Page 6 of 11

Posted: 26 Apr 2005, 10:52
by cultus
J wrote:you dimwit.
bruno won the world title after he fought lewis.

tyson beat bruno in 5 the first time he met, lewis in 7, big fornicating deal.

as for dominating if Bruno had a killer instinct when he wobbled tyson we wouldnt even be discussing this. Dominated...hmmmm. :roll:

the second tyson victory was post lewis by some 3 years. When Frank really was old.

please do your research before making stupid comment. :roll:
yeah .. wobbled... its not like he was hurt or somethin just off balance for a sec -- ment nothing.. and dimwit.. classy .. very - comin from woodhead. ... you guys just argue that Lewis fought better competition and still with the same ten years older competition he does very crappy. Nice champion, even Tyson just released from prison did better (3 round KO!). pff.. you suck :roll: and now comes the cursing and pointing :( ..

Posted: 26 Apr 2005, 10:53
by jamesmcdonnell
cultus wrote:
Slapsie Maxie wrote::TU:

Good Post

I think the reason for the blind loyalty is that Tyson for a certain generation is a defining feature not just of their love of boxing, but of their lives. I can sympathise with that. I kept believing that Ali could come back one more time. He defined my childhood in the same way that Tyson does those who were becoming sentient in the early 80's and it killed me that he was not immortal, because it reminded me that I wasn't

Lewis never had that impact in the way that so very few fighters have ( Marciano, Dempsey etc ) but history will remember him as two things

A better boxer than Tyson

and

A better champion than Tyson

Slapsie
Dont generalyze.
generation is a defining feature not just of their love of boxing, but of their lives. I can sympathise with that. I kept believing that Ali could come back one more time
Im an artist and 24, have followed the sport only some three years and by far is that my life. Im sure that all you old wish have lost some sight about Tyson. This thread was only about his past prime and not about now at all, as his career is ending.

Lewis was a better champion than Tyson? Do you really beleave that!? Lewis never dominated, he just fought better opposition, but just a itsy-bitsy better opposition. In years to come noone will remember the guy. But Tyson will sure be remembered.

and just to keep some debate goin on Tyson and not on us like it was ment:

Bruno vs Tyson and Bruno vs Lewis ... Tyson beat(dominated) Bruno in his prime and Lewis when Bruno was an oldie got a fluke victory by a lucky shot when Bruno was careless! what's you excuses :(
It's pretty obvious you have only been following the sport 3 years mate, because you're talking bollocks. Lewis fought Bruno when he was inexperienced and Bruno was still in his prime.

Lewis never dominated? He won every round against Tua, he battered Grant, Briggs, Ruddock, Golota into oblivion.

If Lewis' win over Bruno was a fluke victory, then the same goes for McCall's and Rahman's wins over Lewis, there's no such thing as a lucky punch, no more than Barklay's punch against Hearns was lucky, or McCallum's against Curry, then again, you probably don't even know who any of those guys are.

Posted: 26 Apr 2005, 11:00
by jamesmcdonnell
cultus wrote:
J wrote:you dimwit.
bruno won the world title after he fought lewis.

tyson beat bruno in 5 the first time he met, lewis in 7, big fornicating deal.

as for dominating if Bruno had a killer instinct when he wobbled tyson we wouldnt even be discussing this. Dominated...hmmmm. :roll:

the second tyson victory was post lewis by some 3 years. When Frank really was old.

please do your research before making stupid comment. :roll:
yeah .. wobbled... its not like he was hurt or somethin just off balance for a sec -- ment nothing.. and dimwit.. classy .. very - comin from woodhead. ... you guys just argue that Lewis fought better competition and still with the same ten years older competition he does very crappy. Nice champion, even Tyson just released from prison did better (3 round KO!). pff.. you suck :roll: and now comes the cursing and pointing :( ..
If you're going to insult people, try and learn to spell first you retard!

Have you actually seen the first Tyson v Bruno fight? Probably not, he was not 'off balance' Bruno hit him with a huge right hook and his legs went all over the place.

When Bruno fought Tyson the 2nd time, he was 37, had a detached retina, and came knowing he was going to lose. Seen the fight? No, thought not.

Lewis fought the following people that Tyson never did.

