Page 6 of 12

Re: Haskins v Morales RBR

Posted: 14 May 2016, 17:51
by gb
I've got this 6-2. Too generous to Morales?

Re: Haskins v Morales RBR

Posted: 14 May 2016, 17:52
by rpms
jameswilson wrote:Haskins's has a dodgy barnet doesn't he.
Council estate haircut

Re: Haskins v Morales RBR

Posted: 14 May 2016, 17:52
by Rexob
Looking forward to the Stuart hall blockbuster.

Re: Haskins v Morales RBR

Posted: 14 May 2016, 17:52
by jamesmcdonnell
Ive lost interest

Re: Haskins v Morales RBR

Posted: 14 May 2016, 17:52
by Neil Gee
It's going to be Haskins by decision.

Re: Haskins v Morales RBR

Posted: 14 May 2016, 17:53
by Horse
Morales is terrible.

Re: Haskins v Morales RBR

Posted: 14 May 2016, 17:53
by chad
rd350lc wrote:Morales is a poor shadow of his brother .
So is Haskins :lol:

Re: Haskins v Morales RBR

Posted: 14 May 2016, 17:54
by rpms
Counter-puncher wrote:
rpms wrote:Selby fans probably not sticking around for the main event

They're from Barry, they're probably in a rush to get home and abuse prescription drugs.
I've been to Barry,can't really blame them TBH....

Re: Haskins v Morales RBR

Posted: 14 May 2016, 17:54
by keithmoonhangover
Horse wrote:Morales is terrible.
He's in there trying. Anyone that gets in the ring deserves respect.

Re: Haskins v Morales RBR

Posted: 14 May 2016, 17:54
by Rexob
Well that's not a biased card by Woodhall.

Re: Haskins v Morales RBR

Posted: 14 May 2016, 17:54
by Horse
keithmoonhangover wrote:He's in there trying. Anyone that gets in the ring deserves respect.
No, they don't.

Re: Haskins v Morales RBR

Posted: 14 May 2016, 17:55
by Horse
Rexob wrote:Well that's not a biased card by Woodhall.
No, it's not.

Re: Haskins v Morales RBR

Posted: 14 May 2016, 17:55
by Neil Gee
Yawn.

Re: Haskins v Morales RBR

Posted: 14 May 2016, 17:56
by keithmoonhangover
Horse wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:He's in there trying. Anyone that gets in the ring deserves respect.
No, they don't.
When you step through the ropes, you literally put your life on the line. You could die in the ring. Respect to all boxers. If you don't think that, then you should be banned off this forum. You're a disgrace.

Re: Haskins v Morales RBR

Posted: 14 May 2016, 17:57
by Horse
keithmoonhangover wrote:When you step through the ropes, you literally put your life on the line. You could die in the ring. Respect to all boxers. If you don't think that, then you should be banned off this forum. You're a disgrace.
Yawn.

Re: Haskins v Morales RBR

Posted: 14 May 2016, 17:58
by Rexob
Horse wrote:
Rexob wrote:Well that's not a biased card by Woodhall.
No, it's not.

Eh up who rattled your cage.

Re: Haskins v Morales RBR

Posted: 14 May 2016, 17:58
by rpms
Its only the fight that Naz v Erik Morales could've been.
Maybe Haskins should have entered the ring on a magic-carpet

Re: Haskins v Morales RBR

Posted: 14 May 2016, 17:59
by gb
Is Haskins world top 10?

Re: Haskins v Morales RBR

Posted: 14 May 2016, 18:00
by chad
keithmoonhangover wrote:
Horse wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:He's in there trying. Anyone that gets in the ring deserves respect.
No, they don't.
When you step through the ropes, you literally put your life on the line. You could die in the ring. Respect to all boxers. If you don't think that, then you should be banned off this forum. You're a disgrace.
What if they've previously been convicted of rape or kiddy fiddling? Surely there is some exceptions to the rule?

Re: Haskins v Morales RBR

Posted: 14 May 2016, 18:00
by keithmoonhangover
Horse wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:When you step through the ropes, you literally put your life on the line. You could die in the ring. Respect to all boxers. If you don't think that, then you should be banned off this forum. You're a disgrace.
Yawn.
Get in the ring Horse. Go and spar with someone. Feel the punches. You'll understand what it's like to be overmatched. You'll understand what it's like to be in the ring with someone that you can't hit cleanly. You'll find out what it's like to be in the ring with someone who punishes you round after round.

In short, come back when you know what the fvck you're talking about.

Re: Haskins v Morales RBR

Posted: 14 May 2016, 18:01
by keithmoonhangover
chad wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:
Horse wrote:No, they don't.
When you step through the ropes, you literally put your life on the line. You could die in the ring. Respect to all boxers. If you don't think that, then you should be banned off this forum. You're a disgrace.
What if they've previously been convicted of rape or kiddy fiddling? Surely there is some exceptions to the rule?
No exceptions. They all deserve respect. They are putting their life on the line,

Re: Haskins v Morales RBR

Posted: 14 May 2016, 18:02
by milpool
This fight is a good example of why having too many world titles is a bad thing. Average world champion against poor challenger in an arena that isn't even half full.

Re: Haskins v Morales RBR

Posted: 14 May 2016, 18:02
by Horse
keithmoonhangover wrote:Get in the ring Horse. Go and spar with someone. Feel the punches. You'll understand what it's like to be overmatched. You'll understand what it's like to be in the ring with someone that you can't hit cleanly. You'll find out what it's like to be in the ring with someone who punishes you round after round.

In short, come back when you know what the fvck you're talking about.
No.

Re: Haskins v Morales RBR

Posted: 14 May 2016, 18:03
by Rexob
Morales has got the Morales nose.

Re: Haskins v Morales RBR

Posted: 14 May 2016, 18:03
by Horse
milpool wrote:This fight is a good example of why having too many world titles is a bad thing. Average world champion against poor challenger in an arena that isn't even half full.
This should be a non-title fight.

His opponent is a complete chump.