BoxRec

your quite right saad muhammed having a useless troll like you take his name is really insult enough I shouldnt overegg the pudding!

mugabi wrote: your quite right saad muhammed having a useless troll like you take his name is really insult enough I shouldnt overegg the pudding!

You're never right about anything. Just a silly little kid playing games on the internet. At least you've managed to keep your trolling to a single thread here. For that you deserve a sticker.

LOL, somebody just brought up your retarded Czyz thread. That was awesome, you're even funnier when you're trying to talk about Boxing.

Can we all just get along?

I often disagree with SaadOffTheDeck and Goodnight, Irene, but so far we have kept it civilized. Calling names and acting like children will solve nothing.

Back to the original thread:

Holmes defeats Bruno via UD. I think the difference here would’ve been Holmes jab.
Lewis power being the difference here. Lewis wins a clear decision.

Bowe wins a clear victory here also because of his power. I see Bowe getting inside and getting the best of the exchanges.

I think Holmes starts dominating the fight until Foreman lands a big right hand and changes the fight to go on his favor. Foreman has the power to stop Holmes in my opinion.

Holmes easily defeats Douglas, Ruddock, and Morrison.

Posted by SaadOffTheDeck -Quite the opposite, only a retard like yourself could try and pass blame to everyone else in a dump of a thread like this. I could let your insults slide, but I didn't. I'm equally to blame here. Though half of your forum posts are trolling me.

Are you even capable of an original thought? Why don't you just say, "I'm rubber and you're glue. Whatever you say bounces off me and sticks to you!" ?

It just makes you look like the child you are. i'm actually shocked you haven't demanded a fist fight yet.

Dude you're quoting nursery rhymes now & talking about fist fights and you're not da 1 who is CHILDISH

Idisagree wrote:
I often disagree with SaadOffTheDeck and Goodnight, Irene.

You as well?

Many people disagree on these forums in terms of opinions on boxing. The difference is we dont than swear to jackassly and vindictively nitpick the grammer of members whose opinions we do not agree with for an eternity until they are hounded off this board,by name calling and endless trolling campaigns of nitpicking the grammer of perfectly educated members of this forum on any post they dare make.That is insulting childish behaviour that doesnt befit the dignity of adults. The way they have insulted and consistently derailed threads by someone like Raff who i would wager speaks English better than the average English speaker is a good example. I'd like to thank all those who have PM'd me and offered support here and said it was time the trolling boxing forum grammer taliban were challenged. It shows people are fed up with the trolling twosome ruining BOTP threads with insults on anyone who disagrees with them in the form of nitpicking, insults,fabrication, exaggeration and ridicule of legitimately argued viewpoints by derailing threads into name calling sessions. It is the same two names again and again Irene and Saad. Other members here have said it. Many others have PM'd me and said it. Yet the trolling twosome still refuse to address their childish behaviour and ignorant trolling and continue to behave like they are heel WWE characters. why a couple of days ago they proclaimed all of the Current Section Members were uneducated idiots!? i felt like i was watching a WWE telecast where a gang like DX say the Raw brand is better than Smackdown .Shameless that these two trolls have reduced a forum about the distinguished noble art of boxing down to the level of pro wrestling!:shame:

I have given them a very small taste of their own medicine by challenging the playground bully mentality of these trolls. Some may argue one should not engage in a pissing contest with skunks. Equally others would say you fight fire with fire. I have adopted a mix of both approaches in order to get them to address their pompous, arrogant trolling.

Now they have been exposed for all to see and are just repeating the same name calling and sillyness. Saad in particular has been reduced to complaining he hasn't been challenged to a street fight and is presently quoting nursery rhymes such is the extent of his public humiliation and child like inability to address his self destructive trolling addiction.

I offered them a way out of this by suggesting we each put each other on ignore and that they moderate their future behaviour and trolling.

They refused it for another round of trolling on their part.

The offer still stands. I am sure they will refuse it as they seem addicted to humiliating themselves publically.

Another novel that nobody will read. I got tied up at work but I knew I could count on more rubbish from you.

Whatever happened to "Amen"?

I must give it to you, you're a diehard troll. Is that your company? Trolling the internets looking to pick fights with intellectual superiors? You're quite good at it.

Don't be afraid of paragraphs dear Mugabi. Not that anyone will bother to read your musings anyway. But it might help.

