Page 6 of 11
Re: Mundine v Green result
Posted: 08 Feb 2017, 23:15
by Lairdy
buster007 wrote:oh boy, now the mundine huggers r turning on each other, pmsl.
shows how hurt that they r of seeing their hero get smashed by a guy who was severely concussed for the whole fight, lol.
I can see why they r embarrassed alright.
You're embarrassing yourself champ. There are 6 people in the world, from what I've seen, that believe Fanny won that fight. You're one of them.
You don't need to vigorously defend him. Because unless they have the decision overturned, Fanny will have that "W" (albeit clearly paid for) in his column.
Fanny knows in his heart that he got well beaten by a boxer 6kg lighter than him in a ring with dimensions that suited his style. Let's be honest here, he knew that he just had to survive for the victory.
I'm sure he would really appreciate that you're still saying that he "won"... But at the same time, he would probably look at you as a massive nut hugger.
Be your own man champ.
Re: Mundine v Green result
Posted: 08 Feb 2017, 23:21
by Lairdy
bogan whisperer wrote:Mundine now complaining to the Australian National Boxing Federation about the size of the ring used, inquiring as to whether all officials were financial with the ANBF, and protesting that the referee didn't have an ANBF emblem on his shirt.
I kid you not

Well, why not? The officials might have only been financial with Green Machine Promotions...
I can understand you're trying to get a little group of Fanny fans on here to side with you, but that makes you look like a weak coward.
Even if Green seen you trying to defend him, he'd likely be embarrassed.
Re: Mundine v Green result
Posted: 08 Feb 2017, 23:31
by bogan whisperer
What Mundine and Green must accept after their controversial fight
http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/sport/ ... c38fe9a451
What Mundine must accept :
1 The illegal shot in the first round changed the fight.
2 Mundine stopped us from feeling true outrage at the decision because of the advantage he gained through illegal means.
3 Labelling Green a “bitch” was classless and inaccurate.
4 He still has a lot left in the tank.
What Green must accept :
1 The scorecards fell in his favour. But the 98-90 scoreline handed in by one judge was a disgrace.
2 Mundine is a better boxer. Though Green has a case to argue he’s on Mundine’s level as an overall fighter.
3 He’s done. But as stressed above, the illegal shot in the first round clearly affected Green’s performance.
Re: Mundine v Green result
Posted: 09 Feb 2017, 00:35
by Lairdy
bogan whisperer wrote:What Mundine and Green must accept after their controversial fight
http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/sport/ ... c38fe9a451
What Mundine must accept :
1 The illegal shot in the first round changed the fight.
2 Mundine stopped us from feeling true outrage at the decision because of the advantage he gained through illegal means.
3 Labelling Green a “bitch” was classless and inaccurate.
4 He still has a lot left in the tank.
What Green must accept :
1 The scorecards fell in his favour. But the 98-90 scoreline handed in by one judge was a disgrace.
2 Mundine is a better boxer. Though Green has a case to argue he’s on Mundine’s level as an overall fighter.
3 He’s done. But as stressed above, the illegal shot in the first round clearly affected Green’s performance.
Some replies:
1. If you knew boxing, you would understand it wasn't an illegal shot.
2. You're one of the 6 people on this planet that weren't outraged at such rediculous scoring.
3. Fanny Green got walked down by a much smaller fight. How embarrassing.
4. True
2nd lot pf questions:
1. ANY judge that believes Green won that fight is a disgrace to the sport and it's fans.
2. Mundine IS the better fighter overall. Make no mistake about that. He NEVER got to choose advantages like Green did for the 2nd half of his career. He always fought guys at their optimum weight.
