Page 6 of 15
Re: Please Explain Your Scoring
Posted: 21 May 2015, 08:59
by jamesmcdonnell
koolkc107 wrote:Badhusker wrote:This is all you need now:
Floyd - W
Manny - L
Now, hopefully both will retire. No more shouldergate crap.
You smarter than that, 'Husker.
They settin' up the okey-doke one more 'gain.
The might make only half the money but it is still a goldmine.
They will fight next year, Cinco de Mayo.
With Floyd going for 50-0
Sadly, I think you're right - they won't get one red cent of mine.
Re: Please Explain Your Scoring
Posted: 21 May 2015, 09:03
by Hotspurx
Thanks KBB. I agree with you.
And thanks for finding this quote on the scoring zone, Pureist. It seems to me Mayweather's shot in Round 3 (which lands on the hairline and skims off the scalp by the way ...) should be included based on our definition here:
' The method for establishing the scoring zone starts at the top center of the head, with an imaginary line continuing down the sides of the head through the ears, down to and including the shoulders to the naval and hipbones.'
Reading on, scoring shots based on the 'knuckle part of the glove ...' is funny. If that were so half of Calslappy's results would be overturned. Ali too, threw his fair share of slaps throughout his career.
By the way, what were those times for Round 2 and 6?
Re: Please Explain Your Scoring
Posted: 21 May 2015, 16:46
by Pureist
Pureist wrote:lots missed this round 6, from countdown timer, 2.50 floyd lands right, 1.21 floyd scored punch but pacquaio rolled under and it missed, 1.11 pacquaio landed 3 bodyshots not scored, 1.07 right hook for pacquaio not scored, 102 floyd lands jab not scored, 48 floyd lands body shot pacquaio lands left hand both not scored, 46 floyd lands jab not scored, 43 floyd lands jab not scored, 42 pacquaio lands left to body not scored, 41pacquaio lands right uppercut not scored, 35 floyd lands jab not scored, 24 floyd lands jab not scored, 20floyd lands jab not scored, 16 pacquaio lands left not scored, 6 floyd lands jab not scored, ends even round on punches. pacquio landing harder punches, coming forward scoring
. I've already done 6, try and get 2 done tonite
Re: Please Explain Your Scoring
Posted: 21 May 2015, 18:39
by jezzamundo
koolkc107 wrote:Anyone who wants to score the fight for themselves in slow mo can pull up the fight on youtube.
They have controls where you can watch half-speed, quarter speed etc.
I did this and found Compubox accurate for this fight, although I readily concede that is not always the case.
Punches landed on the back of the head do not count; punches landed on the gloves and arms are considered blocked and don't count; punches landed on the back or below the belt don't count.
I can only assume that those getting different numbers from Compubox in this fight are mistakenly counting some of these kinds of punches in their totals.
I've seen you post this a few times now, but this doesn't address why most of the revisionist punch stats have Manny landing a similar amount of punches to the official compubox and Floyd landing far less.
Re: Please Explain Your Scoring
Posted: 22 May 2015, 00:18
by Bobbyptsd
jezzamundo wrote:koolkc107 wrote:Anyone who wants to score the fight for themselves in slow mo can pull up the fight on youtube.
They have controls where you can watch half-speed, quarter speed etc.
I did this and found Compubox accurate for this fight, although I readily concede that is not always the case.
Punches landed on the back of the head do not count; punches landed on the gloves and arms are considered blocked and don't count; punches landed on the back or below the belt don't count.
I can only assume that those getting different numbers from Compubox in this fight are mistakenly counting some of these kinds of punches in their totals.
I've seen you post this a few times now, but this doesn't address why most of the revisionist punch stats have Manny landing a similar amount of punches to the official compubox and Floyd landing far less.
It's a reverse of Ali's "phantom punch". When the shots are slowed down enough, they disappear.
Re: Please Explain Your Scoring
Posted: 22 May 2015, 03:31
by Hotspurx
Bobbyptsd wrote:jezzamundo wrote:koolkc107 wrote:Anyone who wants to score the fight for themselves in slow mo can pull up the fight on youtube.
They have controls where you can watch half-speed, quarter speed etc.
I did this and found Compubox accurate for this fight, although I readily concede that is not always the case.
Punches landed on the back of the head do not count; punches landed on the gloves and arms are considered blocked and don't count; punches landed on the back or below the belt don't count.
I can only assume that those getting different numbers from Compubox in this fight are mistakenly counting some of these kinds of punches in their totals.
