BoxRec

Adamj1987 wrote:

whicker wrote:Whats clear from the ticket sales is that people don't buy tickets to see the undercard.

I expect a very un-filled arena for the first few hours.

indeed. i'll take a pic as i'll be tehre for every undercard fight to show how empty it is

And you will be able to spot various Boxrec'ers spotted around the arena!

mickey1975 wrote:

Adamj1987 wrote:

whicker wrote:Whats clear from the ticket sales is that people don't buy tickets to see the undercard.

I expect a very un-filled arena for the first few hours.

indeed. i'll take a pic as i'll be tehre for every undercard fight to show how empty it is

And you will be able to spot various Boxrec'ers spotted around the arena!

indeed. everyone should wear a boxrec t-shirt then tey can spot themselves in the pic

oohh take a pic of me!!!!

Adamj1987 wrote:

mickey1975 wrote:

Adamj1987 wrote: indeed. i'll take a pic as i'll be tehre for every undercard fight to show how empty it is

And you will be able to spot various Boxrec'ers spotted around the arena!

indeed. everyone should wear a boxrec t-shirt then tey can spot themselves in the pic

Ghey

Eric,
Adam doesn't have a wide angled lens, so that counts you out.

I tend to chat to people after the main event (ie during the bouts after a main event- everyone has gone, pick a seat) and during the early undercard- I'm sure I've met a few boxrec posters without realising who they are!

twenty six wrote:Eric,
Adam doesn't have a wide angled lens, so that counts you out.

Fury v Mcdermott may be on this bill.

leforge wrote:Fury v Mcdermott may be on this bill.

looking forward to this

twenty six wrote: I think David will be more concerned about how many settee bums are on seats that are multiplied by £14.95 !

end thread here, IMO.

leforge wrote:Fury v Mcdermott may be on this bill.

leforge wrote:Fury v Mcdermott may be on this bill.

That would be cool but i thought Fury was having 2 fights in America?

exittored wrote:

leforge wrote:Fury v Mcdermott may be on this bill.

That would be cool but i though Fury was having 2 fights in America?

yeah 27th feb and 13th march
its do able to also be on this bill too , as im assuming his 2 american opponents will be cannon fodder

damianhucker1 wrote:

exittored wrote:

leforge wrote:Fury v Mcdermott may be on this bill.

That would be cool but i though Fury was having 2 fights in America?

yeah 27th feb and 13th march
its do able to also be on this bill too , as im assuming his 2 american opponents will be cannon fodder

who is promoting him in america?Looking after him over there?

twenty six wrote:Eric,
Adam doesn't have a wide angled lens, so that counts you out.

how do you know what Lens he has on his camera ?? something your not telling us!

Oh dear, Eric, is that the best you can do ?
Watch out for Carlos - he's signing up Clients for a performing rights action

How the f*ck this thread has got so many hits and reads is beyond me - my my the sensitive people of boxrec - oh well I am off to think of another plan to lay some "bait" - this one worked excellently as discussed on the phone with a couple of you!!!

People try to resist but in the end get drawn in.

twenty six wrote: Watch out for Carlos - he's signing up Clients for a performing rights action

And the Clients would have a case!

Spud wrote:

How the f*ck this thread has got so many hits and reads is beyond me - my my the sensitive people of boxrec - oh well I am off to think of another plan to lay some "bait" - this one worked excellently as discussed on the phone with a couple of you!!!

People try to resist but in the end get drawn in.

Why on earth would anybody "try to resist" having a pop at you?

(I know we've made our peace, so to speak, but I'm quite amused by the idea that there's some kind of mental struggle going on in people's minds as to whether or not they should comment on Spud.)

oliverfennell wrote:

Spud wrote:

How the f*ck this thread has got so many hits and reads is beyond me - my my the sensitive people of boxrec - oh well I am off to think of another plan to lay some "bait" - this one worked excellently as discussed on the phone with a couple of you!!!

People try to resist but in the end get drawn in.

Why on earth would anybody "try to resist" having a pop at you?

(I know we've made our peace, so to speak, but I'm quite amused by the idea that there's some kind of mental struggle going on in people's minds as to whether or not they should comment on Spud.)

aye, and unless Spud is on a pence-per-click deal on the thread, why he should think it some sort of victory? Ho-hum, if such is his small joy, best leave him to it.

Come on Spud, that's the perfect response from someone who loses the argument - "well I only posted it to wind you up !"
Try salmon fishing - it takes less bait.

If it was a cruiserweight fight then I think they would have difficulties.

BUT it's the heavy's and that's a differant game altogether guys!

Spud wrote:

How the f*ck this thread has got so many hits and reads is beyond me - my my the sensitive people of boxrec - oh well I am off to think of another plan to lay some "bait" - this one worked excellently as discussed on the phone with a couple of you!!!

People try to resist but in the end get drawn in.

You phone people to chat about your boxrec threads?

If I was you, I'd try to get out more

Talk about the undercard, or thread gets locked.

It's waay o/t.

W*nkers!!!