3. He's done. Thank f@#$ing god for that! He is a disgraceful sportsman and role model.
Re: Mundine v Green result
Posted: 09 Feb 2017, 00:42
by bogan whisperer
Lairdy wrote:bogan whisperer wrote:What Mundine and Green must accept after their controversial fight
http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/sport/ ... c38fe9a451
What Mundine must accept :
1 The illegal shot in the first round changed the fight.
2 Mundine stopped us from feeling true outrage at the decision because of the advantage he gained through illegal means.
3 Labelling Green a “bitch” was classless and inaccurate.
4 He still has a lot left in the tank.
What Green must accept :
1 The scorecards fell in his favour. But the 98-90 scoreline handed in by one judge was a disgrace.
2 Mundine is a better boxer. Though Green has a case to argue he’s on Mundine’s level as an overall fighter.
3 He’s done. But as stressed above, the illegal shot in the first round clearly affected Green’s performance.
Some replies:
1. If you knew boxing, you would understand it wasn't an illegal shot.
2. You're one of the 6 people on this planet that weren't outraged at such rediculous scoring.
3. Fanny Green got walked down by a much smaller fight. How embarrassing.
4. True
2nd lot pf questions:
1. ANY judge that believes Green won that fight is a disgrace to the sport and it's fans.
2. Mundine IS the better fighter overall. Make no mistake about that. He NEVER got to choose advantages like Green did for the 2nd half of his career. He always fought guys at their optimum weight.
3. He's done. Thank f@#$ing god for that! He is a disgraceful sportsman and role model.
I trust you realized the points above were made by Jai Bednall of The Daily Telegraph. He expands on each point in his article.
Re: Mundine v Green result
Posted: 09 Feb 2017, 01:18
by DA GOOSE
ClivePatrickLyons wrote:DA GOOSE wrote:ClivePatrickLyons wrote:
That's was a sad day for Aussie boxing when we can do that sort of rubbish to some one I always believed boxing was out of reach from of some one not liking another persons political view's and you know ''leave your race religion at the door'' if those judge's did that to Green or anyother Aussie fighter I would say the same thing its terrible for boxing period.
Lets not exaggerate there have been much worse decisions.
When and was the money involved anywhere near what this fight generated because if it wasn't you should just keep your stupit comment to ya self because its silly when it was worth thousand's not million's of dollar's and you try to talk crap and say it wasn't worst robbery's now now what did I say that got up your nose was it the political view that I mentioned or was it religion/race word I'LL SAY IT AGAIN BIGGEST ROBBERY IN A MILLION DOLLAR FIGHT IN AUSSIE BOXING HISTORY.................NOW DA GOOSE WHO'S RIGHT SHOW ME THE FIGHT THAT BACKS UP YOUR CLAIM THAT I EXAGGERATING
AND PLEASE IF YOU CAN JUST LET ME KNOW WHAT UPSET YOU WITH MY POST WAS THE BIT ABOUT RACE/RELIGION OR WAS IT THE POLITICAL VIEW..............PS I DON'T REALLY GIVE A F.CK ANYMORE
There have been much worse decisions than this Clive. World wide Kovalev-Ward I didn't mention race or politics sorry to make you post in caps.
Re: Mundine v Green result
Posted: 09 Feb 2017, 01:24
by DA GOOSE
Lairdy wrote:buster007 wrote:oh boy, now the mundine huggers r turning on each other, pmsl.
shows how hurt that they r of seeing their hero get smashed by a guy who was severely concussed for the whole fight, lol.
I can see why they r embarrassed alright.
You're embarrassing yourself champ. There are 6 people in the world, from what I've seen, that believe Fanny won that fight. You're one of them.
You don't need to vigorously defend him. Because unless they have the decision overturned, Fanny will have that "W" (albeit clearly paid for) in his column.
Fanny knows in his heart that he got well beaten by a boxer 6kg lighter than him in a ring with dimensions that suited his style. Let's be honest here, he knew that he just had to survive for the victory.
I'm sure he would really appreciate that you're still saying that he "won"... But at the same time, he would probably look at you as a massive nut hugger.
Be your own man champ.
