 pts typically for a knockdown or winning round decisively, 0 pts for an even round. I scored it Joe Frazier 11-5. Had the 10 pt must been in use that would have been 145-139 for Joe Frazier.
Round 1: Ali
Round 2: Ali
Round 3: Even
Round 4: Ali
Round 5: Frazier
Round 6: Frazier
Round 7: Even
Round 8: Frazier
Round 9: Ali
Round 10: Ali
Round 11: Frazier
Round 12: Frazier
Round 13: Frazier
Round 14: Ali
Round 15: Frazier
Total: 7-6-2 Frazier
I watched the Don Dunphy version, which remarkably enough had Burt Lancaster and Archie Moore doing color commentary. Lancaster was even up in the ring afterwards with a microphone. But regardless, a great fight.
Alp, you're right. A lot of judges just automatically score 10-8 without giving the whole round credence. For example, the 11th round of Juan LaPorte against Ruben Castillo. I thought Castillo had a good round, but in the waning seconds of the round LaPorte dropped him. I scored the round 10-10. laPorte gets a point for the knockdown, but I'm not going to forget that Castillo won 7/8 of that round. Now, how the judges saw it I don't know but I get the feeling most of them went with the low-hanging fruit approach and just gave it to LaPorte 10-8. As for Ali-Frazier, if it was a 10 point must system in effect I would have scored rounds 11 and 15 10-8 for a 144-141 for Frazier. As I said, that rounds system was seriously flawed. Of course, even with the 10 point must system in effect today you get screw ups. Look at Adelaide Byrd's score over the weekend for Canelo. Seriously? And are they going to pull here license or send her back for more training? I'm sure they're just going to assign her another plumb assignment.Ambling Alp II wrote:If there a 10-point must system, I would have scored the 11th round 10-8 as well. The problem is that the judges probably would not have. Most of the time, the judges only score a round 10-8 if there is a knockdown. Have always thought that it's too bad that the judges score fights the way that they do.scartissue wrote:This is the second time I watched this fight in my life and this is how I had it with pen to paper. Seamus, this was scored on NY's rounds basis, which is only 1 point a round. A very flawed system because it prevents you from giving Joe extra points for the 11th and 15th rounds. Unless the fight is scored even, in which then it allows supplemental points, but only if it is even. It's like a tie-breaker, but employed with major flaws.Seamus wrote:Joe Frazier vs Muhammad Ali I
R1.JF 1pt
R2.MA 1pt
R3.Even
R4.MA 1pt
R5.JF 1pt
R6.JF 1pt
R7.JF 1pt
R8.JF 1pt
R9.MA 1pt
R10.JF 1pt
R11.JF 2pts
R12.JF 1pt
R13.MA 1pt
R14.MA 1pt
R15.JF 2pts
Under scoring system used. 1pt for winning a round, 2 pts typically for a knockdown or winning round decisively, 0 pts for an even round. I scored it Joe Frazier 11-5. Had the 10 pt must been in use that would have been 145-139 for Joe Frazier.
Round 1: Ali
Round 2: Ali
Round 3: Even
Round 4: Ali
Round 5: Frazier
Round 6: Frazier
Round 7: Even
Round 8: Frazier
Round 9: Ali
Round 10: Ali
Round 11: Frazier
Round 12: Frazier
Round 13: Frazier
Round 14: Ali
Round 15: Frazier
Total: 7-6-2 Frazier
I watched the Don Dunphy version, which remarkably enough had Burt Lancaster and Archie Moore doing color commentary. Lancaster was even up in the ring afterwards with a microphone. But regardless, a great fight.
For that matter, should it be automatic that the round be 10-8 if there is a knockdown? Take the 15th round here. Take away the three second knockdown, and Ali would have won the round. But you know everyone would have had it 10-8.