Page 6 of 7

Re: Price v Hammer

Posted: 03 Feb 2017, 15:19
by Stuarty
Big Dave doesn't look too confident at all man! His big chins twitching like a dogs arsehole!

Re: Price v Hammer

Posted: 03 Feb 2017, 15:23
by wesshaw1985
Stuarty30 wrote:
Big Dave doesn't look too confident at all man! His big chins twitching like a dogs arsehole!
Hammer looks pretty relaxed...

Re: Price v Hammer

Posted: 03 Feb 2017, 15:41
by boxingknockout
Yeah Hammer looks confident- Price looks nervy. I see a very safe and reticent performance by Price whatever happens. He looks like his confidence is gone. Hammer looks a lot shorter though

Re: Price v Hammer

Posted: 03 Feb 2017, 15:56
by Rexob
Sad to say I reckon Price is done at top level.

Re: Price v Hammer

Posted: 03 Feb 2017, 16:08
by crusader
Price does look uneasy there.

Weigh-in body language is often misleading, but Price has a history of carrying his nerves over to his performances. The massive height difference would be more significant to me if it weren't for this:

Image

Re: Price v Hammer

Posted: 03 Feb 2017, 16:59
by PredatorHayds
crusader wrote:Price does look uneasy there.

Weigh-in body language is often misleading, but Price has a history of carrying his nerves over to his performances. The massive height difference would be more significant to me if it weren't for this:

Image
Teper looks like Omid Djalili in this photo

Re: Price v Hammer

Posted: 03 Feb 2017, 17:21
by TheCobra
If he gets done by Hammer then it's back to the plumbing. Hammer has every chance here, we all know that by now - I wouldn't like to predict it either way cos you just don't know any more with Price, he could go at a moment's notice and he boxes like he knows that fact.

Re: Price v Hammer

Posted: 03 Feb 2017, 18:22
by Horse
Rexob wrote:Sad to say I reckon Price is done at top level.
Price was never at the top level.

Re: Price v Hammer

Posted: 03 Feb 2017, 18:27
by crusader
He's never even won beyond domestic level

Re: Price v Hammer

Posted: 03 Feb 2017, 18:55
by chad
I know Pricey has put on the weight but he didn't look good there. I've got a better body and I'm a total waster :lol:

Re: Price v Hammer

Posted: 03 Feb 2017, 19:47
by edb1000
Along with the glass chin pricey has a real problem with stamina which is why I never enjoy watching him fight.
That's a very bad mix indeed.
The sight of him gassed and cowering from Thompson still chills the blood.

Re: Price v Hammer

Posted: 04 Feb 2017, 08:08
by crusader
Hammer's weight could be an issue too. I was looking over his record and noticed that this (264) is his career-high among what's listed. At 259 he was able to outlast Erkan Teper, but the extra mass could make it harder for him to take advantage of Price gassing.

Re: Price v Hammer

Posted: 04 Feb 2017, 09:02
by ozzy1875
crusader wrote:Hammer's weight could be an issue too. I was looking over his record and noticed that this (264) is his career-high among what's listed. At 259 he was able to outlast Erkan Teper, but the extra mass could make it harder for him to take advantage of Price gassing.
Interesting point. This is the first real test for Price since he's been with Dave Coldwell, as much as his chin is suspect if Price boxes to a plan, like Coldwell's boxers have demonstrated in previous fights, this could be a walk in the park for him.

Tyson Fury toyed with Christian Hammer, looked levels above, Price could easily do the same and even stop him earlier. But, as we all know, it's never that easy with him.

Re: Price v Hammer

Posted: 04 Feb 2017, 09:13
by bripez
Stuarty30 wrote:
Big Dave doesn't look too confident at all man! His big chins twitching like a dogs arsehole!
When they bumped fists at the end I was expecting Price to start holding on.

If Hammer fights with any kind of ambition, Price will get beat.