Amazing thread so far if you ask me
Why the crusade pre-Y2K MrFrenchman? You do sound odd in the BOTP forum.

And my man:

boswell perkins wrote:my dad has been following boxing since the 50's he said its always been dirty and always will be

boswell perkins wrote:Dude you're not da 1 who is CHILDISH

You do enter by the front door. Ask yo daddy wut e thinkz ov me.

Sorry if this post isn't long, I'm typing while playing guitar and riding a surf board.

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:

dempseyfire wrote:

mugabi wrote:Ok so 1991 Holmes vs the 1992 versions of the following....I see it like this:



vs Frank Bruno (age 31) as always with bruno depends on if the fight was 10 or 12 rounds for some reason Frank seemed to collapse unable to breathe anytime after the 9th round. But over 10 I see him busting up Holmes face but Larry winning a close decision.

vs Lennox Lewis (age 27) Holmes would outjab and outwork him on the inside over 12 rounds all this version of lennox had was a big punch and holmes could work with that

vs Riddick Bowe (age 24) Holmes loses a very close decision over 12
vs George Foreman (age 43) Turns into a real pier six brawl at times with both mens pride on the line and both men are bruised and swollen facially but Foreman kayoes Larry in the 7th in a similar style to the cooney fight with a sudden barrage of combos

vs Buster Douglas (age 32) Larry outwills the fat slob easy points win

vs Donovan Ruddock (age 29) Ruddock knocks Holmes unconscious in 8
vs Tommy Morrison (age 23 Tommy is in the lead all the way and eventually stops Holmes on his feet with a barrage of left hooks on the ropes in the 6th

So Holmes beats Lewis and loses close to Bowe but gets dominated by Tommy Morrison???

Holmes would've taken Ruddock and Morrison to school and back, just like he did Mercer (who was better than both of them). One dimensional sluggers with suspect stamina were Larry's playthings.

I think he loses competitive but clear decisions to Bowe and Lewis.

Bruno is a tough one, I think it's a split decision either way.

Holmes would've beaten the post-Tokyo Douglas in a very boring fight.

Holmes-Foreman in 92 would've been GREAT. Real grudge match. I slightly favor Holmes by decision.

LOL, I didn't feel like hurting Mugabi's feelings and spending 4 days in a childish internet argument. But Morrison destroying Holmes may be the worst prediction I have ever read.

Through all of these claims of victory. Nothing can top this post from page 1. Mugabi is predictable, if nothing else.

How is the 27 yr old version of Lewis only a big punch and the 23 yr old version of Morrison the total package?

Jaywheel wrote:How is the 27 yr old version of Lewis only a big punch and the 23 yr old version of Morrison the total package?

How dare you insult Mugabi like that!

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:

Jaywheel wrote:How is the 27 yr old version of Lewis only a big punch and the 23 yr old version of Morrison the total package?

How dare you insult Mugabi like that!

When you grow up, you will learn that you can disagree without somebody without being an ass.

Raff The Frenchman wrote:

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:

Jaywheel wrote:How is the 27 yr old version of Lewis only a big punch and the 23 yr old version of Morrison the total package?

How dare you insult Mugabi like that!

When you grow up, you will learn that you can disagree without somebody without being an ass.

It's unfortunate I don't have any examples of how to conduct myself from you in this forum. Maybe if you posted in here other than to join in on nonsense I could follow your lead.

mugabi wrote:

Goodnight, Irene wrote:

mugabi wrote:I think its already well established you are the one who starts fights. Any reasonable person reading this and the other threads like the Czyz one can see that. In fact several have complained about you already but you choose to ignore the truth and defeat that is staring you in the face.

I will make the same offer to you again.
Stop trolling, stop abusing other members,let others have an opinion, put me on ignore, i will do the same and we need never converse again.

The same offer applies to Urineeie.

Put please dont start mimicking my lines, mimicking my advice to you, like you did in your last post, it makes you sound like the retarded little kid you are and its pretty pathetic

dont be like your namesake saddam . accept defeat with dignity. Because any further trolling posts you and your fellow keyboard bully make here will only add to your shameless defeat.

Excuse me if I didn't understand that one clearly --- as I type this, I am guiding Air Force One through a good deal of turbulence, & the screen is uneven. What is, "Urineeie" supposed to articulate? I've seen you botch several attempts at this, now, so let me do the spelling for you. What you are mangling (not your fault I know, as you have to concentrate on driving through the streets Grand Theft Auto-style while simultaneously producing multi-paragraph responses --- God knows, none of us mere mortals could accomplish it) is the phrase, "Goodnight, Urine."

