Il Duce wrote:That left hand, wasn't even that hard.....
As hard as the one Big Jim gives you if you don't have his dinner on the table when he gets in from work?
Il Duce wrote:That left hand, wasn't even that hard.....
This is correct. Frazier was much more an attrition puncher rather than spectacular KO artist.Il Duce wrote:Little Joe
Was not a 'One-Punch' KO Artist.
Yes, he had a few of those knockouts, but that wasn't his moniker.
I sort of disagree. Both times the right man was given the decision but it was close enough that a draw or a close win the other way would have been controversial, but not a robbery. Particularly Duran-Leonard which was razor close, as the judges scorecards indicated.SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Frazier clearly won the fight, not even debatable. It was highly competitive and a great bout with a clear winner. Just like Duran/Leonard one. In defeat Ali & Leonard proved exactly how tough they were, but no legitimate scorecard has either one of them as the winner. And no, a draw isn't plausible either.
Good job you're not a boxing judge then!Il Duce wrote:I had Joe winning by 7-Points {145-138} scoring Rounds 5, 11 and 15 {10-8}.
The trilogy ended with one man winning the all important and defining rubber match and his opponent unable to finish the fight and all your whining can not alter that fact.Il Duce wrote:#1...........Joe Frazier won, and put an 'Exclamation Point' on the Tip of Muhammad Ali's chin.ThatOne wrote:Joe Frazier won the first fight and Muhammad Ali won the trilogy.
Anything beyond that is conjecture, speculation, and rank revisionism.
#2...........Muhammad Ali fought fairly well, but should have been DQ'd, or lost points for' filthy fouling'.
#3...........Joe Frazier fought a courageous battle with eye issues and kidney problems.
This was not a fight where bias came into it.aajayunlimited wrote:Did they just give it to Frazier, because he was the first fighter to both give Ali a beating and a knockdown in a highly profiled battle of champions? When you count up the rounds, how do you have it?
Rounds 1 & 2 for Ali
3 slightly for Ali: I can see how it could be EVEN, because Frazier hurt Ali here(but remember Ali did a lot here plus he staggered Joe at one point).
Round 4 & 5 for Ali.
Round 6 - 8 for Frazier.
Round 9 & 10 for Ali.
11 & 12 for Frazier.
13 & 14 for Ali.
15 for Frazier.
I'm watching the fight right now. Tell me that I'm wrong to score that fight either 8-6-1 or 9-6 for Ali! If there were 2 point rounds, then Frazier would still lose(because he would get 2 extra points for 11 & 15, but Ali would get an extra point for round 9). That doesn't apply, but if it did: the fight would have been closer(1 point win for Ali). I--from scoring the fight--can't see a scenario for Frazier to win this fight as it went down.
Yeah, the judges scorecards never steer you wrong.jezzamundo wrote:I sort of disagree. Both times the right man was given the decision but it was close enough that a draw or a close win the other way would have been controversial, but not a robbery. Particularly Duran-Leonard which was razor close, as the judges scorecards indicated.SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Frazier clearly won the fight, not even debatable. It was highly competitive and a great bout with a clear winner. Just like Duran/Leonard one. In defeat Ali & Leonard proved exactly how tough they were, but no legitimate scorecard has either one of them as the winner. And no, a draw isn't plausible either.
Using the same method, I had Spinks scoring a TKO over Tyson.JohnnyGhabach wrote: ↑08 Jun 2018, 09:21But if you have watched it over and over again, such as myself, and count the punches for each round with a pen and paper, pausing and rewinding, counting each fighter, count the punch ratios and combos, don't score body punches more than clean head punches, Ali literally annihilated Joe in all stats
On what planet do Body punches not count?wouter wrote: ↑08 Jun 2018, 12:53Using the same method, I had Spinks scoring a TKO over Tyson.JohnnyGhabach wrote: ↑08 Jun 2018, 09:21But if you have watched it over and over again, such as myself, and count the punches for each round with a pen and paper, pausing and rewinding, counting each fighter, count the punch ratios and combos, don't score body punches more than clean head punches, Ali literally annihilated Joe in all stats
I won't comment other parts of your insane evaluation due to the obviousness of all things, which is somehow not so obvious to you, but I just mention, that Ali was showing off in public by saying that and he admitted the loss in narrow circles of people close to him.JohnnyGhabach wrote: ↑08 Jun 2018, 09:21 Ali was truly right: The fight was the white mans decision.
I agree, if you watch that fight over and over again you eventually can see that there are a solid two or three seconds where Spinks is in complete control of the fight (but then Tyson starts throwing punches). Had the ref had the good sense to stop the fight before Tyson started throwing any punches, we would have had a different outcome. Spinks got robbed.wouter wrote: ↑08 Jun 2018, 12:53Using the same method, I had Spinks scoring a TKO over Tyson.JohnnyGhabach wrote: ↑08 Jun 2018, 09:21But if you have watched it over and over again, such as myself, and count the punches for each round with a pen and paper, pausing and rewinding, counting each fighter, count the punch ratios and combos, don't score body punches more than clean head punches, Ali literally annihilated Joe in all stats
It was a competitive fight. I don't think it was Wide in anyone's favor, but Frazier definitely deserved it.HomicideHenry wrote: ↑13 Jun 2018, 23:00 The fight was extremely wide in Frazier's favor I don't know what anyone is bothering speculating about.
Second half yes, the first half was very competitive - Frazier by several rounds plus a KD; it was Frazier at his apex, a grand night.HomicideHenry wrote: ↑13 Jun 2018, 23:00 The fight was extremely wide in Frazier's favor I don't know what anyone is bothering speculating about.