Page 6 of 7
Re: #1---HOW MANY FIGHTS CAN YOU NAME.....
Posted: 02 Nov 2009, 17:20
by ThatOne
"I talked with Bill Cayton for years. I never heard Cayton say a word in praise of Ali"
- The lying Granberry
"I honesstly believe that Mike Tyson at his best was the second greatest fighter of all time, but he wasn't Muhammad Ali. Mike is quick but Ali is quicker. Mike had power but Ali had the greatest chin ever. And, Mike, unfortunately is prone to frustration, which would be his Achilles Heel against Ali because Ali was the best fighter in history at playing mind games with his opponents. If Ali in his prime fought Mike at his bet I see Ali winning a decision , eight rounds to four, or nine rounds to three."
-Bill Cayton
Granberry -This is what happens to liars
Revelation 21:8:
"...all liars shall have their part in the lake which burns with fire and brimstone, which is the second death."
Re: #1---HOW MANY FIGHTS CAN YOU NAME.....
Posted: 02 Nov 2009, 17:26
by ThatOne
The lying Granberry:
"Zora Folley said Ali couldn't punch, in an interview just after their fight. And that he, Folley, was ten years past his best."
What Zora Folley actually said
"...The knockdown punch was so fast I never saw it. He has lots of snap, and when the punches land., they dizzy up your head, they fuzz up your mind."
Granberry- Here's another bible verse about liars"
A false witness shall not be unpunished and he that speaketh lies shall not escape." - Proverbs 19:5
Re: #1---HOW MANY FIGHTS CAN YOU NAME.....
Posted: 02 Nov 2009, 17:29
by granberry
ThatOne wrote:Unlike Granny I can provide CITATIONS for my arguments instead of just making poop up:
Citations -If you completed junior high school you would know that's a refernce to the original source
Zora Folley -"Muhammad Ali- His Life And Times-pg 167
Cus D'amato-
Archie Moore- "Muhammad Ali- His Life And Times"- pg 49
Ken Norton- http://www.eastsideboxing.com/boxing-ne ... erview.php
Eddie Futch-http://coxscorner.tripod.com/ali.html
Floyd Patterson-"Muhammad Ali- His Life And Times"-pg 459
Jose Torres-"Muhammad Ali-His Life And Times"-pg.458
Kevin Rooney-"Muhammad Ali-His Life And Times"-pg 459
Bill Cayton-Muhammad Ali-His Life And Times"-pg459
David Remnick wrote the One's beloved
"Muhammad Ali-His Life And Times".
Who is David Remnick?
David Remnick was a writer for the Washington Post.
Remnick is an Ali worshipper without the slighest background in boxing.
LOL
The One is probably the only owner of Remnick's attempt to 'write' about a subject he has ZERO background in.
Monte Cox is known for stealing the material of others and posting it as his own.
Clutch your copy of boxing "expert" David Remnick's book close to you, One.
Remember, the clueless crap David Remnick churned out is 'The Bible of Boxing" for the pathetic the One.
Re: #1---HOW MANY FIGHTS CAN YOU NAME.....
Posted: 02 Nov 2009, 17:31
by Robinson
I have the Patterson-Troy fight and Patterson is fast, and
accurate. Those early fights of patterosn, though raw he
was a talented young athlete.
I think the peek a boo style has its strengths and weaknesses.
Tyson proved this, as he was realy the ultimate expression of
the style. Patterson had his flaws technique wise, contray to
the notion he was so soft jawed. He and Morrison left them
selves exposed often when throwing, their style of peek a boo
left their legs wider than they should be, and their heads
often dead centre of their punches.
Tyson perfected the head movement and angles that Patterson
often neglected or did not have. Tyson's feet were also faster
and he almost never left his legs wide, which Patterson did
all to often. So in my opinion the Peek a Boo style is effective
when done well and done by a YOUNG, explosive athletic fighter.
Its hard to maintain as one ages.
I think Patterson has much faster hands than Ali, Ali has faster
reflexes and his fleet feet give him an over all speed that is
unique to him, especially in that era. Patterson had fast, explosive
short range power. He erupted violently with his combinations,
where as Ali flicked and popped his punches fast from the
outside.
