Page 6 of 8

Re: i have bet £1000 at odds of 3/1 Fury beats Haye

Posted: 25 Aug 2013, 11:51
by squared circle
Chisora was grossly overweight v haye??

How would you described him vs fury then mate?

Re: i have bet £1000 at odds of 3/1 Fury beats Haye

Posted: 25 Aug 2013, 11:59
by Bard of Boxrec
Wow, people are still engaging this troll.

Re: i have bet £1000 at odds of 3/1 Fury beats Haye

Posted: 25 Aug 2013, 14:27
by squared circle
Hey riddick, he might post up his bet screen shot yet!!! ;-)

Re: i have bet £1000 at odds of 3/1 Fury beats Haye

Posted: 25 Aug 2013, 14:33
by Mimmy
squared circle wrote:Hey riddick, he might post up his bet screen shot yet!!! ;-)
He wont do that no one puts a grand on a boxing match unless you are the boxer concerned

Re: i have bet £1000 at odds of 3/1 Fury beats Haye

Posted: 25 Aug 2013, 15:26
by Deno1986
mimmy123 wrote:
squared circle wrote:Hey riddick, he might post up his bet screen shot yet!!! ;-)
He wont do that no one puts a grand on a boxing match unless you are the boxer concerned
Or Hagler.

Re: i have bet £1000 at odds of 3/1 Fury beats Haye

Posted: 26 Aug 2013, 04:06
by sonnyboyx2
Deno1986 wrote:Neven Pajkic (27% KO) had Fury down heavy in their fight but I guess you must have overlooked that one. Fury was holding on or dear life. If Haye hits him with a similar punch, Fury won't finish the fight. Valuev had a rock solid chin but Haye managed to stagger him in the last round I think. You're a good troll I'll give you that.
Fury was a raw over weight rookie when Pajkic floored him, however like all good fighters Fury got to his feet and won the fight. Henry Cooper floored Muhammad Ali.. David Haye was down twice against Mormeck, Haye was down 7 times or more against Wlad.

Re: i have bet £1000 at odds of 3/1 Fury beats Haye

Posted: 26 Aug 2013, 04:09
by sonnyboyx2
squared circle wrote:Chisora was grossly overweight v haye??

How would you described him vs fury then mate?
Chisora was a virgin (undefeated) when he fought Fury and Fury pounded him for 12rds Heleneus & Vitali also both hammered him for 12rds, Chisora then served a lengthy ban from the sport before getting beaten by Haye. Big difference!

Re: i have bet £1000 at odds of 3/1 Fury beats Haye

Posted: 26 Aug 2013, 04:14
by sonnyboyx2
Riddick Blowe wrote:Wow, people are still engaging this troll.
So when you dont agree with a persons opinion on the outcome of an upcoming bout and you dont have the knowledge of the sport to debate that persons points of view. you lower yourself to start labeling that person a troll?... its what a small child would do if they was unable to compete with another child on the school sports day, they would sulk and claim the other child to be a cheat or a show off. grow up you fool and stop your name calling and if you cannot debate the topic then leave it alone and go debate something you know something about.

Re: i have bet £1000 at odds of 3/1 Fury beats Haye

Posted: 26 Aug 2013, 07:36
by Mimmy
sonnyboyx2 wrote:
Riddick Blowe wrote:Wow, people are still engaging this troll.
So when you dont agree with a persons opinion on the outcome of an upcoming bout and you dont have the knowledge of the sport to debate that persons points of view. you lower yourself to start labeling that person a troll?... its what a small child would do if they was unable to compete with another child on the school sports day, they would sulk and claim the other child to be a cheat or a show off. grow up you fool and stop your name calling and if you cannot debate the topic then leave it alone and go debate something you know something about.
I think you need to put up or shut up. you have claimed you have a £1000 bet, but unwilling to back up the claim? This is what a small child would do in a playground when they are unable to compete with another, they would simply make up a claim to make the other look like a fool.

The simplicity of proving your claim is easy. You should not have claimed the bet imo you could have simply stated that you had a bet with the misses etc etc and this would all be incidental. Also actually isnt making up a topic about a claim or event or a person to get a negative response something on the lines of trolling?

If you cannot back up your claim I suggest you go to another forum (betting forum) and make the claim there this would be on a topic that you know something about.

Have a nice Bank holiday!

Re: i have bet £1000 at odds of 3/1 Fury beats Haye

Posted: 26 Aug 2013, 07:53
by forcefraser
Show your cairds Sonnyboy, ah sais show yer fecking cairds.

If you don`t, then damn you to hell.

Re: i have bet £1000 at odds of 3/1 Fury beats Haye

Posted: 26 Aug 2013, 09:07
by squared circle
sonnyboyx2 wrote:
squared circle wrote:Chisora was grossly overweight v haye??