I've seen you post this a few times now, but this doesn't address why most of the revisionist punch stats have Manny landing a similar amount of punches to the official compubox and Floyd landing far less.
It's a reverse of Ali's "phantom punch". When the shots are slowed down enough, they disappear.
Exactly Bobby. The viral 'punch count' video posted by Manny Pacquiao is full of phantom punches. The only way this fight is scored for Pacquiao is by awarding them. Thanks Pureist. I must have missed your punch count for Round 6. I'll comb this thread for them now.
Re: Please Explain Your Scoring
Posted: 22 May 2015, 09:26
by jezzamundo
Exactly Bobby. The viral 'punch count' video posted by Manny Pacquiao is full of phantom punches. The only way this fight is scored for Pacquiao is by awarding them. Thanks Pureist. I must have missed your punch count for Round 6. I'll comb this thread for them now.
Again, the revisionist punch stats out there are generally giving Manny a similar amount of punches landed, but suggest that Compubox credited Floyd with many more punches than he actually landed. I'm not saying that one side is right, the truth almost certainly lies somewhere in between the official compubox numbers and the revisionist punch stats, which in some cases are almost certainly made by fight fans with a bias against Floyd's negative style.
Re: Please Explain Your Scoring
Posted: 22 May 2015, 12:38
by ruin795
I am not sure what you are saying. The first 6 rounds were close and I had Manny up 4-2 after them. The rest of the fight I gave Mayweather and finished with an 8-4 score. I am NOT a Manny fan. I rewatched the fight and thought that maybe the 12 could have gone to Manny and then I have 7-5. HOWEVER I am completely changing how I score fights. Because the idiots on these threads want to give so much credit to boxers who are boring. Here it is: if you jab jab and then run.. YOU SCORED ZERO POINTS. I am now deducting points for running. People need to stop with the bullcrap. NO ONE WANTS TO SEE JAB JAB RUN... JAB JAB HOLD... If someone does that and the other throws 2x punches and it hits them in the arms and shoulders they won the round. They were aggressive and ineffective aggression >>>> NO aggression. YOU PEOPLE ARE KILLING BOXING WTH YOUR BORING SCORING. THATS NOT BOXING. Ask Joe Frazier or Evander Holyfield or George Foreman.
Re: Please Explain Your Scoring
Posted: 22 May 2015, 13:11
by NateJR
ruin795 wrote:I am not sure what you are saying. The first 6 rounds were close and I had Manny up 4-2 after them. The rest of the fight I gave Mayweather and finished with an 8-4 score. I am NOT a Manny fan. I rewatched the fight and thought that maybe the 12 could have gone to Manny and then I have 7-5. HOWEVER I am completely changing how I score fights. Because the idiots on these threads want to give so much credit to boxers who are boring. Here it is: if you jab jab and then run.. YOU SCORED ZERO POINTS. I am now deducting points for running. People need to stop with the bullcrap. NO ONE WANTS TO SEE JAB JAB RUN... JAB JAB HOLD... If someone does that and the other throws 2x punches and it hits them in the arms and shoulders they won the round. They were aggressive and ineffective aggression >>>> NO aggression. YOU PEOPLE ARE KILLING BOXING WTH YOUR BORING SCORING. THATS NOT BOXING. Ask Joe Frazier or Evander Holyfield or George Foreman.
Landed jabs are scoring punches, punches on the shoulders and arms are not. Floyd landed a lot of jabs in this fight and very effective jabs that kept Pacquiao at bay the entire fight. Pacquiao was aggressive out of desperation, but he wasn't finding any success, that's why he wasn't aggressive for the majority of the fight. Floyd would simply roll off the ropes and go right back to the middle of the ring and take control right back as soon as Pacquiao tried to be aggressive, or Floyd would clinch to take away his rhythm. That is ring generalship, which is also scored in boxing. That is 100% boxing at it's absolute finest. The people claiming Floyd held the entire fight are exaggerating a lot as well, there wasn't that much clinching in that fight like people claim there was, especially in the second half of the fight.
Re: Please Explain Your Scoring
Posted: 22 May 2015, 13:19
by NateJR
If what Floyd does isn't boxing, what is? Fighting at range where you can be effective and your opponent can't be isn't boxing? Getting off the ropes using lateral movement when you're opponent is trying to punch you in the face isn't boxing? Clinching to take away your opponents rhythm isn't boxing? Using your jab isn't boxing? Countering isn't boxing? Head movement isn't boxing? Floyd does all of the above and are the fundamentals of boxing.
