BoxRec

Who would you consider haters?

I see all the talk of haters but generally what I saw was reasonable skepticism. There are doubtlessly people who aren't favorable of Brook, but I think some posters are too keen to throw negative labels at people simply because they weren't pro-Brook.

crusader wrote:Who would you consider haters?

I see all the talk of haters but generally what I saw was reasonable skepticism. There are doubtlessly people who aren't favorable of Brook, but I think some posters are too keen to throw negative labels at people simply because they weren't pro-Brook.

I've already seen somebody say how this fight "exposed" then both rather than give credit. I've also seen enough "porter is garbage".

Those guys.

crusader wrote:Who would you consider haters?

plenty of the mugs on this thread.....

Brook was Britain's most boring boxer.

I was right.

Horse wrote:Brook was Britain's most boring boxer.

I was right.

Dipping your hooves in

Horse wrote:Brook was Britain's most boring boxer.

I was right.

No.

crusader wrote:Who would you consider haters?

I see all the talk of haters but generally what I saw was reasonable skepticism. There are doubtlessly people who aren't favorable of Brook, but I think some posters are too keen to throw negative labels at people simply because they weren't pro-Brook.

Well said, agree entirely

Horse wrote:Brook was Britain's most boring boxer.

I was right.

The troll returns.

For 15 months you have abused Kell insinuating he is a liar and a coward. You refused to accept he had fractured his foot, insisting he had turned down a career high purse because he was a bottlejob. Even last week you claimed he would feign injury to avoid the Porter fight. Kell and his family read these posts. Does that give you some kind of kick?

Kell has dreamed of being a world champion for 19 years. On Saturday he beat the American favourite in the USA. His courage and bravery was there for all boxing fans to see. The American press were certainly impressed with his performance. You have finally come back on the board not to praise Kell but to have more digs.

You name yourself after an animal because you are a pathetic human being. You are the biggest joke on this forum you snivelling coward.

Pugilist-specialist, some people aren't going to like Kell Brook and you know what? That's okay. A guy you have followed for years has just travelled to the states to become a world champ. The world is now his lobster. Don't worry about what Horse says, or that some people have doubted Brook's ability in the past. It isn't worth your time. Just enjoy it whilst it lasts

He done himself & British boxing proud the weekend.

Lenny wrote:Pugilist-specialist, some people aren't going to like Kell Brook and you know what? That's okay. A guy you have followed for years has just travelled to the states to become a world champ. The world is now his lobster. Don't worry about what Horse says, or that some people have doubted Brook's ability in the past. It isn't worth your time. Just enjoy it whilst it lasts

What happened to the Oyster?

Lenny wrote:Pugilist-specialist, some people aren't going to like Kell Brook and you know what? That's okay. A guy you have followed for years has just travelled to the states to become a world champ. The world is now his lobster. Don't worry about what Horse says, or that some people have doubted Brook's ability in the past. It isn't worth your time. Just enjoy it whilst it lasts

Lenny, plenty of people have questioned Kell's ability. That's fair enough on a boxing forum. Horse became a troll, insinuating that Kell was a liar, fraud and a coward.

Final round wrote:

Lenny wrote:Pugilist-specialist, some people aren't going to like Kell Brook and you know what? That's okay. A guy you have followed for years has just travelled to the states to become a world champ. The world is now his lobster. Don't worry about what Horse says, or that some people have doubted Brook's ability in the past. It isn't worth your time. Just enjoy it whilst it lasts

What happened to the Oyster?

Kell will go far with those mussels.

Final round wrote:

Lenny wrote:Pugilist-specialist, some people aren't going to like Kell Brook and you know what? That's okay. A guy you have followed for years has just travelled to the states to become a world champ. The world is now his lobster. Don't worry about what Horse says, or that some people have doubted Brook's ability in the past. It isn't worth your time. Just enjoy it whilst it lasts

What happened to the Oyster?

I don't like oysters, lobster is much better

Pugilist-specialist wrote:

Lenny wrote:Pugilist-specialist, some people aren't going to like Kell Brook and you know what? That's okay. A guy you have followed for years has just travelled to the states to become a world champ. The world is now his lobster. Don't worry about what Horse says, or that some people have doubted Brook's ability in the past. It isn't worth your time. Just enjoy it whilst it lasts

Lenny, plenty of people have questioned Kell's ability. That's fair enough on a boxing forum. Horse became a troll, insinuating that Kell was a liar, fraud and a coward.

