Boxing news,Dumbing down.!!!

Deserter
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6439
Joined: 04 Sep 2003, 10:01

Re: Boxing news,Dumbing down.!!!

Post by Deserter »

bad mamma jamma wrote:
milpool wrote:The first boxing magazine I got was in 1987, the Ring with Michael Olajide on the front!
u know what i remember that one, i remember taking it to school and someone commented on his jeri-curls..the wet look hair...
Somewhat sadly I remember that issue as well! Speaking of Olajide, I always thought he'd go further than he did. Same with his brother Tukunbo - the latter seemed a murderous puncher on the way up, but then got starched by Mendoza and drifted out of the game... think he was a renowned trumpet player or something similar?
smcb80
Cruiserweight
Posts: 195
Joined: 18 May 2011, 08:27

Re: Boxing news,Dumbing down.!!!

Post by smcb80 »

i'm going to start subcribing to Ring Magazine, any UK outlets that do it rather than pay x3 times the cost to have it shipped from US?
dondada
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 8872
Joined: 26 Nov 2003, 10:55

Re: Boxing news,Dumbing down.!!!

Post by dondada »

smcb80 wrote:i'm going to start subcribing to Ring Magazine, any UK outlets that do it rather than pay x3 times the cost to have it shipped from US?
On a different note, I tried to roll back the years and re-subscribe to Blues and Soul magazine a few weeks ago.

They've been online only for four years but are making a comeback via hard copy.

Just got it - 52 pages, 11 of which were ads; a lot of the copy was reviews.

£3.95 cover price but if you want to subscribe, it works out at seven quid an issue! (Six over the year). Crazy. Won't last five minutes.
milpool
Cruiserweight
Posts: 5402
Joined: 18 May 2011, 13:38

Re: Boxing news,Dumbing down.!!!

Post by milpool »

bad mamma jamma wrote: i used to love the pull out posters of the fighters...does anyone out there remember the Boxing Monthly massive pull out poster for the Tyson - Spinks fights..i still have that somewhere stored away..
Yep, I had that stuck on my bedroom wall.
DavidPayne
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6248
Joined: 11 Mar 2004, 11:00

Re: Boxing news,Dumbing down.!!!

Post by DavidPayne »

Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:
smcb80 wrote:i'm going to start subcribing to Ring Magazine, any UK outlets that do it rather than pay x3 times the cost to have it shipped from US?
On a different note, I tried to roll back the years and re-subscribe to Blues and Soul magazine a few weeks ago.

They've been online only for four years but are making a comeback via hard copy.

Just got it - 52 pages, 11 of which were ads; a lot of the copy was reviews.

£3.95 cover price but if you want to subscribe, it works out at seven quid an issue! (Six over the year). Crazy. Won't last five minutes.
However, ultimately, magazines will become like vinyl. The preserve of niche fans.
tonyevs
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5843
Joined: 08 Feb 2004, 18:13

Re: Boxing news,Dumbing down.!!!

Post by tonyevs »

Deserter wrote:
tonyevs wrote:Nowadays, it can be read in half hour tops.
I do like some of the changes Tris Dixon has brought in. And think they have very good writers.
But the style is now very lazy .... Why write when a fullpage photo can be used to pad the issue out, seems to be the mindset.
I haven't kept my old copies of BN, but from memory while the ratio of text to pictures was different, the pagination used to be lower, so I wouldn't be that surprised if it was broadly similar in terms of overall word count in reality. I actually think the publication has improved under Tris's stewardship.
.

Yes. Less pages .. but more to read :TU:
When they have upped the price. Its always then sold to us that they are adding more pages or improving the quality of the paper used.
Then in reality, the extra pages will only be for that weeks issue or just added photos :witzend:
And I was more than happy with the lower quality paper they used years ago .. it served its purpose just fine.


As said before though. Tris Dixon has improved the paper in the short time he has been at the helm. If only he could sort the picture padding problem out :TU:
Scottrf
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1146
Joined: 30 Nov 2010, 05:43

Re: Boxing news,Dumbing down.!!!

Post by Scottrf »

Do they ever have a feedback form with the mag to see what content readers prefer/changes they would make? If not, why not?
Jon Saxon
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1657
Joined: 22 Feb 2009, 16:16

Re: Boxing news,Dumbing down.!!!