It seems like Floyd has simplified boxing and his style is so sublime that he makes it look too easy. It's almost like Floyd makes it look so easy that people just don't understand what he's doing and can't process perfection. I'm not saying Floyd is perfect in the ring, but as far as boxing, what Floyd does in the ring is brilliance. You either don't understand what he's doing or admire what he does mainly due to the consistency and poise he shows in the ring. If you can't call what Floyd does "boxing", you should really be following another sport.
Re: Please Explain Your Scoring
Posted: 22 May 2015, 13:20
by ruin795
NateJR wrote:ruin795 wrote:I am not sure what you are saying. The first 6 rounds were close and I had Manny up 4-2 after them. The rest of the fight I gave Mayweather and finished with an 8-4 score. I am NOT a Manny fan. I rewatched the fight and thought that maybe the 12 could have gone to Manny and then I have 7-5. HOWEVER I am completely changing how I score fights. Because the idiots on these threads want to give so much credit to boxers who are boring. Here it is: if you jab jab and then run.. YOU SCORED ZERO POINTS. I am now deducting points for running. People need to stop with the bullcrap. NO ONE WANTS TO SEE JAB JAB RUN... JAB JAB HOLD... If someone does that and the other throws 2x punches and it hits them in the arms and shoulders they won the round. They were aggressive and ineffective aggression >>>> NO aggression. YOU PEOPLE ARE KILLING BOXING WTH YOUR BORING SCORING. THATS NOT BOXING. Ask Joe Frazier or Evander Holyfield or George Foreman.
Landed jabs are scoring punches, punches on the shoulders and arms are not. Floyd landed a lot of jabs in this fight and very effective jabs that kept Pacquiao at bay the entire fight. Pacquiao was aggressive out of desperation, but he wasn't finding any success, that's why he wasn't aggressive for the majority of the fight. Floyd would simply roll off the ropes and go right back to the middle of the ring and take control right back as soon as Pacquiao tried to be aggressive, or Floyd would clinch to take away his rhythm. That is ring generalship, which is also scored in boxing. That is 100% boxing at it's absolute finest. The people claiming Floyd held the entire fight are exaggerating a lot as well, there wasn't that much clinching in that fight like people claim there was, especially in the second half of the fight.
Landing jabs are scoring points never said it wasn't. Running is scoring negative points based on ring generalship since that is a mental dominance by the opponent. If the opponent was not effective then there would be no running. And landing on the shoulders and arms IS scoring points because I don't believe it should be completely discounted. It is applying damage and they can be hitting the head in parts just not cleanly. Marciano used to hit people in the arms so much they said they couldn't raise there arms by the 6th round anymore to block shots. But even though the fighter is in this state you are saying he is down 0-6??????????????????? THAT MAKES NO SENSE. No those punches unless whiff count. Not as much as a clean shot but still count. I would rather watch hard punches in the shoulder/arms/back than a jab for 12 rounds. Then fighters like Mayweather would adjust and actually have to fight harder to land more punches and make the fights better and more watchable.
Like I said I scored the second half of the fight 0-6 for mayweather as pacman meaningful punch count dropped significantly.
Re: Please Explain Your Scoring
Posted: 22 May 2015, 13:26
by ruin795
NateJR wrote:If what Floyd does isn't boxing, what is? Fighting at range where you can be effective and your opponent can't be isn't boxing? Getting off the ropes using lateral movement when you're opponent is trying to punch you in the face isn't boxing? Clinching to take away your opponents rhythm isn't boxing? Using your jab isn't boxing? Countering isn't boxing? Head movement isn't boxing? Floyd does all of the above and are the fundamentals of boxing.
It seems like Floyd has simplified boxing and his style is so sublime that he makes it look too easy. It's almost like Floyd makes it look so easy that people just don't understand what he's doing and can't process perfection. I'm not saying Floyd is perfect in the ring, but as far as boxing, what Floyd does in the ring is brilliance. You either don't understand what he's doing or admire what he does mainly due to the consistency and poise he shows in the ring. If you can't call what Floyd does "boxing", you should really be following another sport.
Im not saying Floyd is not boxing. And I am not saying that he would not still succeed. But thinking about adding points to making the fight and not being so hung up on clean punches would create better fights and a bigger fan base possibly
Re: Please Explain Your Scoring
Posted: 22 May 2015, 14:36
by Hotspurx
Hey Jezz,
I've long known Compubox was a pile of shite.