Save your time and put him on ignore anyone who doesn't like or support Danny Green is a Mundine nuthugger in this guys eyes. Fair play to both fighters for making a ton of money despite being nowhere near being world class anymore.

Re: Mundine v Green result
Posted: 09 Feb 2017, 01:27
by buster007
what a bunch of whining babies u lot are, lol.
mundine lost fair and square against a guy who was concussed.
he should be praising the ref cause if green wasn't concussed i'd say mundine might still be in hospital recovering from a severe beating :)
u know what would be good, have them fight again but bumdine needs to start after being cowardly king hit when his hands are being held by the ref.
I wonder if the 'woman' would still be standing after round one? not likely, lol.
Re: Mundine v Green result
Posted: 09 Feb 2017, 01:39
by GhostBoxing15
buster007 wrote:what a bunch of whining babies u lot are, lol.
mundine lost fair and square against a guy who was concussed.
he should be praising the ref cause if green wasn't concussed i'd say mundine might still be in hospital recovering from a severe beating :)
u know what would be good, have them fight again but bumdine needs to start after being cowardly king hit when his hands are being held by the ref.
I wonder if the 'woman' would still be standing after round one? not likely, lol.
Let's see Green Puff come in 8 kilos lighter than Choc & see how Green Puff goes, Green Puff needs all the help he can get with his weight advantages, throw him in with Broadhurst or Pitt, Green would be concussed from Round 1
Re: Mundine v Green result
Posted: 09 Feb 2017, 02:32
by DA GOOSE
UK boxing website who bothered to watch this fight scored it for Mundine. Scathing of Australian scoring.
http://boxing-kingdom.blogspot.com.au/2 ... video.html
Re: Mundine v Green result
Posted: 09 Feb 2017, 03:30
by Redback Rasta
Ironic you should be pointing at that when you scored it for Green :OhYes:
Re: Mundine v Green result
Posted: 09 Feb 2017, 03:46
by Lairdy
bogan whisperer wrote:Lairdy wrote:bogan whisperer wrote:What Mundine and Green must accept after their controversial fight
http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/sport/ ... c38fe9a451
What Mundine must accept :
1 The illegal shot in the first round changed the fight.
2 Mundine stopped us from feeling true outrage at the decision because of the advantage he gained through illegal means.
3 Labelling Green a “bitch” was classless and inaccurate.
4 He still has a lot left in the tank.
What Green must accept :
1 The scorecards fell in his favour. But the 98-90 scoreline handed in by one judge was a disgrace.
2 Mundine is a better boxer. Though Green has a case to argue he’s on Mundine’s level as an overall fighter.
3 He’s done. But as stressed above, the illegal shot in the first round clearly affected Green’s performance.
Some replies:
1. If you knew boxing, you would understand it wasn't an illegal shot.
2. You're one of the 6 people on this planet that weren't outraged at such rediculous scoring.
3. Fanny Green got walked down by a much smaller fight. How embarrassing.
4. True
2nd lot pf questions:
1. ANY judge that believes Green won that fight is a disgrace to the sport and it's fans.
2. Mundine IS the better fighter overall. Make no mistake about that. He NEVER got to choose advantages like Green did for the 2nd half of his career. He always fought guys at their optimum weight.
3. He's done. Thank f@#$ing god for that! He is a disgraceful sportsman and role model.
I trust you realized the points above were made by Jai Bednall of The Daily Telegraph. He expands on each point in his article.
I read the article. He seems like "that guy"... Ya know, the one that'll sit there and try and paint it like "I'm neutral, so you should believe me", but reeks of a Fanny Green fan!
Re: Mundine v Green result
Posted: 09 Feb 2017, 05:11
by Lairdy
DA GOOSE wrote:ClivePatrickLyons wrote:DA GOOSE wrote:
Lets not exaggerate there have been much worse decisions.
