BoxRec

I see there are two more believers in the poll! That's three! LMAO! I'm sticking to my opinion, Washington by decision.

This is a fight I'm very interested in, because the winner here could step in to a key position to snub a title fight on last minute or something (Carlos Takam style).

I feel Kownacki takes this by decision and positions himself for a big fight after.

Personally I want the winner of this vs Tyrone Spong but we'll see...

StillUK wrote: ↑04 Jan 2019, 19:30 This is a fight I'm very interested in, because the winner here could step in to a key position to snub a title fight on last minute or something (Carlos Takam style).

I feel Kownacki takes this by decision and positions himself for a big fight after.

Personally I want the winner of this vs Tyrone Spong but we'll see...

Kownacki said after this, he wants one for fight then he’s ready for a world title fight. IMO, after this, he needs to face a real tough challenge. He’s not in a mandatory position yet with anyone, but if he can beat some one highly ranked, it’ll put him there, but will be tough.

Ruthless-RKO wrote: ↑04 Jan 2019, 19:36

StillUK wrote: ↑04 Jan 2019, 19:30 This is a fight I'm very interested in, because the winner here could step in to a key position to snub a title fight on last minute or something (Carlos Takam style).

I feel Kownacki takes this by decision and positions himself for a big fight after.

Personally I want the winner of this vs Tyrone Spong but we'll see...

Kownacki said after this, he wants one for fight then he’s ready for a world title fight. IMO, after this, he needs to face a real tough challenge. He’s not in a mandatory position yet with anyone, but if he can beat some one highly ranked, it’ll put him there, but will be tough.

after defeating Washington i would like to see him vs Chisora, then Whyte or Breazeale

Ruthless-RKO wrote: ↑04 Jan 2019, 19:36

StillUK wrote: ↑04 Jan 2019, 19:30 This is a fight I'm very interested in, because the winner here could step in to a key position to snub a title fight on last minute or something (Carlos Takam style).

I feel Kownacki takes this by decision and positions himself for a big fight after.

Personally I want the winner of this vs Tyrone Spong but we'll see...

Kownacki said after this, he wants one for fight then he’s ready for a world title fight. IMO, after this, he needs to face a real tough challenge. He’s not in a mandatory position yet with anyone, but if he can beat some one highly ranked, it’ll put him there, but will be tough.

He can't handle a real tough challenge. Him and breazeale would be a fringe contender war.

StillUK wrote: ↑04 Jan 2019, 19:30 This is a fight I'm very interested in, because the winner here could step in to a key position to snub a title fight on last minute or something (Carlos Takam style).

I feel Kownacki takes this by decision and positions himself for a big fight after.

Personally I want the winner of this vs Tyrone Spong but we'll see...

spong ran over a bunch of cans and then when he finally faced a half decent gatekeeper he could only squeak by with a split decision, hes a more fitting match for the loser if anyone

jamamb wrote: ↑04 Jan 2019, 20:48

StillUK wrote: ↑04 Jan 2019, 19:30 This is a fight I'm very interested in, because the winner here could step in to a key position to snub a title fight on last minute or something (Carlos Takam style).

I feel Kownacki takes this by decision and positions himself for a big fight after.

Personally I want the winner of this vs Tyrone Spong but we'll see...

spong ran over a bunch of cans and then when he finally faced a half decent gatekeeper he could only squeak by with a split decision, hes a more fitting match for the loser if anyone

I think Spong is wad, but didn't he fight hurt in his last fight?

i dunno, but funny hes hurt all of a sudden when he faces someone with a bit of a pulse

jamamb wrote: ↑04 Jan 2019, 21:06 i dunno, but funny hes hurt all of a sudden when he faces someone with a bit of a pulse

Like I said. He's a wad. And not a young wad.

jamamb wrote: ↑04 Jan 2019, 21:06 i dunno, but funny hes hurt all of a sudden when he faces someone with a bit of a pulse

I know one thing, dude has another account. He's the only spong fan on the board.

Onetimeonly wrote: ↑04 Jan 2019, 21:55

jamamb wrote: ↑04 Jan 2019, 21:06 i dunno, but funny hes hurt all of a sudden when he faces someone with a bit of a pulse

I know one thing, dude has another account. He's the only spong fan on the board.

