BoxRec

I heard its going to be Mayweather vs Algieri?

PsychoGamerTwo wrote:I heard its going to be Mayweather vs Algieri?

Hell, why not? He was good enough of an opponent for Pacquiao and Khan (who claimed CA is an "A Class" and very dangerous fighter)

punchoutsb wrote:You said I hate Floyd Mayweather, and I asked for proof.

You and kool do share the similarity of never answering a question or making outrageous claims and then not backing them up. If you're not the same person, you both suffer from similar maladies.

The only thing we suffer from is having to read your garbage.

KBB wrote:

punchoutsb wrote:You said I hate Floyd Mayweather, and I asked for proof.

You and kool do share the similarity of never answering a question or making outrageous claims and then not backing them up. If you're not the same person, you both suffer from similar maladies.

The only thing we suffer from is having to read your garbage.

So where's that Mayweather hate of mine? And since you guys are such good friends, ask him to come back and post his "fistful of guys" that Klitschko's ducking

punchoutsb wrote:So where's that Mayweather hate of mine? And since you guys are such good friends, ask him to come back and post his "fistful of guys" that Klitschko's ducking

Yeah sure we eat dinner at one another's house everyday, we go fishing and pay each other's taxes too. Ask him your damn self.

KBB wrote:

punchoutsb wrote:So where's that Mayweather hate of mine? And since you guys are such good friends, ask him to come back and post his "fistful of guys" that Klitschko's ducking

Yeah sure we eat dinner at one another's house everyday, we go fishing and pay each other's taxes too. Ask him your damn self.

OK I'll ask him:

brut, please post the supposed mayweather hate and the "fistful of guys" that Klitschko is avoiding

punchoutsb wrote:OK I'll ask him: brut, please post the supposed mayweather hate and the "fistful of guys" that Klitschko is avoiding

Ok Bnovelist I will do it and make sure you tell your other alter ego CheapA$$ to do the same and don't forget to double space between sentences and write in all caps too.

HitBattousai wrote:

koolkc107 wrote:Of course Berto beats Algieri and Rios. He just KTFO another guy who would ALSO beat both Rios and Algieri in Lopez.

I don't thing Algieri stays vertical once Berto tags him right. And Andre is skilled enough to box circles around Rios with more than enough power to make Brandon respect him.

Easy wins both for Andre, even at his age.

Berto doesn't box, he was getting outboxed by shot Lopez before he finally caught up to him and Lopez is far from a boxer. Berto is a fast-handed brawler with crappy defense, low workrate, no jab, and while he can hurt you if he catches you with something you don't see, his power is not especially impressive otherwise. He has heart but has simply not improved his boxing craft over his career. Rios would just walk through his stuff and bang on him all night and Algieri would outbox Berto easily. This is not to say that either of them are that good. It's that they are good enough to beat Berto. Berto's last fight against a semi-credible opponent he got beat up and stopped by journeyman Soto-Karass. Before that, beat up by Guerrero(who has since been exposed as a top 20 Welterweight at best) and Ortiz(not much needs to be said here). The shining achievement of Berto's career is a very dubious win over Luis Collazo. He is simply not very good and never has been.

You don't want to talk about records and quality of competition here when supporting Rios and Algieri.

Algieri's lone claim to fame is getting some home cooking after Provodnikov beat his arse.

Rios's signature win is Mike Alvarado- 'nuff said.

Compared to those two, Berto has a HOF resume.

Fact is, Berto just KTFO of a guy that also has a HOF resume in comparison to those two.

And, as stated earlier in this thread, he did just as expeditiously as Maidana and Canelo. Hell, Maidana had a rougher time of it than Berto did with Lopez.

And I highly doubt ANYONE on this board picks Rios or Algieri to survive Marcos.

Hey, I want Floyd to fight Canelo or Cotto in September too. Hell yes, I pop a bunch of popcorn if Money and GGG were meeting at 154.

But, those fights are not going to happen in September.

So yeah, I am good with Floyd taking a victory lap on FREE TV against a credible opponent who is always in viewer friendly fights.

At least he is considering not making folks PAY for his "farce", unlike other guys.

Pack fought Rios and Algieri (by the way undefeated at the time) coming of a devastating KO loss. What is Floyd's excuse ?

The reality is after that last bulls@it fight, Mayweather can't sell any more PPV's to the public, so he might as well have it on free TV. Aside fighting G3 (great opponent) or Cotto/Canelo again (Own fanbase), I can't find somebody that he would sell over a million PPV's with. I honestly think he'd be below 750K. Thus he is still trying to collect money without the PPV money, so they bring in Berto possibly. A safe opponent that would be happy just to get a big purse, even if it is less than the last few Mayweather opponents.

ikorolev wrote:Pack fought Rios and Algieri (by the way undefeated at the time) coming of a devastating KO loss. What is Floyd's excuse ?

Algieri was undefeated fighting who? And in what division that had any relevance at all to the one Pac fights in?

FAIL

And what is the excuse for Rios? Also not even a factor at 147 and STILL has no signature win at the weight to this day.

But you was fine with being fed both farces on PPV in one year.

Yet, you have a problem with Mayweather fighting a credible former champion who is always in exciting fights on free TV?

Shake yourself, Holmes.

Rios fight was next after the KO loss. Algieri was undefeated before fighting Manny, and he is definitely bigger than Manny.