Re: Price v Hammer

Posted: 04 Feb 2017, 10:58
by wesshaw1985
Price has to stop Hammer in the first 4 or Hammer will take a decision or stop him late...

Re: Price v Hammer

Posted: 04 Feb 2017, 11:12
by bripez
wesshaw1985 wrote:Price has to stop Hammer in the first 4 or Hammer will take a decision or stop him late...
I was going to say 2 - as long as Hammer doesn't walk on to a mega shot early doors then I don't think that Price has the the mental stamina to go beyond 4 with a live opponent.

Re: Price v Hammer

Posted: 04 Feb 2017, 11:15
by squared circle
Hammer to ko price 5-2 against

More than worth a small investment

Re: Price v Hammer

Posted: 04 Feb 2017, 14:52
by jameswilson
I've got a double on Ryder and Hammer to win. To get 4.95 on that double is far too good value to turn down I think.

Re: Price v Hammer

Posted: 04 Feb 2017, 15:35
by Bard of Boxrec
What time does this one start do we think? Going down the bookies to put a large wedge on Hammer stoppage 1-6 and Hammer stoppage.

but first some lovely cottage pie dinner

Re: Price v Hammer

Posted: 04 Feb 2017, 15:41
by Vincent stevenson
Price by ko for me . A lot of negative posts on here about David mostly by people using Nick names and aliases . He's an exciting British heavyweight a bit of support and backing would not go amiss

Re: Price v Hammer

Posted: 04 Feb 2017, 15:45
by Boxerbeetle
Vincent stevenson wrote:Price by ko for me . A lot of negative posts on here about David mostly by people using Nick names and aliases . He's an exciting British heavyweight a bit of support and backing would not go amiss
Price has had loads of support and backing over the years, people are just being realistic now.

Re: Price v Hammer

Posted: 04 Feb 2017, 15:47
by Bard of Boxrec
Vincent stevenson wrote:Price by ko for me . A lot of negative posts on here about David mostly by people using Nick names and aliases . He's an exciting British heavyweight a bit of support and backing would not go amiss
I hate to break it to you, but Price being British doesn't make him more likely to win

Re: Price v Hammer

Posted: 04 Feb 2017, 15:48
by freddydoesdallas
Boxerbeetle wrote:
Vincent stevenson wrote:Price by ko for me . A lot of negative posts on here about David mostly by people using Nick names and aliases . He's an exciting British heavyweight a bit of support and backing would not go amiss
Price has had loads of support and backing over the years, people are just being realistic now.
This. I've always been hoping price would do well and I've never changed my name on here. I backed him to beat Thompson twice and still thought he'd beat teper.

If he wins, great as he seems a good guy. He'll get a title shot and earn some big money. Realistically, I can't see him dealing with being hit again.

Re: Price v Hammer

Posted: 04 Feb 2017, 15:56
by Boxerbeetle
freddydoesdallas wrote:
Boxerbeetle wrote:
Vincent stevenson wrote:Price by ko for me . A lot of negative posts on here about David mostly by people using Nick names and aliases . He's an exciting British heavyweight a bit of support and backing would not go amiss
Price has had loads of support and backing over the years, people are just being realistic now.
This. I've always been hoping price would do well and I've never changed my name on here. I backed him to beat Thompson twice and still thought he'd beat teper.

If he wins, great as he seems a good guy. He'll get a title shot and earn some big money. Realistically, I can't see him dealing with being hit again.
Same. Although for the record, I stand by my pick that Price would have ko'd Fury if they had met when they were supposed to. Fury ducked that fight with good reason. Obviously he's since improved loads and Price got found out by Thompson, but I still think Price would have ko'd Fury at that point in their respective careers.

Re: Price v Hammer

Posted: 04 Feb 2017, 16:10
by jamesmcdonnell
Kro wrote:
Vincent stevenson wrote:Price by ko for me . A lot of negative posts on here about David mostly by people using Nick names and aliases . He's an exciting British heavyweight a bit of support and backing would not go amiss
Well said :clap:
Price is also chinny as hell.