It isn't witty, or clever, & even Raffy is cringing at it in obligatory silence as we speak --- but at least now someone has articulated your backward attempt at parody properly. Excuse me for a moment while I pull her in for the landing.

G'day Urineeie! Well I wouldnt expect someone of your convict background to have the education to understand my English.Its called the Queen's English Bruce!...... and since when was Australia the world centre for good English!

Also thanks for sharing your airforceone fantasies with us, although I would guess your not currently stationed on a helicopter but rather the dunnie! sitting there racked by feelings of persucution and delusion about your crusade for better spoelling in boxing forums!

whoops i got some spoellings wrong again! please dont punish me by trolling me to forum hell for an eternity urineieee! I must hand it to you though, the way you always get your spellings right! You police these forums for grammer mistakes with all the precision and bigoted zeal of the taliban policing afghan women for not having full length beards!


You and your friend shall henceforth be known as the trolling taliban twosome on a crusade for better spelling on boxing forums everywhere!

Such an admirable worthwhile pursuit for two young retarded men!

I've seen your interpretations of what you see when you watch our fair sport. Spelling is the least of your worries.

gambler49 wrote:Wat Irene and Saad need to understand is that this is a Boxing forum and NOT a Writing and Literature Forum! I think every1 that posts on here can type there words well enuff to be readable so I don't see da problem. As far as GI goes I think it's just pompous arrogance. He seem to suffer from narcissism
and a need to try and correct other posters on their grammar and spelling. His attack on Raff was well outta order! But he looked bad in the process. Maybe this is just an act on his part, or maybe he really is like this in real life, either way he aint gonna change on this forum. But. I hope that other posters can see that his style is not the way to go. It's not clever! And also it aint even funny!
As for Saad I urge u2 repent and remove this pompous arrogance that u have in u.
As for Irene, if his style is just and act, then good 4 him.. If this is how he rly is then I pity him. He either don't have any friends, or he will be friendless inda future... 99.9% of peeps don't appreciate being looked down upon.
Listen to me wen I talk: U will meet many peeps in ur life, some will be smarter and some wont be as smart as u. But u DON'T jump on some1 and slag them! Unless of corse they ask 4 ur opinion.

In fairness to me, & what I think most people either don't realise, or fail to acknowledge, is that I've never put anyone down or questioned anybody for anything other than genuinely pre-High School-level language.

Frankly, I grow very tired of hearing the same old weary response, "Well, this isn't a spelling bee!" because I've pulled them up on a repeated inability to distinguish, 'there,' 'they're' &, 'their,' or, 'you're,' from, 'your.' These are things I learned in primary (elementary) school. It's embarrassing so many adults, in so many walks of life, are so uneducated.

I find the stock-standard response I get of, "not being perfect" akin to telling a cop who pulls you up for having a busted fender, smashed-in windshield & a door missing, "Not everyone drives a Ferrari!"

mugabi wrote:

Idisagree wrote:
I often disagree with SaadOffTheDeck and Goodnight, Irene.

You as well?

Many people disagree on these forums in terms of opinions on boxing. The difference is we dont than swear to jackassly and vindictively nitpick the grammer of members whose opinions we do not agree with for an eternity until they are hounded off this board,by name calling and endless trolling campaigns of nitpicking the grammer of perfectly educated members of this forum on any post they dare make.That is insulting childish behaviour that doesnt befit the dignity of adults. The way they have insulted and consistently derailed threads by someone like Raff who i would wager speaks English better than the average English speaker is a good example. I'd like to thank all those who have PM'd me and offered support here and said it was time the trolling boxing forum grammer taliban were challenged. It shows people are fed up with the trolling twosome ruining BOTP threads with insults on anyone who disagrees with them in the form of nitpicking, insults,fabrication, exaggeration and ridicule of legitimately argued viewpoints by derailing threads into name calling sessions. It is the same two names again and again Irene and Saad. Other members here have said it. Many others have PM'd me and said it. Yet the trolling twosome still refuse to address their childish behaviour and ignorant trolling and continue to behave like they are heel WWE characters. why a couple of days ago they proclaimed all of the Current Section Members were uneducated idiots!? i felt like i was watching a WWE telecast where a gang like DX say the Raw brand is better than Smackdown .Shameless that these two trolls have reduced a forum about the distinguished noble art of boxing down to the level of pro wrestling!:shame:

I have given them a very small taste of their own medicine by challenging the playground bully mentality of these trolls. Some may argue one should not engage in a pissing contest with skunks. Equally others would say you fight fire with fire. I have adopted a mix of both approaches in order to get them to address their pompous, arrogant trolling.