Post by Jon Saxon »

tonyevs wrote:
Jon Saxon wrote:
tonyevs wrote:
Because it seems that everytime you ask somebody here, how long they been getting the BN, they always without fail - say 20yrs plus .. :roll:
Ask them the earliest copy they have in their possesion (that they can prove) .. it`ll be 20mths at best :D
Eh? who keeps last weeks news? maybe old geeks or nerd boys and the autistic/aspys but its kinda odd don't you think?

You can't take them to your grave so why keep them?

Yep - as I thought :wink:

A big part of keeping the old BN is to reference back on. This is why I grumble so much about the padding out with photos. How the guy looked in a photo isn`t nearly as useful as knowing how he performed in the fight.
Written words describing the fight, and events around the fight are what I`m interested in. These have more relevance in years to come if I choose to look back over a guys career.

Jon Saxon, you really are turning into the star of Boxrec ..
Hey Tony,

I was at the windup, (for once) I actually collect comics and have the Hulk number 1 (yes the real US edition)
However my all time low collecting momment when was when that monobrowed kunt Chris de Burgh outbid me for the chestbuster from 'Alien'
It was my aaaarrrghhhhhhhhhhhhhyoumothufukaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaarrrrrrrrrgggggggggghhhhhhhhhhhh momment In life.
I did up untill a few years ago have a pile of old boxing mags but then I relised that the more you own the more you have to lose.
So I decided to ditch a ton of shit BUT then last year I went and bought another famous number one comic that I have framed and vaccum sealed in my office.

Some collectors just can't helop themselves and boxing collectors are no differant.

sorry back to Boxing news, can anyone tell me why the subscriptions were so shite? in terms of delivery date? is this why its now out on a thursday?
Deserter
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6439
Joined: 04 Sep 2003, 10:01

Re: Boxing news,Dumbing down.!!!

Post by Deserter »

Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:
smcb80 wrote:i'm going to start subcribing to Ring Magazine, any UK outlets that do it rather than pay x3 times the cost to have it shipped from US?
On a different note, I tried to roll back the years and re-subscribe to Blues and Soul magazine a few weeks ago.

They've been online only for four years but are making a comeback via hard copy.

Just got it - 52 pages, 11 of which were ads; a lot of the copy was reviews.

£3.95 cover price but if you want to subscribe, it works out at seven quid an issue! (Six over the year). Crazy. Won't last five minutes.
Ian, bizarre coincidence no. 2, but I used to get Blues and Soul religiously - didn't realise it had re-emerged. The South-West column by Chris Dinnis guided me to many a fine night in Torquay and Exeter dancing the night away!
dondada
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 8872
Joined: 26 Nov 2003, 10:55

Re: Boxing news,Dumbing down.!!!

Post by dondada »

Jon Saxon wrote: However my all time low collecting momment when was when that monobrowed kunt Chris de Burgh outbid me for the chestbuster from 'Alien'
I'm sorry Jon but this has tipped the balance for me... :shame: :lol:
dbflex
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 870
Joined: 08 Nov 2007, 12:53

Re: Boxing news,Dumbing down.!!!

Post by dbflex »

Re reader surveys they used to do them regularly but haven't for a while. As for subscription deliveries, the firm they/we employ to deal with that has recently changed; I hear the service is much improved as a result.
Andy
Editor
Editor
Posts: 2898
Joined: 05 Nov 2008, 08:57

Re: Boxing news,Dumbing down.!!!

Post by Andy »

I used to subscribe to Nostalgia Weekly but it's not as good these days.
DavidPayne
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6248
Joined: 11 Mar 2004, 11:00

Re: Boxing news,Dumbing down.!!!

Post by DavidPayne »

I was after subscription to Hip Replacement....
Jon Saxon
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1657
Joined: 22 Feb 2009, 16:16

Re: Boxing news,Dumbing down.!!!

Post by Jon Saxon »

DavidPayne wrote:I was after subscription to Hip Replacement....
:DDD
Final round
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4911
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 17:02

Re: Boxing news,Dumbing down.!!!

