Posted: 28 Oct 2007, 13:01
Robinson gets my vote. Roy Jones is another who I rank over both Duran and Armstrong. A true modern great.
You will see them in the hall of fame someday, alp. Let's see their body of work. Mike Belloise, Tippy Larkin, Lew Feldman and Willie Joyce were not mediocre fighters. They were excellent fighters!!!Ambling Alp wrote:I do want to say that I thought Armstrong lost to Arizmendi 3 times. However,he only lost to him twice.
Elmer you are being silly when you keep making a big deal about about the Gavilan-Robinson fights. You never saw the fight.
No, I don't "know" that all those guys Armstrong beat will make the Hall of Fame. Neither do you. they are hardly all-time greats. I don't even think they all will. Wouldn't be surprised if none of them do.
Just look at their records and I will see that Armstrong was better?
Well, they both fought great competition.
Robinson won 175, Armstrong only won 151.
Armstrong lost 21 times, Robinson only lost 19 times. Almost all of them came when he was past his prime.
Robinson won the head to head matchup. If you count this since you are counting all of Robinson's losses when he was well past it.
It's obvious that Armstrong was indeed one of the All-Time greats. however, it's just as obvious that Robinson was even better.
I Feel Fine - Yes sometimes it hard to decide whether it's worth debating with elmer. Once we back and forth because he didn't understand what "in a row means". I still wonder if he does.