Now they have been exposed for all to see and are just repeating the same name calling and sillyness. Saad in particular has been reduced to complaining he hasn't been challenged to a street fight and is presently quoting nursery rhymes such is the extent of his public humiliation and child like inability to address his self destructive trolling addiction.

I offered them a way out of this by suggesting we each put each other on ignore and that they moderate their future behaviour and trolling.

They refused it for another round of trolling on their part.

The offer still stands. I am sure they will refuse it as they seem addicted to humiliating themselves publically.

again in the interests of the credibility of this forum section the offer still stands for a ceasefire on the following honourable terms:
both of u and also my good self refrain from any more personal attacks.both of u refrain from nitpicking and trolling and name calling. You put a leash on your junior trolling attack dog jaywheel and send him back to his kennel.ps: guys i thought you insisted on good grammer teach him some spelling!

In honesty i think irene has some worthwhile boxing knowlege to share when he isnt being arrogant and pompous. Forming an alliance with saad though was a mistake and it did you no credit. I think you probably know this deep down.You shouldnt be so tough on raff he handles himself with great dignity and dont forget he has been on here longer than any of us. When you do stick to boxing comment i think you make some very readable points.

Im willing to be the bigger man show me you are as well irene. The choice is yours

A ceasefire will not mean victory or defeatfor any of us more a chance for the botp forum to go back to being about boxing.

I am a man of honour i keep my word.if you two can say deal

we can call it quits.

Either way is fine with me but i wont repeat this offer i honour my word

Feel free to stop embarassing yourself at anytime. Though quoting one of your own epic and illiterate novels with another is a tough way to win over a crowd. Why don't you try a noble approach and shut up? I know it goes against the principles of your trolling, but it's the best way to end a retarded battle that you started.

edit: BTW, Tommy Morrison still had putrid stamina.

Goodnight, Irene wrote:

gambler49 wrote:Wat Irene and Saad need to understand is that this is a Boxing forum and NOT a Writing and Literature Forum! I think every1 that posts on here can type there words well enuff to be readable so I don't see da problem. As far as GI goes I think it's just pompous arrogance. He seem to suffer from narcissism
and a need to try and correct other posters on their grammar and spelling. His attack on Raff was well outta order! But he looked bad in the process. Maybe this is just an act on his part, or maybe he really is like this in real life, either way he aint gonna change on this forum. But. I hope that other posters can see that his style is not the way to go. It's not clever! And also it aint even funny!
As for Saad I urge u2 repent and remove this pompous arrogance that u have in u.
As for Irene, if his style is just and act, then good 4 him.. If this is how he rly is then I pity him. He either don't have any friends, or he will be friendless inda future... 99.9% of peeps don't appreciate being looked down upon.

Listen to me wen I talk: U will meet many peeps in ur life, some will be smarter and some wont be as smart as u. But u DON'T jump on some1 and slag them! Unless of corse they ask 4 ur opinion.

In fairness to me, & what I think most people either don't realise, or fail to acknowledge, is that I've never put anyone down or questioned anybody for anything other than genuinely pre-High School-level language.

Frankly, I grow very tired of hearing the same old weary response, "Well, this isn't a spelling bee!" because I've pulled them up on a repeated inability to distinguish, 'there,' 'they're' &, 'their,' or, 'you're,' from, 'your.' These are things I learned in primary (elementary) school. It's embarrassing so many adults, in so many walks of life, are so uneducated.