When and was the money involved anywhere near what this fight generated because if it wasn't you should just keep your stupit comment to ya self because its silly when it was worth thousand's not million's of dollar's and you try to talk crap and say it wasn't worst robbery's now now what did I say that got up your nose was it the political view that I mentioned or was it religion/race word I'LL SAY IT AGAIN BIGGEST ROBBERY IN A MILLION DOLLAR FIGHT IN AUSSIE BOXING HISTORY.................NOW DA GOOSE WHO'S RIGHT SHOW ME THE FIGHT THAT BACKS UP YOUR CLAIM THAT I EXAGGERATING
AND PLEASE IF YOU CAN JUST LET ME KNOW WHAT UPSET YOU WITH MY POST WAS THE BIT ABOUT RACE/RELIGION OR WAS IT THE POLITICAL VIEW..............PS I DON'T REALLY GIVE A F.CK ANYMORE
There have been much worse decisions than this Clive. World wide Kovalev-Ward I didn't mention race or politics sorry to make you post in caps.
Kovalev vs Ward was a very, very close fight. I gave Ward the edge. I had Mundine winning by 4 rounds.
Re: Mundine v Green result
Posted: 09 Feb 2017, 05:20
by Lairdy
buster007 wrote:what a bunch of whining babies u lot are, lol.
mundine lost fair and square against a guy who was concussed.
he should be praising the ref cause if green wasn't concussed i'd say mundine might still be in hospital recovering from a severe beating :)
u know what would be good, have them fight again but bumdine needs to start after being cowardly king hit when his hands are being held by the ref.
I wonder if the 'woman' would still be standing after round one? not likely, lol.
In 2006 he was "weight drained"
Fast forward 11 years to 2017... he was concussed! Fm, when will the excuses stop? And why have a 3rd fight when Choc has already won the first two...

Re: Mundine v Green result
Posted: 09 Feb 2017, 10:44
by hitman_hatton1
wingy on youtube had it 96-93 for danny green.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ts-bacnqyKA
Re: Mundine v Green result
Posted: 09 Feb 2017, 16:51
by Lairdy
I hope this guy isn't a boxing judge. Sounds like the English version of Lauren Eagle. "Oh, he threw more punches... He's got to win then!".

Re: Mundine v Green result
Posted: 09 Feb 2017, 19:58
by AntonS
Re: Mundine v Green result
Posted: 09 Feb 2017, 21:05
by DA GOOSE
Re: Mundine v Green result
Posted: 10 Feb 2017, 01:13
by buster007
our resident circus clown Lairdy, asks the question, when will the excuses stop?
oh how ironic this, lol.
that's a good question. i'm wondering when u cry babies will stop sooking and finding more excuses and accept that the better fighter won?
Re: Mundine v Green result
Posted: 10 Feb 2017, 08:08
by p4p1
Re: Mundine v Green result
Posted: 10 Feb 2017, 08:31
by AntonS
BTW, lovers, haters or whatever, FYI the fight was never intended to be anything but "International" contest over 10x3, and both teams requested International officials be allowed to officiate, which under ANBF S.A. rules is allowed, whereupon they themselves selected them.
At short notice, they approached ANBF Ltd to sanction Green's title defence, which was approved, albeit title was then never on the line, given agreed 83kgs limit, which supposedly ANBF Ltd was unaware such agreement existed.....so it claims
Naturally, at that stage it was too late to ditch Yank officials & therefore they officiated OZ title.
WTF is Mundine now crapping on & on with all the crap = why, why, were, were they, blah blah blah??

Re: Mundine v Green result
Posted: 10 Feb 2017, 09:33
by Lairdy
AntonS wrote:BTW, lovers, haters or whatever, FYI the fight was never intended to be anything but "International" contest over 10x3, and both teams requested International officials be allowed to officiate, which under ANBF S.A. rules is allowed, whereupon they themselves selected them.
At short notice, they approached ANBF Ltd to sanction Green's title defence, which was approved, albeit title was then never on the line, given agreed 83kgs limit, which supposedly ANBF Ltd was unaware such agreement existed.....so it claims
Naturally, at that stage it was too late to ditch Yank officials & therefore they officiated OZ title.