I can only tell you that I'm 1 of those sad bastard's who've reviewed this bout in slow-mo. Unlike most however, I gave Pacquiao the benefit of the doubt on a multitude of shots -- That is shots on the blind side of the camera. After doing so, I still found Floyd the victor.
Perhaps I'll elaborate on this on this if Pureist ever produces his mythical punch statistics.
Re: Please Explain Your Scoring
Posted: 23 May 2015, 08:35
by Pureist
http://i.imgur.com/1QB3qzQ.jpg. That's the punch at .03 sec left round 3-----------------all punches not scored on punch count video, p= pacquaio, f= mayweather-------------------------round 2--- 2.51 p lands l body shot, 2.42 p lands l bodyshot, 2.27 p scored punch that missed, 2.25 f lands 4 rips while clinching( illegal to hold and punch, not scored) 1.50 f lands r, 1.34 f lands jab, 1.27 p lands l bodyshot, 1.26 f lands r bodyshot in clinch, not scored, 1.23 f lands r bodyshot in clinch, NS, .04 f lands jab, .01 p lands l uppercut----------- score with punch counter p-6, f-5, Floyd landed the better quality shots, his round. Round 3 --------2.39 p lands r, 2.30 p lands r, 2.14 f lands low blow, NS, 2.04 p lands l hook, 1.59 f lands l, 1.42 f lands r, 1.33 p lands bodyshot, 1.05 p lands l hook, 1.01 f lands jab, .30 f lands jab, .26 f lands r, .21 f lands jab, .21 p lands r, .16 f lands r bodyshot, .03 f lands right BEHIND ear,NS as per picture link above------ score including punch count p-10, f-8,-- pacquaio landed the better quality shots in this round, his round
Re: Please Explain Your Scoring
Posted: 23 May 2015, 08:48
by jezzamundo
Hotspurx wrote:Hey Jezz,
I've long known Compubox was a pile of shite.
I can only tell you that I'm 1 of those sad bastard's who've reviewed this bout in slow-mo. Unlike most however, I gave Pacquiao the benefit of the doubt on a multitude of shots -- That is shots on the blind side of the camera. After doing so, I still found Floyd the victor.
Perhaps I'll elaborate on this on this if Pureist ever produces his mythical punch statistics.
Thanks Hotspurx. I generally like compubox, though I've never thought of it as a tool to score a fight, but as soon as I saw the numbers for this fight - some rounds in particular - I thought it looked fishy. I haven't watched the fight in slow-mo and don't intend to do so - but I appreciate that you and others have done. I would be interested to see your final punch stats as well as round-by-round if you still have them.
Re: Please Explain Your Scoring
Posted: 23 May 2015, 09:45
by Pureist
Round 4 ------- 2.44 f lands r bodyshot, 2.22 p lands right, 2.13 f lands jab, 1.54 p lands right, 1.37 f lands l jab, 1.31 f lands l jab, 1.22 p lands l hook, 1.21 p lands r rip, 1.19 p lands l rip, 1.18 p lands l hook, .59 p lands l hook, .54 p lands r hook, .46 f lands r bodyshot, .17 f lands r, .09 p lands l bodyshot, ------- score including punch count p =21, f =11, pacquaio round easily
Re: Please Explain Your Scoring
Posted: 23 May 2015, 09:51
by Pureist
So far I have done rounds 2,3,4 and 6 from the slo mo punch count tape, I slowed that to 1/4 speed and any punches still in question I checked 3-4 times, my punch stats are absolutely spot on
Re: Please Explain Your Scoring
Posted: 23 May 2015, 10:01
by jezzamundo
Pureist wrote:So far I have done rounds 2,3,4 and 6 from the slo mo punch count tape, I slowed that to 1/4 speed and any punches still in question I checked 3-4 times, my punch stats are absolutely spot on
Are you going to make a topic with your full count as well as round-by-round punch stats?
Re: Please Explain Your Scoring
Posted: 23 May 2015, 10:08
by Pureist
Why, they will be on here anyway, listing time of punch, what punch was landed and by who, these dicks that think that compubox was accurate are right off
Re: Please Explain Your Scoring
Posted: 23 May 2015, 10:23
by jezzamundo
fergusg wrote:Some of the remarks posted on this thread have been submitted by deeply disturbed individuals possessing a mild form of keyboard Tourette’s syndrome, which compels them to write-up insanely idiotic posts, whereby their rambling incoherent comments cannot be regarded as remotely close to anything that could possibly be considered a rational thought!