I find the stock-standard response I get of, "not being perfect" akin to telling a cop who pulls you up for having a busted fender, smashed-in windshield & a door missing, "Not everyone drives a Ferrari!"

i guess thats the whole problem you have. You cant deal with the fact that in this new online world of 'text' and 'twitter english' and 'net english' many people such as myself choose to disregard formal english grammer when writing on purpose. I mean gambler spelt 'you' as u.he also spelt ' when' as 'wen' and 'course' as corse. And he has done it before. Does that mean i should be so arrogant and ill informed to dismiss him as 'uneducated' or 'lacking in elementary school education'? No! That would be incredibly ignorant as it is clear he knows the formal and correct spelling of those words and is simply not as strict using them in such an informal context as a online boxing forum. I am exactly the same and so is raff. I often spell you as u or you're as your. I am on an online boxing forum typing on my tiny handphone keyboard' im thinking who cares? And 99% dont care as they do exactly the same as me and gambler and raff to give but 3 examples out of billions of people engaging in 'net or text talk' online. But in our proffesional lives we will use the formal grammer and spelling.

The only problem and the cause of your unpopularity is your inability to grasp this concept up to now.

A shame as you often make good posts when only talking about boxing.

I write this with full sincerity

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Feel free to stop embarassing yourself at anytime. Though quoting one of your own epic and illiterate novels with another is a tough way to win over a crowd. Why don't you try a noble approach and shut up? I know it goes against the principles of your trolling, but it's the best way to end a retarded battle that you started.

edit: BTW, Tommy Morrison still had putrid stamina.

you on the other hand are an incorrigible troll and retard and a total nut job who should be sectioned under the mental health act!
the only embarrasment here is you and your foam at the mouth conviction that george foreman was a lousy infighter and that a 43 year old larry holmes would beat a 25 year old foreman! is there any chance you could take a swim in the english channel while typing your reply at least that way there is a slim chance you might do us all a favour and drown in your own sea of stupidity

the offer of a truce to you is withdrawn but the offer of a truce is still open to irene

Nice try, but we both know the people I speak to aren't writing informal, "text speech." They are people who literally do not comprehend the basic principles I've outlined. When someone writes, 'ur,' or, 'u're' that is text-speech, not when they write, 'your' as though, 'you're' does not exist. You know that perfectly well. Your post is an attempt to hood-wink.

mugabi wrote:

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Feel free to stop embarassing yourself at anytime. Though quoting one of your own epic and illiterate novels with another is a tough way to win over a crowd. Why don't you try a noble approach and shut up? I know it goes against the principles of your trolling, but it's the best way to end a retarded battle that you started.

edit: BTW, Tommy Morrison still had putrid stamina.

you on the other hand are an incorrigible troll and retard and a total nut job who should be sectioned under the mental health act!
the only embarrasment here is you and your foam at the mouth conviction that george foreman was a lousy infighter and that a 43 year old larry holmes would beat a 25 year old foreman! is there any chance you could take a swim in the english channel while typing your reply at least that way there is a slim chance you might do us all a favour and drown in your own sea of stupidity

the offer of a truce to you is withdrawn but the offer of a truce is still open to irene

I think your idea of a truce is I stop being me. That's a compromise no reasonable person can make.

Goodnight, Irene wrote:Nice try, but we both know the people I speak to aren't writing informal, "text speech." They are people who literally do not comprehend the basic principles I've outlined. When someone writes, 'ur,' or, 'u're' that is text-speech, not when they write, 'your' as though, 'you're' does not exist. You know that perfectly well. Your post is an attempt to hood-wink.

well its unfortunate for you and your mental well being that you can't accept i speak the truth.

I think its pretty clear you have some kind of deep insecurity about your own education or perhaps lack of it? Were you called 'stupid' by your father as a child?
I ask in all sincerity as i want to help understand why you have a habitual impulse to nitpick, or fabricate, perceived written english flaws by others on boxing forums, in order to convince yourself you are more educated than others? This delusion may be some deep form of psychosis? Do you have someone you can talk to about this? Your welcome to talk to me? I do note it is interesting raff in particular has been the main target of these insecurities. Raff being a on the surface sophisticated frenchman while you are an australian.
Do you pick on his english as you have an insecurity about his being able to speak french when you cannot and therefore you fear he is superior to you and you must troll him? Do you attempt to troll me as i am an ivy league graduate and therefore a threat to you in your own mind?
I will do everything i can to help your affliction.it is clear to me now i musn't blame you, it must have been very traumatic when you were called stupid by your father as a child. Consider me a friend we can talk about private in pm's if you prefer.
But the main thing is i will help you get through this.you poor thing you must be tortured by these insecurities. Im here to tell you you're not stupid.