Mercer
Tua
Briggs
Grant
Klitchsko
Morrison

He also Beat Holyfield, should have been twice, but was robbed the 1st time, something Tyson couldn't do. He also of course beat Tyson, both men were old, Lewis was actually older, but had kept himself in better shape and was still near his prime, whereas Tyson was a washed up shell, because of poor training habits, inactivity and generally not giving a shit.

Tyson also got beat up by Danny Williams, Lewis could come out of retirement next year, and he still wouldn't lose to Williams, no offence to Danny, who I like, but he's not world class, never was, and never will be.

Look at Tyson's record, his stint after prison is pathetic! Seldon, Botha, (a highlight), Golota, Nielsen, Savarese, Williams, McBride!! Christ, it's bum of the month club for Tyson ever since he got out of jail.

Posted: 26 Apr 2005, 11:11
by cultus
It's pretty obvious you have only been following the sport 3 years mate, because you're talking bollocks. Lewis fought Bruno when he was inexperienced and Bruno was still in his prime.

Lewis never dominated? He won every round against Tua, he battered Grant, Briggs, Ruddock, Golota into oblivion.

If Lewis' win over Bruno was a fluke victory, then the same goes for McCall's and Rahman's wins over Lewis, there's no such thing as a lucky punch, no more than Barklay's punch against Hearns was lucky, or McCallum's against Curry, then again, you probably don't even know who any of those guys are.
But around the same time Tyson beat Bruno in third :roll: .. and he wasnt inexperienced, what are you talking about? he had some 30 bouts behind him. That Bruno was better that the one Lewis fought .. anyways Bruno would fight 4 opponents before he would face Lewis .. now thats not a supper tuper experience he gained. I would say he rather lost stuff.[/quote]

Posted: 26 Apr 2005, 11:18
by J
cultus wrote:
J wrote:you dimwit.
bruno won the world title after he fought lewis.

tyson beat bruno in 5 the first time he met, lewis in 7, big fornicating deal.

as for dominating if Bruno had a killer instinct when he wobbled tyson we wouldnt even be discussing this. Dominated...hmmmm. :roll:

the second tyson victory was post lewis by some 3 years. When Frank really was old.

please do your research before making stupid comment. :roll:
yeah .. wobbled... its not like he was hurt or somethin just off balance for a sec -- ment nothing.. and dimwit.. classy .. very - comin from woodhead. ... you guys just argue that Lewis fought better competition and still with the same ten years older competition he does very crappy. Nice champion, even Tyson just released from prison did better (3 round KO!). pff.. you suck :roll: and now comes the cursing and pointing :( ..

wobbled he was hurt mate, to the point the commentator forgot himslef and shouted "GO FRANK GO ON HIT HIM, YOUVE GOT HIM FRANK YOUVE GOT HIM."

i suck i think you'll find as your tongue is blatently up tyson ringpeice.

FACT: lewis will be remembered in the all time lists a better than tyosn, by people who have forgotten more about boxing than you will ever you sad little troll,

get over it. :roll:

cue being called a mofo, this that the other..blah blah blah.


YAWN. :lol:

Posted: 26 Apr 2005, 11:20
by jamesmcdonnell
I said LEWIS WAS INEXPERIENCED WHEN HE FOUGHT BRUNO. Not Bruno when he fought Tyson.

When Lewis fought Bruno, he was still pretty raw. He was in his 4th year as a pro. Bruno had already fought for the title twice, and at 33 was still near enough to his prime, whilst Lewis was still a good 4 years away from his. Lewis struggled with Bruno's jab, but eventually got through with a good shot and bashed him up.

I'm sorry, but your english doesn't even make sense, this is a waste of time. If English is your second language I apologise, if it's not you are a dumbass.

Posted: 26 Apr 2005, 11:22
by cultus
jamesmcdonnell wrote:
cultus wrote:
J wrote:you dimwit.
bruno won the world title after he fought lewis.

tyson beat bruno in 5 the first time he met, lewis in 7, big fornicating deal.

as for dominating if Bruno had a killer instinct when he wobbled tyson we wouldnt even be discussing this. Dominated...hmmmm. :roll:

the second tyson victory was post lewis by some 3 years. When Frank really was old.

please do your research before making stupid comment. :roll:
yeah .. wobbled... its not like he was hurt or somethin just off balance for a sec -- ment nothing.. and dimwit.. classy .. very - comin from woodhead. ... you guys just argue that Lewis fought better competition and still with the same ten years older competition he does very crappy. Nice champion, even Tyson just released from prison did better (3 round KO!). pff.. you suck :roll: and now comes the cursing and pointing :( ..
If you're going to insult people, try and learn to spell first you retard!