WTF is Mundine now crapping on & on with all the crap = why, why, were, were they, blah blah blah??

You seem like your "fence sitting" Anton...
Re: Mundine v Green result
Posted: 10 Feb 2017, 09:43
by AntonS
Lairdy wrote:AntonS wrote:BTW, lovers, haters or whatever, FYI the fight was never intended to be anything but "International" contest over 10x3, and both teams requested International officials be allowed to officiate, which under ANBF S.A. rules is allowed, whereupon they themselves selected them.
At short notice, they approached ANBF Ltd to sanction Green's title defence, which was approved, albeit title was then never on the line, given agreed 83kgs limit, which supposedly ANBF Ltd was unaware such agreement existed.....so it claims
Naturally, at that stage it was too late to ditch Yank officials & therefore they officiated OZ title.
WTF is Mundine now crapping on & on with all the crap = why, why, were, were they, blah blah blah??

You seem like your "fence sitting" Anton...
Mate, I only sit on the fence, when I can't predict fight outcome. The above is
fact, otherwise I wouldn't put unnecessary wear & tear on my keyboard.
Over the years, albeit I ain't a media scribe, I learned not to throw direct question at anyone......indirect is so much better.....answer is unlikely to be bullshit infested
![[icon_wink.gif] ;-)](./images/smilies/icon_e_wink.gif)
Re: Mundine v Green result
Posted: 10 Feb 2017, 10:21
by amwsnw
Lairdy wrote:buster007 wrote:oh boy, now the mundine huggers r turning on each other, pmsl.
shows how hurt that they r of seeing their hero get smashed by a guy who was severely concussed for the whole fight, lol.
I can see why they r embarrassed alright.
You're embarrassing yourself champ. There are 6 people in the world, from what I've seen, that believe Fanny won that fight. You're one of them.
You don't need to vigorously defend him. Because unless they have the decision overturned, Fanny will have that "W" (albeit clearly paid for) in his column.
Fanny knows in his heart that he got well beaten by a boxer 6kg lighter than him in a ring with dimensions that suited his style. Let's be honest here, he knew that he just had to survive for the victory.
I'm sure he would really appreciate that you're still saying that he "won"... But at the same time, he would probably look at you as a massive nut hugger.
Be your own man champ.
Lairdy this is not a robbery. The fight was extremely close. I watched with others who were no doubt going for Green and immediately after thought Mundine edged it or it was a draw. After watching it again by myself i have Green by 2 points. Regardless of how the decision was reached (and I appreciate all of the points Choc is raising) i dont think its a travesty that Danny got the decision.....and I am not a Fanny fan or a choc nuthugger.
Re: Mundine v Green result
Posted: 10 Feb 2017, 19:21
by bogan whisperer
AntonS wrote:BTW, lovers, haters or whatever, FYI the fight was never intended to be anything but "International" contest over 10x3, and both teams requested International officials be allowed to officiate, which under ANBF S.A. rules is allowed, whereupon they themselves selected them.
At short notice, they approached ANBF Ltd to sanction Green's title defence, which was approved, albeit title was then never on the line, given agreed 83kgs limit, which supposedly ANBF Ltd was unaware such agreement existed.....so it claims
Naturally, at that stage it was too late to ditch Yank officials & therefore they officiated OZ title.
WTF is Mundine now crapping on & on with all the crap = why, why, were, were they, blah blah blah??

BOTH teams requested International officials, yet Mundine now complaining to the Australian National Boxing Federation because the referee didn't have an ANBF emblem on his shirt
Mundine also pressing the barrow as to whether all officials were financial with the ANBF
Mundine's propensity to complain about anything and everything is part of his makeup. Mundine has never been one to accept the decision of officialdom unless it suits him and is now absolutely desperate. Going as far as to question the size of the ring used in his protest