Goodnight, Irene wrote:

mugabi wrote:

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Feel free to stop embarassing yourself at anytime. Though quoting one of your own epic and illiterate novels with another is a tough way to win over a crowd. Why don't you try a noble approach and shut up? I know it goes against the principles of your trolling, but it's the best way to end a retarded battle that you started.

edit: BTW, Tommy Morrison still had putrid stamina.

you on the other hand are an incorrigible troll and retard and a total nut job who should be sectioned under the mental health act!
the only embarrasment here is you and your foam at the mouth conviction that george foreman was a lousy infighter and that a 43 year old larry holmes would beat a 25 year old foreman! is there any chance you could take a swim in the english channel while typing your reply at least that way there is a slim chance you might do us all a favour and drown in your own sea of stupidity

the offer of a truce to you is withdrawn but the offer of a truce is still open to irene

I think your idea of a truce is I stop being me. That's a compromise no reasonable person can make.

yes i think that was the line of argument saddam hussien used at his trial prior to his life imprisonment when explaining why he hadnt ceased trying to build weapons of mass destruction

I see your point

mugabi wrote:

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Feel free to stop embarassing yourself at anytime. Though quoting one of your own epic and illiterate novels with another is a tough way to win over a crowd. Why don't you try a noble approach and shut up? I know it goes against the principles of your trolling, but it's the best way to end a retarded battle that you started.

edit: BTW, Tommy Morrison still had putrid stamina.

you on the other hand are an incorrigible troll and retard and a total nut job who should be sectioned under the mental health act!
the only embarrasment here is you and your foam at the mouth conviction that george foreman was a lousy infighter and that a 43 year old larry holmes would beat a 25 year old foreman! is there any chance you could take a swim in the english channel while typing your reply at least that way there is a slim chance you might do us all a favour and drown in your own sea of stupidity

the offer of a truce to you is withdrawn but the offer of a truce is still open to irene

Blah, blah blah, your pathetic nature is shown in your offer of a "truce". You're the only one that is upset. Your existence means nothing to me, I wish you no harm. I'm just not the type to sit around and eat insults without responding. All of this is because you can't handle a differing opinion.

You love to toss around troll but you have 80 posts bickering to every one about Boxing. Just shut your pie hole and it's over. Put me on ignore and stop following me around like a love sick teenager. Better yet, learn to deal with people not agreeing with your ass backwards opinions.

The most amusing part is your "truce" would only last until the next time I laughed at one of your insane Boxing posts. Poor me, the truce offer is withdrawn from the internet thug. Whatever will I do?

Get a life, I take more intelligent dumps than your posts.

"I think its pretty clear you have some kind of deep insecurity about your own education or perhaps lack of it? Were you called 'stupid' by your father as a child?"

Do you? I think it's pretty clear that this type of generic psycho-analysis & mentioning of insecurity is the most exhausted attempt at attacking someone in the history of our species. I think it speaks to a lack of wit & imagination. That's what I think's, "pretty clear."

"...I ask in all sincerity as i want to help understand why you have a habitual impulse to nitpick perceived faults in others in order to convince yourself you are more educated than others? This delusion may be some deep form of psychosis? Do you have someone you can talk to about this? Your welcome to talk to me? I do note it is interesting raff in particular has been the main target of these insecurities..."

No, you do not ask, "in sincerity." You ask to be facetious & smug, but --- & responding honestly --- you can't pull that off. It's just not something you're for. Everyone has limits.

"...Do you pick on his english as you have an insecurity about his being able to speak french when you cannot and therefore you fear he is superior to you and you must troll him? Do you attempt to troll me as i am an ivy league graduate and therefore a threat to you in your own mind?
I will do everything i can to help your affliction.it is clear to me now i musn't blame you, it must have been very traumatic when you were called stupid by your father as a child. Consider me a friend "

Whoever said unintentional humour was the best wasn't wrong

I think we found where your strength in comedy lies. Don't play dumb, "friend" --- it is the saddest of ironies that you are too stupid to manage it

Goodnight, Irene wrote:Nice try, but we both know the people I speak to aren't writing informal, "text speech." They are people who literally do not comprehend the basic principles I've outlined. When someone writes, 'ur,' or, 'u're' that is text-speech, not when they write, 'your' as though, 'you're' does not exist. You know that perfectly well. Your post is an attempt to hood-wink.

Ur is infinitely more intelligent than "Your a retard".