How would you described him vs fury then mate?
Chisora was a virgin (undefeated) when he fought Fury and Fury pounded him for 12rds Heleneus & Vitali also both hammered him for 12rds, Chisora then served a lengthy ban from the sport before getting beaten by Haye. Big difference!

1) what has any of that got to do with his weight?
2) most people had him beating helenius- certainly not a 12 round beating
3) consensus view was he gave vitali his hardest fight for years and won at least 3 rounds clearly if not more certainly not a 12 round beating

Glad you are debating on a topic you know loads about mate, would hate to see you harping on about something you seem to know little about

Re: i have bet £1000 at odds of 3/1 Fury beats Haye

Posted: 26 Aug 2013, 09:17
by sonnyboyx2
squared circle wrote:
sonnyboyx2 wrote:
squared circle wrote:Chisora was grossly overweight v haye??

How would you described him vs fury then mate?
Chisora was a virgin (undefeated) when he fought Fury and Fury pounded him for 12rds Heleneus & Vitali also both hammered him for 12rds, Chisora then served a lengthy ban from the sport before getting beaten by Haye. Big difference!

1) what has any of that got to do with his weight?
2) most people had him beating helenius- certainly not a 12 round beating
3) consensus view was he gave vitali his hardest fight for years and won at least 3 rounds clearly if not more certainly not a 12 round beating

Glad you are debating on a topic you know loads about mate, would hate to see you harping on about something you seem to know little about
i have forgotton more about boxing than you will ever ever know my friend. there is very very few people alive who can talk the sport of boxing like i can. ..trust me!

Re: i have bet £1000 at odds of 3/1 Fury beats Haye

Posted: 26 Aug 2013, 11:48
by Mimmy
Sonny ^^^^^



[quote]i have forgotton more about boxing than you will ever ever know my friend. there is very very few people alive who can talk the sport of boxing like i can. ..trust me![quote]

I knew it was you

Image

Re: i have bet £1000 at odds of 3/1 Fury beats Haye

Posted: 26 Aug 2013, 14:07
by sonnyboyx2
mimmy123 wrote:
sonnyboyx2 wrote:
Riddick Blowe wrote:Wow, people are still engaging this troll.
So when you dont agree with a persons opinion on the outcome of an upcoming bout and you dont have the knowledge of the sport to debate that persons points of view. you lower yourself to start labeling that person a troll?... its what a small child would do if they was unable to compete with another child on the school sports day, they would sulk and claim the other child to be a cheat or a show off. grow up you fool and stop your name calling and if you cannot debate the topic then leave it alone and go debate something you know something about.
I think you need to put up or shut up. you have claimed you have a £1000 bet, but unwilling to back up the claim? This is what a small child would do in a playground when they are unable to compete with another, they would simply make up a claim to make the other look like a fool.

The simplicity of proving your claim is easy. You should not have claimed the bet imo you could have simply stated that you had a bet with the misses etc etc and this would all be incidental. Also actually isnt making up a topic about a claim or event or a person to get a negative response something on the lines of trolling?

If you cannot back up your claim I suggest you go to another forum (betting forum) and make the claim there this would be on a topic that you know something about.

Have a nice Bank holiday!
i dont need to put up nothing, if you have a problem with me and how i make my wagers then tuff s*** to you mate. i place my bets on Betfair plain and simple, so your constant bickering just makes me laugh. address the topic of how i have explained Fury will dismantle Haye on the 28th and i will be collecting.

Re: i have bet £1000 at odds of 3/1 Fury beats Haye

Posted: 26 Aug 2013, 14:13
by Mimmy
Sonny, I don't have any issues with your wagers, I'm a betting man myself but only back on Jason Hart and Jim Crowley. 16/1 winner today along with a 9/2. Admittedly I did not wager £1000 but im quids in (again) today.

Sonny, if you are a betting man keep your eye on Jason Hart, he's a 3lb claimer and knocking them in. Jim Crowley wins on Blackpool donkeys he can make a nag cross that line in front. Boom take a look at his stats, last season He killed the bookies, now theres something to think about.

Re: i have bet £1000 at odds of 3/1 Fury beats Haye

Posted: 26 Aug 2013, 14:44
by Hagler2002
sonnyboyx2 wrote:i place my bets on Betfair plain and simple, so your constant bickering just makes me laugh.
What makes me laugh is you haven't backed Fury, no one has on for a grand Betfair :lol:

Explain that one gobshite!

