BoxRec

i havnt taken any stuff from him. I form my own opinions I have a lot of different articles, books, magazines, films, websites i can get my opinion from.


- O and ted spoon wasnt live at the fight(i mis read) he simply read ringside reports about the fight.



- monte has some very good articles and defintley knows a good deal about boxing and clearly understans the fight game, the only downside i see in him and others is he is very biased in certian issues and isnt fair in his assesment about certain fighters.

BrocktonBlockbuster49 wrote:i havnt taken any stuff from him. I form my own opinions I have a lot of different articles, books, magazines, films, websites i can get my opinion from.


- O and ted spoon wasnt live at the fight(i mis read) he simply read ringside reports about the fight.



- monte has some very good articles and defintley knows a good deal about boxing and clearly understans the fight game, the only downside i see in him and others is he is very biased in certian issues and isnt fair in his assesment about certain fighters.

So, if you think Monte knows "knows a good deal about boxing and clearly understands the fight game" you must agree with his comments viz
"boxing is a dying art form"
"good defence is a rarity"

To me, that's just utter bollocks.

I know, I know. Guys like Mayweather are nothing compared to those blokes from the 1900's. Or so you like to hint at.

I guess no one having seen much (if anything) of those old lads in action adds to the fantasy.

So, old Spoon wasn't there eh? I never thought he was...

So, if it all comes from books etc, how about posting a selection of quotes from these sources you have to back up your story about the Walcott - Simon bout???? Like you and Spoon, I've never seen the fight so I'd be interested to see what your absolutely rock solid opinions are based on. And it can't just be what Spoonbill said as he hasn't seen it, remember.

Even Monte tries to quote real sources...

I know, I know. Guys like Mayweather are nothing compared to those blokes from the 1900's. Or so you like to hint at.

actually i think mayweather is one of the greatest ring technicians of all time and is a future all time great if he doesnt trip over his ego.

BrocktonBlockbuster49 wrote:

I know, I know. Guys like Mayweather are nothing compared to those blokes from the 1900's. Or so you like to hint at.

actually i think mayweather is one of the greatest ring technicians of all time and is a future all time great if he doesnt trip over his ego.

Maybe.

Anyway, you ready to reveal your sources for your take on the bout where Abe Feakin Simon KO'd Jersey Joe Walcott?

Collins2000 wrote:I know, I know. Guys like Mayweather are nothing compared to those blokes from the 1900's. Or so you like to hint at.

I guess no one having seen much (if anything) of those old lads in action adds to the fantasy.

I think much of this opnion that many of us have about "old time" fighters being generally better than current fighters has grown from the knowledge of the sport, and a little bit of common sense. While I can only speak for conditions in the US, boxing is a dieing sport. There are very few boxing gyms and trainers left, and only a fraction of the number of boxers that there were just 50 years ago. Unless you live in a good sized city there are probably NO boxing gyms in your city.

I live in Akron, Ohio and boxing was taught in my school when I was in jr high in the early 70's. At that time there were 6 or 7 boxing gyms, each with decent trainers. Today there is one, that I am aware of. The golden gloves boxing tournament was a major attraction as late as the mid 70's, and used to draw several thousand for the finals at the downtown Akron Armory. Now the golden gloves tournaments are regional, due to the lack of fighters, gyms and trainers.

Now if you can explain to me how boxers could be better now -- when there are so few of them, and there are so few trainers -- than they were 50+ years ago i would be in your debt, because I could read more of these posts and not get upset when old-time fighters are dissed.

Collins2000 wrote:

BrocktonBlockbuster49 wrote:

I know, I know. Guys like Mayweather are nothing compared to those blokes from the 1900's. Or so you like to hint at.

actually i think mayweather is one of the greatest ring technicians of all time and is a future all time great if he doesnt trip over his ego.

Maybe.

Anyway, you ready to reveal your sources for your take on the bout where Abe Feakin Simon KO'd Jersey Joe Walcott?

im lookin . just checked the new york times, but that wasnt the paper, the NY times had walcotts bout with tiger jack fox.

BrocktonBlockbuster49 wrote:

Collins2000 wrote:

BrocktonBlockbuster49 wrote:
actually i think mayweather is one of the greatest ring technicians of all time and is a future all time great if he doesnt trip over his ego.

Maybe.

Anyway, you ready to reveal your sources for your take on the bout where Abe Feakin Simon KO'd Jersey Joe Walcott?

im lookin . just checked the new york times, but that wasnt the paper, the NY times had walcotts bout with tiger jack fox.

Keep on looking. Can't Spoonbill help you locate it? It's the fight where Walcott gets KTFO by Simon.



As an aside, do you recognise this old time fighter? He looks the part, eh?

http://www.cyberboxingzone.com/images/w0405-fat.jpg

Collins2000 wrote:

BrocktonBlockbuster49 wrote:

Collins2000 wrote: Maybe.

Anyway, you ready to reveal your sources for your take on the bout where Abe Feakin Simon KO'd Jersey Joe Walcott?

im lookin . just checked the new york times, but that wasnt the paper, the NY times had walcotts bout with tiger jack fox.

Keep on looking. Can't Spoonbill help you locate it? It's the fight where Walcott gets KTFO by Simon.



As an aside, do you recognise this old time fighter? He looks the part, eh?

http://www.cyberboxingzone.com/images/w0405-fat.jpg

idk its hard to find, abe FREAKIN simon doesnt seem to be a very popular man

BrocktonBlockbuster49 wrote:

Collins2000 wrote:

BrocktonBlockbuster49 wrote:
im lookin . just checked the new york times, but that wasnt the paper, the NY times had walcotts bout with tiger jack fox.

Keep on looking. Can't Spoonbill help you locate it? It's the fight where Walcott gets KTFO by Simon.




idk its hard to find, abe FREAKIN simon doesnt seem to be a very popular man

He was pretty popular when he KTFO Jersey Joe Walcott

http://www.josportsinc.com/item_images/1022422658.jpg

Collins2000 wrote:

BrocktonBlockbuster49 wrote:

Collins2000 wrote: Keep on looking. Can't Spoonbill help you locate it? It's the fight where Walcott gets KTFO by Simon.




idk its hard to find, abe FREAKIN simon doesnt seem to be a very popular man

He was pretty popular when he KTFO Jersey Joe Walcott

http://www.josportsinc.com/item_images/1022422658.jpg

not really because jersey joe walcott was a nobody part time fighter then

Quit stalling. I thought you had a library of books, tapes, girlie mags etc?

Collins2000 wrote:Quit stalling. I thought you had a library of books, tapes, girlie mags etc?

woa slow down there chief, my names not jimmy jacobs