BoxRec

mickey1975 wrote:

taffytoon wrote:

Coco wrote:I hope they take strong action against FW because he is out of order and he knows it.
If they don't it will give everyone in boxing carte blanche to do what they want and this tough game needs regulation.
Perhaps FW thinks because he financially bailed out the board over the Watson case and they let him not pay Calzaghe for the Hopkins fight, that he gets special treatment.

I seriously hope this is his downfall I really do.

I would have thought you would have liked him after the way he has looked after Nathan?

Yes and of course his management of JC.

damianhucker1 wrote:well im now in a split as far as what i want the board to do

Pretty much where I am Damien. I was dead against the show to start with and would have happily backed the Board but as weeks have passed its transpired that the Board have been instrumental in what could be their own downfall. Not "definitively" banning Derek, thinking they had enough clout that other organisitions would follow suit, threatening to Terminate members licences then back peddling, not getting the LBF thrown out of the EBU and not having provisions in their own rules to stop this debacle in the first place. It's like I was pissed at FW for undermining the Boards authority through exploiting their indecisiveness and lax approach but I'm even more pissed at the board for not being able to stop it and having glaring loopholes in their rules that can be exploited. They sort of deserve what's happening for resting on their laurels.

A very interesting post mentioned on the other thread about allegedly being the PROMOTER of this fight.

Now as far as I know there is no UK promoter known as allegedly..... there maybe a promoter with a luxemberg licence though.

If its what I think that is being attempted to do... a very interesting stunt. Loopholes, loopholes, loopholes.... oh if only integrity was used more often in law.

stujones wrote:A very interesting post mentioned on the other thread about Allegedly channel being the PROMOTER of this fight.

Now as far as I know there is no UK promoter known as Allegedly channel..... there maybe a promoter with a luxemberg licence though.

If its what I think that is being attempted to do... a very interesting stunt. Loopholes, loopholes, loopholes.... oh if only integrity was used more often in law.

If FW manages any fighters on the bill he can still be called for this though.