Have you actually seen the first Tyson v Bruno fight? Probably not, he was not 'off balance' Bruno hit him with a huge right hook and his legs went all over the place.

When Bruno fought Tyson the 2nd time, he was 37, had a detached retina, and came knowing he was going to lose. Seen the fight? No, thought not.

Lewis fought the following people that Tyson never did.

Mercer
Tua
Briggs
Grant
Klitchsko
Morrison

He also Beat Holyfield, should have been twice, but was robbed the 1st time, something Tyson couldn't do. He also of course beat Tyson, both men were old, Lewis was actually older, but had kept himself in better shape and was still near his prime, whereas Tyson was a washed up shell, because of poor training habits, inactivity and generally not giving a shit.

Tyson also got beat up by Danny Williams, Lewis could come out of retirement next year, and he still wouldn't lose to Williams, no offence to Danny, who I like, but he's not world class, never was, and never will be.

Look at Tyson's record, his stint after prison is pathetic! Seldon, Botha, (a highlight), Golota, Nielsen, Savarese, Williams, McBride!! Christ, it's bum of the month club for Tyson ever since he got out of jail.
J:"you dimwit" .. I was insulted first!!! .. and its my third language .. so very very sorry bout the mistakes :roll: yeah yeah .. danny williams ectr.. he DID injure his knee did he not... and 10 point for lewis by living healthy :TU: great achievement. by the way are you from england ... "hows the weather" :D

Posted: 26 Apr 2005, 11:22
by J
cultus wrote:

But around the same time Tyson beat Bruno in third :roll: .. and he wasnt inexperienced, what are you talking about? he had some 30 bouts behind him. That Bruno was better that the one Lewis fought .. anyways Bruno would fight 4 opponents before he would face Lewis .. now thats not a supper tuper experience he gained. I would say he rather lost stuff.
dimwit cor ive beaten blokes up for less :roll:

take deep breaths and concentrate mate. :wink:

then maybe the rest of the world will learn from your obvious wisdom.
note heavy sarcasm :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

piss noff mate im not wasting my breath on you anymore.

Posted: 26 Apr 2005, 11:25
by cultus
J wrote:
cultus wrote:
J wrote:you dimwit.
bruno won the world title after he fought lewis.

tyson beat bruno in 5 the first time he met, lewis in 7, big fornicating deal.

as for dominating if Bruno had a killer instinct when he wobbled tyson we wouldnt even be discussing this. Dominated...hmmmm. :roll:

the second tyson victory was post lewis by some 3 years. When Frank really was old.

please do your research before making stupid comment. :roll:
yeah .. wobbled... its not like he was hurt or somethin just off balance for a sec -- ment nothing.. and dimwit.. classy .. very - comin from woodhead. ... you guys just argue that Lewis fought better competition and still with the same ten years older competition he does very crappy. Nice champion, even Tyson just released from prison did better (3 round KO!). pff.. you suck :roll: and now comes the cursing and pointing :( ..

wobbled he was hurt mate, to the point the commentator forgot himslef and shouted "GO FRANK GO ON HIT HIM, YOUVE GOT HIM FRANK YOUVE GOT HIM."

i suck i think you'll find as your tongue is blatently up tyson ringpeice.

FACT: lewis will be remembered in the all time lists a better than tyosn, by people who have forgotten more about boxing than you will ever you sad little troll,

get over it. :roll:

cue being called a mofo, this that the other..blah blah blah.