I'm sure that some of these people are either the visually-impaired or are those poor members of society, formerly known as Pactards, suffering from an extreme form of post-Mayweather deeply distressed and saddened disorder, compelling them to possess insanely irrational thoughts and an appallingly deluded recollection of events!
The nature of these extremely bizarre and irrational posts provides an utterly compelling argument about there being quite a lot of troubled people that use this forum that requires an urgent and immediate need to receive help from professionally-trained mental healthcare specialists!
Some of the comments I’ve been reading strongly suggests that there are several BoxRec forum members lacking in mental capacity and should be retained against their will in secure institutions that will ensure their absurd anti-social behaviour does not upset or threaten innocent unsuspecting members of society!
I’m sure that every single person that uses this forum are now dumber for having read so many moronic posts. I award these troubled individuals no kudos and may god have mercy on their soul!

I agree that some of the posts made here - from both sides - have shown a lot of bias. Scoring in boxing is very subjective and clearly there are a wide range of opinions. While I had the fight as a close win to Floyd, I can see how someone who prefers Floyd's defensive style, could score the fight as wide as 118-110, while someone who prefers Manny's aggression (although it was in patches) could score the fight as a narrow win for Manny. There were a lot of swing rounds with few meaningful punches landed by either fighter.
Re: Please Explain Your Scoring
Posted: 23 May 2015, 10:29
by jezzamundo
Pureist wrote:Why, they will be on here anyway, listing time of punch, what punch was landed and by who, these dicks that think that compubox was accurate are right off
Because if you're going to the effort of watching every round in slow motion - which I commend you for doing, I don't have the time or patience to do it - surely it's worth taking a little bit of time to put it all together into one post for ease of reading?
The way compubox is done - live with clickers - it's never going to be as accurate as punch counts done post fight in slow motion. That said, some punches would be easier to see ringside than on footage.
Re: Please Explain Your Scoring
Posted: 23 May 2015, 10:37
by Tanzio
This fight was hard enough to watch the first time (even free). I forced myself through seconds.
You dudes are still suffering this waltz? In slowmo?
Stunning
Re: Please Explain Your Scoring
Posted: 23 May 2015, 12:49
by KBB
NateJR wrote:If what Floyd does isn't boxing, what is? Fighting at range where you can be effective and your opponent can't be isn't boxing? Getting off the ropes using lateral movement when you're opponent is trying to punch you in the face isn't boxing? Clinching to take away your opponents rhythm isn't boxing? Using your jab isn't boxing? Countering isn't boxing? Head movement isn't boxing? Floyd does all of the above and are the fundamentals of boxing.
It seems like Floyd has simplified boxing and his style is so sublime that he makes it look too easy. It's almost like Floyd makes it look so easy that people just don't understand what he's doing and can't process perfection. I'm not saying Floyd is perfect in the ring, but as far as boxing, what Floyd does in the ring is brilliance. You either don't understand what he's doing or admire what he does mainly due to the consistency and poise he shows in the ring. If you can't call what Floyd does "boxing", you should really be following another sport.
Excellent breakdown and analysis, they cannot simply accept that Napman Plankquiao lost, it's been 3 weeks and they are still crying and raising the garbage slow mo flag, shoulder injury flag, no shot allowed flag (I thought he was afraid of needles).
10-2 and It's over..............even Mikey Garcia agrees with total domination but I guess he'll be labeled a flomo or some other circus name they have.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w_iYvwlHNGQ
Re: Please Explain Your Scoring
Posted: 23 May 2015, 18:48
by Pureist
Don't know what you don't understand kbb, this punch count is accurate that I'm doing, anytime I've listed in each round so far there will be a punch landed for the nominated fighter, Floyd got the decision, I said a draw or 1 round either way, total domination is ridiculous, an honest and accurate breakdown of the footage will actually show that, it will show how compubox are fantasy stats and that either judges should be more alert, not from the same country of origin of the fighters or personally know any of the fighters
Re: Please Explain Your Scoring
Posted: 23 May 2015, 19:07
by Ricky_
Pureist wrote:Don't know what you don't understand kbb, this punch count is accurate that I'm doing, anytime I've listed in each round so far there will be a punch landed for the nominated fighter, Floyd got the decision, I said a draw or 1 round either way, total domination is ridiculous, an honest and accurate breakdown of the footage will actually show that, it will show how compubox are fantasy stats and that either judges should be more alert, not from the same country of origin of the fighters or personally know any of the fighters
Keep going pureist, looking forward to your final numbers
