Re: Who is the biggest threat to Canelo?
Posted: 01 Feb 2021, 20:44
I wonder what Opplyst-ine and verlichte and fergusg would have to say on the matter 
You’ve forgotten the purpose of this discussion, were my words you quoted factually inaccurate?gilgamesh wrote: ↑01 Feb 2021, 20:44 And yet he didn't have a fight cancelled for it. While Canelo did. Crazy. It's almost like Canelo did it, and was proven guilty of it, and Roy never was.
I don't find facts upsetting at all. I'm telling you the facts right here. If the fight ain't cancelled over it, then it's hear say at best. If a fight is cancelled over it, then the evidence had to be substantial or they wouldn't have cancelled the fight.
Stands up to pretty basic logic I'd say.
Nobody in Boxing is making money off of a cancelled or postponed fight.
It's not undeniable at all.Enlightened-One wrote: ↑01 Feb 2021, 20:51You’ve forgotten the purpose of this discussion, were my words you quoted factually inaccurate?gilgamesh wrote: ↑01 Feb 2021, 20:44 And yet he didn't have a fight cancelled for it. While Canelo did. Crazy. It's almost like Canelo did it, and was proven guilty of it, and Roy never was.
I don't find facts upsetting at all. I'm telling you the facts right here. If the fight ain't cancelled over it, then it's hear say at best. If a fight is cancelled over it, then the evidence had to be substantial or they wouldn't have cancelled the fight.
Stands up to pretty basic logic I'd say.
Nobody in Boxing is making money off of a cancelled or postponed fight.
That’s what you were originally arguing against?
You’re claiming I’m applying double standards and bias, by expressing skewed personal opinions, but yet the literal interpretation of my sentences you quoted are undeniably factually accurate.
Please re-quote my sentences and precisely detail their factual inaccuracy.gilgamesh wrote: ↑01 Feb 2021, 20:53It's not undeniable at all.Enlightened-One wrote: ↑01 Feb 2021, 20:51You’ve forgotten the purpose of this discussion, were my words you quoted factually inaccurate?gilgamesh wrote: ↑01 Feb 2021, 20:44 And yet he didn't have a fight cancelled for it. While Canelo did. Crazy. It's almost like Canelo did it, and was proven guilty of it, and Roy never was.
I don't find facts upsetting at all. I'm telling you the facts right here. If the fight ain't cancelled over it, then it's hear say at best. If a fight is cancelled over it, then the evidence had to be substantial or they wouldn't have cancelled the fight.
Stands up to pretty basic logic I'd say.
Nobody in Boxing is making money off of a cancelled or postponed fight.
That’s what you were originally arguing against?
You’re claiming I’m applying double standards and bias, by expressing skewed personal opinions, but yet the literal interpretation of my sentences you quoted are undeniably factually accurate.
And since you're not admitting to your double standards, just shut the f*ck up and quit talking to me. You're a petty man who won't admit to his own faults. I get it. Now f*ck off and bother somebody else.
margaret thatcher wrote: ↑01 Feb 2021, 20:44 I wonder what Opplyst-ine and verlichte and fergusg would have to say on the matter![]()
gilgamesh wrote: ↑01 Feb 2021, 20:58 Tell ya what. Maybe you need 2 weeks to learn to stop talking to me when I call you on your bullsh*t and you don't admit it. What do you think?
If you get it, then shut the f*ck up and take your bullsh*t elsewhere. If you don't. We'll see you in 2 weeks.
I clearly proved my point. It's there for all to see. I quoted your Double standards, and you won't admit to them even when the quote is right in front of your face.
Enlightened-One wrote: ↑01 Feb 2021, 21:04gilgamesh wrote: ↑01 Feb 2021, 20:58 Tell ya what. Maybe you need 2 weeks to learn to stop talking to me when I call you on your bullsh*t and you don't admit it. What do you think?
If you get it, then shut the f*ck up and take your bullsh*t elsewhere. If you don't. We'll see you in 2 weeks.
I clearly proved my point. It's there for all to see. I quoted your Double standards, and you won't admit to them even when the quote is right in front of your face.![]()
![]()
You guys might. I won't.
Classic!!!Counter-puncher wrote: ↑01 Feb 2021, 05:40![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
a mere 7 days to overturn a crippling personality disorder, I never had you down as a dewy-eyed optimist of the human spirit Gil![]()
F EO!! He’s finally dancing with someone that can end his maniacal redundant replies with a click of the mouse. That is a win for us all.fanman wrote: ↑08 Feb 2021, 08:25 Woah, thread derailed by personal squabbling. Can't deny there was some humour there. I think it was unfair to ban EO twice, just because he was being annoying. He was just airing his opinions.
Biggest threat to Canelo - Beterbiev because of the size & power I guess