YAWN. :lol:
com on .. cant have that many emotions and cursing in one post .. and .. I do like Lewis ... but your just blinded like most Tyson fans.. and quite amuzing :D on the top of the world

Posted: 26 Apr 2005, 11:27
by J
what?

blinded like all tyson fans, i cant stand the fornicator should never have been allowed back in the ring vfor cannibalising holyfield what are you on about?


rantings of a mad man. :wink: :roll:

Posted: 26 Apr 2005, 11:28
by cultus
J wrote:
cultus wrote:

But around the same time Tyson beat Bruno in third :roll: .. and he wasnt inexperienced, what are you talking about? he had some 30 bouts behind him. That Bruno was better that the one Lewis fought .. anyways Bruno would fight 4 opponents before he would face Lewis .. now thats not a supper tuper experience he gained. I would say he rather lost stuff.
dimwit cor ive beaten blokes up for less :roll:

take deep breaths and concentrate mate. :wink:

then maybe the rest of the world will learn from your obvious wisdom.
note heavy sarcasm :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

piss noff mate im not wasting my breath on you anymore.
ontop of the world :D :D :D :D :D :D cant breathe? take choose AIR

Posted: 26 Apr 2005, 11:30
by cultus
J wrote:what?

blinded like all tyson fans, i cant stand the fornicator should never have been allowed back in the ring vfor cannibalising holyfield what are you on about?


rantings of a mad man. :wink: :roll:
you hate the man (TYSON 8) ) admit it and take a piss J

Posted: 26 Apr 2005, 11:38
by jamesmcdonnell
You should change the 3rd letter of your name to an N.

Posted: 26 Apr 2005, 11:39
by cultus
jamesmcdonnell wrote:I said LEWIS WAS INEXPERIENCED WHEN HE FOUGHT BRUNO. Not Bruno when he fought Tyson.

When Lewis fought Bruno, he was still pretty raw. He was in his 4th year as a pro. Bruno had already fought for the title twice, and at 33 was still near enough to his prime, whilst Lewis was still a good 4 years away from his. Lewis struggled with Bruno's jab, but eventually got through with a good shot and bashed him up.

I'm sorry, but your english doesn't even make sense, this is a waste of time. If English is your second language I apologise, if it's not you are a dumbass.
damnit .. sorry I missread.. about the INEXPERIENCED part. sorry .. .. but then Lewis Prime started quite late ...

Posted: 26 Apr 2005, 11:42
by jamesmcdonnell
Yes, Lewis didn't hit his stride properly until after Steward got hold of him and ironed out all the flaws in his style. After that he became a lot harder to beat well, in fact he only lost once after Steward trained him, and reversed that defeat.

Posted: 26 Apr 2005, 13:35
by cultus
cultus wrote:
J wrote:what?

blinded like all tyson fans, i cant stand the fornicator should never have been allowed back in the ring vfor cannibalising holyfield what are you on about?


rantings of a mad man. :wink: :roll:
you hate the man (TYSON 8) ) admit it and take a piss J
I ment that your not objective beacose of your hatred towards Tyson. I like Tyson for many reasons and might not also be objective cose im not searching for these flaws carefully enaugh. I also like Lewis but rather the champion that he could have been.

im young boxing fan but im trying to find out as much as I can.. its really hard to access old fights.. I mean IMPOSSIBLE .. none of my friends care about boxing .. so boxrec is really important in getting any information at all. I think it is the best boxing forum right now. but iv seen almost all of Tysons fights over and over .. so I know TYSON.

Posted: 26 Apr 2005, 15:07
by Eric the Viking
At least this thread, though 100x longer than it deserves to be (ever heard of "quoting selectively", ya weenies?), is in the proper forum now. :TU:

Posted: 26 Apr 2005, 17:02
by natedog
jamesmcdonnell wrote:Arguing with Mike Tyson nuts is like challenging a quadraplegic to a sack race, utterly pointless.

It's also funny how those who are devoted to Tyson, always seem to hate Lewis. Wonder why that is eh?

You might think Tyson was more exciting possibly, but impressive as his first reign appeared at the time, his level of competition overall was slightly inferior. Tyson was effectively washed up by the age of 28. His last great performance was

Hell, I would even say that had they met around the time that Lewis lost to McCall, Tyson would have beaten him, but the fact is, Lewis held it together for a much longer period of time, between 1999 and 2004 he was the best heavyweight in the world, and a titleist before that. Sure, he lost a couple of fights he shouldn't have, and as for one punch, he was in fairness stopped on his feet, you could argue that he should have been allowed to continue, certainly Douglass was absolutely fucked and was allowed to make it to his feet and continue, and Larry Holmes was wobbly as fornicate and glassy eyed against Shavers, and yet was given the chance. Lewis on both occasions was not actually given the chance to continue.