Also, Manny's options were more limited due to TR vs GBP and then TR vs Haymon splits. Floyd doesn't really have any limitations in choice of opponents.

ikorolev wrote:Rios fight was next after the KO loss. Algieri was undefeated before fighting Manny, and he is definitely bigger than Manny.

Also, Manny's options were more limited due to TR vs GBP and then TR vs Haymon splits. Floyd doesn't really have any limitations in choice of opponents.

In my opinion Floyd is very limited because of not only the CBS/SHOWTIME contract.
But the big one the multiple lawsuits against his adviser Haymon.
Everyone may want to fight Floyd but there are limitations because of these 2 conflicts.

Maybe, but Lara, Andrade and Golovkin have no relation to those lawsuits. Neither do Thurman, Brook, Porter, etc.

Floyd is boring anyways, he rips people off, he's a coward... Why make such a stink about who he's fighting? Every person who posted on this thread will watch this fight. Talking about it being a shitty fight that you won't watch?.. I guarantee that's nothing more than a case of sour grapes (mainly because you have your mind made up that there's someone out there that you think will beat him) and whoever makes those claims will watch this fight lol. Floyd owes none of you anything.. This isn't the era of boxing on network TV, but instead of overcharging us on PPV against a name opponent he would more than likely fight safety first against and win a clear UD for you all to complain about, he's fighting slightly lesser fighter he will more than likely be more offensive against on free network TV.. Oh what a terrible thing for Floyd to do.. How dare Floyd fight all the top guys around his weight class and then take a easy fight for once at the age of 39. What a bunch of ungrateful whiny little bitches you all are..

Right, people are so ungrateful. They made him the reachest athlete, and they dare to demand something

and yall support that crap....boxing fans-stupid

KBB wrote:

punchoutsb wrote:OK I'll ask him: brut, please post the supposed mayweather hate and the "fistful of guys" that Klitschko is avoiding

Ok Bnovelist I will do it and make sure you tell your other alter ego CheapA$$ to do the same and don't forget to double space between sentences and write in all caps too.

Just like both your egos to avoid giving proof...AGAIN

koolkc107 wrote:

ikorolev wrote:Pack fought Rios and Algieri (by the way undefeated at the time) coming of a devastating KO loss. What is Floyd's excuse ?

Algieri was undefeated fighting who? And in what division that had any relevance at all to the one Pac fights in?

FAIL

And what is the excuse for Rios? Also not even a factor at 147 and STILL has no signature win at the weight to this day.

But you was fine with being fed both farces on PPV in one year.

Yet, you have a problem with Mayweather fighting a credible former champion who is always in exciting fights on free TV?

Shake yourself, Holmes.

Don't forget that list of guys Wlad's ducking, Holmes

punchoutsb wrote:

koolkc107 wrote:

ikorolev wrote:Pack fought Rios and Algieri (by the way undefeated at the time) coming of a devastating KO loss. What is Floyd's excuse ?

Algieri was undefeated fighting who? And in what division that had any relevance at all to the one Pac fights in?

FAIL

And what is the excuse for Rios? Also not even a factor at 147 and STILL has no signature win at the weight to this day.

But you was fine with being fed both farces on PPV in one year.

Yet, you have a problem with Mayweather fighting a credible former champion who is always in exciting fights on free TV?

Shake yourself, Holmes.

Don't forget that list of guys Wlad's ducking, Holmes

Nope, not going to do your research for you.

I try not to get in the habit of proving the obvious.

I will give you a hint tho.

This website has rankings. Use them. You will see the fistful right away.

NateJR wrote:Floyd is boring anyways, he rips people off, he's a coward... Why make such a stink about who he's fighting? Every person who posted on this thread will watch this fight. Talking about it being a shitty fight that you won't watch?.. I guarantee that's nothing more than a case of sour grapes (mainly because you have your mind made up that there's someone out there that you think will beat him) and whoever makes those claims will watch this fight lol. Floyd owes none of you anything.. This isn't the era of boxing on network TV, but instead of overcharging us on PPV against a name opponent he would more than likely fight safety first against and win a clear UD for you all to complain about, he's fighting slightly lesser fighter he will more than likely be more offensive against on free network TV.. Oh what a terrible thing for Floyd to do..How dare Floyd fight all the top guys around his weight class and then take a easy fight for once at the age of 39. What a bunch of ungrateful whiny little bitches you all are..

+1,000

Will he face Khan after Berto? Khan was out of the Sept date due to Ramadan.

palooka wrote:Will he face Khan after Berto? Khan was out of the Sept date due to Ramadan.

I hope Khan never gets a big payday.I am looking forward to the next face plant he does.

ikorolev wrote:Maybe, but Lara, Andrade and Golovkin have no relation to those lawsuits. Neither do Thurman, Brook, Porter, etc.

Couldn't agree more, Berto is way down in the competitive fight list, I wouldn't bother watching it, would rather watch an evenly matched fight with much less skill than this one sided circus act

koolkc107 wrote: Nope, not going to do your research for you.

I try not to get in the habit of proving the obvious.

I will give you a hint tho.

This website has rankings. Use them. You will see the fistful right away.

It's not my research, because I didn't make the outlandish claim.

So you can continue acting like a bitch, or you can simply name names.

But I think we both know what you'll do