Who's the Spong fan?

oogiebe wrote: ↑04 Jan 2019, 21:57

Onetimeonly wrote: ↑04 Jan 2019, 21:55

jamamb wrote: ↑04 Jan 2019, 21:06 i dunno, but funny hes hurt all of a sudden when he faces someone with a bit of a pulse

I know one thing, dude has another account. He's the only spong fan on the board.

Who's the Spong fan?

Asshat. Just search spong, he has to have at least 6 accounts now.

Onetimeonly wrote: ↑04 Jan 2019, 21:59

oogiebe wrote: ↑04 Jan 2019, 21:57

Onetimeonly wrote: ↑04 Jan 2019, 21:55

I know one thing, dude has another account. He's the only spong fan on the board.

Who's the Spong fan?

Asshat. Just search spong, he has to have at least 6 accounts now.

Another multi-account troll...

i think that his current name is getnada

dagilechia wrote: ↑04 Jan 2019, 22:28 i think that his current name is getnada

Geez I'm so naïve on these multi-name guys. Maybe because I mostly ignore the poor and non-serious posters.

oogiebe wrote: ↑04 Jan 2019, 17:48 I see there are two more believers in the poll! That's three! LMAO! I'm sticking to my opinion, Washington by decision.

Good for you Oogie, you trust in your judgement

I'm not familiar with the term "wad" and had to look it up. At first I thought that was a typo but then you repeated it. I'm guessing you don't mean Spong is a large bundle of cash so did you mean he's a different kind of ... er ... deposit?

candyslim wrote: ↑05 Jan 2019, 03:19

oogiebe wrote: ↑04 Jan 2019, 17:48 I see there are two more believers in the poll! That's three! LMAO! I'm sticking to my opinion, Washington by decision.

Good for you Oogie, you trust in your judgement

I'm not familiar with the term "wad" and had to look it up. At first I thought that was a typo but then you repeated it. I'm guessing you don't mean Spong is a large bundle of cash so did you mean he's a different kind of ... er ... deposit?

LOl! Wad of crap.

Ok that's a new one on me.

Actually not literally on me and I'm very pleased and relieved about that

candyslim wrote: ↑05 Jan 2019, 15:23 Ok that's a new one on me.

Actually not literally on me and I'm very pleased and relieved about that

LOL!

oogiebe wrote: ↑05 Jan 2019, 15:24

candyslim wrote: ↑05 Jan 2019, 15:23 Ok that's a new one on me.

Actually not literally on me and I'm very pleased and relieved about that

LOL!

wad
/wäd/
noun
noun: wad; plural noun: wads

1.a lump or bundle of a soft material, used for padding, stuffing, or wiping.
"a wad of cotton"
synonyms: lump, clump, mass, pad, swab, hunk, wedge, ball, cake, nugget; More
bit, piece, plug
"a wad of cotton"

•a portion of chewing gum, or of tobacco or a narcotic when used for chewing.

synonyms: quid, twist, plug, chew, chaw
"a wad of tobacco"

2.a bundle of paper, banknotes, or documents.
"a thick wad of index cards"
synonyms: bundle, roll, pile, stack, sheaf, bankroll
"a wad of $20 bills"
•informal
a large amount of something, especially money.
"she was working on TV and had wads of money"
verb
verb: wad; 3rd person present: wads; past tense: wadded; past participle: wadded; gerund or present participle: wadding
compress (a soft material) into a lump or bundle.
"a wadded handkerchief"
2. stop up (an aperture or a gun barrel) with a bundle or lump of soft material.
"he had something wadded behind his teeth"

Hopefully not crap, eh?

Thanks for taking the trouble to further my education. I'm flattered you took the time.

candyslim wrote: ↑05 Jan 2019, 17:37 Hopefully not crap, eh?

Thanks for taking the trouble to further my education. I'm flattered you took the time.

Another worthless word to add to your vocabulary!

Anyone else actually looking forward to this? Seems like 2019 will be the year of the HW’s I hope!

Already had Jennings-Rivas.. now this. Decent match ups I say.

Ruthless-RKO wrote: ↑24 Jan 2019, 17:45 Anyone else actually looking forward to this? Seems like 2019 will be the year of the HW’s I hope!

Already had Jennings-Rivas.. now this. Decent match ups I say.

I'm looking forward to a Washington win by Decision.

Sorry. Didn't see this when I put an identical poll up. My bad.