Post by Final round »

MachoMan09 wrote:
DavidPayne wrote:However, ultimately, magazines will become like vinyl. The preserve of niche fans.
Vinyl is, due to original sound being analog by definition, obviously of a superior quality to digital recordings. Clearly digital formats are more convenient in most circumstances, but if a person is genuinely into music they will want--or should want--to put a bit of vinyl on from time to time, or at the very least expect club DJs to make use of it. Hence the niche will remain. I'm not so sure that magazines that are niche to begin with will be able to maintain a comparable degree of superiority; so as the non-internet generation die off the niche will become tiny and probably unsustainable, won't it?
Vinyl did make a resurgence in the Indie scene in the noughties with all the 45's that were coming out but I noticed underground electronic/dance scene seemed to gradually fade into digital download formats and many of the club Dj's now burn the various files on CD mixers for ease these days. A good bit of vinyl still sounds great but digital is very clean and airy sound and will only improve.
Final round
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4911
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 17:02

Re: Boxing news,Dumbing down.!!!

Post by Final round »

Jon Saxon wrote:
tonyevs wrote:
Jon Saxon wrote: Eh? who keeps last weeks news? maybe old geeks or nerd boys and the autistic/aspys but its kinda odd don't you think?

You can't take them to your grave so why keep them?

Yep - as I thought :wink:

A big part of keeping the old BN is to reference back on. This is why I grumble so much about the padding out with photos. How the guy looked in a photo isn`t nearly as useful as knowing how he performed in the fight.
Written words describing the fight, and events around the fight are what I`m interested in. These have more relevance in years to come if I choose to look back over a guys career.

Jon Saxon, you really are turning into the star of Boxrec ..

I was at the windup, (for once) I actually collect comics and have the Hulk number 1 (yes the real US edition)

So I decided to ditch a ton of shit BUT then last year I went and bought another famous number one comic that I have framed and vaccum sealed in my office.
Hulk No1 very nice, what was the other comic,
Jon Saxon
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1657
Joined: 22 Feb 2009, 16:16

Re: Boxing news,Dumbing down.!!!

Post by Jon Saxon »

Final round wrote:
Jon Saxon wrote:
tonyevs wrote:
Yep - as I thought :wink:

A big part of keeping the old BN is to reference back on. This is why I grumble so much about the padding out with photos. How the guy looked in a photo isn`t nearly as useful as knowing how he performed in the fight.
Written words describing the fight, and events around the fight are what I`m interested in. These have more relevance in years to come if I choose to look back over a guys career.

Jon Saxon, you really are turning into the star of Boxrec ..

I was at the windup, (for once) I actually collect comics and have the Hulk number 1 (yes the real US edition)

So I decided to ditch a ton of shit BUT then last year I went and bought another famous number one comic that I have framed and vaccum sealed in my office.
Hulk No1 very nice, what was the other comic,

I would love to tell you but I can't but what i can't say is this, it's the only one of it's kind that I know of (except for one other in the us) and its the only one singed by the publisher, writer & artist in the world.
Final round
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4911
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 17:02

Re: Boxing news,Dumbing down.!!!

Post by Final round »

Jon Saxon wrote:
Final round wrote:
Jon Saxon wrote:
I was at the windup, (for once) I actually collect comics and have the Hulk number 1 (yes the real US edition)

So I decided to ditch a ton of shit BUT then last year I went and bought another famous number one comic that I have framed and vaccum sealed in my office.
Hulk No1 very nice, what was the other comic,

I would love to tell you but I can't but what i can't say is this, it's the only one of it's kind that I know of (except for one other in the us) and its the only one singed by the publisher, writer & artist in the world.
:TU:
Final round
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4911
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 17:02

Re: Boxing news,Dumbing down.!!!

Post by Final round »

MachoMan09 wrote:
Final round wrote:
MachoMan09 wrote: Vinyl is, due to original sound being analog by definition, obviously of a superior quality to digital recordings. Clearly digital formats are more convenient in most circumstances, but if a person is genuinely into music they will want--or should want--to put a bit of vinyl on from time to time, or at the very least expect club DJs to make use of it. Hence the niche will remain. I'm not so sure that magazines that are niche to begin with will be able to maintain a comparable degree of superiority; so as the non-internet generation die off the niche will become tiny and probably unsustainable, won't it?
Vinyl did make a resurgence in the Indie scene in the noughties with all the 45's that were coming out but I noticed underground electronic/dance scene seemed to gradually fade into digital download formats and many of the club Dj's now burn the various files on CD mixers for ease these days. A good bit of vinyl still sounds great but digital is very clean and airy sound and will only improve.
I don't think digital will ever be as good as analog vinyl. The grooves carved into vinyl perfectly mirror the original sound's waveform i.e. no loss of sound. Digital simply cannot do that and only provides a snapshot that always results in loss of information/sound quality. The upside of digital is longevity, Mp3s don't get dusty or scratched, and the fact they don't take up space. A DJ flying out to Ibiza for the weekend can have tens of thousands of tracks on a hard-drive, he'd need a freight plane to transport that many records. Most clubbers these days don't know the difference anyway.
Yeah nothing like a dirty vinyl groove for warm deep sound and your right about today's clubbers not knowing the difference I reckon but I'm not sure about digital not being able to ever attain the same audio property's artificially. I dunno the proof's in the pudding and I've not missed my record collection 80,90s electronic house etc since I sold them and acquired them digitally apart from it as an object
Last edited by Final round on 04 Aug 2011, 16:46, edited 1 time in total.
Final round
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4911
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 17:02

Re: Boxing news,Dumbing down.!!!

Post by Final round »

:TU: Yes we have sorry all!
Jon Saxon
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1657
Joined: 22 Feb 2009, 16:16

Re: Boxing news,Dumbing down.!!!

Post by Jon Saxon »

MachoMan09 wrote:Yeah forever is a long time and the way technology moves on I'm probably being a bit pessimistic with my comment that digital will never be as good a quality as analog in terms of sound quality. I can listen merrily away to a digital dance track and not be in the slightest bit concerned but when I run a comparison with vinyl, it's night and day at the moment. Similarly if I compare a rock song on digital to a live gig the drums in particular are noticeably degraded on digital. I think we've taken this off topic. :DD
Well what about this then?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gszni4TOATo
Wake up call
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1178
Joined: 10 Feb 2008, 11:10

Re: Boxing news,Dumbing down.!!!

Post by Wake up call »

If it's recorded as an MP3 it will sound quality but in WAV it will be spot on. In terms of house music, these days it is made on computers, recordered on computers and played on computers.

I used to love the days when I had my 1210s and used to spend Saturday afternoons visiting record shops for vinyl. Now I just go onto Beatport.
Jon Saxon
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1657
Joined: 22 Feb 2009, 16:16

Re: Boxing news,Dumbing down.!!!

Post by Jon Saxon »

Wake up call wrote:If it's recorded as an MP3 it will sound quality but in WAV it will be spot on. In terms of house music, these days it is made on computers, recordered on computers and played on computers.

I used to love the days when I had my 1210s and used to spend Saturday afternoons visiting record shops for vinyl. Now I just go onto Beatport.
X1 sad days indeed, sold mine 4 years ago before they would be to hard to get rid off, the mystery of the white label is gone forever mate.

"Digital killed the analog star", sad days indeed as there is some amount of shite on half of the internet sites like beatport etc..
Jeff Thomas
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3016
Joined: 30 Apr 2009, 06:32

Re: Boxing news,Dumbing down.!!!

Post by Jeff Thomas »

I get fighting fit, boxing monthly and boxing news every month; I think they are all pretty fantastic. They could all be better, but obviously anything could've more suited to the individual reading.

For example I personally would like a lot more details from boxing news' local reports- some of them are terribly short and vague, I'd like records to ALWAYS be included.

From fighting fit I think a fighter circuit of the month would be good- allowing more interaction for the reader - on some fronts find it hard to see how a non 'expert' could get much use ! Sometimes it's a little heavy on the science.

With boxing monthly I'd like ko's to be included in records- I also miss the uk results round up (with brief summaries in brackets like this) -

All three mags are great and unmissable
Jon Saxon
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1657
Joined: 22 Feb 2009, 16:16

Re: Boxing news,Dumbing down.!!!

Post by Jon Saxon »

King Geedorah wrote:Can't believe Macho, Andy, Final Round & The Saxton are into dance music!

This is them on a secret night out.

Image

Lol in all truth mate this is us after a few beers.(I'm lying on the floor at this point :D )
Image

I'm not really a dance fan though I do like the odd dance track.

I much prefer this band http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G4KNz79vYzg I actually this this is the best live female rock vocal I have ever heard.

What an amazing cover!
Post Reply