You can give it all you want about how Tyson was a showman blah blah blah, and please, spare me the bollocks about potential, McCall had plenty of potential too, he used to give Tyson murder in sparring, but it took Manny Steward to give him the tactics and the confidence to win, and that was only because King wanted rid of Lewis and was determined to give Oliver the best possible chance. The rest of the time, McCall was just treated as a sparring partner, a hired hand. Douglas and McCall were two peas from the same pod, underachieving talented heavyweights who the wrong mental makeup to be true champions.

tyson may eat up thread after thread in the current scene, but on the British Forum he is scarcely mentioned, he's part of the history of the sport, not the future. He's had one fight a year for the lat four years, and he's lost 2 out of the last four.

His last creditable win was over Ruddock, in 1991!

Funny how Ruddock, who went the distance with Tyson in their second fight, after being stopped too hastily in their first, is suddenly washed up when he fights Lewis only a year later, despite notching up two KO wins in between. Utter tosh.

Don't be surprised if McBride bashes Tyson into retirement, anyone who lasts 3 rounds is in with a shout these days. McBride probably wont, but you never know.
I like Lewis, its his fans that get on my nerves. Tyson's competition is comparable to Lewis's. Tyson may have been washed up by 28, but he accomplished everything and more than what Lewis accomplished in that amount of time.

Mike Tyson.................................Lennox Lewis

"The Guards"
Larry Holmes/Michael Spinks.........Mike Tyson/Evander Holyfield
Carl Williams...............................Tony Tucker
Quick Tillis...................................Oliver Mcall
Bonecrusher Smith.......................Frank Bruno
Pinklon Thomas............................Razor Ruddock

"Contemporaries"
Prime Tyrell Biggs........................Prime Henry Akinwande
Prime Razor Ruddock...................Prime David Tua
Prime Tony Tucker.......................Prime Zeljko Mavorik
Prime Tony Tubbs........................Prime Shannon Briggs
Prime Frank Bruno.......................Prime Michael Grant
Prime Marvis Frazier.....................Prime Andrew Galota

"Solid Contenders"
Mitch Greene...............................Mike Weaver
Alex Stewart...............................Ray Mercer
Buster Mathis..............................Phil Jackson
Andrew Galota............................Tommy Morrison
Clifford Etienne...........................Derek Williams
Lou Saverese..............................Glen Mcrory
Briane Nielson.............................Lionel Butler
Francois Botha............................Francois Botha
Bruce Seldon..............................Hasim Rahman
Henry Tillman.............................Tyrell Biggs
Jose Ribalta................................Gary Mason

"Journeymen"
Jesse Fergueson.........................Jean Chanet
Alfonso Ratliff............................Ossie Occasio
Julius Francis.............................Mike Dixon
Steve Zouiski............................Dan Murphy
Mike Jameson...........................Mike Acey
David Jaco................................Greg Gorell


"The best of"
Buster Douglas........................Hasim Rahman
Evander Holyfield.....................Vitali Klitscho*

Lewis gets extra credit for fighting Vitali since he's not of the same era as Lewis.
Thats about it, and I dont see where this great difference of competition is.

Posted: 26 Apr 2005, 17:06
by Syntax Error
I must admit that I find it amusing that this thread is in the past boxers section! :o

That's where most of Tyson's fans are!!!! :TU:

Posted: 26 Apr 2005, 17:10
by natedog
Syntax Error wrote:I must admit that I find it amusing that this thread is in the past boxers section! :o

That's where most of Tyson's fans are!!!! :TU:
Not exactly, he's still fighting isnt he? We'll see what he does if he gets by Mcbride. If he's serious he will be fighting again real soon after that. If Tyson does find a second wind, and beats a titlelist he may surpass George Foreman. Think about it.... thats a three time champ in three different decades, and I dont think thats been done before. Maybe Ali... I will have to check that.