Patterson was able to KO Cooper because Cooper struggled with
smaller guys, its some times harder to defend from fast and
explosive punches that come from under neath and inside of your
own blows, than those of a bigger man which come wider and
from the outside.
I do not know that Jones' jab was faster, but it was more to the
point and more consistent in that fight. Ali was backing up and
throwing his jab more with his arm, than his body and feet like
Jones was. Because of this, i think Jones was more effective
at times with his jab. Much the same way Mercer was able to
out jab Lewis years later.
Re: #1---HOW MANY FIGHTS CAN YOU NAME.....
Posted: 02 Nov 2009, 17:32
by granberry
Get the copy of Sports Illustrated after the Folley-Ali fight.
Folley says Ali can't punch (he contrasts Liston as a great puncher)
and Folley says he, Folley, was ten years past his best when he fought Ali.
Re: #1---HOW MANY FIGHTS CAN YOU NAME.....
Posted: 02 Nov 2009, 17:33
by ThatOne
The lying Granberry:
Patterson said Ali couldn't punch and did NOT have fast hands.
"....All I kinow is that anybody that moved like Clay moved is going to give his opponents lots of problems."
-Floyd Patterson
Proverbs 6:16-20
There are six things the LORD hates, seven that are detestable to him: haughty eyes,a lying tongue, hands that shed innocent blood,a heart that devises wicked schemes, feet that are quick to rush into evil, a false witness who pours out lies and a man who stirs up dissension among brothers.
Re: #1---HOW MANY FIGHTS CAN YOU NAME.....
Posted: 02 Nov 2009, 17:36
by Robinson
In Ali's defence. I do not think he was going 'hard' on Folley in that
fight. And in any case, Ali is not known as a hard puncher, and some
times, fighters have off nights.
Re: #1---HOW MANY FIGHTS CAN YOU NAME.....
Posted: 02 Nov 2009, 17:40
by granberry
The One quoting Monte Cox.
The blind leading the blind.
Re: #1---HOW MANY FIGHTS CAN YOU NAME.....
Posted: 02 Nov 2009, 17:48
by granberry
Patterson said Ali couldn't punch and did NOT have fast hands.
Patterson said that repeatedly.
Like Folley, Patterson gave Liston as the example of the great puncher.
Remember, Ali shills never LIE.
And those who laugh at the crap regurgitated by the frantic Ali shills are EVIL.
Anything "quoted" by an Ali shill is a "fact."
Anything ever written, even by David Remnick and Monte Cox, is a "fact" as long as it sells The Religion of Ali.
Deep thinkers and thorough "scholars" like frantic Ali shill the One are paragons of unbiased seeking after the "truth."
LOL
Give us some more "truth," straight from David Remnick, Monte Cox, assorted internet posters, and anyone else who works for The Religion of Ali.
Post away, frantically, the One.
Re: #1---HOW MANY FIGHTS CAN YOU NAME.....
Posted: 02 Nov 2009, 17:49
by ThatOne
granberry wrote:Get the copy of Sports Illustrated after the Folley-Ali fight.
Folley says Ali can't punch (he contrasts Liston as a great puncher)
and Folley says he, Folley, was ten years past his best when he fought Ali.
Is this the issue you were looking for granmama?
"The guy had a style all his own.It's far ahead of any fighter today. How could Dempsey, Tunney, or any of them keep up? Louis wouldn't have a chance Louis was too slow.Marciano couldn't get to him and could never get away from him. There's no way to train yourself for what he does. The moves, the speed, the punches, and the way he changes styles every time you have him figured. The right hands Ali hit me with just had no business landing but they did. They came from nowhere. Many times he was in the wrong position but he hit me anyway. I 've never seen anyone who can do that. The knockdown punch was so fast I never saw it. He has lots of snap , and when the punches land they fuzz up your mind and dizzy your head. The trickiest fighter I have ever seen. He's had twenty nine fights and looks like he had one hundred. He could write the book on boxing and anybody that fights him should be made to read it."
=Sports Illustrated, April 10, 1967
Re: #1---HOW MANY FIGHTS CAN YOU NAME.....
Posted: 02 Nov 2009, 17:59
by ThatOne
"and Folley says he, Folley, was ten years past his best when he fought Ali."
-granberry
Not only are you a liar but you are a hypocrite
You crucify Ali for his poor showing against Jimmy Young when he was the same age as Folley when he fought him and he was two years older than Folley when he faced Leon Spinks. I'm glad you realize you have to jusge fighters by their primes:
Matthew 22:18 But Jesus perceived their wickedness, and said, Why tempt ye me, ye hypocrites?
Re: #1---HOW MANY FIGHTS CAN YOU NAME.....
Posted: 02 Nov 2009, 18:09
by Grimm
granberry wrote:Patterson said Ali couldn't punch and did NOT have fast hands.
Patterson said that repeatedly.
Like Folley, Patterson gave Liston as the example of the great puncher.
Remember, Ali shills never LIE.
And those who laugh at the crap regurgitated by the frantic Ali shills are EVIL.
Anything "quoted" by an Ali shill is a "fact."
Anything ever written, even by David Remnick and Monte Cox, is a "fact" as long as it sells The Religion of Ali.
Deep thinkers and thorough "scholars" like frantic Ali shill the One are paragons of unbiased seeking after the "truth."
LOL
Give us some more "truth," straight from David Remnick, Monte Cox, assorted internet posters, and anyone else who works for The Religion of Ali.
Post away, frantically, the One.
granberry now's the time hit him with the comic book post about Mexican fighters. I bet that'll get em.
Re: #1---HOW MANY FIGHTS CAN YOU NAME.....
Posted: 02 Nov 2009, 18:13
by ThatOne
Grimm wrote:granberry wrote:Patterson said Ali couldn't punch and did NOT have fast hands.
Patterson said that repeatedly.
Like Folley, Patterson gave Liston as the example of the great puncher.
Remember, Ali shills never LIE.
And those who laugh at the crap regurgitated by the frantic Ali shills are EVIL.
Anything "quoted" by an Ali shill is a "fact."
Anything ever written, even by David Remnick and Monte Cox, is a "fact" as long as it sells The Religion of Ali.
Deep thinkers and thorough "scholars" like frantic Ali shill the One are paragons of unbiased seeking after the "truth."
LOL
Give us some more "truth," straight from David Remnick, Monte Cox, assorted internet posters, and anyone else who works for The Religion of Ali.
Post away, frantically, the One.
granberry now's the time hit him with the comic book post about Mexican fighters. I bet that'll get em.
The funniest thing on internet boards is seeing somebody destroyed on their own "burn" threads.
Re: #1---HOW MANY FIGHTS CAN YOU NAME.....
Posted: 02 Nov 2009, 18:14
by Grimm
ThatOne wrote:Grimm wrote:granberry wrote:Patterson said Ali couldn't punch and did NOT have fast hands.
Patterson said that repeatedly.
Like Folley, Patterson gave Liston as the example of the great puncher.
Remember, Ali shills never LIE.
And those who laugh at the crap regurgitated by the frantic Ali shills are EVIL.
Anything "quoted" by an Ali shill is a "fact."
Anything ever written, even by David Remnick and Monte Cox, is a "fact" as long as it sells The Religion of Ali.
Deep thinkers and thorough "scholars" like frantic Ali shill the One are paragons of unbiased seeking after the "truth."
LOL
Give us some more "truth," straight from David Remnick, Monte Cox, assorted internet posters, and anyone else who works for The Religion of Ali.
Post away, frantically, the One.
granberry now's the time hit him with the comic book post about Mexican fighters. I bet that'll get em.
The funniest thing on internet boards is seeing somebody destroyed on their own "burn" threads.

Re: #1---HOW MANY FIGHTS CAN YOU NAME.....
Posted: 02 Nov 2009, 18:29
by BoxBuzz
I just noticed that granberry has accused many of us here of "posting on boxing forums".
And then he goes on to imply that for just such acts, our credibility is permanently suspect.
This is going over the line. I'm contacting my lawyer, and suggest that others do the same.
Just because granberry has never posted on a boxing forum, he thinks he can pass judgment and impune the honor of the rest of us who have, on occasion in a moment of weakness, been given to a post here an there on a harmless boxing forum? This somehow makes our comments without merit?
This seems to smack of random bias and reveals a small flaw in his analytical ability.
This is of course purely and simply my personal opinion, and I and I alone am responsible for it's content.
Re: #1---HOW MANY FIGHTS CAN YOU NAME.....
Posted: 02 Nov 2009, 18:44
by granberry
SPORTS ILLUSTRATED is famous as the FLAMING SHILL magazine for Ali.
HOW MANY TIMES has Sports Illustrated had Ali on its cover?
20 times?
30 times?
50 times?
WHO wrote the crap containing the supposed quote attributed to Folley?
Is there a NAME on it?
The Sports Illustrated crap the One posted lays it on so thick that it rings FALSE.
Folley isn't around to verify it.
That's the way media salesmen like it, quoting people who can't answer back.
Bob Woodward, a supposed 'paragon' of journalism, is known for falsely attributing "quotes' to people, over, and over, and over.
Woodward repeatedly quotes dead people, claiming they gave him quotes at a time when it is then found they were no longer alive.
Victor Lasky took one chapter of a Bob Woodward book, checked with all the people who were "quoted,"
and found several had died before the time Woodward said he got the "quote" from them, several others said they had never talked to Woodward, and several others said they had talked to Woodward and that he quoted them falsely.
The Folley "quote" from Sports Illustrated is so overdone that it REEKS.
But the One will swallow it whole.
Cayton and his partner Jimmy Jacobs spent hours on the phone with me (they had money and I didn't so if we went on for a while I asked if they would call me back, which they did)
going over the films and fighters they had films of.
As I wrote above, they both had utter contempt for the Liston-Ali fake knockout, and gleefully told me about the film they made laying out why that 'fight' was raw sewage.
Of course we spent most of our time talking about more worthwhile boxing.
Amazingly, Cayton did not know about the film cutter's machines, which enable you to run a film at any speed, or even stopped, frame by frame (24 frames a second).
They are prohibitively expensive, but I had access to them at certain libraries.
Cayton who was a millionaire many times over, certainly could have gotten one if he wanted to.
When it came out that Tyson had taken lithium and Thorazine in combination at the insistence of his TV actress wife (which effectively destroyed Tyson as a championship athlete) I called Cayton and went over how serious that was and what these drugs did to a person’s co-ordination, balance, perceptions, and reflexes. Cayton handled it the best he could by getting a psychiatrist to hold a press conference where he announced that he had examined Tyson, that Tyson was not mentally ill, and that he would not be taking any more of these ‘medicines.’
Once Don King drew Tyson away from Cayton by appealing to Tyson with his crap about the evil whites, I told Cayton that he should sue to get Tyson back, since Tyson had a legal contract with Cayton.
Cayton told me he thoguht that might alienate Tyson and that he was trying to coax Mike back instead in other ways.
I think he made a mistake.
When Tyson was on trial for the phony ‘rape,’ Cayton said to me,
“If I were handling Mike’s business, he never would have been indicted.”
Cayton made a terrible mistake leaving his and Jacobs' film collection to ESPN.
ESPN never shows the wonderful films they collected over a lifetime, instead running the same tired Ali and Sugar Ray Leonard crap repeatedly.
After all. who cares about Sam Langford, Jack Root, Joe Gans, etc etc etc.
While the One clutches his David Remnick and shilling Sports Illustrated crap to his chest he claims I never talked to Cayton.
The dream world the frantic Ali worshippers live in (if you can call that living) is disgusting.
Re: #1---HOW MANY FIGHTS CAN YOU NAME.....
Posted: 02 Nov 2009, 18:47
by ThatOne
granberry wrote:SPORTS ILLUSTRATED is famous as the FLAMING SHILL magazine for Ali.
HOW MANY TIMES has Sports Illustrated had Ali on its cover?
20 times?
30 times?
50 times?
WHO wrote the crap containing the supposed quote attributed to Folley?
Is there a NAME on it?
The Sports Illustrated crap the One posted lays it on so thick that it rings FALSE.
Folley isn't around to verify it.
That's the way media salesmen like it, quoting people who can't answer back.
Bob Woodward, a supposed 'paragon' of journalism, is known for falsely attributing "quotes' to people, over, and over, and over.
Woodward repeatedly quotes dead people, claiming they gave him quotes at a time when it is then found they were no longer alive.
Victor Lasky took one chapter of a Bob Woodward book, checked with all the people who were "quoted,"
and found several had died before the time Woodward said he got the "quote" from them, several others said they had never talked to Woodward, and several others said they had talked to Woodward and that he quoted them falsely.
The Folley "quote" from Sports Illustrated is so overdone that it REEKS.
But the One will swallow it whole.
Cayton and his partner Jimmy Jacobs spent hours on the phone with me (they had money and I didn't so if we went on for a while I asked if they would call me back, which they did)
going over the films and fighters they had films of.
As I wrote above, they both had utter contempt for the Liston-Ali fake knockout, and gleefully told me about the film they made laying out why that 'fight' was raw sewage.
Of course we spent most of our time talking about more worthwhile boxing.
Amazingly, Cayton did not know about the film cutter's machines, which enable you to run a film at any speed, or even stopped, frame by frame (24 frames a second).
They are prohibitively expensive, but I had access to them at certain libraries.
Cayton who was a millionaire many times over, certainly could have gotten one if he wanted to.
When it came out that Tyson had taken lithium and Thorazine in combination at the insistence of his TV actress wife (which effectively destroyed Tyson as a championship athlete) I called Cayton and went over how serious that was and what these drugs did to a person’s co-ordination, balance, perceptions, and reflexes. Cayton handled it the best he could by getting a psychiatrist to hold a press conference where he announced that he had examined Tyson, that Tyson was not mentally ill, and that he would not be taking any more of these ‘medicines.’
Once Don King drew Tyson away from Cayton by appealing to Tyson with his crap about the evil whites, I told Cayton that he should sue to get Tyson back, since Tyson had a legal contract with Cayton.
Cayton told me he thoguht that might alienate Tyson and that he was trying to coax Mike back instead in other ways.
I think he made a mistake.
When Tyson was on trial for the phony ‘rape,’ Cayton said to me,
“If I were handling Mike’s business, he never would have been indicted.”
Cayton made a terrible mistake leaving his and Jacobs' film collection to ESPN.
ESPN never shows the wonderful films they collected over a lifetime, instead running the same tired Ali and Sugar Ray Leonard crap repeatedly.
After all. who cares about Sam Langford, Jack Root, Joe Gans, etc etc etc.
While the One clutches his David Remnick and shilling Sports Illustrated crap to his chest he claims I never talked to Cayton.
The dream world the frantic Ali worshippers live in (if you can call that living) is disgusting.
Re: #1---HOW MANY FIGHTS CAN YOU NAME.....
Posted: 02 Nov 2009, 18:49
by ThatOne
"SPORTS ILLUSTRATED is famous as the FLAMING SHILL magazine for Ali.
HOW MANY TIMES has Sports Illustrated had Ali on its cover?
20 times?
30 times?
50 times?
WHO wrote the crap containing the supposed quote attributed to Folley?
Is there a NAME on it?
The Sports Illustrated crap the One posted lays it on so thick that it rings FALSE.
Folley isn't around to verify it.
That's the way media salesmen like it, quoting people who can't answer back.
"
-gramama
You are a lunatic. The quotation is from the April 10, 1967 issue of Sports Illustrated. Folley didn't die until 1972
Just admit I owned you, granmama, You have been owned by lesser men.
THATONE
Re: #1---HOW MANY FIGHTS CAN YOU NAME.....
Posted: 02 Nov 2009, 18:52
by granberry
BoxBuzz wrote:I just noticed that granberry has accused many of us here of "posting on boxing forums".
And then he goes on to imply that for just such acts, our credibility is permanently suspect.
buz, the One, grim, buz' boy collins, ifeelfine, and the rest of the boxrec Ali shill contingent
have never had any contact with boxing in any way
expect for their pathetic 'posting' on the internet about the subject they obviously have never had any contact with.
Re: #1---HOW MANY FIGHTS CAN YOU NAME.....
Posted: 02 Nov 2009, 18:55
by ThatOne
granberry wrote:BoxBuzz wrote:I just noticed that granberry has accused many of us here of "posting on boxing forums".
And then he goes on to imply that for just such acts, our credibility is permanently suspect.
buz, the One, grim, buz' boy collins, ifeelfine, and the rest of the boxrec Ali shill contingent
have never had any contact with boxing in any way
expect for their pathetic 'posting' on the internet about the subject they obviously have never had any contact with.
My uncle was a boxer. My father was a boxer. You are a clown . I laced em up.
Let's put our cards on the table. I'll link my uncle's record on boxrec and verify I'm his nephew and you verify that you know every boxing luminary of the past fifty year as you claim.
Deal
Re: #1---HOW MANY FIGHTS CAN YOU NAME.....
Posted: 02 Nov 2009, 19:01
by Grimm
granberry wrote:BoxBuzz wrote:I just noticed that granberry has accused many of us here of "posting on boxing forums".
And then he goes on to imply that for just such acts, our credibility is permanently suspect.
buz, the One, grim, buz' boy collins, ifeelfine, and the rest of the boxrec Ali shill contingent
have never had any contact with boxing in any way
expect for their pathetic 'posting' on the internet about the subject they obviously have never had any contact with.
granberry you have never boxed nor seen a boxing match.
You cannot possibly gain boxing knowledge by misconstruing and then reciting everything Bert Sugar says.
Hey, if you disagree with someone or feel that they are wrong about something just post that comicbook picture and talk about collins and the moderators.
Because in your world that seems to constitute making a point.
Re: #1---HOW MANY FIGHTS CAN YOU NAME.....
Posted: 02 Nov 2009, 19:04
by ThatOne
Grimm wrote:granberry wrote:BoxBuzz wrote:I just noticed that granberry has accused many of us here of "posting on boxing forums".
And then he goes on to imply that for just such acts, our credibility is permanently suspect.
buz, the One, grim, buz' boy collins, ifeelfine, and the rest of the boxrec Ali shill contingent
have never had any contact with boxing in any way
expect for their pathetic 'posting' on the internet about the subject they obviously have never had any contact with.
granberry you have never boxed nor seen a boxing match.
You cannot possibly gain boxing knowledge by misconstruing and then reciting everything Bert Sugar says.
Hey, if you disagree with someone or feel that they are wrong about something just post that comicbook picture and talk about collins and the moderators.
Because in your world that seems to constitute making a point.
My uncle's record is on boxrec. He wasn't an ATG but he was good enough to have a common opponent with JakeLaMotta. I'm waiting for granmama to prove he is who he says he is.
Re: #1---HOW MANY FIGHTS CAN YOU NAME.....
Posted: 02 Nov 2009, 19:04
by granberry
The One will not answer my questions about the crap he posted from his beloved Ali shill magazine, Sports Illustrated.
My question was
Was there a NAME on the article?
What was that NAME?
WHO wrote the crap containing the supposed quote attributed to Folley?
Is there a NAME on it?
The world of the Ali shill is a gullible one.
Re: #1---HOW MANY FIGHTS CAN YOU NAME.....
Posted: 02 Nov 2009, 19:09
by ThatOne
granberry wrote:The One will not answer my questions about the crap he posted from his beloved Ali shill magazine, Sports Illustrated.
My question was
Was there a NAME on the article?
What was that NAME?
WHO wrote the crap containing the supposed quote attributed to Folley?
Is there a NAME on it?
The world of the Ali shill is a gullible one.
It was from the April 10, 1967 issue of SI.
Do your own research.
Re: #1---HOW MANY FIGHTS CAN YOU NAME.....
Posted: 02 Nov 2009, 20:01
by ThatOne
"Henry Cooper said (a washed up) Floyd Patterson who knocked him out in 4 rounds had faster hands than Ali and hit harder than Ali"
-granmama
"....The five great heavyweights were really Jack Johnson, Jack Dempsey, Rocky Marciano, Muhammad Ali, and Joe Louis....But you had to admire Muhammad Ali . He will go down in history as one of the greatest moving heavyweights of all time.His particular style wasn't everyone's favorite-all that jumping about-but yes- he was one of the greatest heavyweights."
-Sir Henry Cooper.