Page 6 of 6
Re: Amir Khan
Posted: 07 Dec 2009, 17:36
by Hagler2002
NorthEastBoxingFan wrote:it's not a trick question....
Drop dead you irritating cúnt.
Re: Amir Khan
Posted: 07 Dec 2009, 17:42
by n1ebf
Hagler2002 wrote:NorthEastBoxingFan wrote:it's not a trick question....
Drop dead you irritating cúnt.
i'm only trying to answer the question that YOU asked me

Which was how threatened would I be if you stuck a shot gun in my effing face?
well if it was a sawn off I'd expect you to be no more than a yard away which is within striking range. If it's long barrelled then you'd be further away which is where the jiu jitsu comes is as that gives several take down options followed by face pummelling.
If you could let me know if you are right, or left handed, as that would also make a difference.
Also, is the shot-gun loaded??
Re: Amir Khan
Posted: 07 Dec 2009, 17:57
by Hagler2002
NorthEastBoxingFan wrote:
well if it was a sawn off I'd expect you to be no more than a yard away which is within striking range. If it's long barrelled then you'd be further away which is where the jiu jitsu comes is as that gives several take down options followed by face pummelling.
Drop dead you irritating cúnt.
Re: Amir Khan
Posted: 07 Dec 2009, 18:08
by n1ebf
Hagler2002 wrote:NorthEastBoxingFan wrote:
well if it was a sawn off I'd expect you to be no more than a yard away which is within striking range. If it's long barrelled then you'd be further away which is where the jiu jitsu comes is as that gives several take down options followed by face pummelling.
Drop dead you irritating cúnt.
very dangerous things shot guns. Can go off when you don't want them to. You know this, surely
not very appropriate things to be threatening people with on a moderated boxing forum, if I might dare to suggest.
Re: Amir Khan
Posted: 07 Dec 2009, 18:50
by rob h
Bloodyhell it's like a night out in Stockport reading posts on this forum.
Re: Amir Khan
Posted: 07 Dec 2009, 18:54
by rob h
Re: Amir Khan
Posted: 07 Dec 2009, 19:05
by Wax On
Embarassing. But amusing too.
Re: Amir Khan
Posted: 07 Dec 2009, 19:32
by n1ebf
Wax On wrote:Embarassing.
it's not me holding the double barrell mate!

Re: Amir Khan
Posted: 08 Dec 2009, 03:12
by Hagler2002
NorthEastBoxingFan wrote:Wax On wrote:Embarassing.
it's not me holding the double barrell mate!

That's because you claim to be hard enough to take apart 30yr old plus, fat bloated blokes with your bare hands, you dish out the personal insults YET AGAIN but when offered to say them to my face you phucking bottle it.
You rile many people on this forum with your self opinionated shít and I would say you are the most irritating person I have ever come across on the internet, the thing been I don't think you're any different in real life.
You claim to have a ignore list as long as your arm yet seem to read everyone's posts who you claim is on it.
Its got to the point were anything I post you reply to it with a snide remark, insult or personal attack and then make fun of it when I lose my rag.
I am going to leave this forum for a while because I'm not enjoying it, I'm going to end up banned with you constantly winding me up to the point where I actually want to smash you to bits in the real world.
Re: Amir Khan
Posted: 08 Dec 2009, 03:45
by Poncey
Good Lord.