Posted: 26 Apr 2005, 19:02
by Eric the Viking
natedog wrote:I dont see where this great difference of competition is.
Maybe it's not so much the difference in the overall level as the fact that:

Tyson: 0-2 vs. Holyfield (both lopsided)
Lewis: 1-1 vs. Holyfield (loss was disputable)

Tyson: 0-1 vs. Douglas, 0-1 vs. Williams
Lewis: 1-1 vs. McCall, 1-1 vs. Rahman (both losses avenged convincingly)

...and of course Tyson lost badly to a similarly-aged Lewis, Tyson never beat a HOF-quality heavyweight close to his prime, Tyson hasn't had a quality win in over 15 years, I could go on and on...

Heh, I'm still chuckling over "Prime Marvis Frazier" and "Prime Zeljko Mavrewfhdgrytgrnwhatever." :D

Posted: 26 Apr 2005, 19:29
by Tantum
Yeah, Larry Holmes showed us how good a "Prime" Marvis Frazier was.

Posted: 26 Apr 2005, 23:17
by natedog
Eric the Viking wrote:
natedog wrote:I dont see where this great difference of competition is.
Maybe it's not so much the difference in the overall level as the fact that:

Tyson: 0-2 vs. Holyfield (both lopsided)
Lewis: 1-1 vs. Holyfield (loss was disputable)

Tyson: 0-1 vs. Douglas, 0-1 vs. Williams
Lewis: 1-1 vs. McCall, 1-1 vs. Rahman (both losses avenged convincingly)

...and of course Tyson lost badly to a similarly-aged Lewis, Tyson never beat a HOF-quality heavyweight close to his prime, Tyson hasn't had a quality win in over 15 years, I could go on and on...

Heh, I'm still chuckling over "Prime Marvis Frazier" and "Prime Zeljko Mavrewfhdgrytgrnwhatever." :D

Tyson has a win over a top 5 all-time great just a few years removed from his prime. Larry Holmes suffered his first and only KO loss of his career, which has spanned 4 decades. That is quite an underated accomplishment, which certainly rivals anything in Lewis's or Holyfields resume. Holmes, who was 37, went on to beat a prime Mercer years later, and even gave a prime Evander all he could handle. Tyson also has a win over probably the greatest light hw champ of all-time. Spinks, who was the one and only man to dethrone the great Holmes, was undefeated and certainly a real HW by then. Spinks was only a few pounds lighter than Tyson, and even destroyed Cooney before he took the Tyson fight. Spinks had made a name for himself in the HW division. Tyson destroyed the man in 91 seconds, which is the 4th quickest KO in championship history. Tyson destroyed all contenders of his time, with the exception of Buster Douglas. Douglas, who I might add. is a much better fighter than Rahman, or Mcall. Whats the shame in that considering how bored Tyson was, and how inspired Buster was? Its still the MOST famous fight of all time. Both fighters are immortal for it.

Tyson was removed for 4yrs, plus another two yrs in 97, making it a total of 6 yrs of the 1990's. Tyson fought the best version of Holyfield, where Lewis fought a washed up bored version 3 yrs later. Holyfield was deeply inspired and trained double, which was like 16 weeks for the Tyson fight. Tyson was absent 6yrs of the 1990's, and you hold it over his head when he gets pummelled by a very close to his peak, Lennox Lewis?? Thats crazy! Tyson has been out of his prime since the early 90's. You say Lewis is 1-1 over a washed up, shop worn Evander Holyfield? So what?? You think thats great? Lewis couldnt even knock him out, yet middleweight Toney did. Even JOHN RUIZ put HOLY down!!! Lewis fought the man twice and arguably lost the second match. Holmes, who is 10X the boxer Holy was, was KO'd in only 4 rounds, which certainly hints at the skill level Tyson brought during his prime. Holmes, has an absolute granite chin, which was certainly better than Holyfields juiced up steroid beard.

Posted: 27 Apr 2005, 00:30
by Tantum
Lewis didn't put Holyfield down, no...

But Holyfield beat the fornicate out of Tyson. Tyson got slammed all night long... Like he did many a night in prison.

Posted: 27 Apr 2005, 01:24
by natedog
Tantum wrote:Lewis didn't put Holyfield down, no...

But Holyfield beat the fornicate out of Tyson. Tyson got slammed all night long... Like he did many a night in prison.
heheh, I see I've found a Lewis fan. :lol: