BoxRec

rd350lc wrote:

Tex-Mex wrote:Great fight.

Burnett should change his nickname to The Pitbull. He has a lot of dog in him

Really ? Was scrappy as could be and a mess of a fight .

Did you watch the ZZ-Warren fight? ZZ is a very tough opponent. This was a great performance by Burnett.

Is it just me or are a dispoportionate amount of women judges awful

Dave Coldwell, useless

abc belts aside is burnett the best in the world? certainly cant be far from it can he

did this thread just move

Did Burnett get a UD?

Burnett VS McDonnell would be an epic fight in Ireland

jamamb wrote:abc belts aside is burnett the best in the world? certainly cant be far from it can he

Burnett and Zolani Tete likely best 2 in division.

McDonnell/Solis rematch in Monaco - Solis was robbed 1st time.

gilgamesh wrote:Did Burnett get a UD?

Yes 2 diabolical cards and a 116-112 which was true reflection.

Hatton said RB had nicked it but 2 cards were awful.

gilgamesh wrote:Did Burnett get a UD?

Yes by about 116-112 On the sensible card and wide on the other two ridiculous cards

A fight with Tete would be one hell of a match up but can the two bickering promoters agree ? Both would be very confident in their man, but FW wouldn’t be confident of getting a decision

Thanks for clearing that up for me fellas

jamamb wrote:did this thread just move

Yeah, and I just posted in the wrong thread because of it

It wasnt ridiculous. Burnett outboxed a bull with little technical ability. Just because you steam forward doesnt guarantee anything!

jamamb wrote:Is it just me or are a dispoportionate amount of women judges awful

Yes. They usually base the winner on the colour of their shorts....

ThereByTheGrace wrote:It wasnt ridiculous. Burnett outboxed a bull with little technical ability. Just because you steam forward doesnt guarantee anything!

so you think 12-0 and 11-1 are fine?

jamamb wrote:

ThereByTheGrace wrote:It wasnt ridiculous. Burnett outboxed a bull with little technical ability. Just because you steam forward doesnt guarantee anything!

so you think 12-0 and 11-1 are fine?

If you take the 1st 6 rounds - 3-3 was fair reflection. ZZ definately won 1&2.

boxingknockout wrote:

jamamb wrote:Is it just me or are a dispoportionate amount of women judges awful

Yes. They usually base the winner on the colour of their shorts....

She's not judged a world title fight for a few years. Let's see if she re appears in other poor cards.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BiBRsF2kuGM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_3LHPvoiE_o

hopefully Burnett gets the winner of McDonnell/Solis next.
Zhakiyanov vs. Haskins/Hall...

I had a Ormond winning the fight 116-111. He clearly won the fight. The rounds he won , he won clearly. Wasn't a tough one to score. The women with the wide scoring shouldn't be allowed to judge in the UK again.

Women judging is shocking.

Burnett won fairly easily for me. Beat him at his own game. ZZ was struggling to shift through the gears. He's getting on for a Bantam.
I had him winning 117/111

caught up with it and had it 8-4 burnett. didnt watch hyland-ormond but almost every online score ive seen was for ormond.

burnett going to be tough to beat cus he can box and fight. think he could've won every round had he boxed though.