Horse has always been a troll, ignore him and hopefully he'll go away. He has never gone after a fighter like he did with Brook before because you guys can be a little over sensitive

Bask in your glory and enjoy the mostly Horse-less forum until 00:01 on September 1st

Lenny wrote:

Pugilist-specialist wrote:

Lenny wrote:Pugilist-specialist, some people aren't going to like Kell Brook and you know what? That's okay. A guy you have followed for years has just travelled to the states to become a world champ. The world is now his lobster. Don't worry about what Horse says, or that some people have doubted Brook's ability in the past. It isn't worth your time. Just enjoy it whilst it lasts

Lenny, plenty of people have questioned Kell's ability. That's fair enough on a boxing forum. Horse became a troll, insinuating that Kell was a liar, fraud and a coward.

Horse has always been a troll, ignore him and hopefully he'll go away. He has never gone after a fighter like he did with Brook before because you guys can be a little over sensitive

Bask in your glory and enjoy the mostly Horse-less forum until 00:01 on September 1st

I want Horse to fall out with Ronnie Clark's gang.

Lenny wrote:Horse has always been a troll, ignore him and hopefully he'll go away. He has never gone after a fighter like he did with Brook before because you guys can be a little over sensitive

Bask in your glory and enjoy the mostly Horse-less forum until 00:01 on September 1st

This forum has gotten bad enough already recently. Without me this place would be in real trouble.

Brook was very boring, so I said so and most people agreed with me. That's not trolling.

Horse wrote:

Lenny wrote:Horse has always been a troll, ignore him and hopefully he'll go away. He has never gone after a fighter like he did with Brook before because you guys can be a little over sensitive

Bask in your glory and enjoy the mostly Horse-less forum until 00:01 on September 1st

This forum has gotten bad enough already recently. Without me this place would be in real trouble.

Brook was very boring, so I said so and most people agreed with me. That's not trolling.

ffsake horse the bloke just won away from home in the US against a solid champ in a fight few gave him better than a 25% chance of winning and you come up with this?

Then you post your opinions on top 30's p4p and expect realistic reaction?
I can assure you this isnt the way to obtain kudos and gravitas towards your opinions.

Very disappointing.

ps as for being in trouble without you, how far up your own arse are you? Id suggest you go misisng for a bit and then come back and see if the forum is in trouble.
I'd suggest that all we would suffer is some anti kell, pro fury posts and a top 30 p4p in britain of varying quality.

Thats the thruth of the matter.

J wrote:ffsake horse the bloke just won away from home in the US against a solid champ in a fight few gave him better than a 25% chance of winning and you come up with this?

Then you post your opinions on top 30's p4p and expect realistic reaction?
I can assure you this isnt the way to obtain kudos and gravitas towards your opinions.

Very disappointing.

It was obviously a very good win against Porter.

That doesn't need to be said.

J wrote:ps as for being in trouble without you, how far up your own arse are you? Id suggest you go misisng for a bit and then come back and see if the forum is in trouble.
I'd suggest that all we would suffer is some anti kell, pro fury posts and a top 30 p4p in britain of varying quality.

Thats the thruth of the matter.

You'd miss me.

so why come up with this derogatory bs mate, it just detracts from your integrity and authenticty as a poster (i know a bit rich coming from my past perfromances when i first posted onhere but i have sorted that out)...Im not trying to have a go as we have had many good discussions over the years but of late you seem a bit detached from fistic reality....in my humble opinion.

Horse wrote:

J wrote:ps as for being in trouble without you, how far up your own arse are you? Id suggest you go misisng for a bit and then come back and see if the forum is in trouble.
I'd suggest that all we would suffer is some anti kell, pro fury posts and a top 30 p4p in britain of varying quality.

Thats the thruth of the matter.

You'd miss me.

a little bit mate but not a lot

J wrote:so why come up with this derogatory bs mate, it just detracts from your integrity and authenticty as a poster (i know a bit rich coming from my past perfromances when i first posted onhere but i have sorted that out)...Im not trying to have a go as we have had many good discussions over the years but of late you seem a bit detached from fistic reality....in my humble opinion.

I didn't dredge this old thread up.

I was just defending myself by saying that Brook's career was widely considered to be very boring, and making a thread about that was not unfair nor inaccurate.

Kudos to Kell for finally stepping up and doing well, but he should have done it about 3 years ago instead of pottering about so much.

J wrote:a little bit mate but not a lot

A little's enough for me.