Image

Warra Phucking Mug :yay:

Re: i have bet £1000 at odds of 3/1 Fury beats Haye

Posted: 26 Aug 2013, 14:54
by addi
tflanagan5 wrote:anyone who thinks this fight is a mismatch is ridiculous. David Haye's record at heavyweight isnt spectacular, he lost to Klitschko and in my opinion was very fortunate to beat Valuev.His best win at heavyweight has been Chisora and you can see by the end of the fight he was starting to tire. At cruiserweight he only had two world title fights, one beating Enzo Maccarinelli who is now a domestic level light heavyweight with a glass chin and Jean Marc Mormeck who was destroyed by Wladimir in one of the most one sided title fights ever.A lot of the hype behind Haye has been generated by himself and i even believed he had a chance against Wladimir with the way he was talking. His a fighter who likes to ambush opponents and when it works it looks spectacular ie.Audley Harrison. Fury is underrated because many believe him to be a clown, but his going to set a fast pace from the start, faster than the Wladimir fight and i see Haye getting gased by the late rounds. If Fury comes in with a proper defense and doesnt get carried away David Haye is going to find it very hard to beat him. Haye is also a head hunter which means Fury doesnt have too worry too much about defending his body, which means he can keep his hands high. Fury also has a very good jab which he can use to keep Haye away from him and Fury is an exceptional inside fighter for a big man. IMO Haye only has one way to beat Fury and thats by catching him with a massive punch and hoping Furys chin is as bad as some people say it is, which could very well happen but Fury can out box and out work Haye. And betting odds are effected by who people put there money on, so the casual fan must think, Fury the man who punched himself in the face, talks the world of poo and has been down a few times isnt going to stand a chance against David 'the hayemaker' Haye who is known mostly for being a big puncher
spot on. fury will jab his head of all night.

Re: i have bet £1000 at odds of 3/1 Fury beats Haye

Posted: 26 Aug 2013, 14:55
by Wrists
Hagler2002 wrote:
sonnyboyx2 wrote:i place my bets on Betfair plain and simple, so your constant bickering just makes me laugh.
What makes me laugh is you haven't backed Fury, no one has on for a grand Betfair :lol:

Explain that one gobshite!

Image

Warra Phucking Mug :yay:
Ooh shot son

Re: i have bet £1000 at odds of 3/1 Fury beats Haye

Posted: 26 Aug 2013, 14:56
by Hagler2002
Wrsits, delete that one and quote my new post I'd put the wrong image on first time I've just edited it.

Re: i have bet £1000 at odds of 3/1 Fury beats Haye

Posted: 26 Aug 2013, 15:00
by addi
Clint Magnum wrote:The Tyson Fury that fought Kevin Johnson is three times the Tyson of 24 months ago.
I did not rate him whatseover but he has improved significantly both in speed and conditioning.
However if the poster would like to make another side bet with me as well as the bookies I'll match his £1k bet and back Haye with a winner takes all?.. :bag:
you gonna give him the same odds as the bookies.

Re: i have bet £1000 at odds of 3/1 Fury beats Haye

Posted: 26 Aug 2013, 15:31
by Mimmy
Hagler2002 wrote:Wrsits, delete that one and quote my new post I'd put the wrong image on first time I've just edited it.
Nice one Hagler, you are a fcuking god!

Now get your money on Baltic Spirit 2-30 Ripon Jason Hart's only ride.

You gotta be a good lier these days when all info is available on the net.

Re: i have bet £1000 at odds of 3/1 Fury beats Haye

Posted: 26 Aug 2013, 15:53
by ALI
Hagler2002 wrote:
sonnyboyx2 wrote:i place my bets on Betfair plain and simple, so your constant bickering just makes me laugh.
What makes me laugh is you haven't backed Fury, no one has on for a grand Betfair :lol:

Explain that one gobshite!

Image

Warra Phucking Mug :yay:
Fcuking class mate :DD

They say you should never argue with an idiot as he will bring you down to his level and win from experience, but not this time, Haglers landed the Hayemaker, Sonny's through the ropes and lying by the front row, no count necessary.

What a spanner!

Re: i have bet £1000 at odds of 3/1 Fury beats Haye

Posted: 26 Aug 2013, 16:35
by Mimmy
I do not know anyone who has bet a grand on anything. My dad was a compulsive gambler before he died and lost over 7000 during the summer months, this was a common occurance. He is the only person ive seen waste a truck load of money. The most ive lost in one bet is properly 20 quid

Re: i have bet £1000 at odds of 3/1 Fury beats Haye

Posted: 26 Aug 2013, 17:02
by mickey1975
mimmy123 wrote:I do not know anyone who has bet a grand on anything. My dad was a compulsive gambler before he died and lost over 7000 during the summer months, this was a common occurance. He is the only person ive seen waste a truck load of money. The most ive lost in one bet is properly 20 quid
I know a few who would bet a grand regularly. My biggest was £900 on Haye to beat Chisora at 4/9. Even though I knew it would win, still shit myself having that much riding on it.

Re: i have bet £1000 at odds of 3/1 Fury beats Haye

Posted: 26 Aug 2013, 18:49
by NazNaci1
Well the OP's reasoning that Fury would win is laughable. He has size on his side but has been dropped by much smaller guys. He is going to get obliterated and Haye knows it.

Haye holds ALL the aces, bar height and reach and seeing as Tyson is hardly Willie Pep, I (like most) expect a bit of a tonking for the big lump. He talks s***, his opponents have been s*** and he really is nothing special.