BoxRec

Blodhemn wrote:

Tanzio wrote:

gilgamesh wrote:
Banned again

WTH he do this time?

He is thanking his lucky stars he got banned tonight.

Upset Rover.

as much as I went back and forth with Saad, I would never report another poster. Fvckin dog needs to be put to sleep.

Had the 1st even. Can't score a round for someone who didn't land punches, this ain't no Burt Sugar retelling of the Willie Pep round.

Tanzio wrote:

Blodhemn wrote:

Tanzio wrote:
WTH he do this time?

He is thanking his lucky stars he got banned tonight.

Upset Rover.

as much as I went back and forth with Saad, I would never report another poster. Fvckin dog needs to be put to sleep.

Yeah same. Saad trolled at times but who cares, many posters do the same thing.

Blodhemn wrote:Had the 1st even. Can't score a round for someone who didn't land punches, this ain't no Burt Sugar retelling of the Willie Pep round.

I thought Lamont landed enough to shade it.

Bobbyptsd wrote:People seem to be forgetting awful quick that he got outboxed soundly against Alexander. I mean, it's funny how that result got changed to an official "shaft" a few minutes ago when at the time of their fight, most people believed Alexander beat him pretty clearly.

It's fine to start a bandwagon, let's just not drive it off a cliff.

This post is full-blown retard. Alexander robbed Matthysse, and that wasn't a claim that just got fabricated in the wake of this fight. Alexander didn't outbox anything, and his punches had less than nothing on them. Matthysse whooped Alexander's ass, Alexander dealt no damage in return, and the only thing that scored points on the judge's scorecards was Don King's bribe money.

From Post subject: Re: Robbery - is this term thrown around too much?, April 24, 2013.

Lackeos wrote:Alexander robbed Matthyse.

Matthysse clearly beat Alexander. I actually think the Judah decision was fair as Lucas gave up so many early rounds, but the Alexander fight wasn't even that close.

If Matthysse goes and destroys Garcia, the likely outcome, he's the clear Mayweather opponent below 154.

Tanzio wrote:

Bobbyptsd wrote:People seem to be forgetting awful quick that he got outboxed soundly against Alexander. I mean, it's funny how that result got changed to an official "shaft" a few minutes ago when at the time of their fight, most people believed Alexander beat him pretty clearly.

It's fine to start a bandwagon, let's just not drive it off a cliff.

WTF fight were YOU watching?! Matthysse got robbed clearly in that bullsh!t 10 rounder.

Just sit the fvck down. This is Mathysse's night, and there are a whole lot of teams working on their strategies to avoid this beast.

Matthysse may be the reason that the Canelo fight happens with FMJ in September now.

Wow, at least you're not overacting.

Mathysse lost to Alexander, but you are the one who had Bradley beating Pac, so I suppose you never got your eyes fixed.

Regardless, Mathysse has nothing to do with what Floyd will do next. You are getting incredibly carried away.

Lackeos wrote:

Bobbyptsd wrote:People seem to be forgetting awful quick that he got outboxed soundly against Alexander. I mean, it's funny how that result got changed to an official "shaft" a few minutes ago when at the time of their fight, most people believed Alexander beat him pretty clearly.

It's fine to start a bandwagon, let's just not drive it off a cliff.

This post is full-blown retard. Alexander robbed Matthysse, and that wasn't a claim that just got fabricated in the wake of this fight. Alexander didn't outbox anything, and his punches had less than nothing on them. Matthysse whooped Alexander's ass, Alexander dealt no damage in return, and the only thing that scored points on the judge's scorecards was Don King's bribe money.

From Post subject: Re: Robbery - is this term thrown around too much?, April 24, 2013.

Lackeos wrote:Alexander robbed Matthyse.

You're quoting yourself, because you are of course a reliable source? I mean if you said it, right?

At least you're not conceited or anything.

Bobbyptsd wrote:

Tanzio wrote:

Bobbyptsd wrote:People seem to be forgetting awful quick that he got outboxed soundly against Alexander. I mean, it's funny how that result got changed to an official "shaft" a few minutes ago when at the time of their fight, most people believed Alexander beat him pretty clearly.

It's fine to start a bandwagon, let's just not drive it off a cliff.

WTF fight were YOU watching?! Matthysse got robbed clearly in that bullsh!t 10 rounder.

Just sit the fvck down. This is Mathysse's night, and there are a whole lot of teams working on their strategies to avoid this beast.

Matthysse may be the reason that the Canelo fight happens with FMJ in September now.

Wow, at least you're not overacting.

Mathysse lost to Alexander, but you are the one who had Bradley beating Pac, so I suppose you never got your eyes fixed.

Regardless, Mathysse has nothing to do with what Floyd will do next. You are getting incredibly carried away.

Now put that dead carcass back up your ass for use the next time that you have no defense.

I am not getting carried away at all. When someone detonates good boxers like Lamont Peterson the way Matthysse does, it effects the future plans of other good boxers. Hence, the prospect of Danny vs FMJ improved significantly, as did the prospect of FMJ vs Canelo.

FMJ vs Matthysse is the one that is very likely not to take place. Not because FMJ can't beat him, but because of the risk involved.

^
He lost, whether you like it or not.

And I'll reiterate, you thought Bradley beat Pacquiao. Hardly a carcass, it speaks directly to your credibility.

FMJ won't be fighting Mathysse , because there's more money elsewhere. Very little risk, little reward.

Bobbyptsd wrote:^
He lost, whether you like it or not.

And I'll reiterate, you thought Bradley beat Pacquiao. Hardly a carcass, it speaks directly to your credibility.

FMJ won't be fighting Mathysse , because there's more money elsewhere. Very little risk, little reward.

There's 36 minutes of risk every time someone boxes a man who swings for the fences and ca turn their lives around with a win; that's why lots of us choose to continue to believe in this sport.

Bobbyptsd wrote:^
He lost, whether you like it or not.

And I'll reiterate, you thought Bradley beat Pacquiao. Hardly a carcass, it speaks directly to your credibility.

FMJ won't be fighting Mathysse , because there's more money elsewhere. Very little risk, little reward.

Is their anyone Mayweather fights that's a big reward?

world ranked wrote:

Bobbyptsd wrote:^
He lost, whether you like it or not.

And I'll reiterate, you thought Bradley beat Pacquiao. Hardly a carcass, it speaks directly to your credibility.

FMJ won't be fighting Mathysse , because there's more money elsewhere. Very little risk, little reward.

Is their anyone Mayweather fights that's a big reward?

I'd not thought of that before because Floyd earns so much regardless of opponent the risk/reward ratio is seriously skewed

Bobbyptsd wrote:^
He lost, whether you like it or not.

And I'll reiterate, you thought Bradley beat Pacquiao. Hardly a carcass, it speaks directly to your credibility.

FMJ won't be fighting Mathysse , because there's more money elsewhere. Very little risk, little reward.

And Pac lost, whether you like it or not. Although I will admit that Bradley won a closer fight than the robbery that was awarded to Alexander.

And credibility . . . come on, man . . . you are a psychological super fund site.